GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 19, No. 2 ( 2013-02), p. S234-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e18680-e18680
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e18680-e18680
    Abstract: e18680 Background: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are oral therapies widely used to treat men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Recent data have suggested potentially worsened quality of life and depression with use of enzalutamide compared to abiraterone. Because Veterans are at a higher risk for mental health conditions, we sought to compare mental health service utilization in Veterans with CRPC receiving enzalutamide to those receiving abiraterone. Methods: The Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse was used to identify men with CRPC who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for ≥ 30 days as first-line treatment between 2010-2017. We compared the rate of mental health visits per 100 patient-months for men on abiraterone versus enzalutamide using an exact rate ratio test, assuming Poisson counts. Results: Among 2902 male Veterans, 68.6% (n=1992) received abiraterone and 31.4% (n=910) enzalutamide as first-line therapy. Men who received enzalutamide were older (76 vs 74, p 〈 0.01) and had a higher comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] ≥ 2 in 28.7% vs 21.6%, p 〈 0.01); no differences were noted in race or prevalence of preexisting documented mental health diagnoses. Median time on drug was 8 months for both medications. There was no difference in the rate of mental health visits per 100 patients-months on enzalutamide versus abiraterone (6.6 v. 6.7, p=0.66). However, within patient sub-groups, men who were age 75 or older, not married, or without notable comorbidities had lower rates of mental health visits with enzalutamide compared to abiraterone; whereas those who were younger than 75, married, had higher comorbidities, or a preexisting mental health diagnosis had higher rates of mental health visits with enzalutamide (Table). Conclusions: Among Veterans with CRPC who received a novel antiandrogen therapy first-line, there was no difference in engagement in mental health care between those who received abiraterone versus enzalutamide. Sub-group analysis revealed significant differences between patients on the two medications in demographic and diagnostic characteristics associated with number of visits, suggesting that vulnerability for mental health symptoms may vary by medication type. Further work in understanding the long-term impact of novel antiandrogens on mental health is needed.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e18878-e18878
    Abstract: e18878 Background: Bone metastases occur in up to 90% of men with metastatic prostate cancer and cause skeletal-related events (SREs) such as fracture and spinal cord compression. Although bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been shown to decrease the risk of SREs in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), BMAs are not widely used in this patient population. In this retrospective study, we report the prescribing patterns of BMAs and predictors of BMA use in a large national cohort. Methods: We used the VA corporate data warehouse to identify patients with mCRPC who were treated with first-line mCRPC therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, or ketoconazole) between 2010 and 2017. BMA prescribing frequency and patterns were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate clinical and disease-specific factors associated with BMA use which are presented as adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: In the final cohort of 4,079 patients, the median age at mCRPC diagnosis was 73 years (IQR 66-81). 29% of patients in the cohort were Black. Diagnosis codes identified bone metastases at mCRPC diagnosis in 48% of the cohort (ICD-9 and 10 coding for sites of metastases are known to underestimate the actual incidence of metastases). Only 48% of patients received a BMA following initiation of treatment for mCRPC, 47% of which had already received a BMA 6 months prior to mCRPC diagnosis. For those who were new BMA starts, the median time to BMA administration from mCRPC treatment was 3.4 months (IQR 1.2-8.8). Factors associated with BMA use were having an ICD-9 or 10 diagnosis code for bone metastases at time of mCRPC treatment (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.48), concurrent corticosteroid use (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.53-2.38), and docetaxel use as first-line mCRPC therapy (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.45-2.18). Factors associated with decreased BMA use were Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥ 2 (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90), advancing age (OR 0.86 per 10 years, 95% CI 0.79-0.94), and decreased eGFR (eGFR 30-59, OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96; eGFR 0-29, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.37). Having a diagnosis code for a SRE before mCRPC diagnosis (e.g., bone fracture and cord compression) did not impact BMA use, but the incidence of those events was low. Conclusions: Less than half of this VA cohort received a BMA after starting therapy for mCRPC. Key factors associated with BMA use were corticosteroid use and first-line docetaxel use, which likely represented more aggressive disease. Notably, patients who were older and had more comorbid conditions were less likely to receive a BMA despite being highest risk for frailty and SREs. Future quality improvement efforts aimed at increasing BMA use may address the needs of the geriatric mCRPC patient population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. TPS5096-TPS5096
