Abstract: Introduction: Treatment of older or frail patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) remains challenging due to impaired organ function, underlying comorbidities, need for convenient regimens and burden of care, all of which impact the tolerability of anti-MM therapies. In the STORM study, selinexor plus dexamethasone (sel-dex) demonstrated anti-MM activity with an ORR of 26.2% and similar safety across all age groups in pts with triple-class refractory MM (Chari et al. NEJM 2019, Gavriatopoulou et al. IMW 2019). In the phase 3 BOSTON study, the combination of weekly sel-dex with once weekly bortezomib (SVd) was superior to standard twice weekly bortezomib and dex (Vd) across all efficacy endpoints in pts with MM who had received 1-3 prior therapies. Furthermore, while conferring a longer PFS and higher ORR than Vd, SVd was associated with significantly reduced rates of peripheral neuropathy (PN), the most clinically relevant toxicity associated with bortezomib that limits long term administration, especially in older and/or frail pts. Here we present results of subgroup analyses of the BOSTON study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SVd versus Vd based on age and frailty index. Methods: Pts enrolled in BOSTON were assigned (1:1) to once weekly oral sel (100 mg) plus once weekly subcutaneous (SC) bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dex (20 mg BIW) in the SVd arm or to standard twice weekly SC bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dex (20 mg QIW) in the Vd arm. Treatment was administered in both arms until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS, as assessed by an Independent Review Committee. For these analyses, pts were assigned to 2 groups based on age ( & lt;65 and ≥65 years) and Frailty Score categories (frail and fit). Frailty Score was assessed using baseline characteristics including age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (Facon et al. Leukemia 2019). Results: Of the 402 enrolled pts, 241 (60%) were ≥65 years (SVd=109, Vd=132). Of these, 81 (37%) were ≥75 and 106 (44%) were categorized as frail (SVd=51, Vd=55). Baseline pt and disease characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms in the subgroups. PFS was prolonged in both age groups with SVd compared with Vd. In ≥65, PFS was 21.0 vs 9.5 months (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83; P=0.0018) and in & lt;65, PFS was 12.2 vs 9.4 months (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.10; P=0.07). The PFS benefit of SVd was sustained and comparable in the frail pts: 13.9 vs 9.5 months (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.40-1.17; P=0.08); and in the fit pts: 13.2 vs 9.4 months (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93; P=0.0076) (Figure). The ORR was significantly improved with SVd in those ≥65 (76.1% vs 64.4%; P=0.0243) and & lt;65 (76.7% vs 58.7%, P=0.0071). The ORR was improved with SVd in both the frail (69.7% vs 60.9%; P=0.14) and fit groups (79.8% vs 62.9%; P=0.0011). Overall survival was 24.8 months and 23.5 months in the Vd arm in the ≥65 and frail pts respectively and was not reached in any of the subgroups in the SVd arm. There were more deaths in the ≥65 (30% [SVd 23%, Vd 36%]) and frail groups (35% [SVd 26%, Vd 44%] ) compared with the & lt;65 (23% [SVd 26%, Vd 20%]) and fit groups (24% [SVd 23%, Vd 24%] ). Similar to the overall population, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia, anemia, pneumonia and fatigue. In the SVd arm, the incidence of AEs was comparable across subgroups except for a higher incidence of fatigue in ≥65 versus & lt;65 (17% vs 8%) and pneumonia in the frail versus fit (19% vs 7%). The incidence of serious AEs in the SVd versus Vd arms was (56% vs 45%) and (47% vs 25%) in ≥65 and & lt;65 and (59% vs 48%) and (48% and 33%) in the frail and fit groups, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 21% pts on SVd versus 16% on Vd in ≥65 and in 18% on SVd versus 11% on Vd in the frail group. Grade ≥ 2 PN rates were lower in the SVd compared with Vd arms in all subgroups with significant differences in ≥65 (22% vs 37%; P=0.0060) and frail groups (15% vs 44%; P=0.0002). Conclusions: In pts with previously treated MM, the once weekly SVd regimen led to prolonged PFS, improved response rates and rates of PN regardless of age and frailty score compared to standard twice weekly Vd. Non-PN AEs were higher with triplet than doublet therapy, but most of the AEs were reversible and treatable. There were fewer deaths on SVd in pts ≥65 and in frail pts compared to Vd. Once weekly SVd is a potent and convenient treatment option for pts with previously treated MM, including those who are ≥65 years and/or frail. Figure Disclosures Auner: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gavriatopoulou:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Delimpasi:GENESIS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spicka:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Dimopoulos:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Leleu:Incyte: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS-celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria. Hajek:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharma MAR: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Sinha:Dr Reddys Lab, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria. Venner:Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene, Amgen: Research Funding. Garg:Janssen, Takeda, Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi: Honoraria. Stevens:Amgen, MorphoSys: Consultancy. Quach:Amgen, Celgene, karyopharm, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Sanofi.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Amgen, sanofi, celgene, Karyopharm, GSK: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen Cilag: Consultancy. Jagannath:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Moreau:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Levy:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baylor University Med Center: Current Employment. Badros:Amgen: Consultancy; University of Maryland: Current Employment. Anderson:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bahlis:BMS/Celgene and Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Facon:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, Roche, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, BMS, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Mateos:EDO Mundipharma: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Joshi:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy. Chai:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Current Employment. Arazy:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shacham:Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) . Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Celgene/BMS, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Karyopharm: Research Funding.

