Abstract: Introduction: In adults with Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the optimal post-remission therapy remains uncertain. Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first complete remission (CR1) has become a widely adopted curative strategy, the need for HCT may be supplanted by intensive, pediatric-style chemotherapy regimens. These two approaches have not previously been compared. Methods: We evaluated the outcomes of 422 related or unrelated donor HCT recipients aged 18-50 years with Ph-ALL in CR1 between 06/2002 and 12/2011 as reported to the CIBMTR. This was compared to a concurrent cohort of 108 Ph- ALL CR1 pts (18-50 years) who received a Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium pediatric regimen consisting of intensive, non-HCT therapy. Primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Patients in the DFCI chemotherapy cohort who received HCT in CR1 were censored at the day of HCT. Left-truncated analysis methods were used to adjust time from CR1 to transplant. Results: The HCT cohort was older (median age 34 vs. 30 years, p=0.001) and had higher diagnostic WBC counts (median 12x109/L [range 〈 1-515) vs. 8x109/L [1-1424], p=0.001, respectively). The proportion of patients with T –ALL was lower in the HCT cohort (14% vs. 22%, p=0.03), while the incidence of t(4;11)/MLL was similar in both groups (8% vs. 10%, respectively). Of the HCT cohort 396 (94%) underwent myeloablative (MA) conditioning. Donor source was matched related donor in 176 (42%), 8/8 unrelated donors in 168 (40%), and 7/8 (18%) from 7/8 unrelated donors. In univariate analyses (Figure 1) cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was similar in both groups (HCT 25% [19-28] vs. chemo 23% [15-32] p=0.97). Two-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the HCT cohort (HCT 33% [28-39] vs. chemo 4% [1-8], p 〈 0.0001). At 4 years, DFS was superior in the chemo cohort (HCT 40% [35-45] vs. chemo 71% [60-79] , p 〈 0.0001). Four year OS also favored chemo (HCT 45% [40-50] vs. chemo 73% [63-81] , p 〈 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, independent factors predictive of treatment failure (relapse or death) were HCT (HR 3.11 [2.08 – 4.66], p 〈 0.001) and the presence of CNS disease at diagnosis (HR 1.56 [1.03 – 2.38], p=0.04). The sole factor associated with poorer OS was the administration of HCT (HR 2.86 [1.88 – 4.34] , p 〈 0.0001). The favorable OS with chemo was maintained when restricting the HCT cohort to those recipients with related donors or fully matched (8/8) unrelated donors and those whose time from diagnosis to CR1 was 〈 8 weeks (HR 2.14 [1.36-3.35], p=0.001). Similar outcomes were seen when restricting the HCT cohort to those who achieved CR1 〈 8 weeks from diagnosis and received myeloablative conditioning. Conclusion: In this comparison of two cohorts of younger Ph- negative adults in CR1, post-remission therapy with an intensive, pediatric-inspired, chemotherapy-based regimen conferred a survival advantage when compared to allogeneic HCT. The high TRM associated with HCT is a major factor in determining outcomes after HCT. In an era of increasing adoption of pediatric regimens for adults with Ph- ALL, allogeneic HCT may no longer be required for the majority of patients who achieve CR1. These data support the need for randomized controlled studies in Ph- ALL comparing pediatric-inspired non-HCT regimens to allogeneic HCT-based therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: The development and survival of cancer cells require adaptive mechanisms to stress. Such adaptations can confer intrinsic vulnerabilities, enabling the selective targeting of cancer cells. Through a pooled in vivo short hairpin RNA (shRNA) screen, we identified the adenosine triphosphatase associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA-ATPase) valosin-containing protein (VCP) as a top stress-related vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We established that AML was the most responsive disease to chemical inhibition of VCP across a panel of 16 cancer types. The sensitivity to VCP inhibition of human AML cell lines, primary patient samples, and syngeneic and xenograft mouse models of AML was validated using VCP -directed shRNAs, overexpression of a dominant-negative VCP mutant, and chemical inhibition. By combining mass spectrometry–based analysis of the VCP interactome and phospho-signaling studies, we determined that VCP is important for ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase activation and subsequent DNA repair through homologous recombination in AML. A second-generation VCP inhibitor, CB-5339, was then developed and characterized. Efficacy and safety of CB-5339 were validated in multiple AML models, including syngeneic and patient-derived xenograft murine models. We further demonstrated that combining DNA-damaging agents, such as anthracyclines, with CB-5339 treatment synergizes to impair leukemic growth in an MLL-AF9–driven AML murine model. These studies support the clinical testing of CB-5339 as a single agent or in combination with standard-of-care DNA-damaging chemotherapy for the treatment of AML.

