GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    In: G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 5, No. 5 ( 2015-05-01), p. 719-740
    Abstract: The Muller F element (4.2 Mb, ~80 protein-coding genes) is an unusual autosome of Drosophila melanogaster; it is mostly heterochromatic with a low recombination rate. To investigate how these properties impact the evolution of repeats and genes, we manually improved the sequence and annotated the genes on the D. erecta, D. mojavensis, and D. grimshawi F elements and euchromatic domains from the Muller D element. We find that F elements have greater transposon density (25–50%) than euchromatic reference regions (3–11%). Among the F elements, D. grimshawi has the lowest transposon density (particularly DINE-1: 2% vs. 11–27%). F element genes have larger coding spans, more coding exons, larger introns, and lower codon bias. Comparison of the Effective Number of Codons with the Codon Adaptation Index shows that, in contrast to the other species, codon bias in D. grimshawi F element genes can be attributed primarily to selection instead of mutational biases, suggesting that density and types of transposons affect the degree of local heterochromatin formation. F element genes have lower estimated DNA melting temperatures than D element genes, potentially facilitating transcription through heterochromatin. Most F element genes (~90%) have remained on that element, but the F element has smaller syntenic blocks than genome averages (3.4–3.6 vs. 8.4–8.8 genes per block), indicating greater rates of inversion despite lower rates of recombination. Overall, the F element has maintained characteristics that are distinct from other autosomes in the Drosophila lineage, illuminating the constraints imposed by a heterochromatic milieu.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2160-1836
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2629978-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2014
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 23, No. 11_Supplement ( 2014-11-01), p. B65-B65
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 23, No. 11_Supplement ( 2014-11-01), p. B65-B65
    Abstract: Background: Compared with other racial groups, Black Americans have higher incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) and lower screening rates. Theory-based tailored interventions to increase screening are more likely to be successful, especially those tailoring on stage of adoption. The purpose of our study was to examine predictors of stage of adoption for fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy screening among non-adherent Black Americans. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from 817 Black primary care patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Participants were categorized into precontemplation, contemplation, or preparation groups. Predictor variables examined included: demographics (age, gender, education, employment, income, health insurance, and clinical site), clinical variables (body mass index, family history of CRC, and personal history of cancer), CRC health beliefs and knowledge (perceived risk, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cancer fatalism, and knowledge), and social support (marital status, family/friend encouragement, and doctor recommendation). Hierarchical modeling was used to identify significant predictors with p value equal to or less than 0.01. Results: Participants who: were older (OR = 1.04, p = .003); male (OR = 1.70, p = .007); seen at a VA site (OR = 2.80, p & lt; .001); had greater perceived FOBT self-efficacy (OR = 1.59, p = .007), had family or friend encouragement of CRC testing (OR = 1.64, p = .004), and had a provider recommendation for FOBT (OR = 2.05, p & lt; .001) had higher odds of being at a more advanced stage for FOBT (closer to action). Participants with a personal history of cancer (OR = 0.37, p = .002) and with greater perceived FOBT barriers (OR = 0.79, p = .042) had higher odds of being at an earlier stage of adoption for FOBT (away from action). Higher perceived colonoscopy benefits (OR = 1.56, p & lt; .001); higher perceived colonoscopy self-efficacy (OR = 1.66, p & lt; .001); family or friend encouragement of CRC tests (OR = 1.71, p = .001), and a doctor recommendation for colonoscopy (OR = 2.47, p & lt; .001) had higher odds of being at a more advanced stage for colonoscopy. Compared to participants with incomes less than $15,000, those with incomes greater than $30,000 (OR = 0.46, p = .005) had higher odds of being at an earlier stage of adoption for colonoscopy. Conclusion: Enhancing self-efficacy and encouragements from family and friends may be important components of interventions to promote CRC screening among Black Americans. Healthcare providers can utilize knowledge of the characteristics associated with stage of adoption to educate and motivate their primary care Black American patients to complete CRC screening tests. Citation Format: Hsiao-Lan Wang, Shannon M. Christy, Celette S. Skinner, Victoria L. Champion, Victoria L. Champion, Jeffrey K. Springston, Susan M. Perkins, Susan M. Perkins, Yan Tong, Connie Krier, Netsanet Gebregziabher, Susan M. Rawl, Susan M. Rawl. Colorectal cancer screening in nonadherent black Americans. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AACR Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Dec 6–9, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B65. doi:10.1158/1538-7755.DISP13-B65
