GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 25, No. 1 ( 2007-01-01), p. 16-24
    Abstract: The optimal postremission therapy for children with very high-risk (VHR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is not well established. This randomized trial compared three options of postremission therapy: chemotherapy and allogeneic or autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT). Patients and Methods All 106 VHR-ALL patients received induction with five drugs followed by intensification with three cycles of chemotherapy. Patients in complete remission (CR) with an HLA-identical family donor were assigned to allogeneic SCT (n = 24) and the remaining were randomly assigned to autologous SCT (n = 38) or to delayed intensification followed by maintenance chemotherapy up to 2 years in CR (n = 38). Results Overall, 100 patients achieved CR (94%). With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were 45% (95% CI, 37% to 54%) and 48% (95% CI, 40% to 57%), respectively. The three groups were comparable in the main pretreatment ALL characteristics. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no differences for donor versus no donor in DFS (45%; 95% CI, 27% to 65% v 45%; 95% CI, 37% to 55%) and OS (48%; 95% CI, 30% to 67% v 51%; 95% CI, 43% to 61%), as well as for autologous SCT versus chemotherapy comparisons (DFS: 44%; 95% CI, 29% to 60% v 46%; 95% CI, 32% to 62%; OS: 45%; 95% CI, 31% to 62% v 57%; 95% CI, 43% to 73%). No differences were found within the different subgroups of ALL and neither were differences observed when the analysis was made by treatment actually performed. Conclusion This study failed to prove that, when a family donor is available, allogeneic SCT produces a better outcome than autologous SCT or chemotherapy in children with VHR-ALL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 2026-2026
    Abstract: Abstract 2026 Poster Board II-3 Background The ALL89 PETHEMA trial proved that delayed consolidation had a favorable influence on the outcome of children with IR-ALL.The subsequent ALL96 trial incorporated reinductions with vincristine, asparaginase and prednisone during the first year of maintenance therapy to the early and late consolidations of the previous protocol. We performed a historical comparison of both cohorts of children to evaluate the benefit of such approach in children with newly diagnosed ALL of low and intermediate risk in first complete remission. Methods Children aged 1 to 18 years were classified as low-risk (LR) if they were 1 to9 years of age and the WBC at diagnosis was 〈 50×10 9/l and as intermediate-risk (IR) if their age was 〉 9 to 18 years or the WBC was 〉 50×10 9/l. High-risk patients [i.e. children with ALL carrying the t(9;22) or t(4;11) translocations or with WBC 〉 200×10 9/l] were excluded from analysis. The ALL89 trial assigned 213 with low (N=111) or intermediate (N=102) risk ALL in first complete remission to receive early or early and late consolidation cycles followed by 2 years of maintenance treatment with oral mercaptopurine and weekly intramuscular methotrexate. Children (86 IR and 233 LR) achieving CR in the ALL96 trial received similar early and delayed consolidations and additional monthly vincristine (2 mg IV), asparaginase (20000 UI/sq meter IV) and prednisone (60 mg/sq meter PO x 7 days) reinductions (VAP) were incorporated during the first year of maintenance treatment. The primary end point of the historical comparison was disease-free survival. Results Median follow-up of children in continuous first CR was 6 years (range 0.3 – 12). Patients in both trials were comparable in terms of gender, age, performance status and characteristics of ALL at diagnosis. 109 children (75 LR and 34 IR) in the ALL89 trial were assigned to receive early consolidation only (Cohort 1 – C1) and 104 (36 LR and 68 IR) to receive early and delayed consolidation treatment (Cohort 2 –C2). 281 children (79 LR and 202 IR) in the ALL96 trial received a median of 7 (range 3-7) reinductions with VAP after early and delayed consolidations (Cohort 3 - C3). 46 LR patients relapsed (24 in C1, 9 in C2 and 13 in C3). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 67% (95%CI 58-76), 74% (95%CI 62-86) and 84% (95%CI 77-93) for C1, C2 and C3 respetively. The hazard ratios for patients in the C2 and C3 groups were 0.77 (95%CI 0.36-1.65, p=NS) and 0.45 (95%CI 0.22-0.93, p=0.031). 80 IR patients relapsed (18 in C1, 27 in C2 and 25 in C3). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 46% (95%CI 31-61), 57% (95%CI 46-68) and 80% (95%CI 75-86) The hazard ratios for patients in the C2 and C3 groups were 0.77 (95%CI 0.42-1.39, p=NS) and 0.29 (95%CI 0.16-0.52, p 〈 0.001) respectively. Two children (1 in the C2 and 1 in the C3 group) died in first CR due to consolidation or reinduction related toxicity. Conclusions Monthly vincristine, asparaginase and prednisone (VAP) reinductions during the first year of maintenance treatment significantly reduced the relapse rate and improved the disease-free survival of children with LR and IR ALL in first CR. The major benefit was obtained in IR ALL. Supported in part by grants P-EF/08 from José Carreras Leukemia Foundation, from grant PI051490 and RD06/0020/1056 from RETICS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 4334-4334
