GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS2573-TPS2573
    Abstract: TPS2573 Background: Brain metastases, most commonly derived from melanoma, lung and breast cancers, are the most common brain tumor, with approximately 200,000 cases diagnosed annually in the United States. Median survival is on the order of months. For patients with clinically symptomatic brain metastases, approximately half succumb due to intracranial progression. In preclinical work, we demonstrated that brain metastases and primary tumors are often genetically distinct with frequent alterations in the CDK and PI3K pathway (Brastianos, Carter et al. Cancer Discovery 2015). Methods: We are currently accruing to a prospective multi-arm phase II study of CDK, PI3K/mTOR, and NTRK/ROS1 inhibitors in patients with brain metastases harboring alterations associated with sensitivity to these inhibitors (abemaciclib, paxalisib and entrectinib), respectively. Patients with new, recurrent or progressive brain metastases are eligible for this trial. Previously obtained tissue from brain metastases and extracranial sites (primary or extracranial metastases) are screened for the presence of these alterations, and if present in both tumor sites, patients will receive the appropriate corresponding targeted treatment. Screening is carried out with the SNaPshot NGS assay, which is a fully validated clinical test designed and developed at the MGH Center for Integrated Diagnostics. The primary endpoint of response rate (RR) in the central nervous system as per RANO criteria will be evaluated separately for each inhibitor, stratified by histology within each arm. There will be 21 evaluable patients assigned to each of the CDK and PI3K inhibitor and tumor type cohorts (breast, lung and other) and 10 patients assigned to the NTRK/ROS1 inhibitor cohort (lung) for a total of 136 evaluable patients. Although current systemic therapy for brain metastases is often ineffective, we hypothesize that targeted therapies will demonstrate efficacy in patients harboring the appropriate mutations. This study represents a novel individualized therapeutic approach in brain metastases, a disease with a critical need for effective therapy. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Genentech, Kazia Therapeutics Limited, Eli Lilly; Clinical trial information: NCT03994796 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 2006-2006
    Abstract: 2006 Background: Brain metastases are an increasing challenge in oncology due to increasing incidence and limited treatments. Recent studies suggest that brain metastases harbor a tumor microenvironment characterized by immunosuppressive phenotypes, which contribute to treatment resistance. Therefore, a logical therapeutic strategy for brain metastases is to evaluate immune-based strategies that augment T cell cytotoxicity. Methods: This study was designed as an open-label, single-stage, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the intracranial efficacy of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with brain metastases of diverse histologies. The target accrual was 58 patients to achieve at least 52 evaluable patients (i.e., received at least one dose of pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint was intracranial benefit, defined as a best response of complete response, partial response, or stable disease by RANO criteria during treatment. The study design compared a null intracranial benefit rate of 10% against an alternative of 24%. If at least 8 patients among the total of 52 had intracranial benefit, the primary efficacy endpoint would be met and pembrolizumab would be considered worthy of further study in this patient population. This design has a type-I error of 10% and power of 89% (target type-II error of 15%). Results: In the 57 evaluable patients, median age was 53 (range 28-80) and 81% were female. Tumor histologies included breast (n = 35), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 7), melanoma (n = 2), small-cell lung cancer (n = 2), sarcoma (n = 2), ovarian (n = 1), pituitary carcinoma (n = 1), pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1), esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 1), prostate (n = 1), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 1), unknown primary (n = 1) and sinonasal adenocystic carcinoma (n = 1). For the patients with breast cancer, 16 patients had HER-2 positive disease, 17 patients had hormone receptor-positive disease, and 11 patients had the triple-negative subtype. The study met its primary endpoint and achieved an intracranial benefit rate of 42.1% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 31-54%). In addition, seven patients, who had either breast cancer, melanoma or sarcoma, had durable intracranial anti-tumor activity ( 〉 2 years). The extracranial benefit rate in patients with evaluable extracranial disease based on RECIST 1.1 criteria was 45% (18/40; 90% CI: 31-59%). Median overall survival was 8.0 months (90% CI: 5.5-8.7 months). Grade 4 toxicities at least possibly related to treatment were observed in 2 patients: cerebral edema (n = 2). Thirteen patients discontinued treatment for adverse events. Conclusions: Our study of pembrolizumab met overall primary endpoint for intracranial benefit in patients with brain metastases. These results suggest that PD-1 blockade may serve as the backbone of therapeutic strategies for a select group of patients with brain metastases and warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02886585 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 2069-2069
