Abstract: Background : Although in recent clinical trials the 5-year event-free survival rates for pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) range between 49% and 64%, relapse still occurs in up to one-third of cases. Long-term outcomes of children with relapsed or refractory disease remain poor, with overall survival under 40%. Novel drugs directed toward distinct pathways and new molecular targets are required to continue improving outcomes for this aggressive hematological disease. Use of the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, has improved overall and event-free survival in adult patients with newly diagnosed, intensive-chemotherapy ineligible AML, however, its effects in pediatric AML patients remain unclear. We reviewed our multi-institutional experience with venetoclax in this population. Methods : We performed a retrospective review of patients ages 0 to 23 y/o with AML and treated with at least one cycle of venetoclax at either MD Anderson Cancer Center or Texas Children's Hospital prior to May 2021. Flow cytometry was used to assess morphology and response to therapy. Adverse events (AEs) associated with venetoclax were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Descriptive statistics were used to report efficacy and toxicity data. Results : 46 patients with AML who received venetoclax-containing regimens were identified. There was a similar proportion of males and females (52% and 48%) and most were Caucasian (48%). The median age was 21 years (range, 1-23) with eight patients (17%) & lt;12 years of age. The most common AML subtype was M2 (30%; n=14) and the most common genetic mutations were FLT3-ITD (15%; n=7) and KMT2A (26%; n=12). Eight (17%) patients received venetoclax within front-line therapy and 38 (83%) as part of therapy for relapsed or refractory disease. Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range, 0-7) before venetoclax, with ten patients (22%) receiving at least four lines of prior therapy and twenty (43%) at least one prior allogeneic transplant. Venetoclax was combined with a hypomethylating agent in 28 (61%) patients. Dosing varied significantly ranging from 34-479 mg/m2 with 20% (n=9) requiring dose reduction due to concomitant use of azole antifungals. The most common grade 3/4 AE's observed included febrile neutropenia (41%; n=19), neutropenia (35%; n=16), anemia (20%; n=9), and thrombocytopenia (33%; n=15). No patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. The overall response rate in the 38 patients evaluated for disease at the end of cycle 1 was 53% (n=20). Complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was achieved in 42% (n=16) of patients. Among those with CR/CRi, 9 (56%) were MRD negative. Of those sixteen, 4 (25%) had received venetoclax as front-line therapy. In total, seventeen patients (37%) were able to successfully transition to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median follow-up time was 8.5 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (range, 0.13-36.61) and overall survival (OS) was 10 months (range, 0.13-36.61). Patients who received venetoclax as part of front-line therapy had a median PFS of 16.8 months (range, 0.72-17.5) and OS of 16.8 months (range, 0.72-28.75) with 4 (50%) patients still in ongoing remission. Conclusion : Our findings suggest that in pediatric and early young adults, venetoclax is well-tolerated with a variety of cytotoxic agents and has a safety profile similar to that in adults. Patients should be monitored closely for prolonged myelosuppression and febrile neutropenia. As dosing varied significantly in our cohort, more studies are needed to establish an optimal dose in the pediatric population. Longer follow-up is expected to provide more insight on the improvement venetoclax may have on overall and progression-free survival. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kadia: Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Dalichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: Grant/research support; Genfleet: Other; AstraZeneca: Other; Astellas: Other; Pulmotech: Other; Cure: Speakers Bureau; Cellonkos: Other; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other; Ascentage: Other; Novartis: Consultancy; Liberum: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Grant/research support; Amgen: Other: Grant/research support; Aglos: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Grant/research support. Konopleva: Cellectis: Other: grant support; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support; KisoJi: Research Funding; Calithera: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ablynx: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Agios: Other: grant support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: research funding pending, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Support, Research Funding. DiNardo: Takeda: Honoraria; Notable Labs: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ImmuneOnc: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios/Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Foghorn: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb company: Honoraria, Research Funding. Daver: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sevier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Novimmune: Research Funding; Hanmi: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; FATE Therapeutics: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Data Monitoring Committee member; Dava Oncology (Arog): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy; STAR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Newave: Research Funding. Short: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; NGMBio: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Astellas: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Issa: Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ravandi: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kantarjian: Ascentage: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Jazz: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria.

