GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, Elsevier BV, Vol. 7, No. 1 ( 2019-12), p. 389-391
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1875-1768
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2459032-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. 3624-3624
    Abstract: Background: As our knowledge of how DNA alterations can drive cancer progression increases, assays that can simultaneously detect multiple types of variants in a simple and cost-effective manner are becoming increasingly crucial. This holds true of copy number variations (CNVs), where evaluation of this type of variant is an important and necessary feature of any solid tumor profiling assay. Conventional methods for detecting CNVs such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and quantitative PCR (qPCR) are limited to detecting only one gene amplification at a time. This can be a significant drawback with FFPE samples, where the DNA is of low abundance and often heavily degraded, while the number of gene amplifications known to be important in cancer continues to grow. Additionally, different tumor types may express amplifications at different rates and expression may be heterogeneous within the tumor, potentially with irregular staining patterns - all of which illustrate the need for new approaches to CNV detection. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers the ability to assess variants in multiple genes using one sample. To that end, Illumina is developing a comprehensive, hybrid capture-based NGS assay targeting 170 key cancer genes for sequencing on the NextSeq1 platform. The assay consists of a DNA workflow for the identification of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions (indels), as well as an RNA workflow for the identification of splice variants and gene fusions. In addition, using the DNA workflow, a novel analysis pipeline, and CNV caller, CNVs from 57 different genes can be simultaneously assessed all by sequencing of a single sample. Results: Here we present data on both cell lines and FFPE samples of SNVs and indels down to 5% allele fraction and CNVs down to ∼2-fold amplification, all from 40 ng of DNA. To demonstrate the accuracy and precision of our CNV detection method, we tested 7 samples for CNVs using orthogonal CNV detection methods. The Illumina NGS assay detected ERBB2 amplifications in 4 out of 7 samples. Of the 4 Illumina NGS positive samples, 3 samples were positive by FISH and all 4 were positive by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and the Illumina TruSight Tumor 15 panel. The 3 samples that were negative for ERBB2 amplifications by the Illumina NGS assay were also negative by both FISH and ddPCR. Within these samples we also found a previously unknown FGFR1 amplification. Conclusions: The novel Illumina NGS library preparation method is an innovative and useful tool to find multiple CNVs, along with other variant types, within a single sample. The assay can detect multiple CNVs within a single FFPE sample and identify previously uncharacterized CNVs that could be important in finding the correct treatment for a cancer patient. Citation Format: Chia-Ling Hsieh, Clare Zlatkov, Byron Luo, Chen Zhao, Kathryn Stephens, Han-Yu Chuang, Lisa Kelly, Katherine Chang, Rachel Liang, Jianli Cao, Scott Lang, Ashley Adams, Naseem Ajili, Laurel Ball, Glorianna Caves, Danny Chou, Katie Clark, Brian Crain, Anthony Daulo, Sarah Dumm, Ridwana Ekram, Yonmee Han, Anne Jager, Suzanne Johansen, Li Teng, Jenn Lococo, Jaime McLean, Juli Parks, Jason Rostron, Jennifer Sayne, Jennifer Silhavy, June Snedecor, Mckenzi Toh, Stephanie Tong, Elizabeth Upsall, Paulina Walichiewicz, Xiao Chen, Amanda Young, Ali Kuraishy, Karen Gutekunst, Matt Friedenberg, Charles Lin. Development of a comprehensive and highly sensitive next-generation sequencing assay for detection of copy number variations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3624.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 13_Supplement ( 2017-07-01), p. 5354-5354
    Abstract: Solid tumor profiling assays need to deliver accurate and consistent results in the face of decreased quality and quantity of nucleic acids extracted from FFPE samples. Understanding the performance of a particular solid tumor profiling assay with FFPE tissue is critical, but with limited and non-renewable samples available to most assay-developers, the sample number used to understand this performance can be small. TruSight® Tumor 1701 is an Illumina-developed comprehensive solid tumor profiling panel targeting 170 genes using DNA and RNA from FFPE samples. In order to confirm the robustness of the assay with FFPE tissue, 2310 FFPE samples were brought in-house and evaluated. Quantity of both DNA and RNA extraction were determined by various methods, including AccuClear™, Qubit™ and Quantifluor® fluourometric