GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    In: TAXON, Wiley, Vol. 71, No. 1 ( 2022-02), p. 178-198
    Abstract: The shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis , concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of “scientific reductionism”, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0040-0262 , 1996-8175
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2081189-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 204216-2
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Rodriguésia, FapUNIFESP (SciELO), Vol. 66, No. 4 ( 2015), p. 1085-1113
    Abstract: Resumo Um levantamento atualizado das plantas com sementes e análises relevantes acerca desta biodiversidade são apresentados. Este trabalho se iniciou em 2010 com a publicação do Catálogo de Plantas e Fungos e, desde então vem sendo atualizado por mais de 430 especialistas trabalhando online. O Brasil abriga atualmente 32.086 espécies nativas de Angiospermas e 23 espécies nativas de Gimnospermas e estes novos dados mostram um aumento de 3% da riqueza em relação a 2010. A Amazônia é o Domínio Fitogeográfico com o maior número de espécies de Gimnospermas, enquanto que a Floresta Atlântica possui a maior riqueza de Angiospermas. Houve um crescimento considerável no número de espécies e nas taxas de endemismo para a maioria dos Domínios (Caatinga, Cerrado, Floresta Atlântica, Pampa e Pantanal), com exceção da Amazônia que apresentou uma diminuição de 2,5% de endemicidade. Entretanto, a maior parte das plantas com sementes que ocorrem no Brasil (57,4%) é endêmica deste território. A proporção de formas de vida varia de acordo com os diferentes Domínios: árvores são mais expressivas na Amazônia e Floresta Atlântica do que nos outros biomas, ervas são dominantes no Pampa e as lianas apresentam riqueza expressiva na Amazônia, Floresta Atlântica e Pantanal. Este trabalho não só quantifica a biodiversidade brasileira, mas também indica as lacunas de conhecimento e o desafio a ser enfrentado para a conservação desta flora.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2175-7860
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2515291-9
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Transfusion, Wiley, Vol. 63, No. 10 ( 2023-10), p. 1859-1871
    Abstract: Hemovigilance (HV) is usually based on voluntary reports (passive HV). Our aim is to ascertain credible incidence, severity, and mortality of transfusion‐associated adverse events (TAAEs) using an active HV program. Study Design and Methods Prospective cohort study to estimate transfusion risk after 46,488 transfusions in 5830 patients, using an active HV program with follow‐up within the first 24 h after transfusion. We compared these results to those with the previously established passive HV program during the same 30 months of the study. We explored factors associated with the occurrence of TAAEs using generalized estimating equations models. Results With the active HV program TAAEs incidence was 57.3 (95% CI, 50.5–64.2) and mortality 1.1 (95% CI, 0.13–2.01) per 10,000 transfusions. Incidence with the new surveillance model was 14.0 times higher than with the passive. Most events occurred when transfusions had already finished (60.2%); especially pulmonary events (80.4%). Three out of five deaths and 50.3% of severe TAAEs were pulmonary. In the multivariate analysis surgical patients had half TAAEs risk when compared to medical patients (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34–0.78) and women had nearly twice the risk of a pulmonary event compared to men (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.03–3.32). Patient's age, blood component type, or blood component shelf‐life were unrelated to TAAEs risk. Discussion Active hemovigilance programs provide additional data which may lead to better recognition and understanding of TAAEs and their frequency and severity.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0041-1132 , 1537-2995
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018415-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 4836-4836
    Abstract: Abstract 4836 Background Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent recently approved in Europe for the treatment of MDS, prolongs the median survival time in patients enrolled in clinical trials (Fenaux et al 2009). Decisions regarding treatment are based on performance status, age, patient preference and concomitant illnesses. NCCN-recommended treatment approaches vary according to International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) classification. AZA was available in Spain under compassionate use before its regulatory approval in May 2009. Material and Methods We present the preliminary analysis of the clinical results of the data from a longitudinal, multicenter Spanish patient registry, which retrospectively collected data from community-based hematology clinics on the disease course and management of patients with MDS treated with AZA in a compassionate use setting, in whom the dosing schedule administered was documented. AZA dosing was applied to the patients in different regimens in 28-day cycles. As of August 1, 2009, data from 147 patients with MDS diagnosed according to WHO criteria had been collected. Results Median age was 71 years and 66% were men. Most of the patients had primary MDS (129 patients; 88%). The most prevalent ECOG