GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Cancer Prevention Research Vol. 4, No. 10_Supplement ( 2011-10-01), p. PR-02-PR-02
    In: Cancer Prevention Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 4, No. 10_Supplement ( 2011-10-01), p. PR-02-PR-02
    Abstract: Ovarian cancer causes significant morbidity and is associated with the highest mortality among gynecologic cancers. Etiologic theories of ovarian cancer indicate that oxidative stress may have a role its development. It has been suggested that limiting oxidative stress to the ovarian epithelium could be considered a first-line defense against ovarian cancer. Although evidence for an association between individual dietary antioxidant intake and ovarian cancer risk is conflicting, the combined evidence suggests a modest inverse association with intake. We evaluated the role of total dietary antioxidant capacity and intake of individual antioxidants (vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, selenium, lutein, and lycopene) on ovarian cancer risk in a population-based case-control study in New Jersey. Cases included women ages 21 years and older with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer who resided in six counties of New Jersey. Controls were women in the same age range who resided in the same geographic area. Women with a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy were excluded. Dietary intake was assessed using the Block food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and total antioxidant indices were constructed by linking FFQ-derived estimates to two standardized antioxidant capacity databases, the USDA Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) Database, and the University of Olso's Antioxidant Food Database. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals while controlling for major ovarian cancer risk factors. Total antioxidant intake was not found to be associated with ovarian cancer risk. However, a strong protective effect was observed for the highest tertile of dietary selenium intake compared to the lowest (OR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.20–0.85). In contrast, supplement use was associated with significant increased risks for all micronutrients. Vitamin C supplement use was associated with an increased risk of 1.63 (95%CI: 1.01–2.62), with similar results for vitamin E supplement use (OR: 1.63; 95%CI: 1.02–2.63), beta-carotene supplement use (OR: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.08–2.66) and selenium supplement use (OR: 1.64; 95%CI: 1.05–2.56). In conclusion, we observed a strong decreased risk for ovarian cancer with dietary selenium intake. No associations were observed with total antioxidant intake or any other antioxidant micronutrients, while increased risks were observed with antioxidant supplement intake. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2011;4(10 Suppl):PR-02.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1940-6207 , 1940-6215
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2422346-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Drugs - Real World Outcomes, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 7, No. 2 ( 2020-06), p. 97-107
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2199-1154 , 2198-9788
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2806600-5
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 3972-3972
    Abstract: Abstract 3972 Second hematologic malignancies have been found to occur at a higher rate among multiple myeloma patients compared to the general population. Although alkylating therapy has been suggested to play a role, the underlying causes remain largely unclear. Increased survival benefit has been documented with the introduction of novel agents over the past decade, and, as noted in other cancers, there may also be a higher occurrence of second malignancies in the era of novel therapies. Recently, data from Phase III studies suggest that patients treated with lenalidomide with prior exposure to melphalan may have an increased risk compared to placebo. However, the contribution of other specific agents has not been well characterized. Evaluation of second malignancies in clinical trial and product safety data for bortezomib has not revealed an increased incidence in bortezomib-treated patients. Additionally, our follow-up study of the VISTA clinical trial participants after 5 years showed no elevation in risk (San Miguel, et al. ASH 2011). To expand our current knowledge, we are conducting a population-based study using the NCI SEER-Medicare database (NCI SEER cancer registry linked with diagnostic and treatment claims data of Medicare beneficiaries) to evaluate bortezomib and other standard treatment exposures in relation to second malignancies subsequent to multiple myeloma. Using the NCI SEER-Medicare database, we identified all multiple myeloma patients with their first diagnosis between 1 Jan 2000 and 31 Dec 2007 aged 66 years or older. Exposure to chemotherapy was identified via Medicare claims, and second malignancies, defined as invasive cancers whose onset was after bortezomib-based therapy and occurring at least 2 months after the initial multiple myeloma diagnosis, were identified from the SEER registries. We identified the number of second malignancies among elderly patients with multiple myeloma and following bortezomib exposure; expanded multivariate analyses, adjusted for exposures, will be presented at the meeting. A total of 9,377 multiple myeloma patients were identified (median age 76 years; 50% males). During the study period, 2,285 (21%) patients had any documented exposure to bortezomib (with or without other treatments). Patients with bortezomib exposure had a median age of 73 years, and 55% were male. Among these 2,285 patients with bortezomib exposure, 33 patients (1.4%) developed a second malignancy (4 [0.2%] hematologic and 29 [1.3%] solid tumors) during the study period after their first documented bortezomib exposure. Hematologic tumors were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3) and acute myeloid leukemia (n=1). Solid tumors were prostate (n=4), bladder (n=4), lung and bronchus (n=3), colon (excluding rectum) (n=3), breast (n=3), and other (n=12). Among the 7,092 multiple myeloma patients with no documented exposure to bortezomib, 320 (4.5%) developed a second malignancy (55 [0.8%] hematologic and 265 [3.7%] solid tumors) during the study period. Hematologic tumors