Abstract: Introduction Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder that involves antibody and cell mediated destruction of platelets as well as suppression of their production. Corticosteroids are initial standard therapy in adults. Initially Rituximab (dose375mg/m2) was approved as one of the important second line therapy in chronic ITP. In the present prospective study, we will evaluate the efficacy, safety and response duration of low dose Rituximab (100mg) and high dose Dexamethasone as a front line therapy in new onset adult ITP cases. Methods Inj. Rituximab at a fixed dose of 100mg intravenous infusion for four doses (day 1,8,15,22) and Dexamethasone tablet 40 mg/daily PO for four days in a fifteen days' interval (day 1-4 and day 15-18). Response rate evaluated according to published guidelines. Results Total no. of cases was 15. Male 5, female 10. Age range 18 to 62 years with median age of 36 years. Course completed in 15 patients. Median follow up of the patients was 6 months. Complete response (CR) was achieved after 1st dose of rituximab in 3 cases, 2 after 2nd dose and 4 after 4th dose of Rituximab. Partial response (PR) was achieved in 2 cases after completion of therapy and no response seen in 4 cases. Seven cases (46.66%) achieving CR maintaining sustained response after 6 months of completion of therapy. Two cases who achieved CR initially reverted to PR after 6 months with dropping of platelet count but without any evidence of bleeding symptoms. Minor side effects like GI intolerance, nausea, vomiting occurred in 3 patients, High blood sugar level during treatment seen in 2 patients and severe adverse effects like pneumonitis and intestinal obstruction seen in 2 patients who needed hospitalization. We did not observe any infusion related reaction. Conclusions CR and PR rate was 60% (9/15) and 14%(2/15) respectively. Six months after completion of therapy 77.8% (7/9) showed sustained response after achieving CR. Low dose Rituximab and high dose Dexamethasone is a useful treatment option in adult acute ITP patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Currently, there are no guidelines for the management of B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from an Indian perspective. The diagnostic workup, monitoring, and treatment of B-ALL vary among different physicians and institutes. Objective To develop evidence-based practical consensus recommendations for the management of B-ALL in Indian settings. Methods Modified Delphi consensus methodology was considered to arrive at a consensus. An expert scientific committee of 15 experts from India constituted the panel. Clinically relevant questions belonging to three major domains were drafted for presentation and discussion: (i) diagnosis and risk assignment; (ii) frontline treatment; and (iii) choice of therapy (optimal vs. real-world practice) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. The questionnaire was shared with the panel members through an online survey platform. The level of consensus was categorized into high (≥ 80%), moderate (60%–79%), and no consensus ( & lt; 60%). The process involved 2 rounds of discussion and 3 rounds of Delphi survey. The questions that received near or no consensus were discussed during virtual meetings (Delphi rounds 1 and 2). The final draft of the consensus was emailed to the panel for final review. Results Experts recommended morphologic assessment of peripheral blood or bone marrow, flow cytometric immunophenotyping, and conventional cytogenetic analysis in the initial diagnostic workup. Berlin–Frankfurt–Münster (BFM)–based protocol is the preferred frontline therapy in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients with B-ALL. BFM/German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia–based regimen is suggested in adult patients with B-ALL. Immunotherapy (blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin) followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the optimal choice of therapy that would yield the best outcomes if offered in the first salvage in patients with R/R B-ALL. In patients with financial constraints or prior allo-HCT (real-world practice) at first relapse, standard-intensive chemotherapy followed by allo-HCT may be considered. For subsequent relapses, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy or palliative care was suggested as the optimal choice of therapy. Conclusion This expert consensus will offer guidance to oncologists/clinicians on the management of B-ALL in Indian settings.