GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cardiovascular Diabetology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 20, No. 1 ( 2021-09-28)
    Abstract: The risk of heart failure among diabetic individuals is high, even under tight glycemic control. The correlates and mediators of heart failure risk in individuals with diabetes need more elucidation in large population-based cohorts with long follow-up times and a wide panel of biologically relevant biomarkers. Methods In a population-based sample of 3834 diabetic and 90,177 non-diabetic individuals, proportional hazards models and mediation analysis were used to assess the relation of conventional heart failure risk factors and biomarkers with incident heart failure. Results Over a median follow-up of 13.8 years, a total of 652 (17.0%) and 5524 (6.1%) cases of incident heart failure were observed in participants with and without diabetes, respectively. 51.4% were women and the mean age at baseline was 48.7 (standard deviation [SD] 12.5) years. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for heart failure among diabetic individuals was 2.70 (95% confidence interval, 2.49–2.93) compared to non-diabetic participants. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox models, conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as smoking (diabetes: HR 2.07 [1.59–2.69] ; non-diabetes: HR 1.85 [1.68–2.02]), BMI (diabetes: HR 1.30 [1.18–1.42] ; non-diabetes: HR 1.40 [1.35–1.47]), baseline myocardial infarction (diabetes: HR 2.06 [1.55–2.75] ; non-diabetes: HR 2.86 [2.50–3.28]), and baseline atrial fibrillation (diabetes: HR 1.51 [0.82–2.80] ; non-diabetes: HR 2.97 [2.21–4.00]) had the strongest associations with incident heart failure. In addition, biomarkers for cardiac strain (represented by nT-proBNP, diabetes: HR 1.26 [1.19–1.34] ; non-diabetes: HR 1.43 [1.39–1.47]), myocardial injury (hs-TnI, diabetes: HR 1.10 [1.04–1.16] ; non-diabetes: HR 1.13 [1.10–1.16]), and inflammation (hs-CRP, diabetes: HR 1.13 [1.03–1.24] ; non-diabetes: HR 1.29 [1.25–1.34]) were also associated with incident heart failure. In general, all these associations were equally strong in non-diabetic and diabetic individuals. However, the strongest mediators of heart failure in diabetes were the direct effect of diabetes status itself (relative effec t share 43.1% [33.9–52.3] and indirect effects (effect share 56.9% [47.7-66.1] ) mediated by obesity (BMI, 13.2% [10.3–16.2]), cardiac strain/volume overload (nT-proBNP, 8.4% [-0.7–17.4] ), and hyperglycemia (glucose, 12.0% [4.2–19.9]). Conclusions The findings suggest that the main mediators of heart failure in diabetes are obesity, hyperglycemia, and cardiac strain/volume overload. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors are strongly related to incident heart failure, but these associations are not stronger in diabetic than in non-diabetic individuals. Active measurement of relevant biomarkers could potentially be used to improve prevention and prediction of heart failure in high-risk diabetic patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1475-2840
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2093769-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2007
    In:  International Psychogeriatrics Vol. 19, No. 06 ( 2007-12)
    In: International Psychogeriatrics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 19, No. 06 ( 2007-12)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1041-6102 , 1741-203X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2147136-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2005
    In:  International Psychogeriatrics Vol. 17, No. 4 ( 2005-12), p. 557-575
    In: International Psychogeriatrics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 17, No. 4 ( 2005-12), p. 557-575
    Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of depression among the oldest old and to analyze factors associated with depression. Methods: A cross-sectional, population-based study was undertaken in Umeå, Sweden. Out of 319 eligible participants aged 85, 90 and 95 years and older, it was possible to evaluate 242 people (75.9%) for depression. Data were collected from structured interviews and assessments in the participants’ homes, and from medical charts, relatives and caregivers. Depression was screened for using the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and further assessed with the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Cognition was assessed using the Mini-mental State Examination, activities of daily living (ADL) using the Barthel ADL Index, nutrition using the Mini Nutritional Assessment and well-being using the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale. Results: The 85-year-olds had a significantly lower prevalence of depression than the 90- and 95-year-olds (16.8% vs . 34.1% and 32.3%). No sex differences were found. One-third of those with depression had no treatment and among those with ongoing treatment 59% were still depressed. Persons diagnosed with depression had a poorer well-being and a higher 1-year mortality. Logistic regression analyses showed that depression was independently associated with living in institutions and number of medications. Conclusion: Depression among the oldest old is common, underdiagnosed and inadequately treated, and causes poor well-being and increased mortality. More knowledge about depression is essential to improve the assessment and treatment of depression among the oldest old.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1041-6102 , 1741-203X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2147136-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2020