Abstract: It has been forty years since President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act of 1971, which many view as the nation's declaration of the “War on Cancer.” The bill has led to major investments in cancer research and significant increases in cancer survival. Today, two-thirds of patients survive at least five years after being diagnosed with cancer compared with just half of all diagnosed patients surviving five years after diagnosis in 1975. The research advances detailed in this year's Clinical Cancer Advances demonstrate that improvements in cancer screening, treatment, and prevention save and improve lives. But although much progress has been made, cancer remains one of the world's most serious health problems. In the United States, the disease is expected to become the nation's leading cause of death in the years ahead as our population ages. I believe we can accelerate the pace of progress, provided that everyone involved in cancer care works together to achieve this goal. It is this viewpoint that has shaped the theme for my presidential term: Collaborating to Conquer Cancer. In practice, this means that physicians and researchers must learn from every patient's experience, ensure greater collaboration between members of a patient's medical team, and involve more patients in the search for cures through clinical trials. Cancer advocates, insurers, and government agencies also have important roles to play. Today, we have an incredible opportunity to improve the quality of cancer care by drawing lessons from the real-world experiences of patients. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is taking the lead in this area, in part through innovative use of health information technology. In addition to our existing quality initiatives, ASCO is working with partners to develop a comprehensive rapid-learning system for cancer care. When complete, this system will provide physicians with personalized, real-time information that can inform the care of every patient with cancer as well as connect patients with their entire medical teams. The rapid learning system will form a continuous cycle of learning: securely capturing data from every patient at the point of care, drawing on evidence-based guidelines, and evaluating quality of care against those standards and the outcomes of other patients. Clinical trials are another area in which collaboration is critical. Increasing clinical trial participation will require commitment across the cancer community from physicians, patients, insurers, hospitals, and industry. A 2010 report by the Institute of Medicine described challenges to participation in trials by both physicians and patients and provided recommendations for revitalizing clinical trials conducted through the National Cancer Institute's Cooperative Group Program. ASCO has pledged its support for the full implementation of these recommendations. More broadly, ASCO recently outlined a bold vision for translational and clinical cancer research for the next decade and made recommendations to achieve that vision. Accelerating Progress Against Cancer: ASCO's Blueprint for Transforming Clinical and Translational Research, released in November, calls for a research system that takes full advantage of today's scientific and technologic opportunities and sets a high-level agenda for policy makers, regulators, and advocates. Cancer research has transformed cancer care in the past forty years, and this year's Clinical Cancer Advances illustrates how far we have come in the past year alone. We now have a tremendous opportunity to use today's knowledge and collaborate across all facets of cancer care to conquer this deadly disease. Michael P. Link, MD President American Society of Clinical Oncology

Abstract: The deep sea has been described as the last major ecological frontier, as much of its biodiversity is yet to be discovered and described. Beaked whales (ziphiids) are among the most visible inhabitants of the deep sea, due to their large size and worldwide distribution, and their taxonomic diversity and much about their natural history remain poorly understood. We combine genomic and morphometric analyses to reveal a new Southern Hemisphere ziphiid species, Ramari's beaked whale, Mesoplodon eueu , whose name is linked to the Indigenous peoples of the lands from which the species holotype and paratypes were recovered. Mitogenome and ddRAD-derived phylogenies demonstrate reciprocally monophyletic divergence between M. eueu and True's beaked whale ( M. mirus ) from the North Atlantic, with which it was previously subsumed. Morphometric analyses of skulls also distinguish the two species. A time-calibrated mitogenome phylogeny and analysis of two nuclear genomes indicate divergence began circa 2 million years ago (Ma), with geneflow ceasing 0.35–0.55 Ma. This is an example of how deep sea biodiversity can be unravelled through increasing international collaboration and genome sequencing of archival specimens. Our consultation and involvement with Indigenous peoples offers a model for broadening the cultural scope of the scientific naming process.

