GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Autogenous Tooth Transplantation as a Treatment Option
    Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing ; 2012
    In:  International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Vol. 5, No. 1 ( 2012-04), p. 87-92
    Details
    In: International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing, Vol. 5, No. 1 ( 2012-04), p. 87-92
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0974-7052 , 0975-1904
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1142
    Language: English
    Publisher: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2666719-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Gardner's syndrome in a 40-year-old woman: successful treatment of locally aggressive desmoid tumors with cytotoxic chemotherapy
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2006
    In:  World Journal of Surgical Oncology Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2006-12)
    Details
    In: World Journal of Surgical Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2006-12)
    Abstract: Desmoid tumors that present as a part of Gardener's syndrome can present very difficult management problems. Case presetation We report a case of intra-abdominal desmoid tumor causing distal small bowel obstruction that complicated the management of a more proximal enterocutaneous fistula from the jejunum. After failure of more conventional management options including imatinib, the patient's disease responded to doxorubicin and ifosfamide. The response resolved the bowel obstruction and allowed small intestinal resection to resolve the enterocutaneous fistula. Conclusion Systemic cytotoxic therapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide can be useful for patients with complications from intra-abdominal desmoid tumor.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1477-7819
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-4-96
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2118383-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Neo/adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and ifosfamide (I) versus gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (T) in patients (PTS) with localized, high risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS): A randomized phase II comparative effectiveness trial.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 10524-10524
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 10524-10524
    Abstract: 10524 Background: Approximately 50% of pts with localized, 〉 5 cm, high grade STS develop metastatic disease. Although controversial, adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated improved disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). AI can cause significant toxicities that often lead to hospitalization. GT is active in metastatic STS pts and as compared to AI has a favorable schedule and toxicity profile. Methods: In a single-institution phase II study, pts with localized, resectable, high grade STS 〉 5 cm were randomized to receive AI or GT. Pts were stratified by neo- or adjuvant treatment and extremity or non-extremity tumor. Pts received A (75 mg/m2 over 48 hrs) and I (2.5 g/m2/d on D1-3) or G (900 mg/m2 over 90 min on D1,8) and T (100 mg/m2 on D8), both arms with GCSF, for 4 cycles unless progression. Radiation was given after chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the trial was hospitalization rate during chemotherapy and was compared using a chi square test and multiple logistic regression adjusting for other variables. The trial was powered to detect a reduction in hospitalization rate from 35% to 10% using GT. Survival functions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 84 pts were enrolled from 11/04-8/12 with 80 pts evaluable. The median age is 56 yrs (19-76) and tumor size is 7.8 cm (3.2-25). 55 pts received neoadjuvant therapy and 48 had extremity STS. In the AI arm, 13/37 (35%) pts were hospitalized vs. 11/43 (26%) in the GT arm (p=0.25). The most frequent reason for hospitalization in AI arm was febrile neutropenia (7 events) and in GT arm was hypersensitivity reaction (4 events). The median DFS of pts treated with AI vs GT is 24 months vs not reached, respectively; median follow up is 30 (1-87) months. The 2-year DFS rate is 53% (SD 9%) in the AI arm vs. 71% (SD 7%) in the GT arm and remains marginally significant after adjusting for age, gender, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor site and size (p=0.054). OS rates are not significantly different between arms. Conclusions: Hospitalization rate was not significantly lower with GT compared to AI, although toxicity profile was different. DFS but not OS is marginally improved with GT. Clinical trial information: NCT00189137.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.10524
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Safety and efficacy of pemigatinib plus pembrolizumab combination therapy in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: Results from FIGHT-101, an open-label phase I/II study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3606-3606
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3606-3606
