Abstract: Lenalidomide maintenance therapy prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) versus placebo in elderly patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) responding to induction chemotherapy in the phase 3 REMARC study. This subpopulation analysis assessed the impact of lenalidomide maintenance and treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) on health‐related quality of life (HRQOL). Global health status (GHS), and physical functioning and fatigue subscales were evaluated in patients who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality‐of‐life questionnaire‐C30 v3.0. The impact of TEAEs classified post hoc as subjective (patients can feel) or observable (only measurable by physicians) on dose reductions and discontinuations was assessed. Among 457 patients (lenalidomide, n  = 229; placebo, n  = 228), mean (standard deviation) GHS was similar between treatment arms [68·2 (20·7) Versus 72·0 (17·8)] at randomisation and remained similar during maintenance. Patients receiving lenalidomide experienced no meaningful changes in GHS, physical functioning, or fatigue. Observable TEAEs were more common (81·1% Versus 66·3%) and more likely to lead to dose reductions, than subjective TEAEs in both arms. PFS was superior in the lenalidomide arm regardless of dose reduction. Lenalidomide maintenance prolonged PFS and did not negatively impact HRQOL in patients with DLBCL despite TEAEs being more common, when compared with placebo.

Abstract: Background Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous and accounts for approximately 10% of all lymphomas. Outcome of relapse/refractory (R/R) PTCL is poor with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3 and 6 months in the absence of stem-cell transplantation (SCT). [Mak, JCO, 2013]. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) monotherapy is approved for R/R systemic anaplastic large cell-lymphoma (ALCL) based on 86% overall response rate (ORR) and 57% complete remission (CR). [Pro, JCO, 2012] . In other CD30-positive (CD30+) R/R PTCL, the ORR of BV is 41%. Gemcitabine (G) used as monotherapy in control arm in the randomized phase 3 LUMIERE trial, provided ORR and CR rates of 35 and 22% respectively. [O'Connor, JCO, 2019]. Considering these results we designed a phase 2 study for R/R CD30+ PTCL combining G and BV with the primary end point to increase the ORR by 15%, compared to G monotherapy. Patients (pts) and Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed CD30+ (≥5%) PTCL who failed or were refractory to 1-3 prior lines of systemic therapy, with measurable disease and ECOG performance status & lt; 3 were eligible. Pts received an induction of 4 cycles of G-BV (28-days cycles; G: 1000 mg/m² at D1 and D15 plus BV: 1.8 mg/kg at D8). Pts with CR or partial remission (PR) and non-eligible for SCT, received BV maintenance 1.8 mg/kg at D1 (21-days cycles) up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was the ORR (CR + PR) according to Lugano criteria based on CT-scan. Secondary objectives included tolerance and safety, DOR, PFS, OS and impact of BV maintenance. Eligible pts were censored at time of SCT. (NCT03496779). Results: From April 2018 to October 2019, 71 pts were included. Pathology central review according to WHO 2017 criteria, so far available for 50 patients, confirmed angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (22 ; 31%); nodal PTCL-TFH (5 ; 7%); PTCL-NOS (5 ; 7%); ALK- ALCL (10 ; 14.1%) ; ALK+ ALCL (4 ; 5.6%), Enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) (2 ; 2.8%); unclassified PTCL (2 ; 2.8%). There were 47 male and 24 female with a median age of 66 years (20-79) and 17 pts were & gt; 75 years. Median time from diagnosis to enrolment was 9.4 months (range, 6-21). Sixty-five pts (91.6%) presented with stage III-IV. The number of prior lines of therapy were 1 (57 pts), 2 (11 pts) or 3 (3 pts), all pts had received previous CHOP-like chemotherapy, 11 pts previous autologous SCT, 5 pts epigenetic modifiers and 39.4% were refractory to their last line of treatment prior to inclusion. The cut-off date of this analysis was 01/31/2020. The 4 cycles of G-BV induction were completed in 45 pts (63%). The reasons for early discontinuation were progression (21 pts), death (3 pts) or adverse event (2 pts). In intention-to-treat analysis, the ORR at the end of induction (EOI) was 47.9% including CR (14 pts; 19.7%), PR (20 pts; 28.2%). PET performed in all patients reaching EOI showed overall and complete metabolic responses in 45.1 and 23.9%, respectively. During G-BV induction 58 pts (81.7%) had at least one G & gt; 3 adverse event (AE) including neutropenia (67.2%), thrombopenia (17.2%), infections (15.5%), peripheral neuropathy (PN) (5.2%) and cardiac event (5.2%). Overall PN of any grade was recorded in 8/71 patients (11%) during G-BV induction and caused BV withdrawal in one case. Among the 34 responding pts after EOI, 27 pts began BV maintenance and 7 pts remain on maintenance at cut-off date. Eight pts were removed from the study due to SCT eligibility, either after the 4 GBV induction (4 pts) or after 1 or 2 maintenance BV cycles (4 pts). With a median follow-up (FU) of 9.5 (0.5-19.4) months, median PFS is 4.5 months (95%CI [3.5 - 10]) and median OS is 12 months (95%CI [8.6 - NR] ). Among the 34 patients in PR/CR after induction, the duration of response (DOR) is 12.8 months (95%CI [10.3 - NR]). At last FU were recorded 32 deaths. Disease status at time of death was PD (25 pts), CR (1 pt) NE or missing (6 pts). Conclusion: The addition of BV to G increases the overall response rate by 15% in the treatment of R/R CD30+ PTCL. OS data are encouraging for this overall R/R patient population but PFS is overall short and a longer FU is mandatory. Especially the DOR of pts achieving CR or PR after 4 cycles of G-BV exceeds 1 year on BV maintenance. This combination is generally well tolerated and this study suggests that G-BV combination could be an interesting alternative for R/R CD30+ PTCL. Disclosures Tournilhac: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; INNATE Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Grant; ABBVIE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travle grant; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grant. Laribi:novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Research Funding; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; takeda: Research Funding. Ysebaert:AbbVie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Guidez:BMS: Honoraria; TAKEDA: Honoraria; Service Hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire CHU POITIERS: Current Employment; AMGEN: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSEN: Honoraria. Le Gouill:Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Consultancy; Roche Genentech, Janssen-Cilag and Abbvie, Celgene, Jazz pharmaceutical, Gilead-kite, Loxo, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier: Honoraria. André:Celgene: Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Karyopharm: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; CHU UCL Namur, site Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium: Current Employment; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Dupuis:Henri Mondor University Hospital Creteil France: Current Employment. Thieblemont:Roche, Amgen, Kyte Gilead, Celgene, Abbvie, Novartis, Cellectis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Roche, Hospita: Research Funding; Cellectis: Speakers Bureau. Bachy:Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Gilead: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, Sanofi: Honoraria. Morschhauser:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Feugier:janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartron:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Camus:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); JANSSEN: Honoraria; AMGEN: Honoraria; PFIZER: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Sibon:takeda france: Consultancy. Snauwaert:roche: Other: travel; janssen: Other: travel; abbvie: Other. Delarue:BMS: Other: stock options ; Celgene/BMS: Current Employment. De Leval:Abbvie: Honoraria; Lausanne University Hospital & Lausanne University Institute of Pathology: Current Employment; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria; Lunaphore Technologies SA: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gaulard:CHU Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris: Current Employment; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; INNATE PHARMA: Research Funding; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company).

Abstract: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of mortality from SARS-CoV-2 disease 2019 (COVID-19). A better understanding of risk factors for adverse outcomes may improve clinical management in these patients. We therefore studied baseline characteristics of HM patients developing COVID-19 and analyzed predictors of mortality. Methods The survey was supported by the Scientific Working Group Infection in Hematology of the European Hematology Association (EHA). Eligible for the analysis were adult patients with HM and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 observed between March and December 2020. Results The study sample includes 3801 cases, represented by lymphoproliferative (mainly non-Hodgkin lymphoma n  = 1084, myeloma n  = 684 and chronic lymphoid leukemia n  = 474) and myeloproliferative malignancies (mainly acute myeloid leukemia n  = 497 and myelodysplastic syndromes n  = 279). Severe/critical COVID-19 was observed in 63.8% of patients ( n  = 2425). Overall, 2778 (73.1%) of the patients were hospitalized, 689 (18.1%) of whom were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Overall, 1185 patients (31.2%) died. The primary cause of death was COVID-19 in 688 patients (58.1%), HM in 173 patients (14.6%), and a combination of both COVID-19 and progressing HM in 155 patients (13.1%). Highest mortality was observed in acute myeloid leukemia (199/497, 40%) and myelodysplastic syndromes (118/279, 42.3%). The mortality rate significantly decreased between the first COVID-19 wave (March–May 2020) and the second wave (October–December 2020) (581/1427, 40.7% vs. 439/1773, 24.8%, p value  〈  0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, age, active malignancy, chronic cardiac disease, liver disease, renal impairment, smoking history, and ICU stay correlated with mortality. Acute myeloid leukemia was a higher mortality risk than lymphoproliferative diseases. Conclusions This survey confirms that COVID-19 patients with HM are at high risk of lethal complications. However, improved COVID-19 prevention has reduced mortality despite an increase in the number of reported cases.