    Abstract: TPS5096 Background: Metastasis Directed Therapy (MDT) is the focus of recently completed and ongoing clinical trials. For biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, MDT delays the initiation of androgen deprivation, but is noncurative as 〉 75% of patient’s progress within 3 years. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), focal therapies are common for palliation of pain, but not routinely recommended for controlling systemic disease. Whole genome sequencing has demonstrated that mCRPC metastases seed new metastases and patients with a greater burden disease develop more rapid resistance to next-generation hormone therapies. Therefore, MDT to all visible disease may be beneficial in oligometastatic CRPC. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized phase 2 clinical trial with a primary endpoint of progression-free (radiographic + clinical) survival at 18 months. Secondary endpoints include objective disease PFS, PSA PFS, PSA response rate, non-irradiated distant MFS and PROs. The utility of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT will be explored and sequential analysis of circulating tumor DNA/circulating tumor cells will be done. Sites of disease are defined by all available imaging (minimum of CT or MRI, NM bone scan, but potentially molecular imaging). Oligometastatic CRPC is defined as between 1 and ≤5 treatment sites. Eligible patients with progressive oligometastatic CRPC may have prior sipuleucel-T but no therapy for mCRPC. Docetaxel or abiraterone within the hormone sensitive phase is allowed. Patients will be randomized 1:1 (stratified by 1-2 vs 3-5 oligometastases and whether molecular imaging in mCRPC is available) to physician’s choice vs. physician’s choice + MDT. MDT may be delivered via multiple radiation oncology techniques to cytotoxic doses. If the prostate itself has not been treated (on MDT arm), it will be treated and count as 1 site. Statistical analysis will provide objective PFS by arm with associated 90% confidence intervals. The study is recruiting 72 randomized patients at the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center and soon the Ann Arbor Veteran’s Administration Hospital. The trial is funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation and a University of Michigan Cancer Center Trial Support Award. Clinical trial information: NCT03556904.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7044-7044
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7044-7044
    Abstract: 7044 Background: Sarcopenia, a state of abnormally low muscle mass, has been found to be associated with more treatment-related complications and shorter overall survival in patients with different cancers. Sarcopenia can be reliably assessed with routine computerized tomography (CT). The objectives of the study were to determine whether sarcopenia is associated with the number of complications and the number of days spent in the hospital in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) for lymphoma. Methods: Adult patients treated for non-Hodgkin's or Hodgkin's lymphoma with autoSCT between 2/2005 – 6/2/2012 at the University of Michigan (U-M) Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Program were eligible for inclusion if a CT of the abdomen was performed within 60 days prior to autoSCT. Total psoas area and lean psoas area were calculated for each patient with cross-sectional area and density measurements taken at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra using algorithms programmed in the Analytic Morphomics Lab at U-M. All analyses were completed using Poisson regression models controlling for age, gender, body mass index, Hematopoeitic-Cell Transplant Co-morbidity Index (HCT-CI), and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Results: Total and lean psoas area were calculated in the 121 patients who met inclusion criteria. Men with greater psoas muscle measures experienced fewer complications and spent fewer days in the hospital during the autoSCT admission compared to men who were sarcopenic (complications β = -0.206, p=0.001; hospital treatment days β = -0.043, p=0.029). Sarcopenia did not play a role in outcomes in women. A strong association existed between sarcopenia and re-admission days within 100 days following autoSCT among both men (β = -1.183, p 〈 0.0001) and women (β = -0.805, p 〈 0.0001). Conclusions: Muscle mass is independently associated with complication rates and duration of hospitalization in patients undergoing autoSCT for lymphoma. CT-determined psoas muscle mass may be a valuable addition to other indices used to guide optimal treatment selection and serve as a potentially modifiable host factor to improve transplant-related outcomes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 8_suppl ( 2017-03-10), p. 35-35
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 8_suppl ( 2017-03-10), p. 35-35
    Abstract: 35 Background: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are oral medications approved by the Food & Drug Administration in 2011 and 2012 to treat men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer. Most men with advanced prostate cancer are over age 65 and thus eligible for Medicare Part D. We conducted a study to better understand the early dissemination of these drugs across the United States using national Medicare Part D data. Methods: We evaluated the number of prescriptions for abiraterone and enzalutamide by provider specialty and hospital referral region (HRR) using Medicare Part D and Dartmouth Atlas data. We categorized HRRs by abiraterone and enzalutamide prescriptions, adjusted for prostate cancer incidence, and examined factors associated with regional variation using multilevel regression models. Results: Among all providers who wrote prescriptions for abiraterone or enzalutamide in 2013 (n=2121), 87.5% were medical oncologists, 3.3% urologists, and 9.2% were listed as other provider specialties. Among those who prescribed either drug, 5% of providers were responsible for 75% of the claims for abiraterone, and 7% were responsible for 75% of the claims for enzalutamide. Some HRRs demonstrated low-prescribing rates despite average medical oncology and urology physician workforce density. Conclusions: The majority of prescriptions written for abiraterone and enzalutamide through Medicare Part D in 2013 were written by a minority of providers with marked regional variation across the United States. Better understanding the early national dissemination of these effective but expensive drugs can help inform strategies to optimize introduction of new, evidence-based advanced prostate cancer treatments.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e17043-e17043
