Abstract: Castleman disease (CD) includes a group of rare and heterogeneous disorders with characteristic lymph node histopathological abnormalities. CD can occur in a single lymph node station, which is referred to as unicentric CD (UCD). CD can also involve multicentric lymphadenopathy and inflammatory symptoms (multicentric CD [MCD]). MCD includes human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8)–associated MCD, POEMS-associated MCD, and HHV-8−/idiopathic MCD (iMCD). The first-ever diagnostic and treatment guidelines were recently developed for iMCD by an international expert consortium convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN). The focus of this report is to establish similar guidelines for the management of UCD. To this purpose, an international working group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened to establish consensus recommendations based on review of treatment in published cases of UCD, the CDCN ACCELERATE registry, and expert opinion. Complete surgical resection is often curative and is therefore the preferred first-line therapy, if possible. The management of unresectable UCD is more challenging. Existing evidence supports that asymptomatic unresectable UCD may be observed. The anti–interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab should be considered for unresectable UCD patients with an inflammatory syndrome. Unresectable UCD that is symptomatic as a result of compression of vital neighboring structures may be rendered amenable to resection by medical therapy (eg, rituximab, steroids), radiotherapy, or embolization. Further research is needed in UCD patients with persisting constitutional symptoms despite complete excision and normal laboratory markers. We hope that these guidelines will improve outcomes in UCD and help treating physicians decide the best therapeutic approach for their patients.

Abstract: Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in treating erythrocytosis and splenomegaly in many PV patients (pts), but is less effective controlling thrombocytosis or splenomegaly in others. Imatinib in PV pts may inhibit c-kit signaling, essential for erythroid progenitor proliferation and/or PDGF-R signaling. The JAK2 V617F mutation is present in most PV pts. We found imatinib therapy in PV pts resulted in a modest molecular response based on %V617F that correlated with hematologic improvement/clinical response; however, those who achieved complete hematological remission had initially lower %V617F. Here we correlate bone marrow (BM) morphology and immunophenotype with clinical/molecular response to imatinib in 10 pts fulfilling criteria for PV (8 men, 2 women; 28–72 yr) treated with imatinib (400–800 mg/day) for 5–31 mo. Cytogenetics in 1 pt showed +9; 4 were normal. CR was defined as phlebotomy-free within18 mo. of treatment (Tx), HCT level & lt;45% for men/ & lt;42% for women, platelet count & lt;400×109/L and no splenomegaly. PR was similarly defined except the platelet count & gt; 400×109/L and & lt;50% reduction of palpable spleen size. %JAK2V617F was determined by pyrosequencing on pre-tx BM (5 pts) and post-tx PBL samples (all pts). Morphologic evaluation was done on sequential BM biopsies based on H & E/reticulin/trichrome stains and available BM aspirate smears. IHC was used to identify progenitors (CD34, CD117), megakaryocytes (MK; CD61), erythoid precursors (GlycoC), granulocytic precursors (MPO); MK c-mpl expression; proliferation (Ki-67). 2 pts showed CR, 6 PR and 2 NR. Median %V617F in CR was 15% (range 8–21%), in PR 57% (range 19–83%) and in NR 58% (range 44–72%). Both CR pts had 2–3-fold decrease in %V617F, whereas 3/6 PR pts had an increase (1–1.5 fold) in %V617F on tx. The 2 CR pts had in the pre-tx BM increased cellularity (60–80%), normal M:E ratio, moderate increase in MKs (10–15/20x). Imatinib tx resulted in normalization of cellularity, decreased erythropoiesis, a lesser decrease in granulopoiesis/megakaryopoiesis, and decreased proliferation in 1 pt (57% to 20%); the other the proliferation was stable at 24%. Reticulin fibrosis was minimal/mild. The PR/NR pre-tx BMs had markedly increased cellularity (80–100%), moderate/marked erythroid hyperplasia, increased granulopoiesis and moderate/marked increase in polymorphic MKs (10 to & gt;30/20x). Imatinib Tx resulted in decreased erythroid cells; less granulopoiesis; and no change/increased MKs with clustering and shedding of CD61+ platelets clumps into stroma. 2 cases progressed to fibrosis.The proliferation was variable (15–30%) with no change on Tx. C-mpl expression in MKs decreased with disease progression. The % cells expressing CD34 and/or CD117 was low and did not change. We found BM morphologic and immunophenotypic changes correlate with clinical/molecular response to imatinib in PV pts. Thus, BM evaluation may be helpful in assessing severity/disease progression and identifying pts who may benefit from imatinib Tx. The findings also suggest heterogeneity of hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Targeting JAK2/other pathways involved in MK proliferation/migration may be beneficial in PV pts with large numbers of MKs who likely progress to fibrosis.

