GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 76, No. 14_Supplement ( 2016-07-15), p. 1790-1790
    Abstract: Objective - High rates of screening mammography have been reported among Hispanic women in the U.S. However, a potential harm of screening is a false positive result with recall breast imaging or biopsy. Our objective was to identify factors associated with false positive results on screening mammography among a predominantly Hispanic population in New York City. Methods - We enrolled women receiving mammography at Columbia University Medical Center in New York, NY. They completed a questionnaire on breast cancer risk factors and gave consent to access their medical records for breast imaging and biopsy reports for the past 15 years. Breast cancer risk was assessed using the Gail model and eligibility for BRCA genetic testing was determined using a family history screener. High breast density was defined qualitatively as heterogeneously or extremely dense. Recall breast imaging was based upon a BIRADS score of 0, 3, 4, 5, or 6 on the screening mammogram. False positive breast biopsies were any biopsies that did not yield breast cancer. Results - From November 2014 to May 2015, 1325 women were enrolled: median age 58 years (range, 29-89); white/black/Hispanic/other (%): 10/10/76/4; 25% met high-risk criteria for breast cancer; 31% had high breast density; 71% were undergoing annual mammography; 53% had at least one recall breast imaging and 6% had at least one false positive breast biopsy. In multivariable analysis, high breast cancer risk, high breast density, and more frequent screening mammograms were associated with recall breast imaging and biopsy. Conclusions - Based upon our results, a potential strategy to reduce the false positive rates on screening mammography is to target women at high risk for breast cancer or with high breast density for screening with breast tomosynthesis, which has less false positives than digital mammography. Additionally, we may adopt less frequent breast cancer screening in average risk women to further reduce the harms of screening. Factors associated with Recall Breast Imaging and False Positive BiopsyVariableOR (95% CI)P-valueAnnual Mammograms vs. Every 2+ Years2.42 (1.88, 3.13) & lt;0.0001High Breast Density vs. Low Breast Density1.46 (1.14, 1.88)0.0031High Breast Cancer Risk vs. Average Breast Cancer Risk1.45 (1.09, 1.92)0.009850+ Years Old vs. & lt;50 Years Old1.03 (0.77, 1.38)0.8344 Citation Format: William Ueng, Julia McGuinness, Katherine Infante, Meghna S. Trivedi, Hae Seung Yi, Raven David, Alejandro Vanegas, Jennifer Vargas, Rossy Sandoval, Rita Kukafka, Katherine D. Crew. Factors associated with false positive results on screening mammography in a population of predominantly Hispanic women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1790.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Prevention Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 8, No. 10_Supplement ( 2015-10-01), p. PR01-PR01
    Abstract: Background: Chemoprevention with anti-estrogens, such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors, has been shown to reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, uptake remains low ( & lt;5%). We examined knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention in a racially/ethnically diverse high-risk population seen at an urban breast center. Methods: We enrolled high-risk women and those with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who were seen for an initial consultation by medical oncology at Columbia University Medical Center. Women eligible for chemoprevention with anti-estrogens had a 5-year breast cancer risk ≥1.67% or lifetime risk ≥20% according to the Gail or Tyrer-Cuzick models, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), DCIS, or BRCA mutation. Patients completed a baseline questionnaire collecting information on health literacy, numeracy, breast cancer knowledge, perceived breast cancer risk, reasons for taking preventive actions, and attitudes toward chemoprevention using validated measures. Demographic and clinical data, including chemoprevention uptake and type of anti-estrogen, were collected from medical chart review. Results: From August 2012 to July 2014, 69 women were enrolled and 45 were evaluable. Among evaluable women, median age was 51.5 years (range, 31.8-76.4); 51% were pre-menopausal; race/ethnicity, white/Hispanic/black/Asian/other (%): 49/24/16/9/2; risk category, elevated breast cancer risk/LCIS/DCIS/BRCA mutation (%): 49/18/29/4. Mean health literacy score was 0.74 (score range 0-4, lower scores indicate higher literacy) and 31% met criteria for low numeracy. At baseline, only 49% demonstrated good breast cancer knowledge and 45% perceived themselves to be at higher risk for breast cancer than the general population. Excluding women with DCIS, median lifetime breast cancer risk according to the Gail or Tyrer-Cuzick models was 29.2% (range, 10.3-92) and 42% had accurate risk perceptions (perceived risk within 10% of estimated lifetime risk). The most common reasons for wanting to take preventive action to lower breast cancer risk included to live longer (98%), to improve health (91%), and to do it for family (87%). Twenty-nine (64%) women had previously heard of a prescription medicine to prevent breast cancer, but only 34% had ever thought about taking an anti-estrogen for prevention. The most common concerns about side effects with tamoxifen were blood clots (47%) and uterine cancer (40%); with raloxifene, blood clots (77%); and with aromatase inhibitors, osteoporosis (59%) and arthritis symptoms (36%). Thirty (68%) women felt like they had enough information following the initial visit with the medical oncologist to decide whether or not to take chemoprevention. Overall, 22 (49%) started an anti-estrogen: 