Abstract: Involvement of the central nervous system ( CNS ) in multiple myeloma ( MM ) is a rare complication, with reported survival of 〈 6 months. This report describes 37 MM patients with leptomeningeal and/or parenchymal brain involvement treated at our institution and identifies factors associated with long‐term survival. From J anuary 1999 to D ecember 2010, 37 patients with CNS MM were evaluated at our institution. Clinical characteristics, treatment and survival were retrospectively collected. CNS disease was present at MM diagnosis in 24% and at relapse in 76%. Plasma cell leukemia (40%) and skull plasmacytomas (65%) were common, suggesting haematological and contiguous spread. Intrathecal ( IT ) chemotherapy was used in 81%, cranial and/or spinal irradiation in 78%, and various systemic therapies [immunomodulatory agents ( IM iDs) (51%), cisplatin‐based ( DPACE ; cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) (27%), bortezomib (19%), alkylators (11%), dexamethasone alone (8%), auto‐transplant (5%)]. Median survival from CNS disease was only 4·6 months [95% confidence interval ( CI ): 2·8–6·7]; however, nine patients had prolonged survival (median: 17·1 months, 95% CI : 13·2–67·4). In general, these long‐term survivors were treated with radiotherapy, multi‐dosing IT chemotherapy, and IM i D ‐containing therapy. CNS MM is a highly aggressive disease but in our experience, long‐term survival can be achieved with the combination of multi‐dosing IT chemotherapy, radiation and IM i D ‐based therapy.

Abstract: Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) demonstrate heterogeneity in clinical profiles and outcome features. However, the extent of neuroanatomical heterogeneity in the CHR-P state is largely undetermined. We aimed to quantify the neuroanatomical heterogeneity in structural magnetic resonance imaging measures of cortical surface area (SA), cortical thickness (CT), subcortical volume (SV), and intracranial volume (ICV) in CHR-P individuals compared with healthy controls (HC), and in relation to subsequent transition to a first episode of psychosis. The ENIGMA CHR-P consortium applied a harmonised analysis to neuroimaging data across 29 international sites, including 1579 CHR-P individuals and 1243 HC, offering the largest pooled CHR-P neuroimaging dataset to date. Regional heterogeneity was indexed with the Variability Ratio (VR) and Coefficient of Variation (CV) ratio applied at the group level. Personalised estimates of heterogeneity of SA, CT and SV brain profiles were indexed with the novel Person-Based Similarity Index (PBSI), with two complementary applications. First, to assess the extent of within-diagnosis similarity or divergence of neuroanatomical profiles between individuals. Second, using a normative modelling approach, to assess the ‘normativeness’ of neuroanatomical profiles in individuals at CHR-P. CHR-P individuals demonstrated no greater regional heterogeneity after applying FDR corrections. However, PBSI scores indicated significantly greater neuroanatomical divergence in global SA, CT and SV profiles in CHR-P individuals compared with HC. Normative PBSI analysis identified 11 CHR-P individuals (0.70%) with marked deviation ( 〉 1.5 SD) in SA, 118 (7.47%) in CT and 161 (10.20%) in SV. Psychosis transition was not significantly associated with any measure of heterogeneity. Overall, our examination of neuroanatomical heterogeneity within the CHR-P state indicated greater divergence in neuroanatomical profiles at an individual level, irrespective of psychosis conversion. Further large-scale investigations are required of those who demonstrate marked deviation.

