GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cancer Medicine, Wiley, Vol. 10, No. 23 ( 2021-12), p. 8475-8482
    Abstract: The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index has been utilized to determine the risk for poor clinical outcomes in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) in an emergency center (EC). However, this index comprises subjective elements and elaborated metrics limiting its use in ECs. We sought to determine whether procalcitonin (PCT) level (biomarker of bacterial infection) with or without lactate level (marker of inadequate tissue perfusion) offers a potential alternative to MASSC score in predicting the outcomes of patients with FN presenting to an EC. Methods We retrospectively identified 550 cancer patients with FN who presented to our EC between April 2018, and April 2019, and had serum PCT and lactate levels measured. Results Compared with patients with PCT levels 〈 0.25 ng/ml, those with levels ≥0.25 ng/ml had a significantly higher 14‐day mortality rate (5.2% vs. 0.7%; p  = 0.002), a higher bloodstream infection (BSI) rate, and a longer hospital length of stay (LOS). Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with PCT levels ≥0.25 ng/ml and lactate levels 〉 2.2 mmol/L were more likely to be admitted and have an LOS 〉 7 days, BSI, and 14‐day mortality than patients with lower levels. PCT level was a significantly better predictor of BSI than MASSC score ( p  = 0.003) or lactate level ( p   〈  0.0001). Conclusions Procalcitonin level is superior to MASCC index in predicting BSI. The combination of PCT and lactate levels is a good predictor of BSI, hospital admission, and 14‐day mortality and could be useful in identifying high‐risk FN patients who require hospital admission.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-7634 , 2045-7634
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2659751-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2 ( 2019-10-23), p. S652-S652
    Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy has ushered cancer treatment into a potentially curative era. However, infectious complications remain largely unknown and the few studies that described infectious complications associated with ICI had no comparative control groups. We assessed the rate of infections in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI plus conventional chemotherapy (CC) vs. CC alone. Methods We performed a comparative single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with NSCLC who received de novo treatment with either Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab, and/or Ipilimumab combined with CC including Pemetrexed and Carboplatin vs. patients treated with CC alone between August 2016 and January 2019. We excluded all patients who were switched from CC to ICI or vice-versa. We evaluated patients’ characteristics, treatment modality, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and outcome. Infections were defined by clinical signs and symptoms, microbiologic documentation, and/or imaging studies. Results A group of 126 patients who received ICI concurrently with CC were compared with 126 patients who received CC alone (control group). Patients in the ICI group were more likely to have stage IV NSCLC compared with the control group (P 〈 0.0001). Pembrolizumab was most commonly used as a single ICI agent in 107 patients (85%), followed by Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as dual therapy (9%). Confirmed infections were identified in 20 (16%) patients in the ICI group and 18 (14%) in the control group (P = 0.7). The control group had a higher rate of multiple infections at different times compared with the ICI group (P = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in the types of infections (bacterial, fungal or viral) that occurred between the two groups. The irAEs were reported in 14 (11%) patients, 13 of them received corticosteroids with a median duration of 32 days (range, 15–64 days). Out of these patients, three (21%) developed confirmed infections of which two were viral upper respiratory tract infections and one was a bacterial urinary tract infection. Conclusion Patients with NSCLC treated with the combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors plus Conventional Chemotherapy have comparable risk of developing infections compared with those on Conventional Chemotherapy alone. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 8, No. Supplement_1 ( 2021-12-04), p. S372-S373
    Abstract: Bamlanivimab is a monoclonal antibody that was granted an emergency use authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration in November 2020 for patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It initially showed promising results with decreasing hospitalizations and return emergency department visits in immunocompetent patients. We evaluated the role of bamlanivimab in the cancer patient population. Methods We conducted a retrospective matched study of all cancer patients diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab in our acute cancer care center (ACCC) from December 2020 to February 2021. These patients were compared to a control group of cancer patients who presented to our ACCC and were diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 from March to November 2020 before the introduction of bamlanivimab. Control patients were matched by age and underlying malignancy. All patients had a baseline oxygen saturation ≥ 94% and an absolute neutrophil count & gt; 500 mm3. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcome that included COVID-related admissions, oxygen desaturation, ICU admission and 30-day mortality were compared in both groups. Results A total of 108 patients were analyzed with 54 patients in each group, of which 59% consisted of hematologic malignancies, and 33% were ≥ 65 years. The presenting symptoms were similar in both groups and mainly consisted of cough, fever, and dyspnea. Patients who received bamlanivimab were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (24% vs. 91%; p & lt; 0.0001), experience oxygen desaturation & lt; 94% during follow-up (11% vs 44%; p=0.0001), require oxygen supplement (7% vs. 44%; p & lt; 0.0001), or be admitted to the ICU (4% vs 15%; p=0.046). No 30-day mortality was observed in the bamlanivimab group with 2 (4%) occurring in the control group. However, the difference was not significant. Conclusion Bamlanivimab decreased hospital and ICU admissions in cancer patients. In addition, bamlanivimab reduced oxygen requirement and the risk of hypoxia and progression to severe disease in this patient population. Disclosures Samuel L. Aitken, PharmD, MPH, BCIDP, Melinta Therapeutoics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Grant/Research Support
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S634-S634
    Abstract: Procalcitonin (PCT) and lactic acid have emerged as biomarkers that increase in bacterial infections/sepsis and have been used in conjunction with clinical judgment to guide antibiotic administration. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index has been used to classify the risk for patients with neutropenic fever. However this index includes subjective elements and complex metrics that make it difficult to use in an oncological emergency center (EC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of serum PCT alone and in combination with lactate to predict bloodstream infections (BSI), hospitalization and 14 days mortality in febrile neutropenic cancer patients presenting to the EC. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all febrile neutropenic cancer patients who presented to our EC between April 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 and had a serum PCT and lactic acid levels done. Fever was defined either as a documented temperature of ≥100.4 °F or a chief complaint of fever reported at home. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count ≤500 cells/mL. Results We included 550 cancer patients of which 385 (70%) had hematologic malignancies and 165 (30%) had solid tumors. A BSI was documented in 116 (21%) patients due to gram negative organisms in 66%, gram positive organisms in 30%, and both in 4%. A higher rate of mortality within 14 days of EC presentation was seen in patients whose PCT ≥ 0.25 compared to those with PCT & lt; 0.25 (5.2% vs 0.7%; p=0.002). Similarly a higher rate of BSI and a longer hospital stay was seen in patients whose PCT ≥ 0.25 compared to those with PCT & lt; 0.25. A PCT ≥ 0.25 or a lactate level & gt;2.2 had a sensitivity of 93% and a negative predictive value of 100% for a 14 day mortality. A logistic regression analysis showed an association between BSI and hematological malignancy, PCT ≥ 0.25, and lacate level & gt;2.2 mmole/L. Conclusion A PCT ≥ 0.25 was associated with BSI, LOS and 14 day mortality. The combination of PCT / serum lactate have a good sensitivity and high negative predictive value for BSI and mortality. Because this combination could be useful in identifying the high risk febrile patients requiring hospital admission, it will be compared to the standard but more labor intensive MASCC score index. Disclosures Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. 6 ( 2022-06-01)
    Abstract: With increased use of antibiotics in high-risk patients, the investigation of new antibiotics to cover potentially resistant pathogens is warranted. In this prospective randomized trial, we compared ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a new cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor, to the standard of care (SOC) for the empiric treatment of neutropenia and fever in patients with hematological malignancies. Methods We enrolled 100 patients to receive intravenous (IV) C/T or SOC antibiotics (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, or meropenem) in combination with gram-positive antibacterial agents. We evaluated responses at the end of IV therapy (EOIV), test of cure (TOC; days 21–28), and late follow-up (LFU; days 35–42). Results We analyzed 47 C/T patients and 50 SOC patients. C/T patients had a higher rate of favorable clinical response at EOIV (87% vs 72%). A 1-sided noninferiority analysis indicated that C/T was at least not inferior to the SOC for favorable clinical response at EOIV (P = .002), TOC (P = .004), and LFU (P = .002). Superiority tests showed that C/T led to significantly lower rates of clinical failure at TOC (6% vs 30%; P = .003) and LFU (9% vs 30%; P = .008). C/T and SOC patients with documented infections had similar rates of favorable microbiological response. Serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (2% vs 0%; P = .48) and overall mortality (6% vs 4%; P = .67) were similar in both groups. Conclusions The empiric use of C/T in high-risk patients with hematological malignancies and febrile neutropenia is safe and associated with better clinical outcomes than SOC antimicrobial agents. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03485950.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Scientific Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 8, No. 1 ( 2018-01-18)
    Abstract: In this analysis, we identified febrile cancer patients with documented infections or neutropenia, whose procalcitonin levels are low at baseline or decrease on antibiotics. These patients had similar outcomes in terms of mortality and relapse of infection regardless of the duration of antimicrobial therapy (less or more than 7 days).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-2322