Abstract: For adults with Philadelphia chromosome‐negative (Ph−) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative strategy. However, pediatric‐inspired chemotherapy may also offer durable leukemia‐free survival in the absence of HCT. We compared 422 HCT recipients aged 18–50 years with Ph‐ALL in CR1 reported to the CIBMTR with an age‐matched concurrent cohort of 108 Ph− ALL CR1 patients who received a Dana‐Farber Consortium pediatric‐inspired non‐HCT regimen. At 4 years of follow‐up, incidence of relapse after HCT was 24% (95% CI 19–28) versus 23% (95% CI 15–32) for the non‐HCT (chemo) cohort ( P =0.97). Treatment‐related mortality (TRM) was higher in the HCT cohort [HCT 37% (95% CI 31–42) versus chemo 6% (95% CI 3–12), P 〈 0.0001]. DFS in the HCT cohort was 40% (95% CI 35–45) versus 71% (95% CI 60–79) for chemo, P 〈 0.0001. Similarly, OS favored chemo [HCT 45% (95% CI 40–50)] versus chemo 73% [(95% CI 63–81), P 〈 0.0001]. In multivariable analysis, the sole factor predictive of shorter OS was the administration of HCT [hazard ratio 3.12 (1.99–4.90), P 〈 0.0001]. For younger adults with Ph− ALL, pediatric‐inspired chemotherapy had lower TRM, no increase in relapse, and superior overall survival compared to HCT. Am. J. Hematol. 91:322–329, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract: Preclinical models have demonstrated the efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting cancer immunotherapies (GVAX platform) accompanied by immunotherapy-primed lymphocytes after autologous stem cell transplantation in hematologic malignancies. We conducted a phase 2 study of this combination in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Immunotherapy consisted of autologous leukemia cells admixed with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting K562 cells. “Primed” lymphocytes were collected after a single pretransplantation dose of immunotherapy and reinfused with the stem cell graft. Fifty-four subjects were enrolled; 46 (85%) achieved a complete remission, and 28 (52%) received the pretransplantation immunotherapy. For all patients who achieved complete remission, the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 47.4% and overall survival was 57.4%. For the 28 immunotherapy-treated patients, the RFS and overall survival rates were 61.8% and 73.4%, respectively. Posttreatment induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to autologous leukemia cells was associated with longer 3-year RFS rate (100% vs 48%). Minimal residual disease was monitored by quantitative analysis of Wilms tumor-1 (WT1), a leukemia-associated gene. A decrease in WT1 transcripts in blood was noted in 69% of patients after the first immunotherapy dose and was also associated with longer 3-year RFS (61% vs 0%). In conclusion, immunotherapy in combination with primed lymphocytes and autologous stem cell transplantation shows encouraging signals of potential activity in acute myeloid leukemia (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00116467).

Abstract: Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) are a group of rare and heterogeneous myeloid disorders. There is strong morphologic resemblance among these distinct diagnostic entities as well as a lack of specific molecular markers and limited understanding of disease pathogenesis, which has made diagnosis challenging in certain cases. The treatment has remained empirical, resulting in dismal outcomes. We, therefore, performed whole-exome and RNA sequencing of these rare hematologic malignancies and present the most complete survey of the genomic landscape of these diseases to date. We observed a diversity of combinatorial mutational patterns that generally do not cluster within any one diagnosis. Gene expression analysis reveals enrichment, but not cosegregation, of clinical and genetic disease features with transcriptional clusters. In conclusion, these groups of diseases represent a continuum of related diseases rather than discrete diagnostic entities.

Abstract: Enasidenib, a selective inhibitor of mutant IDH2 enzymes, was safe and well tolerated in patients with IDH2-mutated myeloid malignancies. Enasidenib induced hematologic responses in patients with relapsed/refractory AML in this dose-escalation and expansion study.

