GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 7_Supplement ( 2023-04-04), p. 2324-2324
    Abstract: Background: Treatment response to chemoradiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade is limited in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). This is likely caused by the fact that the majority of GEAs, belonging to the chromosomally instable subgroup (70%), are often immune excluded. We hypothesize that the immune excluded state is caused by secretion of immune suppressive factors by the tumor cells, to protect themselves from immune attack. By identifying and targeting these factors we aim to increase immune infiltration and increase treatment response. Method: To better understand the drivers of immune exclusion in GEA, we optimized methods to analyze the secretome of freshly dissociated GEA tumor biopsies (n=36) by plating single cells in a 96 well plate for 48 hours and performing targeted proteomics on the supernatant (50ul) using the Olink Target 96 ImmunoOncology panel. Using the same panel, we also analyzed the secretomes of patient-derived organoids (n=7). In parallel the immune infiltrate was characterized immediately in freshly dissociated biopsies with 14 color flow cytometry, and in FFPE material through 6 opal multicolor immunohistochemistry to determine the spatial organization of the immune infiltrate. Results: We identified 62 factors in the panel that are secreted by at least 25% of the biposies. Pro- and anti-inflammatory factors were found to correlate frequently. Using ranked scores for the pro- and anti-inflammatory factors we were able to identify 7 patients with a predominantly inflamed secretome and 29 with a suppressive secretome. The inflamed secretomes are characterized by IFN-gamma, CXCL9-10-11, the presence of granzymes and higher CD8 T cell levels identified by flow cytometry, whereas tumors with dominant anti-inflammatory profile had lower CD8 higher CD4 T cell rates. Notably, the anti-inflammatory secretomes are characterized by an overall lack of pro-inflammatory factors. Among the factors that are most frequently detected ( & gt;85% of patients) are galectin-9, IL-8, VEGFA, HO-1 and CAIX, all factors with potential immune suppressive properties. These are also detected in the secretomes of the organoids, indicating direct tumor mediated suppressive effect in the GEA TME. Conclusion: The analysis revealed that GEAs secrete immune suppressive factors and that the state of the TME as influenced by the secretome is reflected in the immune infiltrate composition. We found that tumors lacking a CD8 T cell infiltrate showed an absence of pro-inflammatory factors and had a secretome predominantly made up of anti-inflammatory factors that were also secreted by organoids. Moving forward we aim to further identify GEA associated suppressive factors by using a broader panel to analyze the secretome. Additionally, functional studies will determine whether targeting these immune suppressive factors will facilitate responses to immune checkpoint blockade Citation Format: Jasper Sanders, Micaela H. Harrasser, Tessa S. van Schooten, Emma N. Bos, Benthe H. Doeve, Maarten F. Bijlsma, Hanneke W. van Laarhoven, Donald L. van der Peet, Sarah Derks. Characterizing the secretome of freshly dissociated gastroesophageal tumor biopsies to identify immune suppressive factors [abstract] . In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2324.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 55, No. 9 ( 2021-10), p. 798-809
    Abstract: A number of studies have investigated the effectiveness of cannabis or cannabinoids for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We aimed to systematically analyze their effect in in the treatment of IBD patients. Study: We included randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies analyzing IBD patients of any age using cannabi(noid)s. Two reviewers searched 3 databases until August 13, 2019. Primary outcome was clinical remission and secondary outcomes included inflammatory biomarkers, symptom improvement, quality of life (QoL) scores, and hospital outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed according to study type. The meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model with subgroup analyses based on study type. Results: The search identified 682 records of which 15 nonrandomized studies and 5 randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis of the primary outcome included 146 randomized participants, all 18 years of age or older. Risk of bias was moderate. Cannabi(noid)s were not effective at inducing remission (risk ratio=1.56, 95% confidence interval=0.99-2.46). No effect on inflammatory biomarkers was observed. However, clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, general well-being, nausea, diarrhea, and poor appetite) all improved with cannabi(noid)s on Likert-scales. Baseline QoL scores were lower in patients using cannabis among cohort studies but improved significantly with cannabi(noid)s. Although length of hospital stay was shorter and risk of parenteral nutrition was lower in patients using cannabis, there was no effect on other IBD complications. Conclusions: Cannabi(noid)s do not induce clinical remission or affect inflammation in IBD patients. However, cannabi(noid)s significantly improve patient-reported symptoms and QoL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0192-0790