performance status was 0-1 (125 patients; 85%). An IPSS risk classification of low/intermediate-1 was documented in 80 patients (55%). An initial AZA dose of 75 mg/m2 was used in 124 patients (84%). Most of the patients (57%) received a 7-day regimen (either with or without a weekend rest). A 5-day regimen was used in 50 patients (31%). AZA was administered mostly subcutaneously (122 patients, 84%). The mean number of cycles administered was 6 (range 2-29). The overall treatment response was 60% (International Working Group 2006 criteria): 18% complete response, 16% complete bone marrow response, 7% partial response, 23% hematological response. Stable disease was documented in an additional 17% of the patients, who did not achieve a response. AZA was generally well tolerated. Grade 3/4 adverse events documented in these patients, regardless of their relationship to the active treatment, were neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (31%), anemia (22%), febrile neutropenia (10%), rash (1%), vomiting or nausea (1%), septic shock (1%), injection site reaction (1%), and constitutional symptoms (1%) Conclusion These preliminary data do not differ from those previously obtained from clinical trials (Silverman et al 2006, Fenaux et al 2009). These results demonstrate that in a community-based setting, patients with MDS respond to AZA treatment. In line with previous clinical trials, we expect this could point to a better prognosis for MDS patients in Spain, with prolonged survival and a better quality of life. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Diagnostics, MDPI AG, Vol. 13, No. 6 ( 2023-03-11), p. 1071-
    Abstract: Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2075-4418
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2662336-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1710-1710
    Abstract: Abstract 1710 Introduction: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependency independently predicted inferior overall survival (OS) (Itzykson R, et al. Blood. 2011;117:403-11). Transfusion dependency appears to have a major negative prognostic impact in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (Malcovati L, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7594-603). The independent prognostic value of development of iron overload on OS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk in MDS has been demonstrated (Sanz G, et al. Blood. 2008;112:abstract 640). Serum ferritin (SF) concentration predicts morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation (Sorror ML, et al. Blood. 2009;114:abstract 651). The prognostic impact of SF on overall response (OR) and OS in patients with MDS treated with azacitidine (AZA) remains unknown. Aim: To analyze the impact of pre-treatment SF levels on response and OS in patients with World Health Organization-defined MDS or AML with 20–30% bone marrow (BM) blasts who received AZA through a compassionate-use program in Spain. Methods: We report a retrospective multivariate analysis of the impact of SF level on OR and OS in patients treated with AZA. Hematologic response was assessed according to International Working Group 2003 (AML) and 2006 (MDS) criteria. SF levels were selected based on median SF value, dividing in two the first half for a better discrimination of the effect ( 〈 500 ng/mL, 500–1000 ng/mL, and 〉 1000 ng/mL). Comparison of baseline characteristics between SF level groups was performed using Chi-Squared, Fisher's exact, or Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square test for qualitative variables; and analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon, or Kruskal-Wallis test for quantitative variables. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effect of pre-treatment variables (ie, SF levels, sex, age, French-American-British classification, BM blast count, time since diagnosis, hemoglobin [Hb] level, International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] risk, and thrombocytopenia) on best OR (marrow complete response [mCR] + complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + hematologic improvement [HI] ). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the effect of the mentioned variables on OS. All analyses were done using SAS System® version 9.2. Results: Of 240 patients enrolled, pre-AZA SF levels were available for 190 patients. The median pre-treatment SF level was 1001 ng/mL (range 21–5548). Baseline characteristics according to SF levels ( 〈 500 ng/mL [n = 49], 500–1000 ng/mL [n = 46] , and 〉 1000 ng/mL [n = 95]) are summarized in Table 1. OR rates were higher and OS was increased in patients with pre-AZA SF levels of ≤ 1000 ng/mL (Table 2 and Fig). In multivariate analysis, pre-treatment SF levels were predictive of best OR (P = 0.0001). Patients with SF levels 〉 1000 ng/mL had a reduced likelihood of OR (P 〈 0.0001 vs SF levels 〈 500 ng/mL). Baseline SF levels were also predictive of OS (P = 0.0002); patients with SF levels 〉 1000 ng/mL had the lowest likelihood of OS (P = 0.0012 vs SF 〈 500 ng/mL; and P = 0.0023 vs SF 500–1000 ng/mL). None of the other variables analyzed had a significant impact on OR or OS. Conclusion: Patients with pre-AZA SF levels 〉 1000 ng/mL had lower OR rates and inferior OS compared with patients with SF levels ≤ 1000 ng/mL. None of the other patient baseline characteristics analyzed had an impact on these