Abstract: An international panel established the first ever diagnostic criteria for iMCD based on review of 244 clinical cases and 88 tissue samples. The criteria require multicentric lymphadenopathy with defined histopathology, ≥2 clinical/laboratory changes, and exclusion of iMCD mimics.

Abstract: Background Human herpes-virus 8-negative/idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare inflammatory disorder involving multicentric lymphadenopathy with characteristic histopathology. Clinical presentation is heterogenous and includes cytokine-driven constitutional symptoms, cytopenias, systemic inflammation, and multi-organ dysfunction. International consensus treatment guidelines are based on a large cohort of case studies and a few clinical trials, but the available evidence is limited. Siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 therapy, is the only FDA-approved treatment for iMCD; 34% of patients achieved durable symptomatic and tumor response in the phase II trial. Tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor therapy, is frequently used off label and demonstrated promising results in an open-label study in Japan. The treatment guidelines recommend siltuximab ± corticosteroids (CS) as first-line therapy for all iMCD patients and tocilizumab as a substitute when siltuximab is not available. Rituximab, a CD20 antibody, is recommended as an alternate first-line therapy in patients who are non-severe and do not exhibit marked cytokine-driven symptoms. In all other patients, rituximab is recommended second-line; however, it has never been systematically evaluated in iMCD. Chemotherapies, immunosuppressants, and immunomodulators are recommended second- or third-line, but again, effectiveness is not well described. Better understanding of treatment effectiveness is urgently needed. Herein, we describe treatment and response in a real-world cohort of iMCD patients. Methods Data were collected and abstracted for 68 patients enrolled in an on-going IRB-approved natural history study of Castleman disease. Diagnosis is graded by an expert panel of clinicians and pathologists on an on-going basis; patients unlikely to have iMCD were excluded from analysis (N=12). Of the 56 patients included, 37 (66%) are expert panel-confirmed and 19 (34%) are awaiting confirmation. Durable response is defined as achieving ≥50% improvement in the proportion of abnormal iMCD minor clinical and laboratory diagnostic criteria sustained for ≥1 year. Small sample size prevented statistical comparisons. Results Median age at diagnosis is 33 years (range: 1-65 years). The cohort is 52.9% female, 63% white, and 4 (7%) patients died. Thirty-three unique drugs, including anti-IL-6 therapies, CS, chemotherapies, immunosuppressants, and others have been administered across the 56 patients. Rituximab is the most frequently used drug, administered to 39 (70%) patients. Siltuximab (29 patients, 52%) and tocilizumab (19 patients, 34%) are the next two most frequently used targeted therapies. There was a 52% response (15/29) to regimens inclusive of siltuximab, 50% response (9/18) to those inclusive of tocilizumab, and 25% response (9/26) to those inclusive of rituximab. Siltuximab±CS induced response in 15/24 (63%) patients, tocilizumab±CS in 4/7 (57%), and rituximab±CS in 2/13 (15%). Among the 37 expert-confirmed iMCD patients, we found a 58% response (11/19) to regimens inclusive of siltuximab, 47% (8/17) to those inclusive of tocilizumab, and 27% (7/26) to those inclusive of rituximab. Further, in these patients, siltuximab±CS induced response in 11/16 (69%), tocilizumab±CS in 3/6 (50%), and rituximab±CS in 1/6 (17%) patients. Of note, 3 of 4 deceased patients received both anti-IL-6 therapy and rituximab and all 4 received chemotherapies and immunosuppressants but did not respond to any drug. Discussion These data reveal that despite there being one FDA-approved treatment, iMCD is treated with a variety of agents. Among the full cohort, siltuximab±CS demonstrated a 63% durable response, which was higher than the response reported in the clinical trial (not statistically compared). This may reflect differences in response criteria and/or disease activity of patients in clinical trials versus real world settings. Siltuximab and tocilizumab have never been systematically compared; in this cohort they demonstrated similar response. Considering the morbidity and mortality of iMCD, these data suggest that current therapies demonstrate important activity. However, additional agents are needed for refractory patients, who have few options and are at risk of death due to disease progression. Further data are needed to compare groups and identify optimal treatment protocols. Disclosures Liu: BridgeBio Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gibson:EUSA Pharma: Employment. Kanhai:EUSA Pharma: Employment. Martin:EUSA Pharma: Employment. Srkalovic:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Foundation Medicine: Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Uldrick:Patent: Patents & Royalties: co-inventor on US Patent 10,001,483 entitled ; Celgene: Other: research support from Celgene through a CRADA at the NCI; Roche: Other: commercial research support through a CTA with Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Merck: Other: drug for a clinical trial from Merck through a CRADA with the NCI. van Rhee:Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy; Adicet Bio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Castleman Disease Collaborative Network: Consultancy. Fajgenbaum:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6-receptor, is approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis in the US. It is frequently used off-label in idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) and is recommended as a substitute first-line therapy in the International Consensus iMCD treatment guidelines. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, is used in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune and cancerous disorders. It is frequently used off-label in iMCD and is recommended as an alternate first-line or a second-line therapy in the International Consensus iMCD treatment guidelines. Corticosteroids are used broadly in iMCD and are recommended as needed as useful adjunctive therapy in the International Consensus iMCD treatment guidelines.