54% tamoxifen, 14% raloxifene, and 32% an aromatase inhibitor. The chemoprevention uptake rate was 69% for DCIS and 41% for the other risk categories combined. Conclusions: In a multi-ethnic cohort of high-risk women, less than half demonstrated sufficient breast cancer knowledge and had accurate breast cancer risk perceptions. After consultation with a medical oncologist, over two-thirds felt they had sufficient information for chemoprevention decision-making. Our chemoprevention uptake rate was relatively high compared to the published literature, which may reflect the highly select women referred to a breast center and the comfort level of medical oncologists in prescribing anti-estrogens. Citation Format: Meghna S. Trivedi, Laura Reimers, Katherine Infante, Dawn L. Hershman, Matthew Maurer, Kevin Kalinsky, Stephanie Aguilar, Rossy Sandoval, Maria C. Alvarez, Rita Kukafka, Katherine D. Crew. Knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention in a multi-ethnic cohort of high-risk women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2014 Sep 27-Oct 1; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2015;8(10 Suppl): Abstract nr PR01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1940-6207 , 1940-6215
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2422346-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 13, No. 6 ( 2023-06-02), p. 1386-1407
    Abstract: Predicting in vivo response to antineoplastics remains an elusive challenge. We performed a first-of-kind evaluation of two transcriptome-based precision cancer medicine methodologies to predict tumor sensitivity to a comprehensive repertoire of clinically relevant oncology drugs, whose mechanism of action we experimentally assessed in cognate cell lines. We enrolled patients with histologically distinct, poor-prognosis malignancies who had progressed on multiple therapies, and developed low-passage, patient-derived xenograft models that were used to validate 35 patient-specific drug predictions. Both OncoTarget, which identifies high-affinity inhibitors of individual master regulator (MR) proteins, and OncoTreat, which identifies drugs that invert the transcriptional activity of hyperconnected MR modules, produced highly significant 30-day disease control rates (68% and 91%, respectively). Moreover, of 18 OncoTreat-predicted drugs, 15 induced the predicted MR-module activity inversion in vivo. Predicted drugs significantly outperformed antineoplastic drugs selected as unpredicted controls, suggesting these methods may substantively complement existing precision cancer medicine approaches, as also illustrated by a case study. Significance: Complementary precision cancer medicine paradigms are needed to broaden the clinical benefit realized through genetic profiling and immunotherapy. In this first-in-class application, we introduce two transcriptome-based tumor-agnostic systems biology tools to predict drug response in vivo. OncoTarget and OncoTreat are scalable for the design of basket and umbrella clinical trials. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1275
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2159-8274 , 2159-8290
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2607892-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 15_suppl ( 2014-05-20), p. TPS1615-TPS1615
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Prevention Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 11, No. 4 ( 2018-04-01), p. 203-214
    Abstract: Obesity, a cause of subclinical inflammation, is a risk factor for the development of postmenopausal breast cancer and is associated with poorer cancer outcomes. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid, possesses anti-inflammatory properties. We hypothesized that treatment with DHA would reduce the expression of proinflammatory genes and aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme for estrogen biosynthesis, in benign breast tissue of overweight/obese women. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II study of DHA given for 12 weeks to overweight/obese women with a history of stage I–III breast cancer, DCIS/LCIS, Paget's disease, or proliferative benign breast disease was carried out. In this placebo controlled trial, the primary objective was to determine whether DHA (1,000 mg by mouth twice daily) reduced breast tissue levels of TNFα. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the effect of DHA on breast tissue levels of COX-2, IL1β, aromatase, white adipose tissue inflammation, and gene expression by RNA-seq. Red blood cell fatty acid levels were measured to assess compliance. From July 2013 to November 2015, 64 participants were randomized and treated on trial (32 women per arm). Increased levels of omega-3 fatty acids in red blood cells were detected following treatment with DHA (P & lt; 0.001) but not placebo. Treatment with DHA did not alter levels of TNFα (P = 0.71), or other biomarkers including the transcriptome in breast samples. Treatment with DHA was overall well-tolerated. Although compliance was confirmed, we did not observe changes in the levels of prespecified biomarkers in the breast after treatment with DHA when compared with placebo. Cancer Prev Res; 11(4); 203–14. ©2018 AACR. See related editorial by Fabian and Kimler, p. 187
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1940-6207 , 1940-6215
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2422346-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e23132-e23132
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e23132-e23132
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 7016-7016
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 7016-7016