Abstract: Abstract 4052 Background: In patient (pts) with advanced MM, clinical parameters such as low platelet count and high serum creatinine levels carry poor prognosis (Kumar SK, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:867-74). At this disease stage, outcome of MM therapy should be assessed not only with the traditional parameters (progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival), but also by evaluating meaningful clinical parameters. POM a novel immunomodulatory agent, in combination with LoDEX, has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity and favorable tolerability in pts with RRMM in the multicenter, randomized, open-label MM-002 phase 1/2 study (Richardson PG, et al. Blood 2011;118:abs 634). This study evaluated changes in clinically important disease parameters with potential prognostic significance; data from the cut-off date of 30 March 2012 are presented. Methods: Pts with MM and ≥2 prior therapies including LEN and BORT, and disease progression during or within 60 days of their last treatment, were randomized to POM+LoDEX (POM, 4 mg/day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle (C); LoDEX, 40 mg/week) or POM alone. At progression, patients receiving Pom alone could receive POM+LoDEX at the discretion of the investigatior. All pts received mandatory thromboprophylaxis (daily low-dose aspirin). We herein present the effect of POM+LoDEX on end-organ functional parameters, including platelet count, serum calcium, serum creatinine (SCr), albumin (Alb), residual nonaffected normal immunoglobulins (Ig) (other than M-protein), hemoglobin (Hgb), and ECOG performance status. Improvement from baseline parameters was assessed by evaluating the change in end-organ functional parameters from pre-therapy to best post-therapy levels. Improvement was defined as a shift from abnormal to normal, with a normal platelet count defined as 150–350 × 103/mm3; calcium level 8.3–10.6 mg/dL; SCr level 0.9–1.5 mg/dL; increase of serum Alb ≥0.5 g/dL; Ig levels: IgA 〉 70 mg/dL, IgG 〉 565 mg/dL, and IgM 〉 40 mg/dL; Hgb increase ≥1 g/dL; and decrease in ECOG performance status of at least 1 score. No allowance was made for the possible confounding influence of the use of blood or platelet transfusions. Results: Of the 113 pts who were randomized to receive POM+LoDex, 112 pts were evaluable for safety. Median number of prior therapies was 5, median treatment duration with POM+LoDEX was 5.0 months, and median number of cycles was 5. A substantial number of pts had abnormal baseline platelet count, calcium, SCr, and Ig levels (Table). During POM+LoDEX treatment, platelet counts, calcium, and SCr levels improved in 62%, 93%, and 42% of pts with abnormal values at baseline, respectively. Most pts treated with POM+LoDEX (97%) had low IgA, IgG, or IgM at baseline. Of those pts, Ig levels improved into a normal range in 15% of pts. Hgb levels increased by ≥1 g/dL in 30% of pts by the end of C2, 41% by C4, and 50% by C8. Alb levels increased by ≥0.5 g/dL in 5% of pts by C2, 8% by C4, and 15% by C8. At baseline, 29 pts in the POM+LoDEX group had an ECOG score of 0, 66 pts had a score of 1 and 10 pts had a score of 2. During treatment, 2 of the 10 pts with a score of 2 improved to 1 and 1 improved to a score of 0; 6 pts maintained their baseline score of 2, 1 pt deteriorated from score 2 to 4. Of those with a baseline score of 1, 22 pts improved to a score of 0, 41 maintained their score of 1 and 3 pts deteriorated (2 to a score of 2 and 1 to a score of 5). Twenty-three pts maintained their ECOG score of 0; 6 pts deteriorated to a score of 1. Overall, there was no incidence of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy and there was a low overall incidence of hypercoagulable events 4% (2% DVT and 2% PE). Therefore disease parameters associated with these adverse events were not assessed. Conclusions: Treatment with POM+LoDEX is associated with an improvement in clinically important disease parameters including, platelet count, serum calcium, SCr, Alb, Ig, and Hgb. ECOG status also normalized or improved in 33% of pts. Improvements in end-organ functional parameters may improve the prognosis and facilitate clinical benefit for advanced RRMM pts, with the ability to continue effective therapy enhanced accordingly – an observation which warrants further clinical study, both comparatively and in combination with other active agents in this setting. Disclosures: Lonial: Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, Onyx, Merck; all 〈 $10,000 per year and disclosed to my institution: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an investigational drug and is not approved for the treatment of patients with any condition. Baz:Celgene, Millennium, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen:Johnson & Johnson, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene, Millennium, Johnson & Johnson: Advisory Board Other.

