GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    COVID-19 Patient-Reported Symptoms Using FLU-PRO Plus in a Cohort Study: Associations With Infecting Genotype, Vaccine History, and Return to Health
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 9, No. 7 ( 2022-07-04)
    Details
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. 7 ( 2022-07-04)
    Abstract: Patient-reported outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are an important measure of the full burden of coronavirus disease (COVID). Here, we examine how (1) infecting genotype and COVID-19 vaccination correlate with inFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO) Plus score, including by symptom domains, and (2) FLU-PRO Plus scores predict return to usual activities and health. Methods The epidemiology, immunology, and clinical characteristics of pandemic infectious diseases (EPICC) study was implemented to describe the short- and long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a longitudinal, observational cohort. Multivariable linear regression models were run with FLU-PRO Plus scores as the outcome variable, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated effects of FLU-PRO Plus scores on return to usual health or activities. Results Among the 764 participants included in this analysis, 63% were 18–44 years old, 40% were female, and 51% were White. Being fully vaccinated was associated with lower total scores (β = −0.39; 95% CI, −0.57 to −0.21). The Delta variant was associated with higher total scores (β = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.45). Participants with higher FLU-PRO Plus scores were less likely to report returning to usual health and activities (health: hazard ratio [HR] , 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.57; activities: HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.67). Fully vaccinated participants were more likely to report returning to usual activities (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.48). Conclusions Full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with decreased severity of patient-reported symptoms across multiple domains, which in turn is likely to be associated with earlier return to usual activities. In addition, infection with the Delta variant was associated with higher FLU-PRO Plus scores than previous variants, even after controlling for vaccination status.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac275
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Understanding “Hybrid Immunity”: Comparison and Predictors of Humoral Immune Responses to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection (SARS-CoV-2) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2023
    In:  Clinical Infectious Diseases Vol. 76, No. 3 ( 2023-02-08), p. e439-e449
    Details
    In: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 76, No. 3 ( 2023-02-08), p. e439-e449
    Abstract: Comparison of humoral responses in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinees, those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, or combinations of vaccine/ infection (“hybrid immunity”) may clarify predictors of vaccine immunogenicity. Methods We studied 2660 US Military Health System beneficiaries with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection-alone (n = 705), vaccination-alone (n = 932), vaccine-after-infection (n = 869), and vaccine-breakthrough-infection (n = 154). Peak anti-spike–immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses through 183 days were compared, with adjustment for vaccine product, demography, and comorbidities. We excluded those with evidence of clinical or subclinical SARS-CoV-2 reinfection from all groups. Results Multivariable regression results indicated that vaccine-after-infection anti-spike–IgG responses were higher than infection-alone (P & lt; .01), regardless of prior infection severity. An increased time between infection and vaccination was associated with greater post-vaccination IgG response (P & lt; .01). Vaccination-alone elicited a greater IgG response but more rapid waning of IgG (P & lt; .01) compared with infection-alone (P & lt; .01). BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine-receipt was associated with greater IgG responses compared with JNJ-78436735 vaccine-receipt (P & lt; .01), regardless of infection history. Those with vaccine-after-infection or vaccine-breakthrough-infection had a more durable anti-spike–IgG response compared to infection-alone (P & lt; .01). Conclusions Vaccine-receipt elicited higher anti-spike–IgG responses than infection-alone, although IgG levels waned faster in those vaccinated (compared to infection-alone). Vaccine-after-infection elicits a greater humoral response compared with vaccine or infection alone; and the timing, but not disease severity, of prior infection predicted these post-vaccination IgG responses. While differences between groups were small in magnitude, these results offer insights into vaccine immunogenicity variations that may help inform vaccination timing strategies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-4838 , 1537-6591
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac392
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002229-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccination
    Elsevier BV ; 2023
    In:  eBioMedicine Vol. 96 ( 2023-10), p. 104799-
    Details
    In: eBioMedicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 96 ( 2023-10), p. 104799-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2352-3964
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104799
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2799017-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated With COVID-19, Severe COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults : A Secondary Cross-Protocol Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2023
    In:  JAMA Network Open Vol. 6, No. 7 ( 2023-07-13), p. e2323349-
    Details
    In: JAMA Network Open, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 6, No. 7 ( 2023-07-13), p. e2323349-