were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=16), acute myeloid leukemia (n=7), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=2), acute lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), chronic myeloid leukemia (n=1), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1), and other (n=27). Solid tumors were lung and bronchus (n=46), prostate (n=38), colon (excluding rectum) (n=33), melanoma (n=23), bladder (n=21), breast (n=17), and other (n=87). Based on more than 9,000 elderly multiple myeloma patients, we found a lower prevalence of second malignancies among persons exposed to bortezomib compared to those with no documented bortezomib exposure in our unadjusted analysis. To account for survival and adjust for other exposures, expanded analyses will be presented at the meeting, including standardized incidence ratios and calculations of absolute excess risk among patients exposed to bortezomib and other standard treatments compared to the general SEER population, cumulative incidence of second malignancy for each treatment group adjusting for death as a competing risk, and multivariate analyses to assess risk while adjusting for prior and concomitant treatments and other risk factors. Disclosures: Gifkins: Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. McAuliffe:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Matcho:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Porter:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Chavers:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Ponsillo:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. King:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Desai:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Cakana:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Esseltine:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5517-5517
    Abstract: Introduction: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by the organ deposition of amyloid derived from misfolded immunoglobulin light chains. The involvement of vital organs, especially the heart, results in severe morbidity and high early mortality. Diagnostic delays of greater than 1 year from clinical evidence of AL have been reported in surveys and retrospective single-center studies. Earlier diagnosis prior to developing advanced organ dysfunction is a key unmet need in AL. To detect patients earlier, a better understanding of the patterns of AL-related signs/symptoms (AL-S/Sx) and healthcare utilization preceding AL amyloidosis diagnosis is necessary. Methods: Using the Optum De-Identified Clinformatics® Data Mart healthcare claims database (Optum), we identified US commercially-insured patients who had one inpatient code or two outpatient codes of ICD-9-CM 277.30 or ICD-10-CM E85.81, E85.89, or E85.9 and treatment with one multiple myeloma drug within 90 days of diagnosis (01Jan06-31Dec18). Twenty-three AL-S/Sx were defined with sets of diagnosis codes, flagged in prior condition lists, and grouped by system affected (cardiac, nervous, renal/ureter, gastrointestinal, or other). The time between the first occurrence of each symptom and AL diagnosis was summarized and healthcare utilization patterns were described to better characterize the patient journey to diagnosis. Results: Among 1313 AL patients, the median time from the first potential AL-S/Sx to AL diagnosis was 2.5 years. The most common AL-S/Sx were malaise/fatigue (53%), edema and swelling (57%), dyspnea (53%), and abdominal pain (52%), which occurred a median of 1-1.8 years prior to diagnosis. Arrhythmia (51%), cardiomegaly (27%), and cardiomyopathy (21%) were identifiable between a median of 1-1.5 years before diagnosis. Chronic kidney disease (45%) and edema (57%) were seen a median of 2.3 years prior to diagnosis. Patients with a first symptom of nephrotic syndrome presented less than 1 year before diagnosis. Peripheral nerve disease (46%), neuralgias (14%), and paresthesia/anesthesia (20%) appeared a median of 2.8 years prior to diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of each AL-S/Sx by organ system in the 5 years prior to diagnosis is shown in Figure 1. Sequencing of symptoms varied greatly among patients. The most common first symptoms in the sequences were abdominal pain, malaise/fatigue/weakness, peripheral nerve disease, and arrhythmia. Between initial AL-S/Sx and diagnosis, 20% of patients had 3 or more ER visits and 16% had 3 or more hospitalizations. More than 90% of patients visited 5 or more provider types between the first AL-S/Sx and AL diagnosis, with the most frequent specialties visited being cardiology (67%), hematology/oncology (43%), and gastroenterology (40%). About one quarter of patients had a monoclonal gammopathy detected at a median of 1 year prior to diagnosis; detailed analyses of this cohort will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: AL patients have a prolonged prodrome, including evidence of cardiac and renal dysfunction, with 50% of patients with a first AL-S/Sx observed more than 2.5 years before AL diagnosis. Only one-quarter of patients had a monoclonal protein detected before diagnosis, indicating a low level of suspicion for AL. Limitations of this study include underestimation of AL S/Sx if diagnosis codes are underutilized in claims. Future studies will use controls to understand background rates of symptoms. Overall, these findings suggest that novel approaches to early diagnosis have significant potential to improve outcomes in AL. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of the first occurrence of potential symptoms prior to the first light chain (AL) amyloidosis diagnosis Figure 1 Disclosures Hester: Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gifkins:Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment. Bellew:Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment. Vermeulen:Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schecter:Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. DeFalco:Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:Janssen R & D, LLC: Employment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 4530-4530
