GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Physiotherapy Canada, University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress), Vol. 74, No. 1 ( 2022-01-01), p. 15-24
    Abstract: Objectif : produire une traduction en français canadien de l’AMSTAR 2, en affirmer la validité de contenu et en examiner la fidélité interjuges. Méthodologie : selon une approche adaptée de celle proposée par Vallerand, des traductions directes et renversées ont été effectuées. Ensuite, en examinant les traductions, un premier comité d’experts a créé la version expérimentale préliminaire. Celle-ci a été modifiée par un deuxième comité d’experts. Vingt futurs professionnels de la santé ont évalué la nouvelle version avec une échelle d’ambiguïté (de 1 à 7). Les cochercheurs principaux ont examiné les éléments problématiques pour affermir la version préofficielle. Afin d’assurer la validité de contenu, une dernière rétrotraduction a été effectuée, validant une version officielle. Ensuite, 4 juges ont évalué 13 revues systématiques publiées en français à l’aide de la version officielle. Le coefficient kappa a été utilisé afin d’examiner la fidélité interjuges. Résultats : cette adaptation a permis la création d’une version franco-canadienne de l’AMSTAR 2. Son utilisation a démontré très peu d’ambiguïté (moyenne 1,15; ÉT 0,26) et une bonne fidélité interjuges (Kappa global  〉  0,64). Conclusion : la version franco-canadienne de l’AMSTAR 2 pourrait servir de soutien aux cliniciens, aux éducateurs et aux gestionnaires francophones au Canada lorsqu’ils cherchent à adopter une pratique factuelle.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0300-0508 , 1708-8313
    Language: English
    Publisher: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2236320-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Wiley, Vol. 29, No. 6 ( 2023-09), p. 942-954
    Abstract: The Hawker appropriateness criteria for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are: osteoarthritis symptoms impacting quality of life, evidence of osteoarthritis, trial of conservative treatments, patient's realistic expectations, patient/surgeon agree benefits outweigh risks, and readiness for surgery. Little is known about the barriers and facilitators of using the Hawker et al. appropriateness criteria for TKA in clinical practice. Aims and Objectives Explore the barriers and facilitators to using appropriateness criteria for TKA in making decisions for adults with knee osteoarthritis. Methods Interpretive descriptive qualitative study at an academic hospital. Purposive sampling aimed to recruit: (1) healthcare team members at all levels influencing care delivery, and (2) adults with TKA assessed at the hospital clinic. Semi‐structured interviews asked about the barriers/facilitators to using the Hawker appropriateness criteria. Data analysis consisted of inductive thematic analysis with themes mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains. Results Nine healthcare professionals and 14 adults with TKA participated and identified common barriers to using the Hawker appropriateness criteria: (a) intervention characteristics domain: difficulty to assess criteria, patients expecting healthcare professionals to decide, limited accessibility to conservative treatments; (b) individuals characteristics domain: no need to change current TKA process, clinical judgement limited to OA severity/age, implicit assessment of subjective criteria; (c) inner setting domain: TKA information received after decision made; and (d) outer setting domain: no timely access to TKA. A facilitator of use was evidence/buy‐in fosters programme changes. Conclusion Barriers to using the criteria relevant to clinical practice and the healthcare system were identified while only one facilitator was revealed. Interventions tailored to these barriers are needed to support the use of the Hawker appropriateness criteria in TKA decision‐making.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1356-1294 , 1365-2753
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2006772-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine, LIDSEN Publishing Inc, Vol. 7, No. 3 ( 2022-03-08), p. 1-1
    Abstract: The current recommendations of the Canadian Paediatric Society about monitoring children’s disruptive behaviors at well-child visits call for screening if behavioral concerns are being raised by parents. But do parents’ concerns about their child’s behavior constitute a reliable means for primary care providers (PCPs) to decide either in favor or against screening? We conducted a rapid systematic review of the literature by identifying documents that cited the landmark study by Glascoe and her colleagues (1991) on the accuracy of behavioral concerns at identifying children with a disruptive behavior problem. Citation tracking was done using Web of Science (Core Collection; 17 October 2018) and SCOPUS (19 October 2018). Only one recent published study was identified. The calibration of concerns’ specificity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a fair value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(0,0) (i.e., 0.255 and 0.094). Also, the calibration of concerns’ sensitivity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a moderate value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(1,0) (i.e., 0.533 and 0.392). Overall, the results do not support the current recommendations. In fact, behavioral concerns do not provide PCPs with enough information to reach a decision about screening. We discuss different ways of gathering the necessary information.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2573-4393
    URL: Issue
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: LIDSEN Publishing Inc
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3010035-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Wiley, Vol. 39, No. 1 ( 2020-01), p. 35-44
