GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 1099-1099
    Abstract: Background: The randomized phase-2 trial SAKK 35/10 was conducted by the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the Nordic Lymphoma Group (NLG) to compare the activity of single-agent rituximab versus rituximab plus lenalidomide in the first-line treatment of symptomatic follicular lymphoma (FL). The results of primary endpoint (complete remission [CR/CRu] at week 23) assessment were previously reported, showing that addition of lenalidomide to rituximab results in a significantly higher CR/CRu rate at the expected cost of increased but manageable toxicity (Kimby et al. Blood 2014.124 (21):799; Zucca et al. Hematol Oncol 2015. 33(s1): 105). Here we report the first analysis of secondary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), time to next anti-lymphoma treatment (TTNT), CR duration, as well as CR/CRu rate at 30 months (CR30). Methods: 154 patients (pts) with grade 1 to 3a FL, untreated and in need of systemic therapy, were randomized to receive either rituximab (375mg/m2 at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14 and 15) or rituximab (same schedule) plus lenalidomide (15 mg daily, from 14 days before the first until 14 days after the last rituximab administration). The sample size was calculated to allow the detection of a 20% increase of the CR/Cru rate with 90% power and type I error 0.10; a one-sided Z-test for proportions was used to compare the two arms. Treatment was discontinued in pts who did not achieve at least a 25% reduction in the sum of products of tumor diameters at week 10. Primary and secondary endpoints were defined according to the NCI international standardized criteria (Cheson et al 1999). Results: 77 pts (median age 63 years, 52% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) were allocated in the single-agent rituximab arm and 77 (median age 61 years, 48% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) in the combination arm. A higher CR/CRu rate in the combination arm was documented both by the investigator assessment (36% vs 25%) and by the independent response reviewers of CT scans (61% vs. 36%). Adverse events of grade ≥3 were more common (56% vs 22% of pts) in the combination arm, including neutropenia (23% vs 7%). At a median follow up of 3.1 years, a longer CR duration was seen for the pts in the combination arm (median not reached vs 2.3 years) as well as a longer PFS (median not reached vs. 2.3 years), these differences were not statistically significant. The CR30, recently identified as a reliable surrogate of PFS (Sargent et al. Hematol Oncol 2015. 33(s1): 166), was significantly improved by the addition of lenalidomide to rituximab (42% vs 19%, p=0.001). Moreover, TTNT was significantly longer with the combination (median not reached vs 2.1 years, p=0.02) [Figure1]. Overall survival rates at 3 years were 93% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions: The SAKK 35/10 randomized trial confirmed that lenalidomide plus rituximab is an active and feasible initial treatment for FL pts in need of therapy. Addition of lenalidomide significantly increased the CR/CRu rate at week 23 (primary endpoint) and was maintained throughout 30 months. Although the trial was not powered to detect survival differences (secondary endpoints), a significantly better TTNT and a trend towards prolonged PFS and CR duration was seen in the combination arm. The excellent overall survival in both arms suggests that chemotherapy-free strategies should be further explored. Figure 1. Time to next anti-lymphoma therapy by treatment arm Figure 1. Time to next anti-lymphoma therapy by treatment arm Disclosures Kimby: Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lecture at educational session; Celgene: Other: Honoraria for lecture. educational meeting; Pfizer: Other: Research grant; Roche: Other: Honoraria for lecture in educational meetings; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: honoraria for educational lecture in meeting sponsored by Gilead. Mey:roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wahlin:Roche: Consultancy. Hernberg:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. de Nully Brown:Roche: Research Funding. Ferreri:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zander:Bristol Myers, Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 1620-1620
