GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 1999
    In:  Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine Vol. 153, No. 7 ( 1999-07-01), p. 705-
    In: Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 153, No. 7 ( 1999-07-01), p. 705-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1072-4710
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 1999
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Ambulatory Pediatrics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 2, No. 2 ( 2002-3), p. 93-99
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1530-1567
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2158654-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 102, No. 6 ( 1998-12-01), p. 1350-1357
    Abstract: To describe the establishment of a national pediatric primary care research network to improve children's health care—Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS), and to evaluate the network's progress toward achieving its objectives. Setting. Pediatric practices in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. Participants. Approximately 1400 pediatric practitioners from more than 470 practices. Results. Beginning in 1986, a core of volunteer pediatrician coordinators from participating American Academy of Pediatrics chapters were identified to oversee local PROS efforts, represent practitioners, and inform the development of proposed research studies. PROS subsequently recruited practitioners from around the country, building a research infrastructure and a system of collaboration between the practitioners, research staff at the AAP, and investigative teams at academic institutions. This PROS collaboration has developed and conducted 10 primary care research studies that have added to the knowledge base of pediatric primary care. Conclusions. PROS has accomplished two of its initial objectives—development of a structure and process for pediatric practice-based research and provision of research experience to practitioners. Successful and consistent achievement of a third objective—meaningful dissemination of study results to relevant audiences—will depend on meeting several challenges. primary care, health services research, child health, ambulatory care.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1098-4275 , 0031-4005
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publication Date: 1998
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1477004-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 107, No. 6 ( 2001-06-01), p. e90-e90
    Abstract: To determine whether the change from an all oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) schedule to an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)-containing schedule has adversely affected the immunization status of young children in the United States. Methods. Immunization data were abstracted from the medical records of children 8 to 35 months old seen consecutively for any reason in the offices of practicing pediatricians who are members of the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network of the American Academy of Pediatrics or the National Medical Association. Data on up to 120 eligible children were collected in each practice between March 1998 and January 2000. Patients were classified as fully immunized at 8 months old if they had received 3 diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, 2Haemophilus influenzae type b, 2 hepatitis B, and 2 poliovirus vaccines. Study children who were ≥12 months of age at the time that data were collected were categorized as being fully immunized at 12 months if they had received the same vaccines before their first birthday. To assess the effect of type of poliovirus vaccines on these outcomes, study patients were classified as being in an IPV or OPV group based on the initial type of vaccine received. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for IPV as a predictor of being fully immunized at 8 and 12 months of age, after adjusting for race/ethnicity of the patient, maternal education level, year of birth, and method of payment for vaccines. In addition, the effect of clustering of children within practices was accounted for by the use of generalized estimation equation techniques. Results. Data were analyzed on 13 520 children from 177 practices in 42 states; 79.4% of patients were fully immunized at 8 months of age, and 88.7% of those eligible were fully immunized at 12 months of age. A total of 6910 patients (51.1%) were classified as OPV recipients, wheras 5282 (39.1%) received IPV. In addition, 1328 children (9.8%) were documented as having received poliovirus vaccine, but the particular type could not be determined. Compared with OPV recipients and after controlling for the confounding variables and the effect of clustering within practices, children in the IPV group were as likely as were OPV recipients to be fully immunized at 8 months of age (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.88,1.23). At 12 months of age, the OR for IPV as a predictor of being fully immunized was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.90,1.30). When compared with OPV recipients, adjusted ORs for children in the undetermined poliovirus vaccine type group being fully immunized at 8 and 12 months of age were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.68,1.04) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.67,1.07), respectively. Conclusions. The results of this national study indicate that the implementation of an IPV-containing poliovirus vaccine schedule has not had an adverse effect on the immunization status of young children who were vaccinated in the offices of practicing pediatricians.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1098-4275 , 0031-4005
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1477004-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 134, No. 4 ( 2014-10-01), p. 747-753