Abstract: Background: Carfilzomib is effective in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Questions remain regarding optimal dosing strategies and combinations. The MCRN-003/MYX.1 single arm phase II clinical trial of high-dose once weekly carfilzomib in combination with dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide (wCCD) in RRMM met its primary endpoint with an overall response rate (ORR) ≥ 80% after 4 treatment cycles [Venner, Blood 2018 132:1984]. This abstract focuses on previously unreported protocol specified secondary and exploratory endpoints including progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: This multi-centre clinical trial is run through the Myeloma Canada Research Network (MCRN) with support from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG). Patients who had 1-3 prior lines of therapy and without proteasome inhibitor (PI) refractory disease were eligible. Treatment consists of carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 day 1 of first cycle then escalated to 70 mg/m2 for all subsequent doses) given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, plus weekly oral dexamethasone 40 mg and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 capped at 500 mg. Treatment continues until progression or intolerance, except for cyclophosphamide which is discontinued after 12 cycles. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, depth of response, PFS and OS as defined by International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (2016). Exploratory endpoints included the impact of cytogenetics (CG) and prior PI or lenalidomide exposure on efficacy, and the novel endpoint of serum free light chain (sFLC) escape, defined as a 〉 25% change in the difference of involved to uninvolved light chain with the absolute rise 〉 100mg/L, in individuals with disease previously measurable by serum or urine protein electrophoresis. This analysis is based on the locked database of 19 June, 2019. Results: Of 76 patients accrued, 75 were included in the analysis. One was ineligible due to prior bortezomib refractoriness. Thirty-nine percent received 1 prior line, 44% two prior lines and 17% three prior lines of therapy. High-risk cytogenetics (t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del P53, considered positive at any level above local accepted threshold) were identified in 32%. Twenty percent had ISS stage III disease. The majority of participants were previously exposed to PI (87%) and lenalidomide (83%). The median duration of follow-up was 25 months. The ORR at any time was 85% (1 patient achieved a response after 4 cycles) with ≥ VGPR achieved in 68% and ≥ CR in 29%. The presence of high-risk CG conferred a worse ORR (75% vs 97% respectively, p = 0.013). Thirty-one patients have died with a median OS and median PFS of 27 months and 17 months respectively (figure 1). High risk CG conferred a worse median OS (18 months vs NR, p = 0.002) and a trend toward a worse median PFS with high risk CG (14 months vs 22 months, p = 0.06; figure 1). For patients with prior PI exposure the median OS and PFS were 27 and 17 months respectively. For patients with prior lenalidomide exposure median OS and PFS were 26 and 16 months respectively. Free light chain escape events were noted in 11 patients (15%) but was the only progression event in 3 (4%). For the remaining 8 patients the sFLC rise was a harbinger of traditional relapse by electrophoresis. The median PFS when sFLC escape was included as a progression event was 17 months. With updated toxicity data the most common ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic events were infection (40%), cardiac (15%, including 5 dyspnea and 1 pulmonary edema) and vascular (17%, including 7 with hypertension and 3 with thrombotic microangiopathy). To date 57 (76%) patients have discontinued carfilzomib, including 34 due to disease progression and 14 due to toxicity. Conclusion: This phase II trial demonstrates that wCCD remains a safe and effective regimen for RRMM. The survival data presented here is comparable to current phase II and III studies examining the weekly dosing strategy. No new toxicity signals are observed but cardiovascular risks remain an important factor in the use of carfilzomib-based therapies. Using sFLC escape does not negatively affect PFS outcomes but likely better characterizes progression as a harbinger of more traditional events detected by electrophoresis. This regimen will be a useful triplet-based option for RRMM especially in patients refractory to lenalidomide and otherwise ineligible for the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone combination. Disclosures Venner: J & J: Research Funding. Leblanc:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sandhu:Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; gilead: Honoraria. White:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Reece:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Louzada:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. McCurdy:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Hay:Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: While Carfilzomib is approved for use in relapsed and refractory myeloma the combination with cyclophosphamide is not approved.