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e17043-e17043
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 28_suppl ( 2021-10-01), p. 61-61
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 28_suppl ( 2021-10-01), p. 61-61
    Abstract: 61 Background: Numerous oral anticancer drugs approved for metastatic prostate cancer are expensive and put patients at risk for financial toxicity. Mechanisms to mitigate these costs are complex to navigate and are variable for different patient populations. We examined the impact of high costs and insurance type on time on therapy and reason for discontinuation of oral medication in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: We identified patients with prostate cancer who filled prescriptions for abiraterone or enzalutamide at our comprehensive cancer center 1/1/17-3/31/19, or who were prescribed one of these therapies but could not fill due to cost. Those with commercial insurance or Medicare part D were included. Clinical and demographic data was extracted for evaluation. Primary outcome variables included initial out-of-pocket cost, time on treatment, and failure to fill medication due to cost. Analysis using chi squared, T-tests and ANOVA was performed to assess associations. Results: We identified 193 patients. Of these, 34% had commercial insurance and 66% had Medicare part D. Mean out-of-pocket expense for the first fill was $62 for patients with commercial insurance and $582 for patients with Medicare Part D. Among those who did not fill due to cost, 9 had Medicare Part D and 1 had commercial insurance. The mean time on therapy for those with commercial insurance was 452 days vs 442 days for those with Medicare Part D. At time of data analysis, 50% of those with commercial insurance vs 45% of those with Medicare Part D remained on treatment. Of those who discontinued, 50% of those with commercial insurance did so due to progression or death vs 44% with Medicare part D. 14% with commercial insurance and 15% with Medicare part D discontinued to due patient preference or toxicities. 1 patient with Medicare part D and no patients with commercial insurance discontinued due to cost. There was no difference in time on therapy by out-of-pocket expense (average 444 days for out-of-pocket 〈 $100 vs 477 days for out-of pocket 〉 $100; p = 0.6) although those with an initial out of pocket expense 〉 $100 were more likely not to fill their medication (24% vs 1%, p 〈 0.01). Conclusions: Costs remain high for oral prostate cancer treatments. Our findings suggest disproportionate financial burden among patients with Medicare Part D causing a significant number of patients to forego recommended therapy. While high costs did lead to failure to fill, we did not observe significant differences in time on treatment for patients with Medicare part D or with high out-of-pocket expense. Additionally, there was not a significant difference in stated reason for stopping therapy. Further research on patient perceptions of financial assistance programs and medication costs are planned.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 6_suppl ( 2021-02-20), p. 70-70
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 6_suppl ( 2021-02-20), p. 70-70
    Abstract: 70 Background: Numerous oral anticancer drugs approved for metastatic prostate cancer are expensive and put patients at risk for financial toxicity. Mechanisms available to mitigate these costs are complex to navigate. Furthermore, the ability to access these resources may not be the same for every insurance. We examined the out-of-pocket (OOP) liability of patients prescribed abiraterone or enzalutamide, the assistance mechanisms used, and the impact on timing of therapy. Methods: Patients with prostate cancer who were prescribed abiraterone or enzalutamide at our comprehensive cancer center between January 1, 2017 and March 31, 2019 were identified. Patients who filled prescriptions via an external pharmacy were excluded. Data regarding demographics, out of pocket costs and assistance mechanisms were evaluated. Results: We identified 219 patients. Of these, 33% had commercial insurance, 61% had Medicare part D, 3% had Medicaid and 8% had no insurance. Most patients (74%) were prescribed abiraterone and 26% enzalutamide. Among those with Medicare Part D, almost one third received significant financial assistance: 11% free drug from the manufacturer and 18% foundational grants. Patients with commercial insurance received a copay card from manufacturers 21% of the time. Patients with commercial insurance paid an average of $57 OOP; 94% with initial cost 〈 $100. Patients with Medicare part D paid an average of $582 OOP; 22% with initial cost 〉 $1000. Commercially insured patients started treatments in under 10 days from the prescription date 51% of the time vs 39% for Medicare patients. In contrast, 11% of commercially insured patients required 〉 30 days to fill vs 19% on Medicare. Only 1% of commercially insured patients were unable to fill due to cost issues compared to 7% of patients on Medicare. Conclusions: Financial assistance mechanisms such as grants and free drug programs help alleviate some financial burden for patients, but many still experience high OOP costs. These burdens appear to be disproportionately experienced by patients with Medicare Part D. We observed that patients with Medicare Part D had higher OOP costs for oral prostate cancer therapies. Those who required assistance often experienced delays in obtaining medication. Further evaluation is planned into how high costs and delays in treatment impacts prostate cancer treatment and patient care. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 5010-5010
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...