GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 579-579
    Abstract: 579 Background: Trastuzumab, an approved prescription drug by EMA and FDA under the name Herceptin has become the key treatment in patients with HER2 − positive breast cancer. HD201, developed by Prestige Biopharma Pte Ltd is a biosimilar candidate to Herceptin. The biosimilarity of HD201 was established based on systematic stepwise comparisons between HD201 and reference product, Herceptin. In order to confirm clinical similarity of HD201 to Trastuzumab, two clinical studies were undertaken. Methods: First, in a double-blind, randomised and parallel group study, 101 randomised healthy human subjects were subjected to a single 6 mg/kg IV dose by body weight over 90-min infusion of either HD201, EU- and US-Herceptin group by assessing pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety (TROIKA-I). The second study was a randomised, double-blind, parallel group, equivalence, multicentre clinical phase III trial (TROIKA) designed to compare the efficacy based on total pathological complete response rate (tpCR), safety, and pharmacokinetics of HD201 to EU-Herceptin in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer. Each group of ~250 subjects were administered with either HD201 or EU-Herceptin in combination with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant followed by the antibody alone in the adjuvant phase. Results: TROIKA-I study demonstrated that HD201 was safe and well tolerated with comparable PK as EU- and US-Herceptin. Based on the neoadjuvant data from TROIKA study, the tpCR rate in the HD201 and Herceptin treatment groups was comparable and the 95% CI was included within the pre-defined margins of equivalence (Table). The incidence and severity of reported TEAEs did not imply any significant safety concerns and were comparable between both groups. In addition, the comparison of steady-state C trough between both arms in TROIKA study has established equivalence. Conclusions: The overall comparison exercise demonstrated the equivalence of HD201 to Herceptin. Clinical trial information: 2016-0040019-11 . [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e21556-e21556
    Abstract: e21556 Background: Prestige Biopharma Pte Ltd is developing HD204, a biosimilar candidate of Bevacizumab (Avastin). Bevacizumab has been approved in the treatment of a variety of metastatic tumours. Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody block angiogenesis which is required for cancer progression by preventing binding of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to VEGF receptors. Due to heterogeneity nature of antibody therapeutic, the impact on quality of HD204 on safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) was reaffirmed through clinical study to establish clinical similarity between HD204 and Avastin. Methods: Quality attributes identified to influence PK and safety established through comprehensive analytical characterization was used to correlate any potential differences (structural or biological) between the two compounds if any, could result in any clinical meaningful differences in safety and PK in the clinical settings. The PK and safety equivalence of HD204 relative to Avastin was demonstrated in a randomized, single-blind, single-dose, three-arm and parallel-group study clinical Phase I (SAMSON). A total of 120 healthy male subjects randomized 1:1:1 were to receive 1 mg/kg intravenous infusion of either HD204, EU- or US-Avastin. Various PK parameters, safety assessments not limiting to adverse events (AE) and measurement of antidrug antibodies (ADA) and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were evaluated. Results: The pairwise comparisons of Exposure (AUC0-inf and AUC0-last), maximal concentration (Cmax) established equivalence between the 3 arms. All other PK parameters including half-life, clearance and volume of distribution were comparable between HD204 and Avastin treatment groups. Treatment related TEAEs reported for each group were 25.0%, 30.0% and 25.6% respectively and comparable. There were no treatment-emergent SAEs. Furthermore, none of the subjects treated with HD204 was ADA positive. Conclusions: HD204 demonstrated equivalent PK and safety profile to both US-Avastin and EU-Avastin at 1mg/kg administered as a 90-minute IV infusion to healthy male subjects. A prospective clinical study aimed to demonstrate equivalence in terms of efficacy, PK and safety is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: 2017-005174-19.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...