GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Wiadomości Lekarskie, ALUNA, Vol. 73, No. 11 ( 2020-11), p. 2378-2385
    Abstract: The aim: Evaluation of stress-protective effects of various anesthetic techniques on Cesarean section (CS). Materials and methods: 127 pregnant women who delivered by cesarean section, were divided into 4 subgroups: 1a (n = 31) – general anesthesia (GA) with ketamine, 1b (n = 31) – GA with sodium thiopental, 2a (n = 31) – spinal anesthesia (SA), 2b (n = 34) – SA with intravenous administration of ondansetron at a dose of 8 mg. The assessment was performed at 5 stages: 1 – initial; 2 – infant extraction; 3 – 6 hours after surgery; 4 – 12 hours after surgery. Results: At stage 2, insulin levels in 1a and 1b subgroups decreased by 23.9% and 34.1%, while in 2a and 2b subgroups there were no significant changes. There was an increase in the levels of cortisol, prolactin and cortisol/insulin ratio at the 2 and 3 stages in the 1a and 1b subgroups. Pain intensity increased by the 3 stage in patients of all groups. It was the highest in the 1a and 1b subgroups. At the 4 stage, pain intensity was reduced in all groups, remaining significantly higher in patients of 1a and 1b subgroups. Conclusions: The dynamics of the content of stress hormones, the pain intensity in patients undergoing CS under SA give reason to consider this method as an optimal and adequate one for protection from surgery stress.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0043-5147
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: ALUNA
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 414731-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Wiadomości Lekarskie, ALUNA, Vol. 73, No. 1 ( 2020-1), p. 104-106
    Abstract: The aim was to examine intraocular pressure (IOP) during lumbar spine surgery in PP under general vs spinal anesthesia and to compare it with volunteers in PP. Materials and methods: We performed randomized prospective single institutional trial. Patients were operated in PP with fixation of 1-2 spinal segments. Patients of group I (n = 30) were operated under SA, group 2A (n = 25) – under TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia) with 45° head rotation (left eye was located lower, than right eye), group 2B (n=25) – under TIVA with no head rotation (both eyes were located on the same level). IOP was measured with Maklakov method before and after surgery. Volunteers (n = 20) were examined before and 90 minutes after lying in PP with 45° head rotation. Results: In all patients and volunteers after lying in PP, we found that IOP have increased. In SA patients and in TIVA patients with no head rotation there was no difference between eyes. The most significant raise of IOP was found in the dependent eye of IIA group patients: it was higher than in volunteers and I group patients (p 〈 0.01), and IIB group patients (p 〈 0.05). In SA patients there was no difference in IOP comparing to volunteers. Conclusions: IOP increased in PP in healthy people and patients under anesthesia (SA and TIVA). IOP in SA patients did not differ from volunteers. IOP increased superiorly in the dependent eye in TIVA patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0043-5147
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: ALUNA
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 414731-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...