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041558-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Gastroenterology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 58, No. 10 ( 2023-10), p. 965-977
    Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire global healthcare system, including oncological care. This study investigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, stage, and treatment of esophagogastric cancer in the Netherlands. Methods Patients diagnosed in 2020 were divided into 5 periods, based on the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, and compared to patients diagnosed in the same period in the years 2017–2019. Patient characteristics and treatments were evaluated for esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) separately. Results The number of esophagogastric cancer diagnoses decreased prominently during the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During this period, a significantly higher percentage of GC patients was diagnosed with incurable disease (52.5% in 2017–2019 and 67.7% in 2020, p = 0.011). We observed a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with potentially curable EC treated with resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (from 35.0% in 2017–2019 to 27.3% in 2020, p  〈  0.001). Also, patients diagnosed with incurable GC were treated less frequently with a resection (from 4.6% in 2017–2019 to 1.5% in 2020, p = 0.009) in the second half of 2020. Conclusions Compared to previous years, the number of esophagogastric cancer diagnoses decreased in the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, while an increased percentage of patients was diagnosed with incurable disease. Both in the curative and palliative setting, patients were less likely to be treated with a surgical resection.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0944-1174 , 1435-5922
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1473159-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Frontiers in Immunology, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 15 ( 2024-4-4)
    Abstract: Tumors in the distal esophagus (EAC), gastro-esophageal junction including cardia (GEJAC), and stomach (GAC) develop in close proximity and show strong similarities on a molecular and cellular level. However, recent clinical data showed that the effectiveness of chemo-immunotherapy is limited to a subset of GEAC patients and that EACs and GEJACs generally benefit less from checkpoint inhibition compared to GACs. As the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment drives response to (immuno)therapy we here performed a detailed immune analysis of a large series of GEACs to facilitate the development of a more individualized immunomodulatory strategy. Methods Extensive immunophenotyping was performed by 14-color flow cytometry in a prospective study to detail the immune composition of untreated gastro-esophageal cancers (n=104) using fresh tumor biopsies of 35 EACs, 38 GEJACs and 31 GACs. The immune cell composition of GEACs was characterized and correlated with clinicopathologic features such as tumor location, MSI and HER2 status. The spatial immune architecture of a subset of tumors (n=30) was evaluated using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) which allowed us to determine the tumor infiltration status of CD3+, CD8+, FoxP3+, CD163+ and Ki67+ cells. Results Immunophenotyping revealed that the tumor immune microenvironment of GEACs is heterogeneous and that immune suppressive cell populations such as monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSC) are more abundant in EACs compared to GACs (p & lt;0.001). In contrast, GACs indicated a proinflammatory microenvironment with elevated frequencies of proliferating (Ki67+) CD4 Th cells (p & lt;0.001), Ki67+ CD8 T cells (p=0.002), and CD8 effector memory-T cells (p=0.024). Differences between EACs and GACs were confirmed by mIHC analyses showing lower densities of tumor- and stroma-infiltrating Ki67+ CD8 T cells in EAC compared to GAC (both p=0.021). Discussions This comprehensive immune phenotype study of a large series of untreated GEACs, identified that tumors with an esophageal tumor location have more immune suppressive features compared to tumors in the gastro-esophageal junction or stomach which might explain the location-specific responses to checkpoint inhibitors in this disease. These findings provide an important rationale for stratification according to tumor location in clinical studies and the development of location-dependent immunomodulatory treatment approaches.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1664-3224
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2606827-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Gastroenterology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 150, No. 4 ( 2016-04), p. S703-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-5085
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2016
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Gastroenterology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 152, No. 4 ( 2017-03), p. 685-688.e6
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-5085
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...