Abstract: Background: CC-90009 is a cereblon (CRBN) E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD) and a first-in-class small molecule that drives the binding of a novel target protein, G1 to S phase transition 1 (GSPT1), to CRBN, resulting in the proteasome-dependent degradation of GSPT1. GSPT1 plays a central role in mRNA translation, and loss of GSPT1 activates an integrated stress response that leads to AML cell death (Matyskiela ME, et al. Nature. 2016;535:252-7; Zhouravleva G, et al. EBMO J. 1995;14:4065-72). In preclinical testing, CC-90009 is active across a range of AML cell lines and primary AML patient (pt) samples in vitro and in vivo and exerts its GSPT1- and CRBN-dependent effects through rapid induction of apoptosis. Here we share the first clinical results in pts with R/R AML. Methods: Adult pts with R/R AML enrolled in the dose-finding phase of this first-in-human, multicenter, open-label phase 1 study to evaluate tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of CC-90009; and to establish the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule (RP2D) (CC-90009-AML-001; NCT02848001). Dose escalation proceeded via a modified 3 + 3 design. Treatment was by daily intravenous administration on either Days 1-5 (D1-5) or Days 1-3 and 8-10 (D1-3/8-10) of a 28-day cycle. Treatment response was assessed after Cycles 1, 2, and 4 by modified International Working Group 2003 criteria. Safety and preliminary response data are presented for all treated pts. PK and PD were analyzed for evaluable pts. Results: As of May 15, 2019, 45 pts with R/R AML had been treated, including 35 pts on the D1-5 and 10 pts on the D1-3/D8-10 schedule. Median age was 66 years (range 27-81); 73% were male. Most pts (n = 36; 80%) were refractory to their last therapy and 17 pts (38%) were refractory to all prior therapy; 14 pts (31%) had secondary AML. Pts were treated at dose levels from 0.3 to 3.6 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) reported (only in dose levels from 2.4 to 3.6 mg) included hypotension, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), hyperbilirubinemia, pneumonitis, and pericarditis with tamponade. Exploration of the 3.6 mg dose level is ongoing; the RP2D has not yet been determined. CC-90009-related grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 23 pts (51%); those occurring in & gt;1 pt were hypocalcemia (22%); hypotension (13%); and hyperbilirubinemia, hyperglycemia, hypophosphatemia, pneumonitis, sepsis, thrombocytopenia, and tumor lysis syndrome (4%). Preclinically identified hypocalcemia was confirmed as a CC-90009 on-target toxicity in the clinic; it was reversible, manageable and did not lead to any treatment discontinuations. The majority of treated pts experienced ≥1 serious TEAE (80%); most were infections (47%). Two (4%) pts experienced TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Dose interruptions due to TEAEs occurred in 12 pts (27%) and dose reductions in 2 pts (4%). Of 40 pts who discontinued treatment, 24 (60%) discontinued due to progressive disease or lack of efficacy. Seven pts discontinued treatment due to death; 4 deaths were secondary to progression from AML, 2 due to sepsis and 1 due to hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome. Responses to single-agent treatment were observed in pts treated at 3.0 or 3.6 mg on the D1-5 schedule, with a best response of complete remission (CR; n = 1), morphologic CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi; n = 1) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS; n = 1). A dose-dependent decrease in GSPT1 levels in peripheral blood blasts and T cells was observed, with a & gt;90% decrease observed for higher dose levels. Evidence of antileukemic activity (decreases in bone marrow and/or peripheral blasts) was seen in pts treated with CC-90009 at 1.2 mg and above with a trend to more sustained reductions at the highest dose levels. Plasma PK analysis demonstrated dose-dependent exposure. Conclusions: In this phase 1 study of CC-90009, a first-in-class agent, evidence of deep GSPT1 degradation, on-target activity and promising antileukemic activity was observed. The observed TEAEs, in addition to those expected in this heavily pretreated R/R AML pt population, were generally well manageable. The study is ongoing with further optimization of dose, schedule and toxicity mitigation. Expansion cohorts in R/R AML and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes are planned. Disclosures Uy: GlycoMimetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Montesinos:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. DeAngelo:Blue print Medicines: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Altman:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biosight: Other: US Lead; France Foundation: Speakers Bureau; PeerView: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; Theradex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; prIME Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Koprivnikar:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Vyas:Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forty Seven, Inc.: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fløisand:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Gjertsen:BerGenBio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EU Horizon 2020: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Norwegian Cancer Society: Research Funding; KinN Therapeutics AS: Equity Ownership; ACTII AS: Equity Ownership; ERA PerMed: Research Funding; Helse Vest Health Trust: Research Funding; Research Council of Norway: Research Funding. Esteve:Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Buchholz:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Couto:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Fan:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hanna:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pierce:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Mersana Therapuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arcus Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pourdehnad:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zeidan:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medimmune/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acceleron Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria.

Abstract: Cytotoxic chemotherapy targets elements common to all nucleated human cells, such as DNA and microtubules, yet it selectively kills tumor cells. Here we show that clinical response to these drugs correlates with, and may be partially governed by, the pretreatment proximity of tumor cell mitochondria to the apoptotic threshold, a property called mitochondrial priming. We used BH3 profiling to measure priming in tumor cells from patients with multiple myeloma, acute myelogenous and lymphoblastic leukemia, and ovarian cancer. This assay measures mitochondrial response to peptides derived from proapoptotic BH3 domains of proteins critical for death signaling to mitochondria. Patients with highly primed cancers exhibited superior clinical response to chemotherapy. In contrast, chemoresistant cancers and normal tissues were poorly primed. Manipulation of mitochondrial priming might enhance the efficacy of cytotoxic agents.