    Abstract: 2069 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common central nervous system tumors in the US. Though the exact incidence is unknown, BM are estimated to occur in up to 10-20% of all cancers. Despite the high frequency, there is little systematic knowledge about how BM are typically diagnosed and treated. The American Brain Tumor Association (ABTA) seeks to understand the BM journey: symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and end of life, through a survey of BM patients and caregivers. Methods: Two surveys were developed by the ABTA with vendor, PSB Research, after careful literature review. The surveys were reviewed by a panel of clinicians who treat BM patients. Online survey research was conducted between 8/13-9/16/18, with one survey for adults with BM (N = 237) and another for caregivers (N = 211). Respondents came from PSB’s panels and ABTA collaborators: LUNGevity, Melanoma Research Foundation and the Kidney Cancer Association. Results: Ninety percent of patients, and a similar number of caregivers, were surprised by the diagnosis, with only 20% of patients knowing about BM before diagnosis. Most caregivers were the adult child of a patient. The impact of the diagnosis was primarily emotional. Top concerns after diagnosis, for both patients and caregivers, were likelihood of treatment success and impact on quality of life. Although a majority of patients were happy with the quality of information given, they stated a need to receive a greater quantity of information about treatment success and options. Only 30% of patients were referred to a patient advocacy organization. When referred, information on treatment success rates and options was most sought. Conclusions: Direct patient and caregiver feedback provides valuable insight towards understanding the BM journey and resources needed to support patients and caregivers. A subsequent survey among oncologists and other clinicians, planned for spring of 2019, will add to these findings.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e14028-e14028
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e14028-e14028
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Science Advances, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Vol. 7, No. 10 ( 2021-03-05)
    Abstract: Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) shows brain metastatic (BM) capability and overexpresses EGFR and death-receptors 4/5 (DR4/5); however, the anatomical location of BM prohibits efficient drug-delivery to these targetable markers. In this study, we developed BLBC-BM mouse models featuring different patterns of BMs and explored the versatility of estem cell (SC)–mediated bi-functional EGFR and DR4/5-targeted treatment in these models. Most BLBC lines demonstrated a high sensitivity to EGFR and DR4/5 bi-targeting therapeutic protein, E V DR L [anti-EGFR VHH (E V ) fused to DR ligand (DR L )]. Functional analyses using inhibitors and CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts revealed that the E V domain facilitated in augmenting DR4/5-DR L binding and enhancing DR L -induced apoptosis. E V DR L secreting stem cells alleviated tumor-burden and significantly increased survival in mouse models of residual-tumor after macrometastasis resection, perivascular niche micrometastasis, and leptomeningeal metastasis. This study reports mechanism based simultaneous targeting of EGFR and DR4/5 in BLBC and defines a new treatment paradigm for treatment of BM.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2375-2548
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810933-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book , No. 38 ( 2018-05), p. 158-167
    In: American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), , No. 38 ( 2018-05), p. 158-167
    Abstract: PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS In low-grade gliomas, MGMT promoter methylation status, IDH mutation status, upregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, and BRAF mutations have shifted the focus toward agents targeting these associated alterations. In glioblastomas, targeting DNA repair mechanisms using PARP inhibitors as well as agents targeting the IDH-mutant enzyme and gene fusions hold promise for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma with those genetic alterations. BRAF V600E mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas have been identified as new promising targets to effectively treat patients with these tumor entities. Meningiomas harbor clinically actionable mutations, including SMO and AKT mutations, that are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. The identification of genetic driver mutations and their underlying molecular pathways in low-grade gliomas, glioblastomas, craniopharyngiomas, and meningiomas opens up new possibilities for the diagnostic process as well as for effective targeted treatment options in affected patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1548-8748 , 1548-8756
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2431126-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e14004-e14004
    Abstract: e14004 Background: Brain metastases (BM) is one of the most feared complications of cancer due to substantial neurologic sequalae, neuro-cognitive morbidity and grim prognosis. In the past decade, targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibitors have resulted in meaningfully improved overall survival for a minority of these patients. Accordingly, there is a growing need to identify issues surrounding patient survivorship and to standardize physician practice patterns for these patients. To date, there has not been a well-conducted formal study to specifically explore these questions of survivorship and practice standardization for BM patients. Methods: Here, we present results from a cross-sectional survey in which we analyzed responses from 237 BM patients, 209 caregivers, and 239 physicians. Surveys contained questions about BM symptoms, discussion of BM diagnosis by the clinician, psychosocial concerns, available treatment options for BM, BM patient advocacy resources, and BM-specific clinical trials. Results: Our survey revealed compelling findings about current care of BM patients. There were discrepancies in the perceived discussion of the implications of the diagnosis of BM, from the patient/caregiver and physician perspective. Important topics, such as prognosis and worrisome symptoms, were felt to have been discussed more frequently by physicians than by patients or caregivers. In our physician survey, private practice physicians, compared to academic physicians, were significantly more likely to recommend whole brain radiotherapy (61.1 vs 39.7%; p = 0.009). Participation in a clinical trial was one of the least recommended treatment options. Many physicians (59.1% private; 71.9% academic) stated that BM patients in their care are denied participation in a clinical trial, specifically due to the presence of BM. The consensus among physicians, patients and caregivers was that the highest yield area for federal assistance is increased treatment and research funding for BM. Conclusions: Our hope is that these findings will serve as a basis for future quality improvement measures to enhance patient-physician communication and patient well-being, continuing medical education activities detailing latest advances in BM for oncologists, and lobbying efforts to the federal government in prioritizing BM research, clinical trials, and patient survivorship.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 2039-2039