Abstract: Background: Carfilzomib, a second generation proteosome inhibitor, is effective in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Recent phase II and phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of weekly dosing strategies. The aim of this study was to examine high dose once weekly carfilzomib in combination with weekly dexamethasone and low dose weekly cyclophosphamide (wCCD) in RRMM. It was hypothesized that this may offer a potent yet convenient and more financially viable triplet-based treatment option than existing combinations. Methods: The MCRN-003/MYX.1 multi-centre single arm phase II clinical trial is run through the Myeloma Canada Research Network (MCRN) with support from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG). Patients who had at least one but not more than three prior lines of therapy and who did not have proteosome inhibitor (PI) refractory disease were eligible. Treatment consists of carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 day 1 of first cycle then escalated to 70 mg/m2 for all subsequent doses) given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, plus weekly oral dexamethasone 40 mg and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 capped at 500 mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Treatment continues until progression or intolerance, except for cyclophosphamide which is discontinued after 12 cycles. The total sample size of 76 patients includes a 6 patient lead-in phase where safety at 70 mg/m2 was evaluated. The primary objective was to observe an overall response rate (ORR) ≥ 80% after 4 cycles of protocol therapy. Secondary endpoints include safety, toxicity, kinetics of and maximal response depth and overall survival. This analysis is based on the locked data base of 2018 July 13. Results: Of the 76 patients accrued 1 was subsequently determined to be ineligible on the basis of bortezomib refractory disease, and 1 did not receive any protocol therapy due to a cardiac event occurring post-study registration but prior to treatment commencement. All patients who received therapy were included in the analysis as per protocol inclusive of the bortezomib exposed patient. Among these 75 patients, median age was 66 years with 33% being 〉 70 years of age. Thirty-seven percent were female. Thirty-nine percent received 1 prior line, 44% received 2 prior lines and 17% received 3 prior lines of therapy. High risk cytogenetics [(t4;14), t(14;16) and del P53] were identified in 32%. Twenty percent had ISS stage III disease and 11% had R-ISS stage III disease. Prior PI and immunomodulatory drug exposure was noted in 87% and 81% respectively. Within the first 4 cycles of therapy 84% (95% CI, 76-92%) of patients achieved PR or better, with ≥ VGPR achieved in 52% and ≥ CR in 9% (table 1, p = 0.0006). There was a trend toward a better ORR after 4 cycles based on the presence or absence of high-risk cytogenetics (75% vs 94% respectively, p = 0.051) not meeting statistical significance. The median duration of follow-up at the time of data analysis was 13.9 months (range 0.2 to 22.8 months). 18 patients have died with an estimated 1-year OS of 80%. The cause of death as assessed by the investigator was myeloma in 13 patients with 3 dying from a cause possibly or probably related to the study intervention. During the first 4 cycles of treatment, non-hematologic toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 33% of patients; most commonly infection (16%) and fatigue (7%). Grade 3/4 anemia was observed in 17%, thrombocytopenia in 33% and neutropenia in 20%. Grade 3 or greater hypertension was seen in 4%, dyspnea in 1%, pulmonary edema in 1% and thrombotic microangiopathy in 4%; all resolved with no long-term sequelae. To date 37 (49%) patients have discontinued carfilzomib, 11 due to toxicity and 16 due to disease progression. Conclusion: This prospective phase II study demonstrates that wCCD is a safe and effective regimen in the treatment of RRMM. The study met its primary endpoint demonstrating a ≥ 80% ORR after 4 cycles of therapy. These results compare favourably to published phase III data examining weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone as well as the established twice-weekly dosing strategies. This regimen will be a useful triplet-based option for RRMM especially in patients refractory to immunomodulatory agents who would otherwise be ineligible for the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone combination. Disclosures Venner: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Leblanc:Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sandhu:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria. White:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Honoraria. Chen:Amgen: Honoraria. Louzada:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria. Hay:Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding.