    Abstract: Current data identifying COVID-19 risk factors lack standardized outcomes and insufficiently control for confounders. Objective To identify risk factors associated with COVID-19, severe COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary cross-protocol analysis included 4 multicenter, international, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials with harmonized protocols established by the COVID-19 Prevention Network. Individual-level data from participants randomized to receive placebo within each trial were combined and analyzed. Enrollment began July 2020 and the last data cutoff was in July 2021. Participants included adults in stable health, at risk for SARS-CoV-2, and assigned to the placebo group within each vaccine trial. Data were analyzed from April 2022 to February 2023. Exposures Comorbid conditions, demographic factors, and SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk at the time of enrollment. Main Outcomes and Measures Coprimary outcomes were COVID-19 and severe COVID-19. Multivariate Cox proportional regression models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs for baseline covariates, accounting for trial, region, and calendar time. Secondary outcomes included severe COVID-19 among people with COVID-19, subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infection, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results A total of 57 692 participants (median [range] age, 51 [18-95] years; 11 720 participants [20.3%] aged ≥65 years; 31 058 participants [53.8%] assigned male at birth) were included. The analysis population included 3270 American Indian or Alaska Native participants (5.7%), 7849 Black or African American participants (13.6%), 17 678 Hispanic or Latino participants (30.6%), and 40 745 White participants (70.6%). Annualized incidence was 13.9% (95% CI, 13.3%-14.4%) for COVID-19 and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-2.2%) for severe COVID-19. Factors associated with increased rates of COVID-19 included workplace exposure (high vs low: aHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.16-1.58]; medium vs low: aHR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.65] ; P   & amp;lt; .001) and living condition risk (very high vs low risk: aHR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.66]; medium vs low risk: aHR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.32] ; P   & amp;lt; .001). Factors associated with decreased rates of COVID-19 included previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (aHR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.09-0.19]; P   & amp;lt; .001), age 65 years or older (aHR vs age & amp;lt;65 years, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.50-0.64]; P   & amp;lt; .001) and Black or African American race (aHR vs White race, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.91]; P  = .002). Factors associated with increased rates of severe COVID-19 included race (American Indian or Alaska Native vs White: aHR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.85-3.69]; multiracial vs White: aHR, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.50-3.20] ; P   & amp;lt; .001), diabetes (aHR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.14-2.08]; P  = .005) and at least 2 comorbidities (aHR vs none, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.09-1.76]; P  = .008). In analyses restricted to participants who contracted COVID-19, increased severe COVID-19 rates were associated with age 65 years or older (aHR vs & amp;lt;65 years, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.32-2.31]; P   & amp;lt; .001), race (American Indian or Alaska Native vs White: aHR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.38-2.83]; Black or African American vs White: aHR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.03-2.14] ; multiracial: aHR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.21-2.69]; overall P  = .001), body mass index (aHR per 1-unit increase, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]; P  = .001), and diabetes (aHR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.37-2.49]; P   & amp;lt; .001). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with decreased severe COVID-19 rates (aHR, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.14]; P   & amp;lt; .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary cross-protocol analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials, exposure and demographic factors had the strongest associations with outcomes; results could inform mitigation strategies for SARS-CoV-2 and viruses with comparable epidemiological characteristics.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2574-3805
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23349
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2931249-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    An Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Reactogenicity: Variation by Type, Dose, and History, Severity, and Recency of Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 9, No. 7 ( 2022-07-04)
    Details
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. 7 ( 2022-07-04)
    Abstract: There is limited information on the functional consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine side effects. To support patient counseling and public health messaging, we describe the risk and correlates of COVID-19 vaccine side effects sufficient to prevent work or usual activities and/or lead to medical care (“severe” side effects). Methods The EPICC study is a longitudinal cohort study of Military Healthcare System beneficiaries including active duty service members, dependents, and retirees. We studied 2789 adults who were vaccinated between December 2020 and December 2021. Results Severe side effects were most common with the Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson and Johnson) vaccine, followed by mRNA-1273 (Moderna) then BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech). Severe side effects were more common after the second than first dose (11% vs 4%; P  & lt; .001). First (but not second) dose side effects were more common in those with vs without prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (9% vs 2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.84; 95% CI, 3.8–9.1), particularly if the prior illness was severe or critical (13% vs 2%; aOR, 10.57; 95% CI, 5.5–20.1) or resulted in inpatient care (17% vs 2%; aOR, 19.3; 95% CI, 5.1–72.5). Side effects were more common in women than men but not otherwise related to demographic factors. Conclusions Vaccine side effects sufficient to prevent usual activities were more common after the second than first dose and varied by vaccine type. First dose side effects were more likely in those with a history of COVID-19—particularly if that prior illness was severe or associated with inpatient care. These findings may assist clinicians and patients by providing a real-world evaluation of the likelihood of experiencing impactful postvaccine symptoms.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac314