    Abstract: 2039 Background: Brain metastases occur in multiple cancer types with higher prevalence in lung, breast, melanoma, and GI cancers. The prognoses of patients who develop brain metastases are very poor and identification of brain metastasis risk could be useful for prognostication, monitoring, and therapy selection. Methods: Data from the whole transcriptome of 220,246 tumor profiles were analyzed and multiple machine learning models were trained on various molecular subtypes. The dataset was split 50% for training and the other 50% for testing, UMAP was employed for dimensionality reduction and the patterns learned across the entirety of the training dataset irrespective of brain metastasis were leveraged on the testing data set. Patients with brain metastasis were identified using the presence of ICD-10 code C79.31 (Secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain). As the absence of C79.31 could be due to the event not happening yet, patients without brain metastasis were stratified into groups based on 3, 4 or greater than 5 years without a C79.31 ICD-10 code. The brain metastasis risk score was defined by empirical evaluation of the positive predictive value in 7 groups of risk probabilities. The validation set contained 1,217 patients with brain metastasis and 4,631 without an observed brain metastasis within 3 years. Results: In the validation set, the prevalence of brain metastases within the risk scores across all cancer types ranged from 4% with the lowest risk score to 94% in the highest with 71% of cases receiving the lowest 2 risk scores, 15% the 2 intermediate risk scores, and 14% the 3 highest risk scores. For breast, lung and colon cancers, the prevalence of brain metastasis ranged from 4-10% in patients with the lowest risk scores to 92-100% in patients with the highest however the distribution of cases with each risk score was markedly different across cancer type. Breast cancer had 62% of cases receiving the lowest 2 risk scores versus 27% in lung, and 92% in colon. Breast cancer had 18% of cases receiving the 3 highest risk scores while lung had 42% and colon only 2% of cases with those 3 highest scores. Conclusions: Whole transcriptome data can be leveraged by a machine learning platform that employs dimensionality reduction techniques along with transfer learning to predict the risk of brain metastasis. This tool can be used to augment the clinical picture of cancer patients an unmet clinical opportunity to inform prognosis, monitoring, and therapeutic selection.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2010
    In:  The American Journal of Medicine Vol. 123, No. 6 ( 2010-06), p. e17-
    In: The American Journal of Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 123, No. 6 ( 2010-06), p. e17-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9343
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003338-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e13585-e13585
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e13585-e13585
    Abstract: e13585 Background: Brain metastases are the most common tumors to affect the central nervous system. Treatment options have recently evolved with the use of targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and increased clinical trials availability. We describe our institutional experience with a novel, weekly tumor board dedicated to brain metastases and its impact on treatment decisions and survival. Methods: We conducted a single institution cohort study at a large academic hospital with a dedicated center for CNS metastases. Attendance at tumor board included representatives from neuro-oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, and neuroradiology. We prospectively gathered data on patient demographics, clinical history, and tumor board recommendations. Patients were followed to assess treatment course and survival. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate time to progression. Results: A total of 49 patients were presented over 2 months, with 4 patients presented twice. The median age at presentation was 63 yrs with a median ECOG of 1. The primary malignancy was 35% melanoma, 49% lung, 22% breast, the remainder other. Most patients had advanced, heavily pretreated disease: 69% had Stage IV disease at time of tumor board presentation with a median of 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, 73% had multiple brain metastases, 39% had prior surgical resection of brain metastases, and 57% had prior CNS radiation. The tumor board recommended a change in management in 26/53 case presentations: 5 surgery, 8 radiation, 9 medical therapy, 3 clinical trial, and 1 surveillance. Recommendations were followed in all except 4 cases due to patient preference and loss to follow-up. When active therapy was recommended, the median time to start was 7 days. Only 3 patients have died at a median follow-up of 62 days. 9 patients have progressed, with a median time to progression of 57 days. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary brain metastasis tumor board provides unique opportunities in the management of complex brain metastasis patients in an era of rapidly evolving therapeutic options. Additional follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes, and comparison to non-tumor board presented patients will be necessary.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...