    Abstract: Abstract 4334 Background and objectives. Children with ALL and low-risk (LR) features have a survival over 80%. The study of minimal residual disease (MRD) is an additional tool for best risk definition and for optimal selection of post-remission treatment. The results of PETHEMA LAL-BR-01 for low-risk childhood ALL (LR-ALL) including sequential MRD evaluation are presented. Patients and Method. Baseline LR-ALL criteria included age 1–9 yr., B-precursor ALL, WBC count 〈 50×109/L, no CNS involvement and absence of hypodiploidy, t(9;22) (BCR-ABL) or 11q23 (MLL) rearrangements. Induction therapy included VCR, DNR, PDN, ASP and CPM (4 weeks), followed by reinduction-consolidation (R-C), consolidation with intensification (C-I) (both including HD-MTX and HD-ARAC among other drugs), maintenance (MP and MTX) with reinductions (with VCR, PDN and ASP)(M-R) during the first yr., and maintenance (M) without reinductions during the second year. CNS prophylaxis consisted of triple intrathecal therapy (MTX, ARA-C and hydrocortisone). Patients with slow cytologic response ( 〉 1× 109 peripheral blood blasts/L on day 8 or 〉 20% bone marrow blasts on day 14), or MRD 〉 0.1% after induction, or MRD 〉 0.01% after R-C or at the 1st or 1.5 yr of therapy were moved to a high-risk (HR) protocol. Results. By April 2010, 176 pts (mean (SD) age 4 (2) yr., 96 males) were evaluable. Baseline ALL characteristics: WBC 8 (SD 6) ×109/L, common ALL 144 (35%), pre-B 30 (17%), hyperdiploidy 〉 50 chromosomes 32 (19%), TEL/AML1 40/140 (29%), normal karyotype 41(24%). Treatment response (172 pts): induction death 2 (infection in both), abandon 2, and complete response (CR) 168 (98%). Five patients were moved to a HR protocol because of slow cytologic response (n=4) or MRD 〉 0.1% at the end of induction (n=1). During consolidation and maintenance 4 pts relapsed and 4 were moved to HR protocol because of MRD 〉 0.01%. Out of 104 pts who completed therapy, 4 relapsed. Seven out of 9 patients moved to the HR protocol (including the 5 pts transferred due to high MRD level) are in first CR and the remaining 2 relapsed. With a median follow-up of 3 (0.1-8.3) yr, 6-yr probabilities of CR duration, overall survival and event-free survival were 92±5%, 97±3% y 87±5%, respectively. The most frequent toxicity was due to infections, and was observed in all phases of the protocol, especially in induction. Dose modifications were documented in 6% of induction cycles, 15% of R-C, and 18% of C-I, in 27% of the patients during M-R and in 25% of the patients during M phase. Conclusions. 1. Most LR-ALL pts achieved a durable CR. 2. Most patients shifted to a HR protocol on the basis of slow response to treatment or MRD positivity maintained CR with HR protocol. 3. Toxicity was acceptable, although frequent dose reductions were required. Supported in part by grants P-EF09 from FJC and RD06/0020/1056 from RTICC. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 173-173
    Abstract: Results of therapy in children with VHR ALL are disappointing and he role of SCT is controversial. Few studies have compared ALLO or AUTO SCT with intensive chemotherapy in children with VHR-ALL. This multicenter randomized trial compare three options of post remission therapy in children (0–18 yr) with VHR-ALL: intensive consolidation plus maintenance chemotherapy (CHT), ALLO or AUTO SCT. Inclusion criteria: one or more of the following: age 0–1 yr., WBC 〉 300x109/L for B-lineage ALL (mature B-ALL excluded), or 〉 100x109/L for T lineage-ALL, t(9;22) or BCR/ABL, t(4;11) or other 11q23 or MLL rearrangements, t(1;19) or slow response ( 〉 10% blast cells in BM study at day 14 of induction therapy) or resistance to other induction therapies. Treatment schedule: Induction: 5-drug (VCR, DNR, PDN, ASP, CPM); early intensification: 3 1-week cycles including HD-MTX, HD-ARAC and HD-ASP over 3 mo. Patients with an HLA-identical familiar donor were assigned to ALLO SCT and the remaining were randomized to AUTO SCT or to delayed intensification CHT (the same three cycles given in the post-remission period) followed by maintenance CHT (MP+MTX) up to 2-yr. in complete remission (CR). Study period: 1993–2003, 119 pts, 106 evaluable (70 VHR de novo ALL, 36 with slow response to other induction therapies), 68% males, median age 8 yr. (range 3 mo-18). Early pre-B: 17 (16%), common+pre-B: 41 (39%), T: 48 (45%). Cytogenetics (81 [76%] valid cases after central review): normal: 38 (47%) t(9;22): 8 (10%), 11q23: 13 (16%), t(1;19): 2 (2%), other: 20 (25%). Response to therapy: Induction death 2 (3%), resistant disease 4 (6%) and CR 64/70 (91%) with baseline VHR features. Of 100 evaluable patients, 24 pts were assigned to ALLO SCT, 38 randomized to AUTO SCT and 38 to CHT. With a median follow-up of 6.5 yr (range 1.3-12.4), medians for DFS and OS were 2.5 yr and 3.6 yr, and 5-yr DFS and OS probabilities were 45±8% and 48±8%. Groups of ALLO, AUTO and CHT were comparable for the main clinicobiologic characteristics and the rate of response to therapy. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no differences in DFS and in OS for donor vs. no donor comparison as well as for comparison of AUTO vs. CHT in the whole series as well as wthin separate subgroups of patients (infants, patients with T-ALL, B-lineage ALL and patients with chromosomal rearrangements). The same results were observed when the analysis was performed on the basis of effectively treated pts (ALLO SCT performed in 74%, AUTO SCT in 66% and delayed intensification CHT in 74% of the pts). By multivariate analyses, slow response to induction therapy was associated with a lower CR, whereas T-cell phenotype was the only variable associated with a lower DFS and OS probabilities. This study failed to prove that, when a family donor is available, allogeneic SCT produces a better outcome than autologous SCT or chemotherapy in children with VHR-ALL. Among children with VHR ALL slow response to therapy and T-cell phenotype are the main adverse prognostic factors
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...