    Abstract: Objective :To evaluate the prognostic significance of RELamplification, expression and c-Rel activation in DLBCL patients and to identify potential mechanisms for impact of c-Rel activation on patient survival. Patients and Design : The study cohort consists 460 de novo DLBCL patients (median follow-up, 46.8 moths) treated with R-CHOP. We assessed the nuclear expression/activation of c-Rel and other NF-κB subunits by immunohistochemistry, REL gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and gene expression profiling using Affymetrix GeneChips array. Correlations between expression of nuclear c-Rel, REL mRNA, and expression of TP53, MDM2, MDM4, MYC, BCL2, AKT1, NFKB1, RELA, NFKB2, and RELB, both at the mRNA and protein levels were analyzed using t-tests. The prognostic significance of c-Rel activation, REL mRNA expression, and REL amplification was evaluated in the overall cohort, and different subgroups stratified by COO, status of TP53 mutation (wide type/WT, or mutated/MUT) and expression, Myc, Bcl-2 overexpression, and nuclear expression of other NF-κB subunits. Results :Nuclear c-Rel expression was observed in 29.6% of DLBCL patients and did not correlate with REL mRNA levels (P=0.95) and COO (P=0.77). In contrast, REL mRNA was significantly higher in germinal center B-like (GCB) subtype (P 〈 0.0001). In GCB-DLBCL, nuclear c-Rel expression was associated with significantly lower Myc, p53, MDM4, and pAKT protein levels but not at the transcriptional level. In contrast, in ABC-DLBCL, c-Rel activation was associated with significantly higher MUT-TP53mRNA level and reduced pAKT expression. Correspondingly to the lack of associations with reduced Myc, pAKT, and p53 in ABC-DLBCL, nuclear c-Rel expression showed prognostic impact only in ABC- but not in GCB- DLBCL, especially when it was concurrent with Myc overexpression (P 〈 0.0001 for OS and P=0.0012 for PFS). Importantly, patients with c-Rel activation and p53 mutations had significantly worse survival (for OS, hazard ratio, 3.56; P=0.0011; median survival, 16.2 vs 87.3 months. For PFS, hazard ratio, 3.976; P=0.0004; median survival, 10.4 vs 55.5 months) compared with other MUT-p53 DLBCL patients. The additive impact of c-Rel activation to TP53 mutations was more apparent in the ABC-DLBCL subtype, in which c-Rel activation was associated with significantly upregulated MUT-TP53 transcription (P=0.0087). Conversely, MUT-p53 expression was associated significantly with upregulated REL mRNA expression (P=0.0021), predominantly in the ABC-DLBCL subtype (P=0.0047). Only in ABC-DLBCL patients, TP53 mutations were associated with elevated nuclear c-Rel levels with a borderline P value (P=0.05). In addition to the association of nuclear p65 in GCB-DLBCL (P=0.003), and p50, NFKB1 and RELA mRNA in ABC-DLBCL (P=0.0023), the prognostic significance of c-Rel appears to depend on p50 (P=0.08) and p65 expression (P=0.12). Also, supporting that c-Rel transactivates anti-apoptotic BCL2L1/BCLXL by previous studies, there was no significant difference in survival of ABC-DLBCL patients with isolated BCL2 overexpression and with nuclear c-Rel expression. Comprehensive gene-expression profiling analysis and cell line study are undergoing in order to identify pathways to activate c-Rel and oncogenic mechanisms for c-Rel–mediated chemoresistance. REL amplification was predominantly observed in GCB-DLBCL (frequency, 7%) and correlated with significantly higher mRNA level (P 〈 0.0001). However, REL amplification did not correlation with nuclear c-Rel expression or patient survival, illustrating the importance of posttranslational regulations in c-Rel activation and function. Consistent with the adverse impact of c-Rel activation at the protein level, a strong trend toward poor survival was observed for elevated RELmRNA in ABC- but not in GCB-DLBCL. Conclusions : Nuclear c-Rel activation was associated with reduced level of proteins whose degradation involves with ubiquitin-proteasome in GCB-DLBCL, and upregulated TP53 transcription in ABC-DLBCL. Reciprocal regulation of c-Rel and MUT-p53 at the transcriptional level may underlie the synergetic adverse effect of c-Rel activation and TP53 mutations. c-Rel cooperated with Myc and conferred significantly worse survival in ABC-DLBCL patients. These subsets of c-Rel+ DLBCL patients likely will benefit from c-Rel targeted therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 3043-3043