Abstract: The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax improves survival for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with lower-intensity therapies, but its benefit in pediatric patients with AML remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed two Texas Medical Center institutions’ experience with venetoclax in 43 pediatric patients with AML; median age 17 years (range, 0.6–21). This population was highly refractory; 44% of patients (n = 19) had ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 37% (n = 16) had received a prior bone marrow transplant, and 81% (n = 35) had unfavorable genetics KMT2A (n = 17), WT1 (n = 13), FLT3-ITD (n = 10), monosomy 7 (n = 5), TP53 (n = 3), Inv(3) (n = 3), IDH1/2 (n = 2), monosomy 5 (n = 1), NUP98 (n = 1) and ASXL1 (n = 1). The majority (86%) received venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included febrile neutropenia in 37% (n = 16), non-febrile neutropenia in 12% (n = 5), anemia in 14% (n = 6), and thrombocytopenia in 14% (n = 6). Of 40 patients evaluable for response, 10 patients (25%) achieved complete response (CR), 6 patients (15%) achieved CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), and 2 patients (5%) had a partial response, (CR/CRi composite = 40%; ORR = 45%). Eleven (25%) patients received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant following venetoclax combination therapy, and six remain alive (median follow-up time 33.6 months). Median event-free survival and overall survival duration was 3.7 months and 8.7 months, respectively. Our findings suggest that in pediatric patients with AML, venetoclax is well-tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that in adults. More studies are needed to establish an optimal venetoclax-based regimen for the pediatric population.

Abstract: 6058 Background: Dysphagia is a common side effect following chemoradiation (CRT) in pts with head and neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this pilot trial was to assess the feasibility of recruiting HNC pts and to collect preliminary data on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture on dysphagia-related QOL. Methods: Pts were eligible if diagnosed with stage III-IV HNC, without evidence of distance metastasis, receiving curative-intent CRT. Pts were randomized to 12 sessions of either active or sham acupuncture, once every two weeks, over 24 weeks from during CRT to 20-week post-CRT. All study personnel and the pts were blinded; the treating acupuncturists were not. MDADI and other questionnaires were measured at baseline (end of CRT), end of acupuncture, and at six months follow-up (12-month post-CRT). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA adjusting for baseline. Results: Accrual was completed in December 2011. Among 42 pts enrolled, 35 (83%) received at least 8 sessions of acupuncture, and 28 (67%) received all 12. Six pts withdrew due to time constraints. No serious side effects were observed. The mean MDADI total scores improved from baseline in both treatment arms [64.5 (SE+2.4) vs. 71.4 (SE±3.1), p = 0.048; 64.5 (SE±2.4) vs. 77.8 (SE±3.0), p 〈 0.001]; the difference in improvement was not significant (p = 0.12). The median feeding tube duration did not differ between active and sham treatments (n = 39, median 125 days vs. 147 days, p = 0.93). Conclusions: Acupuncture is a safe and feasible treatment for HNC pts. There were improvements in QOL parameters from end of CRT to the time points examined that did not differ between the two arms. Efficacy of acupuncture to improve swallowing-related QOL in HNC pts may require more frequent or longer duration of treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT00797732.

Abstract: To determine the frequency of, and factors associated with, death in hospital following ICU discharge to the ward. Methods The Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE study was an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients with severe respiratory failure, conducted across 459 ICUs from 50 countries globally. This study aimed to understand the frequency and factors associated with death in hospital in patients who survived their ICU stay. We examined outcomes in the subpopulation discharged with no limitations of life sustaining treatments (‘treatment limitations’), and the subpopulations with treatment limitations. Results 2186 (94%) patients with no treatment limitations discharged from ICU survived, while 142 (6%) died in hospital. 118 (61%) of patients with treatment limitations survived while 77 (39%) patients died in hospital. Patients without treatment limitations that died in hospital after ICU discharge were older, more likely to have COPD, immunocompromise or chronic renal failure, less likely to have trauma as a risk factor for ARDS. Patients that died post ICU discharge were less likely to receive neuromuscular blockade, or to receive any adjunctive measure, and had a higher pre- ICU discharge non-pulmonary SOFA score. A similar pattern was seen in patients with treatment limitations that died in hospital following ICU discharge. Conclusions A significant proportion of patients die in hospital following discharge from ICU, with higher mortality in patients with limitations of life-sustaining treatments in place. Non-survivors had higher systemic illness severity scores at ICU discharge than survivors. Trial Registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02010073 .