GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Microbiology Spectrum, American Society for Microbiology, Vol. 11, No. 2 ( 2023-04-13)
    Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the number of 16S rRNA genes in the complete genomes of the bacterial and archaeal species inhabiting the human mouth and to assess how the use of different primer pairs would affect the detection and classification of redundant amplicons and matching amplicons (MAs) from different taxa. A total of 518 oral-bacterial and 191 oral-archaeal complete genomes were downloaded from the NCBI database, and their complete 16S rRNA genes were extracted. The numbers of genes and variants per genome were calculated. Next, 39 primer pairs were used to search for matches in the genomes and obtain amplicons. For each primer, we calculated the number of gene amplicons, variants, genomes, and species detected and the percentage of coverage at the species level with no MAs (SC-NMA). The results showed that 94.09% of oral bacteria and 52.59% of oral archaea had more than one intragenomic 16S rRNA gene. From 1.29% to 46.70% of bacterial species and from 4.65% to 38.89% of archaea detected by the primers had MAs. The best primers were the following (SC-NMA; region; position for Escherichia coli [GenBank version no. J01859.1 ]): KP_F048-OP_R030 for bacteria (93.55%; V3 to V7; 342 to 1079), KP_F018-KP_R063 for archaea (89.63%; V3 to V9; undefined to 1506), and OP_F114-OP_R121 for both domains (92.52%; V3 to V9; 340 to 1405). In addition to 16S rRNA gene redundancy, the presence of MAs must be controlled to ensure an accurate interpretation of microbial diversity data. The SC-NMA is a more useful parameter than the conventional coverage percentage for selecting the best primer pairs. The pairs used the most in the oral microbiome literature were not among the best performers. IMPORTANCE Hundreds of publications have studied the oral microbiome through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. However, none have assessed the number of 16S rRNA genes in the genomes of oral microbes, or how the use of primer pairs targeting different regions affects the detection of MAs from different taxa. Here, we found that almost all oral bacteria and more than half of oral archaea have more than one intragenomic 16S rRNA gene. The performance of the primer pairs in not detecting MAs increases as the length of the amplicon augments. As none of those most employed in the oral literature were among the best performers, we selected a series of primers to detect bacteria and/or archaea based on their percentage of species detected without MAs. The intragenomic 16S rRNA gene redundancy and the presence of MAs between distinct taxa need to be considered to ensure an accurate interpretation of microbial diversity data.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2165-0497
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society for Microbiology
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2807133-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Microbiome, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 11, No. 1 ( 2023-03-23)
    Abstract: Sequencing has been widely used to study the composition of the oral microbiome present in various health conditions. The extent of the coverage of the 16S rRNA gene primers employed for this purpose has not, however, been evaluated in silico using oral-specific databases. This paper analyses these primers using two databases containing 16S rRNA sequences from bacteria and archaea found in the human mouth and describes some of the best primers for each domain. Results A total of 369 distinct individual primers were identified from sequencing studies of the oral microbiome and other ecosystems. These were evaluated against a database reported in the literature of 16S rRNA sequences obtained from oral bacteria, which was modified by our group, and a self-created oral archaea database. Both databases contained the genomic variants detected for each included species. Primers were evaluated at the variant and species levels, and those with a species coverage (SC) ≥75.00% were selected for the pair analyses. All possible combinations of the forward and reverse primers were identified, with the resulting 4638 primer pairs also evaluated using the two databases. The best bacteria-specific pairs targeted the 3-4, 4-7, and 3-7 16S rRNA gene regions, with SC levels of 98.83–97.14%; meanwhile, the optimum archaea-specific primer pairs amplified regions 5-6, 3-6, and 3-6, with SC estimates of 95.88%. Finally, the best pairs for detecting both domains targeted regions 4-5, 3-5, and 5-9, and produced SC values of 95.71–94.54% and 99.48–96.91% for bacteria and archaea, respectively. Conclusions Given the three amplicon length categories (100-300, 301-600, and 〉 600 base pairs), the primer pairs with the best coverage values for detecting oral bacteria were as follows: KP_F048-OP_R043 (region 3-4; primer pair position for Escherichia coli J01859.1: 342-529), KP_F051-OP_R030 (4-7; 514-1079), and KP_F048-OP_R030 (3-7; 342-1079). For detecting oral archaea, these were as follows: OP_F066-KP_R013 (5-6; 784-undefined), KP_F020-KP_R013 (3-6; 518-undefined), and OP_F114-KP_R013 (3-6; 340-undefined). Lastly, for detecting both domains jointly they were KP_F020-KP_R032 (4-5; 518-801), OP_F114-KP_R031 (3-5; 340-801), and OP_F066-OP_R121 (5-9; 784-1405). The primer pairs with the best coverage identified herein are not among those described most widely in the oral microbiome literature.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2049-2618
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2697425-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Wiley, Vol. 47, No. 6 ( 2020-06), p. 702-714