    Abstract: Introduction: Phosphoinositide-3-kinases (PI3Ks) are pivotal in various cellular functions including cell proliferation and survival, cell differentiation, intracellular trafficking and immunity. The delta (δ) and gamma (γ) isoforms of PI3K are highly expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin, and often dysregulated in various hematologic malignancies. Because these isoforms contribute to the development, maintenance, transformation, and proliferation of immune cells, dual targeting of PI3K δ and γ represents a promising approach in the treatment of lymphomas. RP6530 is a novel, highly specific dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. Besides, RP6530 was effective in inhibiting Akt phosphorylation and inducing apoptosis in various lymphoma and leukemic cell lines. Herein we present preliminary results of a Phase I, first in human, open label study of an oral PI3K δ/ γ inhibitor, RP6530. (NCT02017613). Methods: The dose escalation will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of RP6530 using a standard 3+3 design. Patients (pts) with a confirmed diagnosis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL), Primary central nervous system lymphomas or Multiple myeloma who have at least one prior therapy are eligible. Additional eligibility criteria include ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and measurable/evaluable disease with a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. Primary endpoints are safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters; secondary endpoints include pharmacodynamic and drug activity (overall and complete response rates). Correlative biomarker samples including quantitative/qualitative measurements of cytokines, chemokines and aberrations indicative of PI3K function and RP6530 efficacy will be analyzed. RP6530 is given orally twice daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from treatment. The study is designed to enroll up to 30 pts in the dose-escalation phase with up to an additional 42 pts in the cohort expansion phase. Efficacy evaluations are planned every 8 weeks. Adverse events (AE) are assessed using the CTCAE v4.0/ IWCLL guidelines as applicable. Results: Nine pts were enrolled to date across 3 dose levels: BID 25mg, 50mg and 100mg. Five pts were males; ECOG score was 0/1/2 in 5/1/3 pts, respectively, with mean age of 74 yrs (range: 54-82). Pts had median 5 (range: 1-11) prior treatment regimens, and 6 were refractory to prior treatments. Lymphoma categories included DLBCL (2 pts), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (2 pts), follicular lymphoma (1 pt), Marginal Zone Lymphoma (1 pt); and CLL/SLL (2 pts); one pt had multiple myeloma. All nine pts are evaluable for DLT assessment. Of the 9 evaluable pts, 6 are currently on study; 1 patient discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Pts tolerated the treatment well. To date, there have been no DLTs. One pt experienced G4 neutropenia that was unrelated to RP6530. No other G3/4 related hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities were observed. Of the six pts who completed 2 cycles of treatment (8 wks) at 50 mg daily dosing or less, 5 showed stable disease while 1 had disease progression. Three pts did not reach the first response assessment. Mean PK parameters determined on Day 1 of Cycle 1(C1D1) are: median Tmax of 1 hrs (range 0.5-2.0hrs), harmonic mean t1/2 of 2 (± 0.47) hr, and CL/F of 39.55 (± 19.3) L/hr. A linear relationship exists between dose and both AUC (r2 = 0.97) and Cmax (r2 = 0.97). The average accumulation index represented by Cmin on Cycle 2 day 1 is 1.12 (± 0.1). PK data from the first 3 cohorts on C1D1 is summarized below. Table 1.Dose25 mg (n=3)50 mg (n=3)100 mg (n=3)Cmax (µg/mL)0.356 (± 0.08)0.563 (± 0.12)1.329 (± 0.55)AUC (µg*hr/mL)0.775 (± 0.32)1.619 (± 0.67)2.482 (± 1.18) Conclusions: To date, RP6530 has been well tolerated in pts with heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. There were no DLTs and toxicities were minimal. Enrollment continues at higher dose cohorts. Updated safety, efficacy, PK, and PD data will be presented. Disclosures Scarfò: Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Research Funding. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceutical SA: Employment. Fazi:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Research Funding. Kumar:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment. Viswanadha:Incozen: Employment. Vakkalanka:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ghia:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Research Funding. Ferreri:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 799-799