assays. Overall, & gt;95% of the samples achieved the minimum concentrations required for the TruSight® Tumor 170 assay. As a surrogate for DNA quality, we measured the amplification potential of the nucleic acid by assessing a ΔCq value using quantitative PCR after normalization to a fixed input mass. To assess RNA quality, we used the DV200 metric, which measures the percentage of RNA fragments & gt;200 nucleotides in length. We examined ΔCq and DV200 values across different tissues and didn’t find a significant difference between tissues. Finally, we assessed the ability of samples to pass the sample quality control (QC) metrics in the TruSight® Tumor 170 assay. These QC metrics ensure accurate variant calling, with a sensitivity and specificity of ≥95%. We found that samples that had a ΔCq value of ≤5 and a DV200 value of ≥20 achieved a QC success rate above 95%. This data highlights the need for further investigation into the methods for extraction, quantification and quality assessment of nucleic acids for solid tumor profiling and underscores the robustness of TruSight® Tumor 170 with FFPE samples. 1 For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. Citation Format: Jennifer S. LoCoco, Li Teng, Danny Chou, Xiao Chen, Byron Luo, Jennifer Sayne, Ashley Adams, Naseem Ajili, Cody Chivers, Beena Murthy, Laurel Ball, Allan Castaneda, Katie Clark, Brian Crain, Anthony Daulo, Manh Do, Tingting Du, Sarah Dumm, Yonmee Han, Michael Havern, Chia-Ling Hsieh, Tingting Jiang, Suzanne Johansen, Scott Lang, Rachel Liang, Jaime McLean, Yousef Nassiri, Austin Purdy, Jason Rostron, Jennifer Silhavy, June Snedecor, Natasha Talago, Li Teng, Kevin Wu, Chen Zhao, Clare Zlatkov, Ali Kuraishy, Karen Gutekunst, Sohela De Rozieres, Matthew Friedenberg, Han-Yu Chuang, Anne C. Jager. Evaluation of quantity, quality and performance with the TruSight® Tumor 170 solid tumor profiling assay of nucleic acids extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5354. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5354
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 13_Supplement ( 2017-07-01), p. 565-565
    Abstract: Recent studies have highlighted the importance of gene fusions and splice variants in solid tumor profiling1. Next-generation sequencing can be an effective means of detecting these alterations in FFPE samples using RNA rather than DNA, as a single chimeric RNA transcript could result from numerous alterations in DNA2. To that end, Illumina developed TruSight® Tumor 1703, a comprehensive, hybrid capture-based NGS assay targeting 170 key cancer genes. Along with a DNA workflow, the assay includes a RNA workflow for the identification of splice variants and gene fusions. Following sequencing on the NextSeq® or HiSeq® instruments, TruSight® Tumor 170 offers an analytical pipeline which initiates variant calling. These algorithms were first optimized against the simulated read data from & gt;350 fusions and splice variants reported in the RNA content of the gene panel. A hybrid approach of read alignment and assembly was used to enhance the fusion calling sensitivity. Deliberate filters were designed to reduce false positive calling from sequence homologs, polymerase read-through, or FFPE artifacts. For splice variant calling, a panel of FFPE non-cancerous samples were used to capture false positive mutation calls. With endogenous RNA splicing in cellular physiology, exon-boundary probes were added in the hybrid capture to enhance enrichment efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, there is not yet a standard definition for the limit of detection (LoD) in detecting gene fusions and splice variants from NGS data. We propose to define the LoD of a fusion calling and splice variant NGS panel as the lowest molecule count of a chimeric transcript that could be reliably detected with a sufficient number of supporting sequencing reads. To determine the LoD of TruSight® Tumor 170 using this definition, we mixed cell lines expressing a panel of known fusions and splice variants to measure the copy number of each chimeric transcript. Using these samples we examined the ability of the assay to confidently detect the alterations using 40 ng of RNA input. To demonstrate the analytical sensitivity and specificity of this NGS based assay, we compiled a panel of 49 mixed samples and validated the molecule count to be near the LoD of 5 copies per ng RNA input by PCR. The sensitivity was & gt;98% for fusions and 100% for splice variants. For understanding the limit of blank (LoB) of the assay, another panel of 40 samples not harboring fusions and splice variants was also assessed by TruSight® Tumor 170. These samples demonstrated a ~97% specificity for fusion calling and & gt;95% specificity for splice variant calling. These results indicate that the TruSight® Tumor 170 panel analysis can identify lowly expressed fusions and splice variants from a small amount of compromised RNA from solid tumor samples at high analytical sensitivity and specificity. 