outcomes. Our results suggest that higher OR rates and increased OS are obtained with AZA treatment in MDS patients with SF levels ≤ 1000 ng/mL, compared with patients with SF levels 〉 1000 ng/mL. This may advocate for early initiation of therapy before increasing SF level; however, prospective controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Acknowledgments: Regina Garcia Delgado, Dunia de Miguel, Alicia Bailen, José Ramón González, Joan Bargay, Jose F. Falantes, Rafael Andreu, Fernando Ramos, Mar Tormo, Rafael F. Duarte, Ma José Jiménez Lorenzo, Salut Brunet, Benet Nomdedeu, Antonio Figueredo, Javier Casaño, Llorenç Badiella, and Antonio Fernández Jurado submitted this abstract on behalf of the Asociación Andaluza de Hematología y Hemoterapia, Spain. Disclosures: Garcia Delgado: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. de Miguel:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Bargay:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Ramos:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Sanz:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 186-186
    Abstract: Introduction: The severity of acute clinical outcomes and mortality in hematologic malignancy (HM) patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 was exhaustively documented in the first weeks of the pandemic. A consistent increased mortality compared to non-cancer patients was observed across studies. In this study we aimed to estimate survival in COVID-19 HM patients by type of malignancy, to describe acute and post-acute clinical outcomes, and to compare outcomes in early and later pandemic periods. Methods: In this population-based registry study sponsored by the Madrid Society of Hematology (Asociación Madrileña de Hematología y Hemoterapia), we collected de-identified data on clinical characteristics, treatment and acute and post-acute outcomes in adult patients with hematologic malignancies and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within the Madrid region of Spain. Our case series included all eligible patients admitted to 26 regional health service hospitals and 5 private healthcare centers between February 28, 2020 and February 18, 2021 with a coverage of 98% on a population of 6.6 million inhabitants. The study outcomes were all-cause mortality, severity of disease (WHO), oxygen support, ICU admission, and follow-up symptoms and signs and complications. Survival probabilities were estimated with the actuarial method and reported overall and stratified by type of malignancy and for two study periods (early cohort,-COVID-19 diagnosis from February 28 to 31 May, 2020, and later cohort, up to February 18, 2021). Results: Of the 1408 patients reported to the HEMATO-MADRID COVID-19 registry, 1166 were included in the present analyses; 839 (72%) had a lymphoid malignancy, including 325 (28%) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 50 (4%) with Hodgkin lymphoma and 263 (23%) with multiple myeloma; and 327 (28%) had a myeloid malignancy, including 115 (10%) with myelodysplastic syndrome, 92 (8%) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 87 (7%) with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Overall COVID-19 clinical severity was classified as critical in 19% of patients, severe in 36%, moderate in 22%, and mild in 22%; 10% were admitted to an ICU; 8% were on mechanical ventilation and 19% on noninvasive ventilation. Mild disease increased between early and later period from 15% to 38% of patients; severe disease decreased from 42% to 24%, p & lt;0.001. COVID-19 treatment with steroids increased from 38% to 59%, p & lt;0.001. At follow-up, 22% reported persistent symptoms related to COVID-19 at 2 months, 16% at 4 months and 14% at 6 months. 381 of 1166 (33%) patients died. Overall 30-day survival was 68%; 2 and 3-month overall survival probabilities were 56% and 53%, respectively. Survival was more favorable for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (82%, 69% and 65% at 30-days, 2 and 3 months, respectively) than for those with lymphoid malignancies (68%, 56% and 54%) or myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (61%, 51%, 46%), p=001. 285 (37%) patients died in the early period vs 96 (24%) in the later, p & lt;0.001, but median (interquartile range) follow-up time was much higher in the early vs later, 45 (20-116) days vs. 26 (11-86), respectively. Overall survival was not different between periods, p=0.5 (hazard ratio [95%C], 0.93 [0.73-1.17] ). In the later cohort, 30 and 60-day survival probabilities were 71% and 56% vs. 67% and 56% in the early cohort Conclusions. A population-based registry in Spain provided strong evidence that although COVID-19 severity decreased over year 1 of the pandemic, mortality remained high, and survival was stable over time in the group of patients with hematological malignancy infected by SARS-Coc-2. A relevant proportion of the infected patients (1 in 6) referred persistent symptoms attributable to COVID-19. The improved clinical management of severe COVID-19 in non-cancer patients that followed the dissemination of evidence-based recommendations did not translate in more favorable survival in patients with hematological malignancies. Research is needed to address the specific characteristics and improve the clinical management of this vulnerable population. Disclosures Martinez-Lopez: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jiménez-Yuste: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kwon: Gilead: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 2773-2773