    Abstract: 3606 Background: Pemigatinib (INCB054828) is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1–3 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in phase 1/2 (FIGHT-101) and phase 2 (FIGHT-201, -202, -203) trials in pts with advanced cancer. Here, we present preliminary safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) data for pemigatinib (PEMI) combined with pembrolizumab (PEMBRO), a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in pts with refractory advanced malignancies enrolled in the ongoing FIGHT-101 trial (NCT02393248). Methods: FIGHT-101 includes monotherapy (part 1 and 2) and combination therapy (part 3) cohorts. This analysis is based on pts enrolled in the PEMI + PEMBRO combination dose finding (3a) and dose expansion (3b) cohorts. Eligible adults had advanced malignancies who had progressed after prior therapy and for whom PEMBRO treatment was relevant; pts in part 3b had FGF/FGFR alterations. Pts received oral PEMI at 9 mg or 13.5 mg QD on an intermittent dosing (ID) schedule (21-day cycle, 14-day on/7-day off), or 13.5 mg QD on a continuous dosing (CD) schedule, plus PEMBRO 200 mg IV on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Results: At data cutoff (August 30, 2019), 23 pts had received PEMI + PEMBRO; 22 (96%) had discontinued therapy (disease progression, 70%). Most frequent tumors were NSCLC (n = 3), bladder (n = 3), pancreatic, testicular, and sarcoma (each n = 2). Of 19 enrolled pts with baseline FGF/FGFR data; 5 had FGFR mutations or rearrangements. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred with PEMI + PEMBRO. The recommended PEMI dose combined with PEMBRO was 13.5 mg QD. Most frequent all-cause, all-grade (Gr) adverse events for ID (n = 17) were hyperphosphatemia (n = 14 [82%]; Gr ≥3, n = 0), anemia (n = 9 [53%] ; Gr ≥3, n = 3 [18%]), and decreased appetite (n = 9 [53%] ; Gr ≥3, n = 0); for CD (n = 6), hyperphosphatemia (n = 5 [83%]; Gr ≥3, n = 0), and dry mouth (n = 4 [67%] ; Gr ≥3, n = 0). One pt discontinued, 2 reduced dose, and 13 interrupted dose due to AEs (none for hyperphosphatemia; dose interruption mainly for gastrointestinal AEs [n = 5]). One fatal AE occurred (suicide, not treatment-related). PK parameters for PEMI in the PEMI + PEMBRO combination were comparable with those for PEMI monotherapy. Five pts had partial response (3 had FGFR rearrangements or mutations); 5 pts had stable disease. Conclusions: PEMI + PEMBRO combination therapy was tolerable with no new safety signals, and demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity in pts with advanced malignancies including those with FGF/FGFR alterations. Clinical trial information: NCT02393248 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3606
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Safety of dual checkpoint-blockade with PSB205, an anti-PD-1/CTLA4 monoclonal antibody combination, manufactured and dispensed as a single product: A phase 1 study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 2611-2611
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 2611-2611
    Abstract: 2611 Background: PSB205 is a new biological agent consisting of two engineered monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD-1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA-4 IgG1) expressed in a fixed ratio (2:1) from a single cell-line, manufactured as one product and dispensed from a single vial. PSB205 was designed to optimally balance efficacy and safety through differential target coverage of PD-1 and CTLA-4: the anti-CTLA-4 antibody was engineered to have a shorter half-life to modulate exposure and lower risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: We report safety data from a first-in-human study, conducted in standard 3+3 Phase 1 dose escalation format, enrolling subjects with refractory solid tumors with mixed histologies, who had exhausted available standard treatments. Primary objectives were safety (including Dose Limiting Toxicities), tolerability and selection of a Phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives were PK and preliminary evaluation of effectiveness. Treatment was Q3 wks. Inclusive the 1st week following the 2nd infusion, the DLT-period was 28 days. Results:Nine US-centers enrolled 27 subjects, representing 19 tumor histologies, in 5 ascending dose cohorts ranging from 0.1 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg; an additional N = 49 pts were dosed in expansion cohorts at 5 mg/kg and 400 mg (fixed dose). Median number of prior systemic treatments for metastatic disease was 4. No DLT was observed at any of dose level evaluated. The most frequent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAE) reported were diarrhea (9%), Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) (5%) and fatigue (4%). Among the subset (N = 33) who completed at least 4 cycles of treatment, the most common TRAE were diarrhea (21%), IRR (12%), Fatigue (9%), and irAEs, specifically colitis, rash and arthralgia (6% each symptom). Most TRAEs were Grade 1 /2, with just 1 case each of diarrhea and colitis Graded as G 3/4. Tumor responses (all PRs) were observed at dose levels of 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg in 4 pts - 1 each with with RCC, SCLC, HNSCC and gastric cancer. Conclusions: PSB205 provides dual checkpoint blockade with a very tolerable side effect profile, with less AEs than typically noted in published studies of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy. Further studies are ongoing to confirm this observation. Dose levels of 5 mg/kg and 400 mg fixed were selected for Phase 2, which has commenced enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03986606.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.2611