Abstract: Few treatments options are available for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have previously been treated with lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), and their prognosis is poor. Pomalidomide (POM) is a distinct IMiD® immunomodulatory agent with a mechanism of action consisting of direct anti-myeloma, stromal-support inhibitory, and immunomodulatory effects. In randomized phase 2 and 3 trials (MM-002 and MM-003), POM plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) demonstrated marked efficacy in RRMM pts who had received multiple prior therapies, including LEN and BORT. This side-by-side analysis presents the most recent survival and safety data from these trials. Methods The MM-002 and MM-003 trials enrolled pts with ≥ 2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT. In MM-002, pts received POM (4 mg/day on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle) alone or in combination with LoDEX (40 mg/week). In MM-003, pts were randomized 2:1 to receive POM+LoDEX or high-dose DEX alone (HiDEX) (40 mg/days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 in a 28-day cycle); HiDEX was chosen as the comparator to isolate the effects of POM, as at the time of trial design it was the standard salvage therapy for heavily pretreated pts. Thromboprophylaxis was required for all pts treated with POM and pts at high risk of developing venous thromboembolism. Data cutoff was February 1, 2013 for MM-002 and March 1, 2013 for MM-003. The primary endpoint in both trials was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of response, and safety. Results In each study, pts had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range 1-17), and all pts had received prior LEN and BORT. In MM-002, 113 pts were treated with POM+LoDEX and 108 were treated with POM alone (60% of POM alone pts subsequently received DEX). A total of 79% of pts were LEN refractory; 62% were refractory to both LEN and BORT; and 35% had received LEN as their last prior therapy. With a median follow-up of 14.2 months (mos), median PFS was 4.2 mos, OS was 16.5 mos, and overall response rate (ORR, defined as at least a partial response) was 33% with POM+LoDEX (Table 1). In MM-003, 302 pts were treated with POM+LoDEX and 153 pts were treated with HiDEX (50% of HiDEX pts subsequently received POM). A total of 94% of pts were LEN refractory; 74% were both LEN and BORT refractory; and 29% had received LEN as their last prior therapy. Survival outcomes were similar in MM-003; with a median follow-up of 10 mos, median PFS was 4.0 mos, OS was 12.7 mos, and ORR was 31% with POM+LoDEX. In both trials, LEN as last prior therapy did not impact response, PFS, or OS vs the overall population. Commonly observed adverse events (AEs) are presented in Table 2 for pts treated with POM+LoDEX. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was 28% and 13% in MM-002, and 26% and 22% in MM-003 for the POM+LoDEX arms, respectively. AEs were generally manageable for POM+LoDEX in MM-002 and MM-003 with dose interruptions (67% for both) and reductions (29% and 26%, respectively), and standard supportive care, including growth factor support (46% and 43%), red blood cell transfusions (45% and 49%), platelet transfusions (14% and 20%), and anti-infective agents (89% in both trials). Rates of POM discontinuation due to treatment-related AEs were low (2–4% with POM+LoDEX). In MM-002 and MM-003, 49% and 51% of pts in the POM+LoDEX arms experienced neutropenia of any grade. With appropriate AE management, 9% and 23% had dose interruptions, 4% and 8% had dose reductions, and 1 pt in both MM-002 and MM-003 discontinued due to neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia developed in 3% and 10% of pts; 1% and 4% had dose interruptions, 0% and 2% had dose reductions, and no pts discontinued due to febrile neutropenia in the MM-002 and MM-003 studies, respectively. The majority of infections occurred in the absence of neutropenia of any grade (54% in MM-002 and 66% in MM-003). The rate of POM discontinuation due to infection was low (1% in MM-002 and 2% in MM-003). Conclusion In both the MM-002 and MM-003 trials, POM+LoDEX consistently extended PFS in advanced RRMM pts. PFS, OS, and ORR were not negatively impacted in patients who were refractory to LEN or BORT, even as last prior therapy. Both trials demonstrated that with dose modifications and supportive care POM was well tolerated, leading to few discontinuations. POM+LoDEX should be considered a standard of care for pts with advanced RRMM who have exhausted LEN and BORT. Disclosures: Siegel: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dimopoulos:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Song:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vij:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baz:Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Weisel:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Delforge:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Talpaz:Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding. Moreau:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. San Miguel:Jansen, Celgene Corporation, Onyx, Novartis, Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Expert board committee Other, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Alegre:Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cavo:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martinez-Lopez:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Casey:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Onyx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; sanofi aventis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Oncopep: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