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 variant is neutralized by vaccine booster–elicited serum but evades most convalescent serum and therapeutic antibodies
    American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) ; 2022
    In:  Science Translational Medicine Vol. 14, No. 645 ( 2022-05-18)
    Details
    In: Science Translational Medicine, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Vol. 14, No. 645 ( 2022-05-18)
    Abstract: As the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant spreads across the world, the degree to which vaccine- and infection-elicited antibodies conferred protection from infection and severe disease remained unclear. Moreover, the neutralizing capacity of therapeutic antibodies was not well defined. Here, Lusvarghi and colleagues tested the ability of serum from individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, serum from individuals vaccinated and boosted with mRNA vaccines, and therapeutic antibodies to neutralize the Omicron BA.1 variant. The authors found that those receiving three doses of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine had Omicron BA.1–neutralizing antibodies. However, convalescent serum poorly neutralized Omicron BA.1, regardless of infecting variant. Last, most, but not all, therapeutic antibodies tested lost potency against the Omicron BA.1 variant. Together, these results underscore the value of vaccination and highlight the need to develop therapeutics that can neutralize Omicron and other emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1946-6234 , 1946-6242
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn8543
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
    Publication Date: 2022
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Antigenic cartography of well-characterized human sera shows SARS-CoV-2 neutralization differences based on infection and vaccination history
    Elsevier BV ; 2022
    In:  Cell Host & Microbe Vol. 30, No. 12 ( 2022-12), p. 1745-1758.e7
    Details
    In: Cell Host & Microbe, Elsevier BV, Vol. 30, No. 12 ( 2022-12), p. 1745-1758.e7
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1931-3128
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.10.012
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2276339-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    1102. The Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Differs by Age
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Details
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the resulting host immune response has been primarily characterized in middle and older aged populations due to a higher incidence of symptoms in these age groups. Due to reduced severity of disease, children were poorly studied and assumed to be less frequently infected compared to older age groups. We measured the viral load and adaptive immune response across the age-spectrum to define the age-dependent viral and host responses. Methods From March 2020-March 2022, we enrolled individuals across the age spectrum who presented to U.S. military medical treatment facilities with COVID-19-like symptoms. In this longitudinal cohort study, demographic and clinical data were collected in addition to nasopharyngeal swabs and peripheral blood. Magnitude of viral RNA was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) from nasopharyngeal samples and SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies were measured from blood with multiplex microsphere immunoassays. Results 4,768 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants were enrolled, among whom 42, 64, 89, 380, 948 and 245 individuals were in age brackets 0-4y, 5-11y, 12-17y, 18-44, 45-64y, and & gt;65y, respectively. Viral load as measured by qPCR was determined to be similar across age groups within the first week post symptom onset. The magnitude of the IgG antibody response against the spike protein was also compared across age groups at early and convalescent time points and was higher in those over the age of 65 years. Conclusion Early viral load during acute infection did not correlate with age in individuals who experienced COVID-19. These findings diverge from other respiratory viruses, such as respiratory syncytial virus and influenza where children tend to have higher viral loads. In contrast, the magnitude of the antibody response against the spike protein correlated with older age at acute and convalescent time points. Together our data suggest that the host response against SAR-CoV-2 differs with age and is not associated with the acute viral load. Defining age-dependent immunity against SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to identify key immunologic responses that can be used to optimize treatment and vaccine strategies. Disclosures Julia S. Rozman, n/a, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Ryan C. Maves, MD, AiCuris: Grant/Research Support|Sound Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Trauma Insights, LLC: Advisor/Consultant Mark P. Simons, PhD, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response David Tribble, MD, DrPH, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Timothy Burgess, MD, MPH, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Simon Pollett, MBBS, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.941
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    80. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with decreased reported physical fitness in a US military longitudinal cohort
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Details