Abstract: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of lymphoma in adults. The disease exhibits a striking heterogeneity in gene expression profiles and clinical outcomes, but its genetic causes remain to be fully defined. Through whole genome and exome sequencing, we characterized the genetic diversity of DLBCL. In all, we sequenced 73 DLBCL primary tumors (34 with matched normal DNA). Separately, we sequenced the exomes of 21 DLBCL cell lines. We identified 322 DLBCL cancer genes that were recurrently mutated in primary DLBCLs. We identified recurrent mutations implicating a number of known and not previously identified genes and pathways in DLBCL including those related to chromatin modification ( ARID1A and MEF2B ), NF-κB ( CARD11 and TNFAIP3 ), PI3 kinase ( PIK3CD , PIK3R1 , and MTOR ), B-cell lineage ( IRF8 , POU2F2 , and GNA13 ), and WNT signaling ( WIF1 ). We also experimentally validated a mutation in PIK3CD , a gene not previously implicated in lymphomas. The patterns of mutation demonstrated a classic long tail distribution with substantial variation of mutated genes from patient to patient and also between published studies. Thus, our study reveals the tremendous genetic heterogeneity that underlies lymphomas and highlights the need for personalized medicine approaches to treating these patients.

Abstract: Context.—Individuals who are immune deficient are at an increased risk for developing lymphoproliferative lesions and lymphomas. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is 1 of 4 clinical settings associated with immunodeficiency recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in which there is an increased incidence of lymphoma and other lymphoproliferative disorders. Objectives.—To describe the major categories of benign lymphoid proliferations, including progressive HIV-related lymphadenopathy, benign lymphoepithelial cystic lesions, and multicentric Castleman disease, as well as the different types of HIV-related lymphomas as defined by the WHO. The characteristic morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of the different entities will be discussed in addition to some of the pathogenetic mechanisms. Data Sources.—The WHO classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues (2001 and 2008), published literature from PubMed (National Library of Medicine), published textbooks, and primary material from the authors' current and previous institutions. Conclusions.—HIV infection represents one of the clinical settings recognized by the WHO in which immunodeficiency-related lymphoproliferative disorders may arise. Although most lymphomas that arise in patients with HIV infection are diffuse, aggressive B-cell lesions, other lesions, which are “benign” lymphoid proliferations, may also be associated with significant clinical consequences. These lymphoproliferations, like many other immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders, are often difficult to classify. Studies of HIV-associated lymphoid proliferations will continue to increase our understanding of both the immune system and lymphomagenesis.

Abstract: Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of heterogeneous hematologic disorders with characteristic histopathological features. CD can present with unicentric or multicentric (MCD) regions of lymph node enlargement. Some cases of MCD are caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), whereas others are HHV-8–negative/idiopathic (iMCD). Treatment of iMCD is challenging, and outcomes can be poor because no uniform treatment guidelines exist, few systematic studies have been conducted, and no agreed upon response criteria have been described. The purpose of this paper is to establish consensus, evidence-based treatment guidelines based on the severity of iMCD to improve outcomes. An international Working Group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network to establish consensus guidelines for the management of iMCD based on published literature, review of treatment effectiveness for 344 cases, and expert opinion. The anti–interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab (or tocilizumab, if siltuximab is not available) with or without corticosteroids is the preferred first-line therapy for iMCD. In the most severe cases, adjuvant combination chemotherapy is recommended. Additional agents are recommended, tailored by disease severity, as second- and third-line therapies for treatment failures. Response criteria were formulated to facilitate the evaluation of treatment failure or success. These guidelines should help treating physicians to stratify patients based on disease severity in order to select the best available therapeutic option. An international registry for patients with CD (ACCELERATE, #NCT02817997) was established in October 2016 to collect patient outcomes to increase the evidence base for selection of therapies in the future.