Abstract: Background Melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) is a standard therapy for NDMM recognized worldwide based on a statistically significant advantage in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs. MP (Facon Lancet 2007; Fayers Blood 2011; NCCN 2013). The combination of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) increased OS with fewer adverse events (AEs) than treatment with lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone in NDMM pts (ECOG E4A03) (Rajkumar Lancet Oncol 2010). The FIRST trial is a multicenter, open-label, phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Rd versus MPT in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. Methods NDMM pts either ≥ 65 years of age, or not candidates for SCT were randomized to one of three arms: Rd in 28-day cycles until disease progression (Arm A), Rd in 28-day cycles for 72 weeks (18 cycles, Arm B), or MPT in 42-day cycles for 72 weeks (12 cycles, Arm C). Assessments by International Myeloma Working Group criteria were done after each cycle. Pts with renal impairment were enrolled; however, pts on dialysis were excluded. Starting doses of lenalidomide and dexamethasone were adjusted based on renal function and age, respectively. Melphalan starting dose was adjusted based on age, absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, and renal function; and thalidomide was adjusted for age. Dose adjustments were permitted for AEs. All pts were required to receive anti-thrombotic prophylaxis. Stratification factors included age, International Stage System, and country. The primary endpoint was a comparison of PFS in Arm A vs. Arm C. Secondary endpoints included OS, overall response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response (DOR), safety, and quality of life (QOL). A preplanned additional analysis included time from randomization to second progression event or death (PFS2). The final preplanned analysis of independently adjudicated progressive disease (PD) events in Arm A vs. Arm C conducted after 960 events of death or PD, and an interim of OS in 64% of survival events (574/896 events) are presented in this abstract. Comparisons of PFS and all secondary endpoints, including OS for all three arms, will be presented at the meeting. Results A total of 1,623 pts were randomized 1:1:1 in three arms. As of today, 121 pts continue to receive lenalidomide on study (Arm A). The median age was 73 (40.0–92.0) years; 35% pts were aged ≥ 75 years; and 41% of pts had ISS stage 3 disease. After a median follow-up of 37 months, the trial met its primary endpoint (PFS), demonstrating a 28% reduction in risk of progression or death (HR=0.72; p= 0.00006). The preplanned interim analysis of OS demonstrated a 22% reduction in risk of death in favor of Arm A vs. Arm C (HR=0.78, p=0.01685); however, the pre-specified boundary (p 〈 0.0096) was not crossed. All other secondary endpoints consistently showed improvement in favor of Arm A vs. Arm C; ORR (PR or better) 75% vs. 62% (p 〈 0.00001), DOR (HR=0.63; p 〈 0.00001), and PFS2 (HR=0.78, p=0.0051). Relevant Grade 3/4 adverse events in Arm A vs. Arm C were neutropenia (28% vs. 45%), thrombocytopenia (8% vs. 11%), febrile neutropenia (1% vs. 3%), infection (29% vs. 17%), neuropathy (5% vs. 15%), and deep-vein thrombosis (5% vs. 3%). The incidence of secondary primary malignancies (SPM) was evaluated. Hematologic malignancies were 0.4% in Arm A vs. 2.2% in Arm C; the overall incidence of solid tumors was identical (2.8%). Conclusion Continuous treatment with the all oral doublet Rd significantly improved the primary endpoint of PFS compared with the standard triplet, MPT. All secondary endpoints support the clinical benefit of continuous Rd treatment. The safety profile of Rd was manageable, with reduced hematologic SPM compared to MPT. Disclosures: Facon: Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide as treatment for NDMM. Dimopoulos:Celgene, Orthobiotech: Honoraria. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Millenium, Jansenn, Pfizer: Research Funding. Catalano:Celgene, Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hulin:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene, Janssen, Millennium, Onyx, Brystol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pinto:Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Weisel:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ludwig:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Delforge:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgen: Consultancy. White:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Binder:Celgene: Research Funding. Anderson:Acetylon, OncoPep: Equity Ownership; Celgene, Onyx, Sanofi Aventis, Gileod: Consultancy. Moreau:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Attal:Janssen: Lectures, Lectures Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Lectures Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knight:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene: Employment. Van Oostendorp:Celgene: Employment. Jacques:Celgene: Employment. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Benboubker:Celgene: Consultancy.