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Tumor/normal genomic profiling in patients with metastatic solid tumors identifies pathogenic germline variants of therapeutic importance.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 1501-1501
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 1501-1501
    Abstract: 1501 Background: Tumor molecular profiling via next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely utilized to direct patients toward clinical trials of targeted therapeutics. NGS testing of paired tumor/normal samples identifies incidental pathogenic germline variants (PGVs), having potential implications for patients and their families. Methods: From 2011-2018, 1,015 patients with metastatic, refractory solid tumors underwent targeted (1700 genes) exome and transcriptome sequencing of matched tumor/normal samples through the Michigan Oncology Sequencing program. Identified PGVs that conferred increased cancer risk or were associated with certain autosomal recessive conditions were reported to the treating oncologist. Chart reviews were conducted every 3 months to assess whether PGV identification impacted treatment decision making. Results: 169 PGVs were identified in 160 unique patients (15.8% of cohort). 69 PGVs (41%) harbored a clear somatic second hit event in the tumor. PGVs associated with defects in double-strand DNA repair ( BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, BRIP1) or DNA mismatch repair ( MLH1, MSH2 and PMS2) were identified in 49 patients (5% of cohort, 31% of patients with PGVs), 37 of which had not previously been identified. 14 PGVs in DNA double-strand repair and 7 PGVs in DNA mismatch repair were identified in cancer types not commonly associated with hereditary breast ovarian cancer or Lynch syndromes, including cancers of unknown primary origin and sarcomas. 7 patients received a PARP inhibitor (PARPi), 3 patients received an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and 1 patient received both PARPi and ICI therapy on the basis of a PGV in DNA repair. 6 patients achieved clinical benefit, defined as time on treatment ≥ 6 months. A patient with cancer of unknown primary origin and PGV in MSH2 achieved exceptional response to ICI therapy, with complete response ongoing and lasting 23 months. Conclusions: Targeted NGS of matched tumor/normal samples identified PGVs in about 1 in every 6 patients with metastatic solid tumors. Approximately 40% of PGVs are associated with a somatic second hit in the tumor, supporting their role in tumor pathogenesis. Unexpected PGVs with therapeutic implications are identified in patients with diverse cancer types, providing opportunities to use targeted therapies with potential for significant clinical benefit. Given this finding, testing for PGVs in DNA repair genes should be considered in all patients with metastatic solid tumor malignancies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1501
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A phase III study (APROMISS) of AL3818 (Catequentinib, Anlotinib) hydrochloride monotherapy in subjects with metastatic or advanced synovial sarcoma.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 11505-11505
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 11505-11505
    Abstract: 11505 Background: AL3818 (Catequentinib, Anlotinib) is a novel, orally administered, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The primary objective of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy of AL3818 monotherapy in patients (pts) with synovial sarcoma (SS) comparing with dacarbazine in randomization setting. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of synovial sarcoma requiring second line or further line treatment were eligible for enrollment. The regimen was a 21-day cycle with oral AL3818 administered on 14 days on and 7 days off. This phase 3 trial is randomized in 2:1 ratio of AL3818 comparing to dacarbazine with option of crossover after PD of dacarbazine treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) with Log Rank test is the primary endpoint and this trial for SS is currently completed enrolled in US and Italy. Results: Total 79 pts initiated treatment and are evaluable, 52 received AL3818 as treatment arm (T), and 27 received dacarbazine (D) as control arm (C). Arms T/C median ages were 40.5/42.0 years (range: 18-70+) and 20/16 (38.5%/59.3%) were male. Overall, PFS was 2.89 months (95% CI: 2.73 – 6.87) for AL3818 and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.45 – 2.70) for D. The PFS of study met the primary endpoint with a p-value of 0.0015 and a HR of 0.449 (95% CI: 0.270– 0.744). At the month 4, 6, and 12, the percentages of progression free patients for AL3818 were 48.1%, 42.3% and 26.9%; and for D were 14.85%, 11.1% and 3.7%. For grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, 12(23.1%) of pts experienced for AL3818 and 7(25.9%) of pts experienced for D. The most common AL3818 related grade 3 AEs were diarrhea (5.8%) and hypertension (3.8%). Conclusions: This phase III trial demonstrates improved disease control and superior progression free survival for AL3818 vs dacarbazine in advanced SS. In addition, the study further confirms the acceptable benefit-risk profile of AL3818 from the prior randomized Phase 2b soft tissue sarcoma study (NCT02449343). AL3818 is a meaningful treatment option for pts with advanced SS. Clinical trial information: NCT 03016819 Clinical trial information: NCT03016819.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.11505