    Abstract: 4530 Background: FGFRa appear in approximately 15% of cases of mUC. Data on whether FGFRa in mUC have a prognostic impact or predictive benefit for particular treatments have been limited by small sample sizes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between tumor FGFRa and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced UC or mUC regardless of therapy type and status. Methods: A convenience sample of oncologists and urologists across the United States provided patient level data on 400 patients with stage IIIb or IV UC via a standardized questionnaire over a 1-month period (August 17, 2020 – September 20, 2020). Study design enriched for FGFRa by requiring physicians to provide ≥1 FGFRa patient record. The questionnaire included physician characteristics, patient demographic information, FGFR status, therapy given, response, and clinical and radiographic measures of progression. Patient records were eligible for inclusion if they were identified and treated during July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2019. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted risk of disease progression by FGFR status. Results: A total of 104 physicians (58.7% medical oncologists, 31.7% hematologic oncologists, and 9.6% urologic oncologists) contributed 414 patient records Overall, 73.9% of the patients were male and the average age was 64.5 years (SD ±10.6). Median follow-up was 15 months. Of the 414 patients, 218 (52.7%) had FGFRa and 196 (47.3%) had FGFR wild-type ( FGFRwt) mUC . Of the 218 patients with FGFRa, 47.2% were treated with front-line chemo, 27.5% with a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-L1), 11.5% with chemo + PD-L1, and 13.8% with other treatments. Of the 196 FGFRwt patients, 63.2% were treated with front-line chemo, 21.9% with PD-L1, 12.2% with chemo + PD-L1, and 2.6% with other treatments. There was no difference in response or progression status for those receiving front-line chemo (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.86-1.55). Among 97 patients (55 FGFRa and 42 FGFRwt) who received PD-L1 alone as front-line therapy, those who had FGFRa had an adjusted risk of progression 2 times higher than their FGFRwt counterparts (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.13-4.00). Conclusions: Patients with FGFRa mUC progressed earlier than FGFRwt patients treated with front-line PDL-1 inhibitors; however, there was no difference in progression in patients treated with chemo based upon FGFR status. This real-world study using a survey design efficiently generated a relatively large FGFRa dataset, mitigating a core limitation of other studies assessing the patient population with FGFRa. Further work is warranted to validate these results and determine the optimal strategy for treating the patient with FGFRa mUC. Gene expression profiling of FGFRa mUC samples from clinical trials will help determine the potential impact of subtype or other features that may associate with benefit from therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Public Library of Science (PLoS) ; 2018
    In:  PLOS ONE Vol. 13, No. 2 ( 2018-2-1), p. e0192033-
    In: PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 13, No. 2 ( 2018-2-1), p. e0192033-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1932-6203
    Language: English
    Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2267670-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: The Prostate, Wiley, Vol. 83, No. 7 ( 2023-05), p. 729-739
    Abstract: Cardiovascular conditions are the most prevalent comorbidity among patients with prostate cancer, regardless of treatment. Additionally, cardiovascular risk has been shown to increase following exposure to certain treatments for advanced prostate cancer. There is conflicting evidence on risk of overall and specific cardiovascular outcomes among men treated for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We, therefore, sought to compare incidence of serious cardiovascular events among CRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate plus predniso(lo)ne (AAP) and enzalutamide (ENZ), the two most widely used CRPC therapies. Methods Using US administrative claims data, we selected CRPC patients newly exposed to either treatment after August 31, 2012, with prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We assessed incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), ischemic stroke, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the period 30‐days after AAP or ENZ initiation to discontinuation, outcome occurrence, death, or disenrollment. We matched treatment groups on propensity‐scores (PSs) to control for observed confounding to estimate the average treatment effect among the treated (AAP) using conditional Cox proportional hazards models. To account for residual bias, we calibrated our estimates against a distribution of effect estimates from 124 negative‐control outcomes. Results The HHF analysis included 2322 (45.1%) AAP initiators and 2827 (54.9%) ENZ initiators. In this analysis, the median follow‐up times among AAP and ENZ initiators (after PS matching) were 144 and 122 days, respectively. The empirically calibrated hazard ratio (HR) estimate for HHF was 2.56 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32, 4.94). Corresponding HRs for AMI and ischemic stroke were 1.94 (95% CI: 0.90, 4.18) and 1.25 (95% CI: 0.54, 2.85), respectively. Conclusions Our study sought to quantify risk of HHF, AMI and ischemic stroke among CRPC patients initiating AAP relative to ENZ within a national administrative claims database. Increased risk for HHF among AAP compared to ENZ users was observed. The difference in myocardial infarction did not attain statistical significance after controlling for residual bias, and no differences were noted in ischemic stroke between the two treatments. These findings confirm labeled warnings and precautions for AAP for HHF and contribute to the comparative real‐world evidence on AAP relative to ENZ.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0270-4137 , 1097-0045
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1494709-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2007
    In:  The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Vol. 86, No. 6 ( 2007-12-01), p. 1730-1737
    In: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Elsevier BV, Vol. 86, No. 6 ( 2007-12-01), p. 1730-1737
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9165 , 1938-3207
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1496439-9
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 23 ( 2023-09), p. S219-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 75, No. 11 ( 2020-03), p. 900-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0735-1097
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468327-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...