Abstract: Abstract 4053 Background: Patients (pts) with MM who relapse and are refractory after therapy with bortezomib or immunomodulatory agents have overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 9 mos and 5 mos, respectively (Kumar et al, Leukemia 2011). A number of cytogenetic abnormalities have also been associated with poor outcomes in MM, including t(4;14), and del(17p) (Avet-Loiseau et al, Blood 2007). In the multicenter, randomized, open-label MM-002 phase 1/2 study, the novel immunomodulatory agent POM, in combination with LoDEX, has demonstrated promising activity and favorable tolerability in pts with RRMM (Richardson PG, et al. Blood 2011;118:abs 634). Here we evaluated outcomes in pts participating in the study with high-risk cytogenetic profiles, with data as of 30 March 2012 presented. Methods: Eligible pts with MM who had received ≥2 prior therapies (including LEN and BORT) and had disease progression within 60 days of their last treatment were randomized to treatment with either POM+LoDEX (POM, 4 mg/day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle; LoDEX, 40 mg/week) or POM alone. At progression, patients receiving POM alone could receive POM+LoDEX at investigator's discretion. Thromboprophylaxis with daily low-dose aspirin was mandatory. The endpoints in this study were PFS, response rates (using European Bone Marrow Transplantation [EBMT] criteria), duration of response, time to response, OS, and safety. Efficacy outcomes and safety in pts with high-risk cytogenetics were compared with those of pts with standard-risk cytogenetics as well as with the overall population who received POM+LoDEX as part of an exploratory analysis. High-risk cytogenetics were defined based on modified criteria and included the presence of the following abnormalities: del(17p13) and/or t(4;14)(p16;q32), based on interphase FISH analysis from marrow aspirates collected at study entry. Results: The intention-to-treat population included 113 pts who were treated with POM+LoDex. At baseline, high-risk and standard-risk cytogenetic profiles were identified in 30 pts (27%) and 57 (50%) pts, respectively; 26 pts (23%) were inevaluable. Cytogenetic abnormalities included del(17p13) in 19 pts and t(4;14)(p16;q32) in 25 pts. Median follow-up time was 13.2 mos for the high-risk group and 17.7 mos for the standard-risk group. The median ORR (≥PR) for all pts was 34%; median ORR for high-risk pts was 23%, compared with 40% for standard-risk pts. The overall median duration of response (≥PR) was 8.3 mos for all pts, 4.9 mos for high-risk pts, and 10.1 mos for the standard-risk pts. The median PFS was 4.6 mos for all pts. The median PFS was 3.1 mos for pts with high-risk cytogenetics and 5.5 mos for pts with standard-risk cytogenetic profiles, respectively. Median OS for all pts was 16.5 mos and was 13.2 mos in the high-risk pts vs 21.7 mos in the standard-risk pts. The type and incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were similar in the high-risk pts (n=29) and those with standard-risk (n=57). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (48% vs 40%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (31% vs 16%), anemia (24% vs 25%), pneumonia (21% vs 28%), dyspnea (17% vs 11%), and fatigue (10% vs 18%). Febrile neutropenia developed in 2 pts (7%) with high-risk cytogenetics and in none with standard cytogenetics. There were no cases of grade 3/4 deep vein thrombosis in high-risk pts vs 2 pts (4%) in pts with standard-risk cytogenetics. There were no cases of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy in either group. Twenty-one (19%) of the POM+LoDex-treated subjects died during the study; 6 (21%) in the high-risk group (MM, n=3; disease progression, n=1; cardio-respiratory distress, n=1; not specified, n=1), and 10 (18%) in the standard-risk group (MM, n=4; disease progression, n=1; infection, n=3; cerebral/subarachnoid hemorrhage, n=2). Conclusions: POM+LoDex treatment appears to be effective in MM pts with high-risk cytogenetic profiles and advanced disease. Although this subgroup of pts has a shorter duration of response compared with RRMM pts without high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, pts with high-risk demonstrated an ORR of 23%, which is comparable to that expected for the overall population treated in this study, and is therefore encouraging. Longer follow-up for PFS and OS is needed to better assess clinical benefit, with combination approaches (such as with bortezomib) in this high-risk population warranting further study. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene, Millennium, Johnson & Johnson: Advisory Board Other. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an investigational drug and is not approved for the treatment of patients with any condition. Jakubowiak:Onyx: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding. Siegel:Onyx: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharma: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Chen:Johnson & Johnson, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Larkins:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Background: Overexpression of the nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), facilitates the export of oncogene mRNA thus facilitating oncoprotein expression, is associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM), and contributes to immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) resistance. Selinexor is an oral, first-in-class, selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that by blocking XPO1 forces the nuclear retention and activation of TSPs and nuclear retention and inactivation of oncoproteins. 