    Abstract: Background: Previous trials from the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the Nordic Lymphoma Group (NLG) showed that therapy with single-agent rituximab can produce long-term remissions in a sizeable subset of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, with overall survival not inferior to chemo-immunotherapy, providing the rationale for the development of chemotherapy-free treatment strategies. Promising results have also been reported with the combination of rituximab and lenalidomide. The SAKK 35/10 phase-2 study was developed and conducted by the SAKK in cooperation with the NLG to compare the activity of rituximab plus lenalidomide versus single-agent rituximab in the first-line FL therapy. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed untreated FL, grade 1, 2, 3a and in need of systemic therapy, were randomized either to rituximab monotherapy (R) (8 infusions of 375mg/m2 at day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and repeated at day 1 of weeks 12, 13, 14 and 15) or to rituximab (given at the same schedule) in combination with lenalidomide (RL) (lenalidomide given orally, 15 mg daily, starting 14 days before the first rituximab administration and continuously until 14 days after the last). The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR/CRu) assessed at week 23, defined according to the NCI standardized criteria (Cheson et al 1999). The study sample size was calculated to allow the detection of a 20% increase of the CR/CRu rate with RL over R, with 90% power and a type I error of 0.10. The 2 arms were compared using a one-sided Z-test with unpooled variance for proportions. Trial treatment was discontinued in patients who at week 10 did not achieve at least a minimal response, defined as reduction of more than 25% in the sum of product of tumor diameters (SPD), and rescue chemotherapy was given at the discretion of the treating physician. Results: In total, 154 patients were randomized; 77 (40 women and 37 men; median age 63yrs, range 29-85; 52% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) were allocated to arm R and 77 (42 women and 35 men; median age 61yrs, range 26-80; 48% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) to arm RL. Treatment was discontinued by 21 (28%) patients in arm R, in 16 due to lack of response at week 10 and in 1 due to toxicity, and by 19 (25%) patients in arm RL, in 3 due to lack of response at week 10 and in 13 due to toxicity. Adverse events of any grade were reported in 91% of patients in arm R and 100% in arm RL and adverse events of grade ≥3 were more common in arm RL than in arm R (51% vs 18% of patients). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5% of patients in arm R and 19% in arm RL. The primary endpoint analysis (using the response assessment from the local investigators, reviewed by the study chairs) showed a significantly higher CR/CRu rate in patients treated with RL in comparison with those receiving R. This difference was observed both in the intent-to-treat (CR/CRu rate, 36% vs. 25%, respectively; p=0.056) and the per-protocol population (CR/CRu rate, 42% vs. 28%, respectively; p=0.049). Conclusions: The addition of lenalidomide to rituximab results in a significantly better CR/CRu at the cost of an expected increased toxicity. Further follow-up is needed to ascertain whether the response improvement will translate into prolonged time to next treatment and superior progression-free and overall survival rates. TableInvestigators’ assessment of the response at week 23 in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population Rituximab (N=77) Rituximab+Lenalidomide (N=77)Response category n (%)[95% C.I.]n (%)[95% C.I.] CR/CRu19 (25) [16-36%]28 (36)[26-48%] PR28 (36) [26-48%]35 (45)[34-57%] SD6 (8) [3-16%]4 (5)[1.4-13%] PD/relapse2 (3) [0.3-9%] 3 (4)[0.8-11%]Not evaluable*22 (29) [19-40%] 7 (9)[4-18%]*Patients with no assessment at week 23, including patients not achieving at least a minimal response at week 10. Disclosures Kimby: Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide, not approved for follicular lymphoma. Mey:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferreri:Celgene: Research Funding. Bargetzi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krasniqi:Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zucca:Roche, Mundivarma, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1566-1566
    Abstract: Abstract 1566 Background. Response-tailored management of PMLBCL is a major challenge in everyday practice, mostly due to the persistence of post-treatment residual masses of uncertain nature. PET/CT is now widely used in the definition of response and as a prognostic indicator, in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), while its role in patients with PMLBCL remains to be defined. Aim of the study. The IELSG-26 study was designed to prospectively evaluate the clinical role of PET/CT after rituximab and anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy (R-CHT) in patients with PMLBCL. Methods. Between January 2007 and July 2010, 125 patients (pts) with PMLBCL were enrolled in 21 institutions and treated with R-CHOP-like (20 pts), R-VACOP-B (34 pts) or R-MACOP-B (71 pts) regimens according to the local policy; consolidation