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2615211-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2018
    In:  Clinical Infectious Diseases Vol. 67, No. 6 ( 2018-08-31), p. 971-977
    In: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 67, No. 6 ( 2018-08-31), p. 971-977
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-4838 , 1537-6591
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002229-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: eLife, eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd, Vol. 12 ( 2023-02-07)
    Abstract: An increasing number of observational studies have reported the persistence of symptoms following recovery from acute COVID-19 disease in non-cancer patients. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 are not fully understood particularly in the cancer patient population. The purpose of this study is to assess post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) in cancer patients following acute COVID-19 recovery. Methods: We identified cancer patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who were diagnosed with COVID-19 disease between March 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, and followed them till May 2021. To assess PASC, we collected patients reported outcomes through questionnaires that were sent to patients daily for 14 days after COVID-19 diagnosis then weekly for 3 months, and then monthly thereafter. We also reviewed patients’ electronic medical records to capture the persistence or emergence of new COVID19-related symptoms reported during any clinic or hospital encounter beyond 30 days of the acute illness and up to 14 months. Results: We included 312 cancer patients with a median age of 57 years (18–86). The majority of patients had solid tumors (75%). Of the 312 patients, 188 (60%) reported long COVID-19 symptoms with a median duration of 7 months and up to 14 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. The most common symptoms reported included fatigue (82%), sleep disturbances (78%), myalgias (67%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (61%), followed by headache, altered smell or taste, dyspnea (47%), and cough (46%). A higher number of females reported a persistence of symptoms compared to males (63% vs. 37%; p=0.036). Cancer type, neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, and hospital admission during acute COVID-19 disease were comparable in both groups. Among the 188 patients with PASC, only 16 (8.5%) were re-admitted for COVID-related reasons. Conclusions: More than one out of two cancer patients, and more likely females, report PASC that may persist beyond 6 months and even 1 year. The most common symptoms are non-respiratory and consist of fatigue, sleep disturbance, myalgia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Most of the cancer patients with PASC were managed on outpatient basis with only 8.5% requiring a COVID-19-related re-admission. Funding: This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA016672, which supports the MD Anderson Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2050-084X
    Language: English
    Publisher: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2687154-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 3, No. suppl_1 ( 2016-12-01)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S809-S809
    Abstract: The risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) reactivation in cancer patients during checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CPI) remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate LTBI therapy and outcomes between cancer patients receiving CPI versus conventional chemotherapy (CC) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LTBI (positive T-SPOT TB test) at MD Anderson Cancer Center between April 2016 and May 2020, who received CPI or combined with other conventional chemotherapy. Thereafter we compared each group to patients treated with other anti-cancer therapies including CC alone or HCT. Results We identified 106 patients with LTBI, who were analyzed into 3 distinct groups: CPI (32 patients, 30%) CC alone (37 patients, 35%), and HCT (37 patients, 35% (7 autologous versus 30 allogeneic). The majority of patients in the CPI group (97%) had solid tumors compared to 54% in the CC group. Nivolumab was the most commonly used CPI agent in 13 patients (40%), followed by pembrolizumab 10 pts (31%). In the CPI group, 20 pts (62%) received LTBI therapy that included Isoniazid (INH), versus 18 patients (49%) in the HCT group and 16 patients (43%) in the CC group (p=0.26). Only 3 patients (CC group) had TB reactivations (8%; p=0.11). None of these 3 patients had received LTBI therapy or corticosteroids prior to the diagnosis. Immune-related adverse effect (IrAEs) were reported in 11 pts (34%) patients, and 9 (82%) of them received corticosteroids. Out of 20 of CPI patients whom received INH, 4 (20%) developed possible INH-induced liver toxicities leading to interruption of medication versus 1 (6%) patient which had mild hepatitis in CC group versus none of HCT patients (p=0.09). Conclusion Our data suggest that latent tuberculosis reactivation remains rare, especially in the severely immunocompromised patients on CPI, CC and steroids. However, hepatotoxicity is relatively common in patients treated with CPI and INH. Therefore, caution and close laboratory and clinical monitoring is required to avoid significant hepatic injury and interruption of LTBI therapy and lifesaving oncological therapy. Disclosures Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...