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Preventive Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 145 ( 2021-04), p. 106449-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0091-7435
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1471564-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Causes & Control, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 33, No. 8 ( 2022-08), p. 1095-1105
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0957-5243 , 1573-7225
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1496544-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2013
    In:  American Journal of Preventive Medicine Vol. 44, No. 4 ( 2013-04), p. 325-329
    In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 44, No. 4 ( 2013-04), p. 325-329
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0749-3797
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020236-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 12 ( 2018-12-01), p. 1433-1441
    Abstract: Colorectal cancer mortality could be decreased with risk-appropriate cancer screening. We examined the efficacy of three tailored interventions compared with usual care for increasing screening adherence. Methods: Women (n = 1,196) ages 51 to 74, from primary care networks and nonadherent to colorectal cancer guidelines, were randomized to (1) usual care, (2) tailored Web intervention, (3) tailored phone intervention, or (4) tailored Web + phone intervention. Average-risk women could select either stool test or colonoscopy, whereas women considered at higher than average risk received an intervention that supported colonoscopy. Outcome data were collected at 6 months by self-report, followed by medical record confirmation (attrition of 23%). Stage of change for colorectal cancer screening (precontemplation or contemplation) was assessed at baseline and 6 months. Results: The phone (41.7%, P & lt; 0.0001) and combined Web + phone (35.8%, P & lt; 0.001) interventions significantly increased colorectal cancer screening by stool test compared with usual care (11.1%), with ORs ranging from 5.4 to 6.8 in models adjusted for covariates. Colonoscopy completion did not differ between groups except that phone significantly increased colonoscopy completion compared with usual care for participants in the highest tertile of self-reported fear of cancer. Conclusions: A tailored phone with or without a Web component significantly increased colorectal cancer screening compared with usual care, primarily through stool testing, and phone significantly increased colonoscopy compared with usual care but only among those with the highest levels of baseline fear. Impact: This study supports tailored phone counseling with or without a Web program for increasing colorectal cancer screening in average-risk women.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Nursing, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 37, No. 4 ( 2014-07), p. 241-251
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0162-220X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049755-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 29, No. 12_Supplement ( 2020-12-01), p. PO-258-PO-258
    Abstract: Incidence and mortality of many preventable cancers are higher in rural compared to urban U.S. regions. However, prior research is limited by methodological inconsistencies in defining rurality, and has largely focused on a rural-urban dichotomy which ignores potential variability of cancer risk factors and outcomes within rural and urban settings. These limitations hamper data interpretation and may lead to inequitable distribution of resources to address disparities. In this study, we describe cancer risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural-urban classification codes to inform our understanding of cancer disparities across the rural to urban continuum. We examined the prevalence and trends in cancer risk factors and screening across the following rural-urban classification codes for counties and county-equivalents in 2013; U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service’s rural-urban continuum codes (RUCC), and Urban Influence Codes (UIC). County-level data on demographics (age, race, education, income, poverty level, insurance status), and cancer risk factors (obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption), including cancer screening (colorectal, cervical and breast) were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and National Health Interview Survey from 2008-2013. Overall, rural counties’ populations were more likely to be older, white, and uninsured with lower educational attainment and household income than urban counties (all ptrend & lt;0.001). Across all classification codes, the prevalence of smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, and binge alcohol use increased (all ptrend & lt;0.03), while colorectal, cervical and breast cancer screening decreased (all ptrend & lt;0.001) with increasing rurality. Variation in the prevalence of cancer risk factors and screening was also evident within rural regions. For example, cervical cancer screening ranged from 67.6% to 74.7%, breast