    Abstract: To obtain salivary interleukin (IL) 1β‐based models to predict the probability of the occurrence of periodontitis, differentiating by smoking habit. Materials/Methods A total of 141 participants were recruited, 62 periodontally healthy controls and 79 subjects affected by periodontitis. Fifty of the diseased patients were given non‐surgical periodontal treatment and showed significant clinical improvement in 2 months. IL1β was measured in the salivary samples using the Luminex instrument. Binary logistic regression models were obtained to differentiate untreated periodontitis from periodontal health (first modelling) and untreated periodontitis from treated periodontitis (second modelling), distinguishing between non‐smokers and smokers. The area under the curve (AUC) and classification measures were calculated. Results In the first modelling, IL1β presented AUC values of 0.830 for non‐smokers and 0.689 for smokers (accuracy = 77.6% and 70.7%, respectively). In the second, the predictive models revealed AUC values of 0.671 for non‐smokers and 0.708 for smokers (accuracy = 70.0% and 75.0%, respectively). Conclusion Salivary IL1β has an excellent diagnostic capability when it comes to distinguishing systemically healthy patients with untreated periodontitis from those who are periodontally healthy, although this discriminatory potential is reduced in smokers. The diagnostic capacity of salivary IL1β remains acceptable for differentiating between untreated and treated periodontitis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0303-6979 , 1600-051X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026349-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Frontiers Media SA ; 2022
    In:  Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Vol. 11 ( 2022-2-9)
    In: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 11 ( 2022-2-9)
    Abstract: Although clustering by operational taxonomic units (OTUs) is widely used in the oral microbial literature, no research has specifically evaluated the extent of the limitations of this sequence clustering-based method in the oral microbiome. Consequently, our objectives were to: 1) evaluate in-silico the coverage of a set of previously selected primer pairs to detect oral species having 16S rRNA sequence segments with ≥97% similarity; 2) describe oral species with highly similar sequence segments and determine whether they belong to distinct genera or other higher taxonomic ranks. Thirty-nine primer pairs were employed to obtain the in-silico amplicons from the complete genomes of 186 bacterial and 135 archaeal species. Each fasta file for the same primer pair was inserted as subject and query in BLASTN for obtaining the similarity percentage between amplicons belonging to different oral species. Amplicons with 100% alignment coverage of the query sequences and with an amplicon similarity value ≥97% (ASI97) were selected. For each primer, the species coverage with no ASI97 (SC-NASI97) was calculated. Based on the SC-NASI97 parameter, the best primer pairs were OP_F053-KP_R020 for bacteria (region V1-V3; primer pair position for Escherichia coli J01859.1: 9-356); KP_F018-KP_R002 for archaea (V4; undefined-532); and OP_F114-KP_R031 for both (V3-V5; 340-801). Around 80% of the oral-bacteria and oral-archaea species analyzed had an ASI97 with at least one other species. These very similar species play different roles in the oral microbiota and belong to bacterial genera such as Campylobacter , Rothia , Streptococcus and Tannerella , and archaeal genera such as Halovivax , Methanosarcina and Methanosalsum . Moreover, ~20% and ~30% of these two-by-two similarity relationships were established between species from different bacterial and archaeal genera, respectively. Even taxa from distinct families, orders, and classes could be grouped in the same possible OTU. Consequently, regardless of the primer pair used, sequence clustering with a 97% similarity provides an inaccurate description of oral-bacterial and oral-archaeal species, which can greatly affect microbial diversity parameters. As a result, OTU clustering conditions the credibility of associations between some oral species and certain health and disease conditions. This significantly limits the comparability of the microbial diversity findings reported in oral microbiome literature.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2235-2988
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2619676-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Molecular Oral Microbiology, Wiley
    Abstract: The multi‐batch reanalysis approach of jointly reevaluating gene/genome sequences from different works has gained particular relevance in the literature in recent years. The large amount of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene sequence data stored in public repositories and information in taxonomic databases of the same gene far exceeds that related to complete genomes. This review is intended to guide researchers new to studying microbiota, particularly the oral microbiota, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and those who want to expand and update their knowledge to optimise their decision‐making and improve their research results. First, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of using the 16S rRNA gene as a phylogenetic marker and the latest findings on the impact of primer pair selection on diversity and taxonomic assignment outcomes in oral microbiome studies. Strategies for primer selection based on these results are introduced. Second, we identified the key factors to consider in selecting the sequencing technology and platform. The process and particularities of the main steps for processing 16S rRNA gene‐derived data are described in detail to enable researchers to choose the most appropriate bioinformatics pipeline and analysis methods based on the available evidence. We then produce an overview of the different types of advanced analyses, both the most widely used in the literature and the most recent approaches. Several indices, metrics and software for studying microbial communities are included, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Considering the principles of clinical metagenomics, we conclude that future research should focus on rigorous analytical approaches, such as developing predictive models to identify microbiome‐based biomarkers to classify health and disease states. Finally, we address the batch effect concept and the microbiome‐specific methods for accounting for or correcting them.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2041-1006 , 2041-1014
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2532744-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...