    Abstract: Abstract 2773 Poster Board II-749 Background: Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent recently approved in Europe for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), prolongs the median survival time in patients enrolled in clinical trials (Fenaux et al 2009). AZA was available for clinical trial or compassionate use in Spain before receiving its marketing authorization from the Spanish Medicines Agency in May 2009. The dosing of AZA in community-based hematology clinics could differ from that approved by the health authorities. Material and Methods: We present the preliminary analysis of the clinical results of data from a longitudinal, multicenter Spanish patient registry, which retrospectively collected data from community-based hematology clinics on the disease course and management of patients with MDS treated under compassionate use conditions with AZA, in whom the dosing schedule administered was documented. AZA was administered to the patients in three different dosing schedules over 28-day cycles; Group A: days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 / Group B: days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9 / Group C: days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Treatment assignation was based on patient status and the feasibility of weekend drug administration. As of August 1, 2009, data from 147 patients with MDS diagnosed according to the WHO criteria had been collected. Results: We evaluated 144 patients in whom the dosing schedule was documented at the time of this analysis. At baseline, the patient characteristics were comparable, except for ECOG performance status, with a higher prevalence of an ECOG ≥ 2 in the day 1-7 dosing schedule group (Group C) (Table 1). Group A accounted for 36% of the patients, group B for 32%, and group C for 32%. The mean initial dose of AZA was comparable between groups. Despite the different dosing schedules, the median number of cycles administered was similar between groups. The overall treatment response rates (International Working Group 2006 criteria) varied according to dosing schedule: 58% in group A, 65% in group B and 74% group C (Table 1). AZA was generally well tolerated, but the adverse events profile differed according to dosing schedule group (Table 1) Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that different treatment schemes are feasible for patients with MDS treated with AZA in the community-based setting, but they have different effectiveness and the safety profiles. These data show a better efficacy/safety profile for the dosing schedule approved by the EMEA. Further analyses are awaited. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: JAMA Oncology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2018-01-01), p. 54-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-2437
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2018
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 1003-1003
    Abstract: Abstract 1003 Poster Board I-25 Introduction: Recently, the cooperative group HOVON-SAKK has refined the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by introducing the concept of monosomal karyotype (MK). This consists of ≥ 2 autosomal monosomies or one autosomal monosomy in addition to a structural alteration. In their experience, MK would explain the poor prognosis of AML with a complex karyotype. Objective: To investigate the prognostic impact of MK in patients with primary (de novo) AML enrolled in the Spanish CETLAM group protocols (AML 94/99/03). Also, to determine whether considering MK added predictive value to the cytogenetic classification of the Medical Research Council (MRC). Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 1149 AML patients. Chromosomal formula was centrally reviewed with karyotypes being classified by the presence of MK and allocated into the MRC risk categories. Complete remission (CR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: The karyotype was assessable in 904 (79%) of the 1149 cases. In 145 of the 904 cases (16%), abnormalities involving CBF gene were detected and in 437 (48%) the karyotype was normal (NK). In 253 (28%) additional patients the karyotype was not monosomal; of them, 61 (24%) belonged to the unfavorable MRC with 17 cases harboring a complex karyotype ≥ 5 abnormalities, 7 cases with rearrangements 3q, 13 cases with -7, 9 cases with 5q abnormalities and 16 cases with t(6;9)). The remaining 69 (7.7%) patients had a MK; of them, 59 (85.5%) were from the unfavorable MRC category and included 43 cases with complex karyotype ≥ 5 abnormalities, 6 cases with rearrangements 3q, 5 cases with -7, 5 cases with alterations of 5q). The following table summarizes the results in terms of CR rate, DFS and OS: Conclusions: The addition of MK to the MRC cytogenetic classification refines the prognostic prediction. In our series, the dismal outcome of patients with MK is confirmed; these patients had worse prognosis than those with adverse cytogenetics without MK. Alternative treatment strategies are mandatory for MK+ patients. Supported in part by grants: GR1-01075, ECO07/90065, PI080672 and RD06/0020/0101. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...