    Abstract: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is strongly recommended for the management of mild to moderate urinary incontinence (UI) in women, yet the specific elements of PFMT that lead to improvement have not been identified. This gap in knowledge may be related, at least in part, to the lack of detail provided on intervention parameters reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) Objective Using three different instruments: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT), the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist, and the Consensus on Therapeutic Exercise Training (CONTENT) scale, the purpose of this study was to assess the completeness of exercise reporting among moderate to high quality RCTs on PFMT for women with UI. Methods Two raters independently scored all 65 RCTs ( n  = 65) retrieved by the most up‐to‐date Cochrane Systematic Review on PFMT for women with UI, and only those of moderate to high quality ( 〉 6 on the PEDro scale) were retained. Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were scored by two independent reviewers using the CERT, TIDieR, and CONTENT instruments. The completeness of intervention reporting was evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results Over half of the items on each instrument were reported less than 50% of the time. Overall, completeness of exercise reporting was 31% (5.8/16 ± 2.4) on CERT, 47% (5.6/12 ± 1.5) on TIDieR, and 46% (4.1/9 ± 1) on CONTENT. The least frequently reported items were the provider of the intervention, the equipment used, the tailoring of exercises, the rationale behind the intervention, and adherence to the intervention. Conclusion PFMT parameters are not adequately reported in the primary RCTs that currently guide clinical practice.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0733-2467 , 1520-6777
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500793-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: International Urogynecology Journal, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 33, No. 4 ( 2022-04), p. 809-819
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0937-3462 , 1433-3023
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1481561-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2021
    In:  Systematic Reviews Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 2021-12)
    In: Systematic Reviews, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 2021-12)
    Abstract: Total hip and knee arthroplasty are a highly performed surgery; however, patient satisfaction with surgery results and patient involvement in the decision-making process remains low. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are tools used in clinical practices to facilitate active patient involvement in healthcare decision-making. Nonetheless, PtDA effects have not been systematically evaluated for hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) decision-making. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the effect of patient decision aids compared to alternative of care on quality and process of decision-making when provided to adults with hip and knee osteoarthritis considering primary elective TJA. Methods This systematic review will follow the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. This protocol was reported based on the PRISMA-P checklist guidelines. Studies will be searched in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Eligible studies will be randomized control trial (RCT) evaluating the effect of PtDA on TJA decision-making. Descriptive and meta-analysis of outcomes will include decision quality (knowledge and values-based choice), decisional conflict, patient involvement, decision-making process satisfaction, actual decision made, health outcomes, and harm(s). Risk of bias will be evaluated with Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for RCTs. Quality and strength of recommendations will be appraised with Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Discussion This review will provide a summary of RCT findings on PtDA effect on decision-making quality and process of adults with knee and hip osteoarthritis considering primary elective TJA. Further, it will provide evidence comparing different types of PtDA used for TJA decision-making. This review is expected to inform further research on joint replacement decision-making quality and processes and on ways PtDAs facilitate shared decision-making for orthopedic surgery. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020171334
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2046-4053
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2662257-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: BJU International, Wiley, Vol. 133, No. 5 ( 2024-05), p. 498-512
    Abstract: To describe primary care provider (PCP) practices for the assessment and management of females with urinary incontinence (UI), and appraise these practices relative to recommendations made in high‐quality clinical guidelines. Methods Studies were searched in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science) from their respective inception dates to 6 March 2023. All studies describing UI evaluation and management practices used by PCPs for female patients were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected studies assessed their quality and extracted data. A narrative synthesis of included studies was performed to describe practices. Relevant evaluation and management practices were then compared to recommendations that were consistent across current high‐quality UI guidelines. Pharmacotherapy, referrals, and follow‐ups were reported descriptively only. Results A total of 3475 articles were retrieved and, among those, 31 were included in the review. The majority reported a poor–moderate adherence to performing a pelvic examination (reported adherence range: 23–76%; based on eight studies), abdominal examination (0–87%; three studies), pelvic floor muscle assessment (9–36%; two studies), and bladder diary (0–92%; nine studies), while there was high adherence to urine analysis (40–97%; nine studies). For the conservative management of UI, studies revealed a poor–moderate adherence to recommendations for pelvic floor muscle training (5–82%; nine studies), bladder training (2–53%; eight studies) and lifestyle interventions (1–71%; six studies). Regarding pharmacotherapy, PCPs predominantly prescribed antimuscarinics (2–46%; nine studies) and oestrogen (2–77%; seven studies). Lastly, PCPs referred those reporting UI to medical specialists (5–37%; 14 studies). Referrals were generally made 〈 30 days after diagnosis with urologists being the most sought out professional to assess and treat UI. Conclusion This review revealed poor–moderate adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations. While these findings reflect high variability in reporting, the key message is that most aspects of patient care for female UI provided by PCPs needs to improve.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1464-4096 , 1464-410X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019983-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...