GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 4065-4065
    Abstract: 4065 Background: Patients with advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer have a dismal outcome. No study has unequivocally proven that systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival. Current NCCN guidelines recommend palliative/best supportive care as a first-line option for patients with unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal/GEJ cancers. Methods: Phase III randomized controlled study conducted in the Department of Medical Oncology at the Tata Memorial Hospital (Mumbai, India) in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal or GEJ cancer, planned for palliative intent therapy. Patients aged 18 to 70 years, with a performance status 〈 2, were stratified based on histopathology, presence of metastatic disease and receipt of prior curative therapy, and randomized 1:1 to best supportive care alone, or best supportive care with chemotherapy consisting of intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 once-a-week, continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Best supportive care consisted of patient education and counselling, non-chemotherapeutic palliative measures like radiation, or stenting, placement of feeding tube, analgesia, antiemesis and other supportive medications, nutritional support, and referral to a patient support group. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), response rate, adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Between May 2016 and Dec 2020, we recruited 281 patients; 143 to chemotherapy and 138 to best supportive care. Histopathology was squamous in 269 (95.7%) patients. In the 143 patients in the chemotherapy arm, median number of paclitaxel cycles was 12 (IQR, 7-23). The response rate was 32%. Grade 〉 3 toxicities occurred in 82 (57%) patients who received paclitaxel; commonly hyponatremia (18%), anemia (11%), fatigue (10%), peripheral neuropathy (10%), infection (9%), and neutropenia (7%). Median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.98-2.23) in the best supportive care arm, and 4.1 months in the chemotherapy arm (95% CI, 3.54-4.74); HR, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.39-0.64); P 〈 0.001. The 1-year OS was 11.6% in the best supportive care arm, versus 30.8% in the chemotherapy arm. Median OS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.93-5.42) in the best supportive care arm, and 8.6 months in the chemotherapy arm (95% CI, 7.56-9.66); HR, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.40-0.66); P 〈 0.001. Conclusions: Systemic chemotherapy significantly prolongs survival and should be considered the standard of care in patients with advanced esophageal and GEJ squamous cell carcinoma. Metronomic weekly paclitaxel is an attractive option, especially in LMICs with limited access to newer immunotherapy-based combination regimens. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2016/01/006474.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 6071-6071
    Abstract: 6071 Background: In the weekly-3-weekly (W3W) study, cisplatin at 100 mg/m 2 once-every-3-weeks led to superior locoregional control compared to cisplatin 30 mg/m 2 once-a-week in combination with radical radiation for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We report the updated analysis of the study. Methods: In this phase III open label non-inferiority study conducted between 2013 and 2017, 300 patients with LAHNSCC were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 once-in-3-weeks or cisplatin 30 mg/m 2 once-a-week, concurrently with radiation. The primary endpoint was locoregional control. Secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life. Results: As of February 5, 2022 (median follow-up, 77.3 months), 132 patients (44%) have had an event for locoregional recurrence; 75 (50%) in the once-a-week cisplatin arm and 57 (38%) in the once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arm. The updated estimated cumulative 2-year locoregional control rates were 59.3% and 75.3% in the once-a-week and once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arms, respectively; absolute difference, 16% (95% CI, 7.19 to 24.81). The estimated 5-year locoregional control rates were 48.2% and 55.2% in the once-a-week and once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arms respectively; absolute difference, 7% (95% CI, -2.5 to 16.5). The median time to locoregional failure was 46.1 months (95% CI, 31.63 to 60.56) in the once-a-week cisplatin arm, and 57.9 months (95% CI, 47.1 to 68.6) in the once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arm; HR, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.02); P = 0.042. The estimated median PFS was 17.5 months (95% CI, 0 to 38.31) in the once-a-week cisplatin arm, versus 37.5 months (95% CI, 28.45 to 46.45) in the once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arm; HR, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.5); P = 0.41. Events for OS included 173 (57.7%) deaths; 109 (36.3%) patients are alive, and 18 (6%) are lost to follow-up. The 5-year OS in the once-a-week and once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arms were 43.1% and 48.6%, respectively. Estimated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 16.3 to 60.7) in the once-a-week cisplatin arm, versus 57.3 months (95% CI, 38.6 to 75.9) in the once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arm; HR, 1.19 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.6); P = 0.238. Details regarding chronic toxicities and second primaries will be presented. Conclusions: Long term follow-up confirms that cisplatin at 100 mg/m 2 administered once-every-3-weeks concurrently with radical radiation for LAHNSCC leads to superior locoregional control and should remain the standard of care. The study was not powered to test for a difference in OS; OS was numerically higher in the once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arm, but the difference did not attain statistical significance. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2012/10/ 003062.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 6073-6073
    Abstract: 6073 Background: Locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radical chemoradiation have unsatisfactory outcomes. Oral metronomic chemotherapy improves outcomes in comparison to maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy in the palliative setting. There is also limited evidence that it may do so in an adjuvant setting. Hence this randomised study was conducted. Methods: Patients of HN cancer with primary in oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx, with PS 0-2 post radical chemoradiation with documented complete response were 1:1 randomised to either observation or oral metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy (MAC) for 18 months. MAC consisted of weekly oral methotrexate (15 mg/m2) and celecoxib (200 mg PO BD). The primary endpoint was OS and the overall sample size was 1038. The study had 3 planned interim analyses for efficacy and futility. Results: 137 patients were recruited and an interim analysis was done. The 3 year PFS in the observation arm was 67.1% (95% CI 53.8-77.3) and the same in the MAC arm was 62.5%(95%CI 49.4-73.1). The corresponding hazard ratio was 1.402 (95% CI 0.7393-2.66, P-value = 0.3). The 3 year OS in the observation arm was 77.3% (95% CI 64.4-86) and the same in the MAC arm was 64.1% (95%CI 51-74.5). The corresponding hazard ratio was 1.588 (95% CI 0.8734-2.886, P-value = 0.1). Any grade mucositis was seen in 30 patients (45.5%) in the MAC arm and 20 patients (28.2%) in the observation arm (P-value = 0.05). The rate of grade 3 or above mucositis was 7.6%(n = 5) in the MAC arm and 1.4%(n = 1) in the observation arm (P-value = 0.106). Conclusions: Both arms had similar OS. Hence observation post complete response post radical chemoradiation remains the standard of care. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2016/09/007315.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...