1 Selinexor is approved with low-dose dexamethasone ± bortezomib for patients with previously treated MM. Pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Pd) has an overall response rate (ORR) of ~30% and median PFS (mPFS) of ~4 months in patients with MM refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. We hypothesized that selinexor could be safely combined with Pd (XPd) and would improve the combination's efficacy. Methods: In the XPd arm of the multi-arm Phase 1b/2 STOMP study, selinexor was evaluated at 60, 80, or 100 mg in combination with Pd. Study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and activity of the XPd regimen. The dose of selinexor 60 mg once weekly (QW), pomalidomide 4 mg once daily (days 1-21), dexamethasone 40 mg QW (XPd-60) was the lowest evaluated dose of selinexor in combination with the approved dose of Pd, and in light of the marked efficacy of that dose (ORR 65%), Phase 2 cohorts at a lower (40 mg weekly) dose of selinexor (XPd-40), were evaluated. Of the 19 patients enrolled at XPd-40 and evaluable for efficacy, 12 patients were enrolled into STOMP and 7 patients were enrolled at the same dose level and similar inclusion criteria into a parallel study XPORT-MM-028. Results: As of 14 July 2021, 39 patients were enrolled into the 60 (N=20) and 40 (N=19) mg selinexor dose levels in combination with Pd: 19 males, median age 66.0 years (range 37-85 years), median number of prior lines of therapy 2 (range 1-9). 85% of patients had MM refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI; bortezomib or carfilzomib or ixazomib), 79% to an IMiD (thalidomide or lenalidomide or pomalidomide), 33% to an anti-CD38 mAb (daratumumab or isatuximab); 26% had triple class refractory disease. Common hematologic, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) consisted of (all grades, grade ≥3) neutropenia (72%, 59%; and two cases of grade 3 [G3] febrile neutropenia one in each of the dose levels), and anemia (51%, 15% all G3). Non-hematologic TEAEs were reversible and included fatigue (56%, 10% all G3) and nausea (49%, 0%). On XPd-60, the RP2D (N=20), ORR was 65% (1 stringent complete response [sCR] , 5 very good partial responses [VGPR], 7 PR); mPFS was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.6 - NE, median follow-up 8.3 months). In patients treated at XPd-40 (N=19), ORR was 42% (3 VGPR, 5 PR); mPFS was not reached (95% CI, 5.7 - NE, median follow-up 2.8 months). Among patients who had received anti-CD38 mAb, the ORR was 64% overall and 100% at the RP2D (1 sCR, 2 VGPR, 3 PR). All patients who had MM refractory to pomalidomide (N=3; all at the 60 mg dose level) responded with 1 VGPR and 2 PR. For the 21 responders across both dose levels, median time to response was 1.0 months (95% CI 1.0 - 2.0) and median duration of response was not reached (95% CI: 8.0, NE). Conclusions: Selinexor, once weekly, can be safely combined with Pd in patients with relapsed MM. The all-oral combination of XPd is highly active with an ORR of 65% at XPd-60, the RP2D, and an ORR of 42% at XPd-40 dose level (compared to expected ORR ~30% for Pd). The high ORR that was achieved at the RP2D, including in patients previously treated with anti-CD38 mAb, supports XPd-60 as a promising therapy with no significant cross-resistance to anti-CD38, PIs or lenalidomide. No new safety signals were identified. The most common TEAE, neutropenia, is a common AE of Pd and was managed effectively with standard G-CSF. The regimen leverages the concept of mechanism switching from an anti-CD38 mAb-based regimen to a selinexor-based regimen. These data support the new Phase 3 study (XPORT-MM-031) with an all-oral combination of XPd vs elotuzumab-Pd in patients who have been previously treated with lenalidomide, a PI, and an anti-CD38 mAb. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures White: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Forus: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chen: Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy. Baljevic: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Exelixis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen Research: Other: Advisory Board; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board. Tuchman: Caelum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi / Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Bahlis: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schiller: Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ambit: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Genentech-Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Trovagene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell Ltd.: Research Funding; Bio: Research Funding; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Kaiser Permanente: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Actuate: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elevate: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; PrECOG: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sangamo: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mateon: Research Funding; Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; ASH foundation: Other: Chair-unpaid; Sellas: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Research Funding; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingleheim: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Research Funding; UC Davis: Research Funding; UCSD: Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; NCI: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Lipe: Seagen Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; amgen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Harpoon: Research Funding. Kotb: Akcea: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Sutherland: Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Bensinger: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Janssen, Poseida, Regeneron, Trillium: Research Funding. Madan: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Sebag: Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Venner: GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Leblanc: BMS/Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding. Monge: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Tadmor: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. DeCastro: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Van Domelen: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhang: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mishal: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bentur: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shacham: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) . Kauffman: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gasparetto: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy; Oncopeptite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Connect Registry: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.