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Safety and efficacy of tazemetostat, a first-in-class EZH2 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with epithelioid sarcoma (ES) (NCT02601950).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 11003-11003
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 11003-11003
    Abstract: 11003 Background: ES is a rare soft tissue sarcoma that metastasizes in approximately 30% to 50% of cases. More than 90% of ES tumors lack expression of INI1, an important component of epigenetic regulation. Loss of INI1 function allows another epigenetic modifier, EZH2, to become an oncogenic driver in tumor cells. Tazemetostat, a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of EZH2, has demonstrated tumor regression and favorable safety in phase 1/2 trials. Methods: Data from a phase 2 open-label, multicenter trial of pts with locally advanced or metastatic ES are reported. Efficacy was assessed with primary and secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, disease control rate (DCR; objective confirmed response of any duration or stable disease [SD] lasting ≥32 weeks), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS); safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: As of September 17, 2018, 62 INI1-negative ES pts were enrolled and treated with tazemetostat 800 mg BID. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (range: 0-9). There were 9/62 (15%) confirmed partial responses (PRs) with an ORR of 15% and DCR of 26%. The DOR ranged from 7.1+ weeks to 103.0+ weeks (median: not reached) with a median OS of 82.4 weeks (95% CI: 47.4, not estimable) for all 62 pts. Tazemetostat was generally well tolerated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally mild to moderate with the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs; ≥10% incidence) regardless of attribution being fatigue (24/62; 39%), nausea (22/62; 35%), and cancer pain (20/62; 32%). Any treatment-related TEAEs of grade ≥3 were reported in 10/62 (16%) pts. TEAEs grade ≥3 reported in ≥2 pts included anemia (6%) and decreased weight (3%). There were no drug-related deaths and a low discontinuation rate (1.7%). Conclusions: In the largest prospective clinical trial of ES to date, tazemetostat achieved disease control in 26% of pts with advanced ES who entered this study. Durable clinical response of the drug was documented. Tazemetostat demonstrated favorable safety with few pts with treatment-related AEs grade ≥3. Clinical trial information: NCT02601950.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.11003
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A comparison of outcomes, presentation, and treatment in pediatric (Ped) versus adult patients (Pts) with Ewing sarcoma.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 11528-11528
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 11528-11528
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.11528
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Radiation-associated versus sporadic osteosarcoma: A single-institution experience.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 11018-11018
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 11018-11018
    Abstract: 11018 Background: Osteosarcoma (osarc) can be a rare complication from radiation (rt) therapy. Radiation-associated osarc (RAO) is reported to have a worse prognosis than non rt-associated osarc with limited objective data comparing the two. We conducted a retrospective study comparing demographics, therapy and outcomes of sporadic osarc (SO) to RAO. This study was confined to adults. Methods: We identified patients (pts) 〉 age 18 years (yr) with osarc treated at our institution between 1990 and 2016 using an institutional database. We categorized tumors as SO or RAO based on history of prior rt within field of osarc. We extracted data on demographics, treatment, and primary malignancy characteristics. Results: We identified 159 pts with osarc, 28 were RAO tumors. Results are in Table 1. Median follow-up was 2.8 yr (0.1-19.6 yr). For RAO, median time from rt to diagnosis was 11.5 yr (1.5-28 yr) with a median cumulative dose of 60 Gy (44-75.8 Gy). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different in pts presenting with metastatic osarc; PFS 10.3 mo vs 4.8 mo (p=0.45) and OS 15.6 mo vs 6.1 mo (p=0.96) in SO vs RAO pts, respectively. For pts with localized osarc, median relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were significantly different, not reached vs 12.2 mo (p 〈 0.001) and not reached vs 27.6 mo (p=0.001) in SO vs RAO, respectively. Conclusions: In our series, there was a significant difference in age, size and location of RAO vs non rt-associated osarc. Overall, all osarc pts with metastatic disease at diagnosis fared poorly. Pts presenting with localized RAO had worse outcomes than patients with localized SO. This was not associated with a detectable difference in therapy rendered or treatment effect in resection specimens. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.11018
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...