1 Klijn et al. (2015) 2 Maher et al. (2009) 3 For Research Use Only. Citation Format: Tingting Du, June Snedecor, Jennifer S. LoCoco, Xiao Chen, Laurel Ball, Allan Castaneda, Danny Chou, Katie Clark, Brian Crain, Anthony Daulo, Manh Do, Sarah Dumm, Yonmee Han, Mike Havern, Chia-Ling Hsieh, Tingting Jiang, Suzanne Johansen, Scott Lang, Rachel Liang, Jaime McLean, Yousef Nassiri, Austin Purdy, Jason Rostron, Jennifer Silhavy, Natasha Talago, Li Teng, Kevin Wu, Clare Zlatkov, Chen Zhao, Ali Kuraishy, Karen Gutekunst, Sohela De Rozieres, Matthew Friedenberg, Anne C. Jager, Han-Yu Chuang. Analytical performance of TruSight® Tumor 170 in the detection of gene fusions and splice variants using RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) solid tumor samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 565. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-565
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 77, No. 13_Supplement ( 2017-07-01), p. 3732-3732
    Abstract: Expanding the paradigm of solid tumor profiling from single-gene testing to comprehensive panels presents many challenges. One such challenges is the ability of these panels to detect genetic alterations from FFPE samples, where the DNA is of low abundance and often heavily compromised. Despite these challenges, next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers the ability to assess multiple variants simultaneously in an ever-expanding list of relevant tumor genes. To that end, Illumina developed a comprehensive, hybrid capture-based NGS assay targeting 170 key cancer genes that is FFPE optimized. The assay consists of a DNA workflow for the identification of single and multiple nucleotide variants (SNVs, MNVs), small insertions and deletions (indels), gene amplifications, as well as a RNA workflow for the identification of splice variants and gene fusions. Following sequencing on the NextSeq® or HiSeq® instruments, the analytical pipeline initiates variant calling. The DNA aligner and variant callers were first optimized against the simulated read data from & gt;40,000 COSMIC[1] mutations reported in the exons of the 170 genes. To reduce false positive variant calling due to systematic errors, each variant call was evaluated against its locus specific background error distribution. This distribution was compiled from a panel of FFPE normal samples and was also used to normalize against systematic bias in read coverage to increase the accuracy of amplification calling. Furthermore, gene amplification calling was improved by the addition of enhancer probes to the hybrid capture pool. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of TruSight® Tumor 170* was assessed on a large collection of FFPE samples and reference material. A panel of 72 cancer samples, including multiple tissue types, reference standards, and cell line and FFPE mixes were used to evaluate the limit of detection. The samples contained 533 SNVs, 80 indels including deletions up to 30 base pairs and insertions up to 31 base pairs, 4 MNVs, and 31 gene amplifications, characterized by orthogonal testing methods. Using 40 ng DNA input, detection sensitivity of the & gt;1000 variants (including replicates) tested at variant allele frequencies down to ~5% was at 99.6%, while detection sensitivity of gene amplifications as low as 1.45x to 2.2x was at 98%. For limit of blank samples, a panel of 24 normal samples was used. Again using 40 ng DNA input, we show & gt;99% specificity for small variant calling and & gt;95% specificity for gene amplification calling. These data demonstrates the TruSight® Tumor 170 is able to detect multiple variant types within a single sample at low nucleic acid input, while exhibiting high analytical sensitivity and specificity for low allele fraction detection. [1] Forbes, et al. (2015) *For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. Citation Format: Danny Chou, Xiao Chen, Austin Purdy, Li Teng, Byron Luo, Chen Zhao, Laurel Ball, Allan Castaneda, Katie Clark, Brian Crain, Anthony Daulo, Manh Do, Tingting Du, Sarah Dumm, Yonmee Han, Michael Havern, Chia-Ling Hsieh, Tingting Jiang, Suzanne Johansen, Scott Lang, Rachel Liang, Jennifer S. LoCoco, Jaime McLean, Yousef Nassiri, Jason Rostron, Jennifer Silhavy, June Snedecor, Natasha Talago, Kevin Wu, Clare Zlatkov, Ali Kuraishy, Karen Gutekunst, Sohela De Rozieres, Matthew Friedenberg, Han-Yu Chuang, Anne C. Jager. Analytical performance of TruSight® Tumor 170 on small nucleotide variations and gene amplifications using DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) solid tumor samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3732. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3732
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...