GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Heart Journal Supplements, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 24, No. Supplement_K ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: Current guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) should receive four foundational treatments, i.e. renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) or angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), β-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). There is emerging consensus that simultaneous initiation or rapid sequencing provide greater benefit, enhancing tolerability of these therapies and improving outcomes. However, implementation of a comprehensive approach is limited by common underuse and underdosing, and paucity of data exists on initiating the four pharmacological pillars of HFrEF during hospitalization or at discharge. Aim To investigate the feasibility of a comprehensive pharmacological approach in patients with HFrEF at discharge after an episode of heart failure (HF) hospitalization in a tertiary referral center. Methods In-patients with HFrEF and a first HF hospitalization (2019-2021) were categorized according to the number/type of treatments prescribed at discharge. Prevalence of contraindications and cautions for HFrEF treatments – as defined by current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on HF – was as assessed. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess predictors of number of treatments prescribed and risk of re-hospitalization. Results Among 305 patients with HFrEF, 49.2% received at least two current recommended drugs. A β-blocker was prescribed in 93.4% of patients, and a RASi/ARNi in 68.2%. Based on current recommendations, 46.2% of patients could receive four foundational drugs. An MRA was prescribed in 32.5% of patients and 100% of patients did not show contraindications to MRA use. Renal dysfunction was present in 13.1% of patients, while hypotension in 11.8%. Bradycardia and renal dysfunction were associated with lower number of drugs prescribed [adjusted OR (95% CI) 0.18 (0.06-0.50), and 0.50 (0.39-0.64), respectively]. A higher number of drugs used was associated with no rehospitalization during the 30 days after discharge [OR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.10-0.49) per number of pillars increase] . Conclusions Based on the presence/absence of contraindications, a quadruple therapy could be implementable in a contemporary cohort of HFrEF in-patients at discharge. Renal dysfunction and bradycardia were the main prevalent conditions limiting the achievement of a more comprehensive therapeutic approach. Use of a higher number of drugs was associated with lower risk of re-hospitalization within 30 days after discharge.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1520-765X , 1554-2815
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2141255-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 10 ( 2023-3-22)
    Abstract: Heart failure (HF) is a multifaceted clinical syndrome characterized by different etiologies, risk factors, comorbidities, and a heterogeneous clinical course. The current model, based on data from clinical trials, is limited by the biases related to a highly-selected sample in a protected environment, constraining the applicability of evidence in the real-world scenario. If properly leveraged, the enormous amount of data from real-world may have a groundbreaking impact on clinical care pathways. We present, here, the development of an HF DataMart framework for the management of clinical and research processes. Methods Within our institution, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli in Rome (Italy), a digital platform dedicated to HF patients has been envisioned (GENERATOR HF DataMart), based on two building blocks: 1. All retrospective information has been integrated into a multimodal, longitudinal data repository, providing in one single place the description of individual patients with drill-down functionalities in multiple dimensions. This functionality might allow investigators to dynamically filter subsets of patient populations characterized by demographic characteristics, biomarkers, comorbidities, and clinical events (e.g., re-hospitalization), enabling agile analyses of the outcomes by subsets of patients. 2. With respect to expected long-term health status and response to treatments, the use of the disease trajectory toolset and predictive models for the evolution of HF has been implemented. The methodological scaffolding has been constructed in respect of a set of the preferred standards recommended by the CODE-EHR framework. Results Several examples of GENERATOR HF DataMart utilization are presented as follows: to select a specific retrospective cohort of HF patients within a particular period, along with their clinical and laboratory data, to explore multiple associations between clinical and laboratory data, as well as to identify a potential cohort for enrollment in future studies; to create a multi-parametric predictive models of early re-hospitalization after discharge; to cluster patients according to their ejection fraction (EF) variation, investigating its potential impact on hospital admissions. Conclusion The GENERATOR HF DataMart has been developed to exploit a large amount of data from patients with HF from our institution and generate evidence from real-world data. The two components of the HF platform might provide the infrastructural basis for a combined patient support program dedicated to continuous monitoring and remote care, assisting patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2297-055X
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2781496-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 12, No. 13 ( 2023-07-04)
    Abstract: Guidelines recommend using multiple drugs in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but there is a paucity of real‐world data on the simultaneous initiation of the 4 pharmacological pillars at discharge after a decompensation event. Methods and Results A retrospective data mart, including patients diagnosed with HF, was implemented. Consecutively admitted patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction were selected through an automated approach and categorized according to the number/type of treatments prescribed at discharge. The prevalence of contraindications and cautions for HF with reduced ejection fraction treatments was systematically assessed. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess predictors of the number of treatments (≥2 versus 〈 2 drugs) prescribed and the risk of rehospitalization. A population of 305 patients with a first episode of HF hospitalization and a diagnosis of HF with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction, 〈 40%) was selected. At discharge, 49.2% received 2 current recommended drugs, β‐blockers were prescribed in 93.4%, while a renin‐angiotensin system inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor was prescribed in 68.2%. A mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist was prescribed in 32.5%, although none of the patients showed contraindications to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist prescription. A sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor could be prescribed in 71.1% of patients. On the basis of current recommendations, 46.2% could receive the 4 foundational drugs at discharge. Renal dysfunction was associated with 〈 2 foundational drugs prescribed. After adjusting for age and renal function, use of ≥2 drugs was associated with lower risk of rehospitalization during the 30 days after discharge. Conclusions A quadruple therapy could be directly implementable at discharge, potentially providing prognostic advantages. Renal dysfunction was the main prevalent condition limiting this approach.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-9980
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2653953-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...