cancer screening from 65.4% to 68.2%, and colorectal cancer screening from 52.8% to 57.2% across rural counties. Our findings suggest that rural cancer disparities persist across multiple rural-urban classification codes, with marked variation in cancer risk factors and screening apparent within rural regions. Thus, focusing on a rural-urban dichotomy may fail to identify subpopulations of rural residents at greater risk for cancer and cancer-related mortality. As such, the variation in cancer disparities within rural regions, including persistent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences, should be considered in future cancer control research to inform the development of targeted policies and strategies to address rural cancer disparities. Citation Format: Kelly A. Hirko, Huiwen Xu, Laura Q. Rogers, Michelle Y. Martin, Siddhartha Roy, Kimberly M. Kelly, Shannon M. Christy, Kimlin T. Ashing, Jean C. Yi, Marquita W. Lewis-Thames, Cathy D. Meade, Qian Lu, Clement K. Gwede, Julianna Nemeth, Rachel M. Ceballos, Usha Menon, Katie Cueva, Karen Yeary, Lisa Klesges, Monica L. Baskin, Kassandra I. Alcaraz, Sabrina Ford. Cancer risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural classification codes: Cancer disparities in the context of rurality [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-258.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 32, No. 12_Supplement ( 2023-12-01), p. B053-B053
    Abstract: We examined rural-urban differences in the prevalence of cancer risk factors and screening behaviors across U.S. census regions to better understand variations within and between geographic regions and inform strategies to address rural cancer inequities. Using an ecological cross-sectional design, we examined rural-urban differences in the self-reported prevalence of county-level cancer risk factors (i.e., obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption) and cancer screening behaviors (i.e., breast, colorectal and cervical) ascertained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey (2008-2013) across four U.S. census regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West).  County-level rurality was defined using 2013 U.S. Office of Management and Budget rural-urban classification codes, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service’s rural-urban continuum codes.  Chi-square tests assessed differences in the mean prevalence of county-level cancer risk factors and cancer screening behaviors in each geographic region.  Analysis of variance (ANOVA) models estimated the p-values for trends in cancer risk factors and screening prevalence across the rural-urban continuum. Within each geographic region, rural counties had a higher prevalence of smoking, obesity and physical inactivity.  Yet, rural-urban differences in cancer risk factors were not statistically significant in all geographic regions (e.g., prevalence of obesity for Western rural vs. urban counties was 26.5% vs. 25.7% [p=0.08] and physical inactivity for Northeastern rural vs. urban counties was 23.2% vs. 22.5% [p=0.15] ).  Moreover, the mean prevalence of obesity was higher in urban areas of the Midwest (31%) and South (31.3%) compared to rural areas in the West (26.5%) and Northeast (29.5%).  Binge alcohol use was higher in rural vs. urban counties in the West (19.8% vs. 17.7%; p & lt;0.001) and Midwest (22.3% vs. 21.5%; p=0.006), but lower in the South (13.5% vs. 15.2%; p & lt;0.001).  Obesity and smoking prevalence increased with increasing rurality across all regions (ptrend & lt;0.045).  Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening prevalence were lower in rural vs. urban counties in each geographic region (all p-values & lt;0.04).  However, the overall prevalence of screening across all cancer sites was higher in rural Northeast counties compared to both rural and urban counties in the South and West regions.   Across all regions, cervical and breast cancer screening decreased with increasing rurality (all ptrend & lt;0.001).  A significant inverse trend in prevalence of colorectal cancer screening with increasing rurality was observed in all regions except the Northeast (ptrend=0.17). Our findings suggest notable variations in rural-urban cancer risk factors and screening disparities across U.S. geographic regions.  Further exploration of the source of this geographic variation is warranted to ensure the development and implementation of relevant cancer control interventions targeting rural populations most in need. Citation Format: Kelly A. Hirko, Huiwen Xu, Laura Q. Rogers, Michelle Y. Martin, Siddhartha Roy, Kimberly M. Kelly, Shannon M. Christy, Kimlin Tam Ashing, Jean C. Yi, Marquita W. Lewis-Thames, Cathy D. Meade, Qian Lu, Clement K. Gwede, Rachel M. Ceballos, Usha Menon, Katie Cueva, Karen Yeary, Lisa Klesges, Monica L. Baskin, Kassandra I. Alcaraz, Sabrina Ford. Rural-urban disparities in cancer risk factors and screening by United States census region [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B053.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Patient Education and Counseling, Elsevier BV, Vol. 105, No. 5 ( 2022-05), p. 1082-1088
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0738-3991
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019572-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...