    Abstract: Competing priorities in pediatric practice have created challenges for practice-based research. To increase recruitment success, researchers must design studies that provide added value to participants. This study evaluates recruitment of pediatricians into a study, before and after the development and addition of a quality improvement (QI) curriculum approved for American Board of Pediatrics Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Part 4 Credit as an enrollment incentive. METHODS: Researchers implemented multiple outreach methods to enroll pediatric practices over 28 months. Field note review revealed that many physicians declined enrollment, stating that they prioritized MOC Part 4 projects over research studies. A QI curriculum meeting standards for MOC Part 4 Credit was developed and added to the study protocol as an enrollment incentive. Enrollment rates and characteristics of practitioners enrolled pre- and post-MOC were compared. RESULTS: Pre-MOC enrollment contributed 48% of practices in 22 months; post-MOC enrollment contributed 49% of practices in 6 months. An average of 3.5 practices enrolled per month pre-MOC, compared with 13.1 per month post-MOC (P & lt; .001). Clinicians in pre- and post-MOC groups were similar in age, gender, race, and time spent on patient care; practices enrolled post-MOC were more likely to be located in federally designated Medically Underserved Areas than those enrolled pre-MOC (28.6% vs 12%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of MOC Part 4 Credit increased recruitment success and increased enrollment of pediatricians working in underserved areas. Including QI initiatives meeting MOC Part 4 criteria in practice-based research protocols may enhance participation and aid in recruiting diverse practice and patient populations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1477004-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2011
    In:  Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care Vol. 41, No. 10 ( 2011-11), p. 286-292
    In: Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, Elsevier BV, Vol. 41, No. 10 ( 2011-11), p. 286-292
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-5442
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052053-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 1999
    In:  Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine Vol. 153, No. 1 ( 1999-01-01)
    In: Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 153, No. 1 ( 1999-01-01)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1072-4710
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 1999
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 1996
    In:  Pediatric Research Vol. 39 ( 1996-4), p. 18-18
    In: Pediatric Research, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 39 ( 1996-4), p. 18-18
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-3998 , 1530-0447
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 1996
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2031217-9
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 118, No. 2 ( 2006-08-01), p. e228-e234
    Abstract: OBJECTIVE. Our objective with this study was to assess the extent to which patients who are seen by practitioners in Pediatric Research in Office Settings, a national primary care practice–based research network, are representative of those who are seen in ambulatory office–based pediatric primary care in the United States. METHODS. Pediatric Research in Office Settings patient data were collected from the offices of 57 randomly selected network practitioners as part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality–funded effort to describe primary care visits and replicate the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey in primary care practice–based research networks. These data were from 1706 randomly selected pediatric patient visits that occurred between March and June 2002. National comparison data were 948 randomly selected pediatric patient visits that occurred between March and June 2000 in the offices of the 33 primary care pediatric practitioners who had participated in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. The groups were compared on patient demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, as represented by Medicaid status), visit characteristics (percentages of patients referred, practitioner designation of visit as acute versus nonacute, and continuity of care), the top patient/parent-articulated reasons for visit, and the top practitioner diagnoses. RESULTS. Comparisons revealed substantial similarities between Pediatric Research in Office Settings and national data, including gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and visit characteristics. Differences were noted for age and race, with Pediatric Research in Office Settings children approximately 1 year older and comprising a significantly lower proportion of black patients than their National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey counterparts. Although the top 6 reasons that were articulated by parents for outpatient visits in the 2 groups were remarkably similar in rank order and proportions, there were overall differences, mostly attributable to a larger number of the “other” category in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings cases. There were no significant differences among the top 5 practitioner visit diagnoses between the Pediatric Research in Office Settings and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. CONCLUSIONS. The Pediatric Research in Office Settings patient population is reasonably representative of patients who are seen in US ambulatory office-based pediatric primary care practices; therefore, the Pediatric Research in Office Settings is an appropriate laboratory for studies of care in such settings.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1477004-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ; 2010
    In:  Pediatrics Vol. 126, No. 4 ( 2010-10-01), p. 740-745
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 126, No. 4 ( 2010-10-01), p. 740-745
    Abstract: The goals were (1) to describe and to characterize pediatric clinical research networks (PCRNs) in the United States and Canada, (2) to identify PCRN strengths and weaknesses, (3) to evaluate the potential for collaboration among PCRNs, and (4) to assess untapped potential interest in PCRN participation. METHODS: Data collection included (1) initial identification of PCRNs through an Internet search and word of mouth, (2) follow-up surveys of PCRN leaders, (3) telephone interviews with 21 PCRN leaders, and (4) a survey of 43 American Academy of Pediatrics specialty leaders regarding untapped interest in network research. RESULTS: Seventy exclusively pediatric networks were identified. Of those, specialty care networks constituted the largest proportion (50%), followed by primary care (28.6%) and disease-specific (21.4%) networks. A network profile survey (response rate: 74.3%) revealed that ∼90% held infrastructure funding. Nearly 75% of respondents viewed cross-network collaborations positively. In-depth telephone interviews corroborated the survey data, with cross-network collaboration mentioned consistently as a theme. American Academy of Pediatrics specialty leaders indicated that up to 30% of current nonparticipants might be interested in research involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric networks exist across the care continuum. Significant numbers of uninvolved practitioners may be interested in joining PCRNs. A strong majority of network leaders cited potential benefits from network collaboration.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1477004-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...