    Abstract: 7016 Background: Current guidelines recommend that women with a history of early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) continue screening mammography after treatment. One strategy is semi-annual ipsilateral mammography for the first 3 years after diagnosis, when risk of local recurrence is highest. However, a potential harm of more frequent screening is false-positive breast biopsy. We examined the association between screening frequency and rates of false-positive biopsy and local recurrence among breast cancer survivors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) in New York, NY, of women diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer from 2007 to 2017, who were treated with BCT and had at least 2 screening mammograms at CUIMC within the first 3 years after diagnosis. Demographic and clinical information were collected from the electronic health record. Frequency of mammography screening was defined as the median interval between two consecutive mammograms (every 6 months vs. yearly). False-positive biopsy and local recurrence were identified by review of breast pathology reports. A false-positive biopsy was defined as a breast biopsy without evidence of invasive or non-invasive cancer. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were conducted to examine relationships between covariates and either false-positive biopsy or local recurrence. Results: In our study cohort (n = 1404), the median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 61 years (range, 24-94), including 45% white, 14% black, 32% Hispanic, and 8% Asian. Eighty percent of women had screening mammography of the ipsilateral breast every 6 months during the first 3 years after diagnosis. Comparing women who screened every 6 months vs. yearly, there was no difference in local recurrence rates (4.0% vs. 4.1%), including screen-detected and invasive recurrences, but a higher rate of false-positive biopsy (13.5% vs. 7.5%). In multivariable analysis, women who screened every 6 months had about a 2-fold increased risk of having a false-positive biopsy (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17-3.19); no other factors were significantly associated with false-positive biopsy. Conclusions: We observed that women with early-stage breast cancer treated with BCT who underwent more frequent screening mammography had more false-positive breast biopsies, but no difference in local recurrence rates. Future studies are needed to determine optimal screening strategies for breast cancer survivors.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Prevention Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 2, No. 6 ( 2009-06-01), p. 598-604
    Abstract: Vitamin D has been associated with decreased risk of several cancers. In experimental studies, vitamin D has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation and induce differentiation and apoptosis in normal and malignant breast cells. Using a population-based case-control study on Long Island, New York, we examined the association of breast cancer with plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels, a measure of vitamin D body stores. In-person interviews and blood specimens were obtained from 1,026 incident breast cancer cases diagnosed in 1996 to 1997 and 1,075 population-based controls. Plasma 25-OHD was measured in batched, archived specimens by Diasorin RIA. The mean (SD) plasma 25-OHD concentration was 27.1 (13.0) and 29.7 (15.1) ng/mL in the cases and controls, respectively (P & lt; 0.0001). Plasma 25-OHD was inversely associated with breast cancer risk in a concentration-dependent fashion (Ptrend = 0.002). Compared with women with vitamin D deficiency (25-OHD, & lt;20 ng/mL), levels above 40 ng/mL were associated with decreased breast cancer risk (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.78). The reduction in risk was greater among postmenopausal women (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.83), and the effect did not vary according to tumor hormone receptor status. In summary, these results add to a growing body of evidence that adequate vitamin D stores may prevent breast cancer development. Whereas circulating 25-OHD levels of & gt;32 ng/mL are associated with normal bone mineral metabolism, our data suggest that the optimal level for breast cancer prevention is ≥40 ng/mL. Well-designed clinical trials are urgently needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation is effective for breast cancer chemoprevention.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1940-6207 , 1940-6215
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2422346-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Causes & Control, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 26, No. 2 ( 2015-2), p. 187-203
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0957-5243 , 1573-7225
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1496544-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: International Journal of Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 134, No. 3 ( 2014-02), p. 654-663
    Abstract: What's new? Physical activity increases the production of reactive oxygen species but also offsets oxidative damage by enhancing DNA repair, a phenomenon that could help explain the inverse relationship between exercise and breast cancer. Mismatch repair (MMR), the least studied of the repair systems in breast cancer, was the focus of this investigation, which reveals an absence of association between disease risk and six MMR polymorphisms but a significant risk in risk for gene‐gene interactions between variants in MSH2 and MLH1 . The data suggest that allelic variability in DNA repair may modify associations between physical activity and breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-7136 , 1097-0215
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 218257-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1474822-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...