Abstract: Background Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis (adSM) still have very poor prognosis. No standard of care is yet available. Midostaurin (PKC412) is a powerful TKI inhibit of VEGFR, FLT3 and most importantly the mutated CKITD816V and D816Y. Preliminarily results from an international phase II trial (Gotlib et al., Blood 2012) reported interesting results in this subgroup of patients. We report herein on the French experience of the compassionate use of PKC412 for the treatment of adSM and compare their outcome to matched adSM historical control patients (pts) who did not receive PKC412 (control group). Methods Over a period of 12 months (from August 2012, date of PKC412 Temporary Approval for Use in France), 22 pts received PKC412 and could be analysed. PKC412 100 mg twice daily was administered orally as continuous 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were evaluated according to the response criteria used in the recent phase 2 trial on midostaurin (Gotlib et al.). The overall survival (OS) of these 22 patients was compared to the OS of 42 age and WHO subcategories matched control adSM patients who were treated before PKC412 era. Results 2 female and 20 male pts with a median age of 65 years [35-84] received midostaurin. Overall, 21 pts (95%) with adSM (5 ASM; 2 MCL; 1 MCS; 12 ASM-AHNMD; 1 SSM-AHNMD,1) and 1 pt progressive SSM. Median number of C-Findings was 3 (0-4). Hepato- and/or splenomegaly were present in 20 (91%) and 21 (95%) pts. Median tryptase level was 204 ng/l (85-2000). Median haemoglobin level, platelet and PMN counts were respectively 10.1g/dl (6.8-13.9), 117G/L (22-289) and 2.8G/L (0.3-17). Twenty (91%) pts had cKIT D816V mutation, 2 pts had cKITWT. ASXL1 and TET2 were mutated in 3/7 and 2/7 tested, respectively. Steroids, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine and Interferon were administered in 9, 4 and 2 pts prior to midostaurin. After a median exposure time of 6.9 [1.6-27.5] months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 77.2% including, major responses (n=13; 59%) (incomplete major in 8 pts, pure clinical in 5); partial response (n=5, 23%) (good partial in 3, minor partial in 2). Three patients were rapidly progressive ( 〈 2 months) and considered refractory to PKC412 (1 MCL, 1 MCS, 1 ASM-AHNMD). Death occurred in 4 pts (refractoriness 2 pts, AHNMD progression 2 pts). After a median follow-up of 7.4 months from PKC412 start, median OS was 24.4 months [12.6-34.2]. Patients with ASM seemed to better benefit from PKC412, however, no significant difference was found between the ASM and SM-AHNMD, probably due to the low patient’s number. The control group consisted in 42 pts with a median age of 65.5 years [23-84]. There were 17 ASM-AHNMD, 21 ISM-AHNMD, 2 SSM-AHNMD, 1 CM-AHNMD and 1 MCL patients. Median tryptase level was 107ng/l [19-501] . Median haemoglobin level, platelet and PMN counts were respectively 12.1g/dl [8-15], 200G/L [10-1036] and 4.6G/L [0.5-24.3]. Thirty-three (79%) pts had cKIT D816V mutation, 7 pts were cKITWT. ASXL1 and TET2 were mutated in 6/29 (21%) and 7/29 (24%) of pts tested, respectively. Steroids, 2-CdA, interferon, imatinib, thalidomide have been used in 19, 21, 6, 4, and 6 pts respectively. Survival distributions were estimated using the adjusted Kaplan-Meier method from the date of diagnosis to the last follow-up for the PKC412 treated and the control groups. Median survival time for PKC412 treated patients was significantly longer than control patients (p=0.04). Conclusion PKC412 is active in advanced SM. Despite the absence of complete remission, PKC412 gives survival advantage for patients with adSM over pts who did not receive the drug. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: This prospective phase II trial (Nov 2011- Dec 2012), supported by the LYSA group, aimed to evaluate the impact on PFS of the RiBVD regimen in newly diagnosed, previously untreated, elderly MCL patients ( 〉 65 years or not eligible for ASCT) (NCT01457144). Inclusion criteria were: WHO 2008 MCL not previously treated, CD20 positive, ECOG 0-2, AA stage II-IV, no CNS involvement or active HBV/HCV/HIV infection. Patients were scheduled to receive a total of 6 cycles of the RiBVD regimen, if they responded (IWG criteria) after 4 cycles. The regimen was administered every 4 weeks with Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on day(D)1, Bendamustine 90 mg/m² IV on D1 and 2, Dexamethasone 40 mg/m² IV on D2 and bortezomib (Velcade®) 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on D1, 4, 8 and 11. Primary prophylaxis with acyclovir was mandatory for Herpes virus reactivation, but there was no recommendation for bacterial prevention. Herein we present preliminary analysis of the trial after 4 RiBVD cycles. Results: A total of 76 patients were included, one was excluded because of HBV active disease and 5 had insufficient data reported in the database. To date we analyzed 70 patients. Patients characteristics: sex ratio M/F 49/21, median age 72 years (y) [64-83] (2 patients were 64 y old), AAstage II/III-IV 5/65, ECOG 0-1/2 59/11, MIPI score low/intermediate/high 3/19/48. Response: 61 responded (ORR=87%), with 19 in PR (26%) and 42 in CR/CRu (60%). Four patients died from pneumonia (n=1), cardiac arrest (n=2) and one following Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Three patients have progressed after 3 cycles. Sixty one patients were analysed by PETscan after 4 cycles, 39 (64%) reached a CR (30 were in CR/CRu and 9 in PR) and 22 remained PET positive (11 patients were in CR/CRu, 10 in PR and 1 stable). RiBVD cycles: 271 cycles were administered out of 280 planned (97%). Twenty four (9%) were delayed, 10 for toxicity. All but one planned Bendamustine doses (n=542) were administered with dosing modified 17 times (3%), mostly for hematological toxicity (n=14). Regarding Bortezomib, 79% (1028/1084) of planned doses were administered, it was prematurely stopped (56, 4%) for neurotoxicity (10 instances) or hematological side effects (46). Rituximab was not administered in 4 instances. Hematologic toxicities: Over the 271 cycles administered, neutropenia was reported in 104 cycles [56 grade 3/4 (g3/4) (21%)] , 2.5% with fever; thrombopenia in 181 cycles [41 g3/4 (15%)]; anemia in 210 cycles, [6 g3/4 (2%)] . Non-hematologic toxicities:Reported in 〉 10% of the cycles were : allergic reactions (10.3%, g3/4 〈 1%), fatigue (40%, g3/4 5%), fever without neutropenia (12%, g3/4 none), weight loss (12%, g3/4 0%), cutaneous rash (12%, g3/4 1.5%), gastrointestinal (40%, g3/4 1.5% ; diarrhea 8%, constipation 17% or emesis 15%), elevated transaminases (14%, g3/4 1%), creatinin (13%, g3/4 none), or glucose (18%, g3/4 1%) ; neuropathy (sensitive or pain) (25%, g3/4 4%). Serious adverse events (SAE) additional to the 4 deaths, were 12 infections including 3 pneumonias (no pneumocystosis), one listeriosis and 2 herpes zoster. Four febrile neutropenia and 3 cutaneous hypersensitivity episodes were also reported. Conclusion Despite 4 toxic deaths (6%), toxicity appears acceptable and manageable. In particular, subcutaneous bortezomib shows markedly decreased neurotoxicity compared to the IV form. This interim analysis shows that four cycles of RiBVD are very effective for untreated elderly MCL patients (ORR 87%) with a high response rate (CR/CRu 60%) which has been shown to be predictive of a long duration of response. An update of these results will be presented at the ASH meeting together with the molecular response rates after 4 cycles. Disclosures: Gressin: Pfizer: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy. Cartron:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.