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: COVID-19 may have deleterious effects on the fitness of active duty US military service members. We seek to understand the long-term functional consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this critical population, and in other military healthcare beneficiaries. Methods The Epidemiology, Immunology, and Clinical Characteristics of Emerging Infectious Diseases with Pandemic Potential (EPICC) study is a longitudinal cohort study to describe the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in US Military Health System beneficiaries. Subjects provided information about difficulties experienced with daily activities, exercise, and physical fitness performance via electronic surveys. Subjects completed surveys at enrollment and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results 5,910 subjects completed survey fitness questions, 3,244 (55%) of whom tested SARS-CoV-2 positive at least once during the period of observation. Over 75% of subjects were young adults and over half were male (Table 1). 1,093 (34.3%) of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects reported new or increased difficulty exercising compared to 393 (14.8%) SARS-CoV-2 negative subjects (p & lt; 0.01) (Table 2). The most commonly reported symptoms related to problems with exercise and activities were dyspnea and fatigue. Among the active-duty members who answered the question about their service-mandated physical fitness test scores, 43.2% of SARS-CoV-2-positive participants reported that their scores had worsened in the study period, compared with 24.3% of SARS-CoV-2 negative participants. Among SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects, reports of difficulty exercising and performing daily activities were highest within one month of the first positive test, decreasing in prevalence among the cohort only slightly to 24% and 18%, respectively, at 12 months (Figure 1). Conclusion A substantial proportion of military service-members in this cohort have reported impairment of their service-mandated physical fitness scores after COVID-19; this proportion is significantly higher than those who are SARS-CoV-2 negative and persists to 12 months in many; similar complaints were reported among non-active duty. Further objective evaluation of post-COVID fitness impairment in this population is warranted. Disclosures Ryan C. Maves, MD, AiCuris: Grant/Research Support|Sound Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Trauma Insights, LLC: Advisor/Consultant Julia S. Rozman, n/a, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response David R. Tribble, DrPH, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Simon Pollett, MBBS, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Mark P. Simons, PhD, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Timothy Burgess, MD, MPH, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.005
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    1066. Precision phenotyping of “long COVID” through machine learning
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Details
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: Characterizing, diagnosing, and caring for “long COVID” patients has proven to be challenging due to heterogenous symptoms and broad definitions of these post-acute sequelae. Here, we take a machine learning approach to identify discrete clusters of long COVID symptoms which may define specific long COVID phenotypes. Figure 1: (A) Principal component analysis followed by K-means clustering identified three groups of participants. (B) Heatmap depicting three distinct clusters (high values are in red and low value are in blue); Cluster 1 exhibits sensory symptoms (e.g., loss of smell and/or taste), Cluster 2 exhibits fatigue and difficulty thinking (e.g., changes in ability to think) symptoms, and Cluster 3 exhibits difficulty breathing and exercise intolerance symptoms. (C) Clinical and demographic characteristics of 97 military health system beneficiaries by identified clusters Methods The Epidemiology, Immunology, and Clinical Characteristics of Emerging Infectious Diseases with Pandemic Potential (EPICC) study is a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort study with data and biospecimens collected from 10 military treatment facilities and online recruitment. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected using case report forms and surveys completed at enrollment and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. For this analysis, we identified those who reported any moderate to severe persistent symptoms on surveys collected 6-months post-COVID-19 symptom onset. Using the survey responses, we applied principal component analysis (PCA) followed by unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithm K-means to identify groups with distinct clusters of symptoms. Results Of 1299 subjects with 6-month survey responses, 97 (7.47%) reported moderate to severe persistent symptoms. Among these subjects, three clusters were identified using PCA (Figure 1A). Cluster 1 is characterized by sensory symptoms (loss of taste and/or smell), Cluster 2 by fatigue and difficulty thinking, and Cluster 3 by difficulty breathing and exercise intolerance (Figure 1B). More than half of these subjects (57%) were female, 64% were 18-44 years old, and 64% had no comorbidities at enrollment (Figure 1C). Those in the sensory symptom cluster were all outpatients at the time of initial COVID-19 presentation (p & lt; 0.01). The difficulty breathing and exercise intolerance symptom-clusters had a higher proportion of older participants (Age group ≥ 45-64) with more comorbidities (CCI ≥ 1-2). Conclusion We identified three distinct ‘long COVID’ phenotypes among those with moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms at 6-months post-symptom onset. With further validation and characterization, this framework may allow more precise classification of long COVID cases, and potentially improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of post- infectious sequelae. Disclosures Ryan C. Maves, MD, AiCuris: Grant/Research Support|Sound Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Trauma Insights, LLC: Advisor/Consultant Julia S. Rozman, n/a, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Mark P. Simons, PhD, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response David R. Tribble, DrPH, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Timothy Burgess, MD, MPH, AstraZeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response Simon Pollett, MBBS, Astra Zeneca: The HJF, in support of the USU IDCRP, was funded to conduct or augment unrelated Phase III Mab and vaccine trials as part of US Govt. COVID19 response.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.907
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...