with mediastinal involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) as indicated by local guidelines was allowed. PET/CT scans were planned at baseline, at 3–4 weeks after R-CHT and at 12 weeks after radiotherapy. Central PET/CT review was performed at the end of treatment using the Deauville score (Meignan et al. Leuk Lymphoma 2009) and complete response (CR) was defined as a negative PET scan or one having minimal residual uptake lower than mediastinal blood pool (MBP) activity in regions which were FDG-PET positive at baseline according to the criteria of the International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma (Juweid et al. JCO 2007). Results. Treatment was administered as initially planned in 119 pts (including IFRT in 106); there were 6 early withdrawals (4 with early progression and 2 with stable disease receiving second-line chemotherapy). PET imaging was not done (n=2) or not evaluable due to technical problems (n=2) in 4 pts, therefore, central review of PET/CT was possible in 115/119 patients. PET/CT visual assessment at 3–4 weeks post-R-CHT showed metabolic CR in 54/115 patients (47%; 95% CI, 36%–56%): in 12 cases (10%; 95% CI, 6%–18%) PET/CT scan was completely negative (score 1 according to the Deauville criteria), while in 42 (37%; 95% CI, 28%–46%) there were small residual masses with an uptake less than MBP (score 2). PET/CT scans showed a positive residual mass after R-CHT in 61/115 pts (53%; 95% CI, 44%–62%). The residual uptake was higher than MBP but below the liver uptake (score 3) in 27 pts (23%; 95% CI, 16%–32%), slightly higher than the liver uptake (score 4) in 24 pts (21%; 95% CI, 14%–29%) and markedly higher than the liver uptake (score 5) in 10 pts (9%; 95% CI, 4%–15%). Despite only 47% of patients attaining a CR -defined by the uptake below MBP activity- after R-CHT, at a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 96% (95% CI, 89%–98%) and 91% (95% CI, 84%–95%), respectively. The achievement of a CR at 3–4 weeks after R-CHT predicted a longer PFS (p=0.015) with high sensitivity but poor specificity (negative predictive value of 0.98 but positive predictive value of only 0.15) and showed a borderline impact (p=0.052) on OS. Patients with Deauville score 3 had a clinical outcome identical to that of ‘PET negative’ (score 1–2) pts and ROC analysis suggested that moving the cut-point for the definition of CR from the MBP to the liver uptake, will increase specificity while maintaining sensitivity. Indeed, defining the response using the liver uptake as a cutpoint is a better predictor for both PFS (p 〈 0.001) and OS (p=0.001); of 10 pts with disease progression, 9 had score 4–5 and one score 2. The latter was one of the five pts with score 1–3 who were not irradiated. All the 4 recorded deaths occurred in the group of patients with score 4–5. Conclusions. Using the MBP cut-point, the PET-positive rate (Deauville score 〉 2) after R-CHT in PMLBCL was higher (53%) than in DLBCL. However, more than 90% of pts are projected to be alive and progression-free at 5 years post treatment and a negative PET/CT after R-CHT is significantly associated with a longer PFS. Pts with score 4 and 5 had a significantly worse PFS and OS. Hence, the liver uptake may represent a more appropriate cut-point than MBP to identify poor-risk pts who may need early intensification of therapy. The frequent use of IFRT in this study precludes any clear conclusion about its role, but the new IELSG-37 randomized trial will assess whether mediastinal irradiation can be safely omitted in PMLBCL pts achieving a CR after R-CHT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 3644-3644
    Abstract: Abstract 3644 Background: R-CHOP is the standard treatment for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) but is usually contraindicated in patients with concomitant heart disease due to the unsafe cardiac profile of doxorubicin. The encapsulation of doxorubicin into liposomes modifies its pharmacokinetic reducing its concentration in the heart. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial investigating activity and safety of R-COMP regimen where conventional doxorubicin was substituted with non-pegilated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99; Myocet ™) in patients with DLBCL presenting with moderate/severe concomitant heart disease. Methods: Main inclusion criteria were: age 〉 18 years, diagnosis of DLBCL, no previous oncological treatments. Patients were also required to have cardiac disorder defined by at least one of the following: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 〈 50%, left ventricular hypertrophy, uncontrolled moderate/severe arterial hypertension, history of ischemic cardiopathy, clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary hypertension, moderate/severe mitral valvular disorder, moderate aortic valvular disorder. Enrolled patients received 6 courses of 3-weekly R-COMP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, TLC-D99 50 mg/m2, prednisone 40 mg/m2/day day 1–5). Cardiac function was monitored with LVEF and electrocardiogram (ECG) after cycle 3, at the end of treatment, and during follow-up. It was adopted a Bayesian sequential design that required the monitoring of complete reponse (CR) and cardiac events (CE) rates defined as primary endpoints. Response was defined according to international criteria (Cheson 2007). CE were defined as a LVEF 〈 25%, a LVEF reduction 〉 20% from baseline, or occurrence of significant cardiac disorder. Initial study assumptions were a CR rate of at least 70% and a rate of CE below 20%; with a power of 80% and a level of significance of 5%, the study sample was fixed at 50 patients. The proposed strategy would be considered as active and safe if at least 26 CRs and no more than 14 CEs were recorded at the end of the study. Results: Between 2009 and 2011, 51 patients were enrolled. One patient was excluded after registration due to violation of inclusion criteria. Median age was 77 years (range 53 – 91 years), 69% were male and 33% had stage IV disease. IPI score at study entry was 0–1 in 25%, 2 in 25%, and 3–5 in 50%. Sixty-three cardiac disorders were identified at baseline; the most frequent was ischemic cardiopathy (40%), followed by AF (17%), baseline LVEF 〈 50% (16%), left ventricular hypertrophy (16%); 2 and 3 concomitant cardiac disorders were described in 4 patients; altered profiles at baseline ECG were detected in 38% patients. Median baseline LVEF was 58%. Treatment was completed in 76% of patients with a median dose intensity for TLC-D99 of 98%. R-COMP was interrupted prematurely due to lack of response (n=1), CEs (n=5), severe infection (n=2), deep venous thrombosis (n=1), renal failure (n=1), other toxicity (n=1), and patient's decision (n=1). As requested by the sequential Bayesian model, the CR rate and the rate of CE never fell outside activity and safety boundaries. In fact, 27 patients achieved a CR (55%; 95%CI=42–72%) and 6 CE were observed, which included significant LVEF reduction (2 patients), clinically significant s-troponine increase (2), hearth failure (1), and cardiac arrest (1). Median LVEF after cycle 3 and at the end of treatment was 59% (range 25–72%) and 56% (30–69%), without significant modifications from baseline values. Grade 3–4 hematological toxicity included neutropenia in 67% of pcases, anemia and thrombocytopenia in 10% each, and infections in 4%. With a median follow-up of 13 months (range 1–28) 6 patients had lymphoma progression, 6 experienced relapse and 6 died without signs of lymphoma relapse/progression. Overall, 10 patients died due to lymphoma (2), severe infection (2), second cancer (1), hemorrhage (1), myocardial infarction (1), renal insufficiency (1), respiratory insufficiency (1), and unknown cause (1). The 1-year OS and PFS were 76% (95%CI: 58–87%) and 60% (95%CI: 42–74%), respectively. Conclusions: The substitution of conventional doxorubicin with non pegilated liposomal doxorubicin (TLCD99-Myocet™) in the R-CHOP regimen is a safe and active option for patients with DLBCL presenting with concomitant moderate/severe cardiac disorders. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 5 ( 2018-02-10), p. 454-462
    Abstract: To investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after a risk-adapted treatment strategy that was based on a positive positron emission tomography scan performed after two doxorubicin, vinblastine, vincristine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) cycles (PET2). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced-stage (IIB to IVB) HL were consecutively enrolled. After two ABVD cycles, PET2 was performed and centrally reviewed according to the Deauville five-point scale. Patients with a positive PET2 were randomly assigned to four cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) followed by four cycles of standard BEACOPP with or without rituximab. Patients with a negative PET2 continued ABVD, and those with a large nodal mass at diagnosis (≥ 5 cm) in complete remission with a negative PET at the end of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to radiotherapy or no further treatment. The primary end point was 3-year PFS. Results Of 782 enrolled patients, 150 (19%) had a positive and 630 (81%) a negative PET2. The 3-year PFS of all patients was 82%. The 3-year PFS of those with a positive and negative PET2 was 