GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 44, No. suppl_1 ( 2013-02)
    Abstract: Implementing: Target Stroke Best Practice Time Sensitive Guidelines Improves Door to Needle Time (DTN) Background: Target Stroke Honor Roll (TSHR) facilities have demonstrated compliance meeting Get With the Guidelines (GWTG) standards for care of the acute stroke patient. TSHR leaders collaborated and recognized there are similar barriers resulting in not achieving the DTN goal. Objective: To review IV-TPA data of patients from TSHR facilities that did not meet the DTN time of less than 60 minutes and specify which of the three categories had the greatest delay. • Internal Process • Patient dynamics • Hemodynamic instability Methods: A six month retrospective review of IV t-PA administrations from 9 Georgia TSHR facilities was performed. The review included those administrations that did not meet the DTN Goal of 〈 60 minutes. Meaningful intervals in treatment were calculated using uniformly abstracted data, and analyzed as proportions of the total DTN time (expressed as a decimal) with the cause(s) for the delay in t-PA administration in each case being placed in one of the three categories. Results: There were 171 cases of which 48 (28%) did not meet the DTN goal time of 60 minutes or less. The data indicates that the most significant barrier to a DTN of 〈 60 minutes is the delay between resulted labs/ CT and the delivery of TPA. The intervals were the time from CT and labs resulted to TPA delivery (.52), patient arrival to MD arriving at the bedside (.13), the time from labs being drawn to labs being resulted (.32), the time from a CT being performed to the CT being resulted (.29), the time from when a CT was resulted to when TPA was ordered (.22), and the time from when TPA was ordered to when it was delivered (.27). Once the total data set was collated, a single factor ANOVA was performed. The results indicated a significant pattern in the data, and meaningful differences between variables (p-value = 1.43E-18). Category results: Internal Process; 28 (58%), Hemodynamic ; 9 (19%), Patient/family ; 11 (23%) Conclusion: The data indicated the primary delay was related to Internal Process 58% (28/48). This concludes that continued vigilance on Target Stroke time sensitive Guidelines can impact the success rate of DTN 〈 60 minutes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2012
    In:  Stroke Vol. 43, No. suppl_1 ( 2012-02)
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 43, No. suppl_1 ( 2012-02)
    Abstract: Background/issues: Acute Ischemic stroke is a time sensitive disease. The only approved treatment is t-PA. Prior studies have demonstrated faster Door-to-Needle (DTN) times for t-PA treated stroke patients were associated with fewer complications and lower risk adjusted mortality. In conjunction to these findings the American Stroke Association has adopted in 2011 the goal to decrease the door to needle time on all eligible patients. The Georgia Stroke Professional Alliance (GA-SPA) has continued to encourage its members to achieve Target:Stroke designation. In response to this challenge seven separate facilities were able to reach this goal. Of note each facility is unique in its geographical location, size, and setting. Despite these differences each was able to obtain the same result in meeting the Target:Stroke criteria. In an effort to reduce the DTN, some facilities have begun mixing t-PA at bedside, while others utilize central pharmacy. Purpose: Identify the method utilized at each facility to mix t-PA. Determine if mixing at Bedside versus central pharmacy improves DTN times. Determine if mixing at bedside increases the risk of adverse affects such as sICH or increase length of stay. Methods: Of the Seven Target:Stroke facilities six submitted data on all t-pa recipients from January 2010 to December 2010. Each facility identified where t-PA is mixed and by whom. Facilities also provided the number of complications resulting from t-PA. Complications included increased length of stay directly related to t-pa, and sICH with an increase of two or more on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Results: Two hundred seventeen ( 217) t-PA cases were reviewed. Four facilities mix t-PA in Pharmacy representing 115 cases with a total of three reported complications. Two facilities mix t-PA at bedside by a trained RN with a total of three reported complications. There was no statistically significant increase in complications by facilities mixing at bedside. Conclusions: Complications did not increase when t-PA is mixed outside of pharmacy. Facilities can successfully attain Target:Stroke Designation, regardless of where t-pa is mixed. Further studies will be conducted to see if mixing at bedside decreases DTN time.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...