60% and 87%, respectively ( P 〈 .001). The 3-year PFS of patients with a positive PET2 assigned to BEACOPP with or without rituximab was 63% versus 57% ( P = .53). In 296 patients with both interim and post-ABVD–negative PET who had a large nodal mass at diagnosis, radiotherapy was randomly added after chemotherapy without a significant PFS improvement (97% v 93%, respectively; P = .29). The 3-year overall survival of all 782 patients was 97% (99% and 89% for PET2 negative and positive, respectively). Conclusion The PET-driven switch from ABVD to escalated BEACOPP is feasible and effective in high-risk patients with advanced-stage HL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 26, No. 31 ( 2008-11-01), p. 5134-5136
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 29, No. 20 ( 2011-07-10), p. 2766-2772
    Abstract: Primary testicular lymphoma (PTL) has poor prognosis with failures in contralateral testis, CNS, and extranodal sites. To prevent these events, we designed an international phase II trial (International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group 10 [IELSG-10]) that addressed feasibility and activity of conventional chemoimmunotherapy associated with CNS prophylaxis and contralateral testis irradiation. The trial was conducted by the IELSG and the Italian Lymphoma Foundation. Patients and Methods Fifty-three patients (age 22 to 79 years) with untreated stage I or II PTL were treated with six to eight courses of rituximab added to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) every 21 days (R-CHOP21); four doses of intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX) and radiotherapy (RT) to the contralateral testis (30 Gy) for all patients and to regional lymph nodes (30 to 36 Gy) for stage II disease. Results All patients received R-CHOP21, 50 received CNS prophylaxis, and 47 received testicular RT. With a median follow-up of 65 months, 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 74% (95% CI, 59% to 84%) and 85% (95% CI, 71% to 92%), respectively. Ten patients relapsed or progressed: two in lymph nodes, five in extranodal organs, and three in the CNS. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 6% (95% CI, 0% to 12%). No contralateral testis relapses occurred. Ten patients died: lymphoma (n = 6), secondary leukemia (n = 2), heart failure (n = 1), and gastric cancer (n = 1). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia, 28%; infections, 4%; and neurologic, 13%. No deaths occurred as a result of toxicity. Conclusion This international prospective trial shows that combined treatment with R-CHOP21, IT-MTX, and testicular RT was associated with a good outcome in patients with PTL. RT avoided contralateral testis relapses, but CNS prophylaxis deserves further investigation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 31 ( 2012-11-01), p. 3848-3853
    Abstract: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) registered in the F2-study and initially managed without treatment were analyzed to describe the presentation and outcome of a watch and wait (W & W) strategy in the rituximab era, to identify parameters for initiating treatment, and to evaluate whether initial W & W could have deleterious effects on treatment efficacy after progression or relapse. Patients and Methods Between 2003 and 2005, 120 patients selected from the 1,093 treatment-naive patients with FL in the F2-study cohort were initially managed expectantly (W & W), and 107 patients were assessed. Most of these patients (80%) had disseminated disease with a low tumor burden according to Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria. Results After a median follow-up of 64 months, treatment was initiated in 54 patients (50%), with a median delay of 55 months for the entire cohort. In a univariate analysis, involvement of more than four nodal areas (hazard ratio [HR], 2.26) and serum albumin less than 3.5 g/dL (HR, 3.51) were predictive of a shorter time to lymphoma treatment initiation. In a multivariate analysis, only involvement of more than four nodal areas remained significant (HR, 2.32). The 4-year freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) rate of W & W patients (79%; 95% CI, 69% to 85%) was not inferior to that of a subgroup of 242 patients from the F2-study cohort with good prognosis characteristics who were initially treated with a rituximab-based regimen (69%; 95% CI, 61% to 76%; P = .103). Conclusion In the rituximab era, patients with FL in a selected prognostically favorable group can still be managed with W & W. W & W does not seem to have detrimental effects on FFTF and overall survival rates after treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...