    In:  European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Vol. 76, No. 4 ( 2020-04), p. 539-546
    In: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 76, No. 4 ( 2020-04), p. 539-546
    Abstract: The aims of this study were to examine sex differences in a heart failure population with regards to treatment and patient characteristics and to investigate the impact of sex on achieved doses of heart failure medications. Methods and results A total of 1924 patients with heart failure in a regional hospital were analysed, 622 patients had ejection fraction ≤ 40% of which 30% were women. In patients with reduced ejection fraction, women were older (79 ± 11 vs. 74 ± 12 years, P 〈 0.001), had lower body weight (70 ± 17 vs. 86 ± 18 kg, P 〈 0.001), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (49 ± 24 vs. 71 ± 30 ml/min, P 〈 0.001) and received lower doses of heart failure medications than men. Multivariable linear regression on patients with reduced ejection fraction showed that sex was not associated with achieved dose of any heart failure medication. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers associated factors were eGFR, systolic blood pressure, age, ejection fraction, and heart rate. For beta-blockers associated factors were body weight, atrial fibrillation and age. For mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists associated factors were eGFR, serum potassium, age, systolic blood pressure, ejection fraction and heart rate. Conclusion Women with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction were prescribed lower doses of heart failure medications, were older, had worse renal function, and lower body weight than men. Sex was not independently associated with achieved doses of heart failure medications, instead age, renal function and body weight explained the differences in treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-6970 , 1432-1041
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1459058-X
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2021
    In:  European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Vol. 77, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 125-131
    In: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 77, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 125-131
    Abstract: To develop a model for systematic introduction and to test the feasibility in a chronic disease population. We also investigated how the approach was received by the patients. Methods and results The systematic introduction approach is a seven-step procedure: step 1, define a few main criteria; step 2, primary scan patients with the one or two main criteria using computerized medical records/databases/clinical registries; step 3, identify patients applying the other predefined criteria; step 4, evaluate if any examinations/laboratory test updates are required; step 5, summon identified patients to the clinic with an information letter; step 6, discuss treatment with the patient and prescribe if appropriate; and step 7, follow up on initiated therapy and evaluate the applied process. The model was tested in a case study during introduction of the new drug sacubitril-valsartan in a heart failure population. In total, 76 out of 1924 patients were identified to be eligible for sacubitril-valsartan and summoned to the clinic to discuss treatment. Patient experiences with the approach were investigated in an interview study with general inductive approach using qualitative content analysis. This resulted in three final categories: a good approach, role of the information letter, and trust in care. Conclusions The systematic introduction approach ensures that strict criteria are used in the selection process and that a treatment can be implemented in eligible patients within a specified population with limited resources and time. The model was effective in our case study and maintained the patient’s confidence in healthcare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-6970 , 1432-1041
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1459058-X
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: International Psychogeriatrics, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 22, No. 7 ( 2010-11), p. 1154-1160
    Abstract: Background: Dementia and depression are common in advanced age, and often co-exist. There are indications of a decreased prevalence of depressive symptoms among old people in recent years, supposedly because of the manifold increase in antidepressant treatment. Whether the prevalence of depressive symptoms has decreased among people in different stages of dementia disorders has not yet been investigated. Methods: A comparison was undertaken of two cross-sectional studies, conducted in 1982 and 2000, comprising 6864 participants living in geriatric care units in the county of Västerbotten, Sweden. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Multi-Dimensional Dementia Assessment Scale (MDDAS), and the cognitive score was measured with Gottfries’ cognitive scale. Drug data were obtained from prescription records. Results: There was a significant decrease in depressive symptom score between 1982 and 2000 in all cognitive function groups except for the group with moderate cognitive impairment. Antidepressant drug use increased in all cognitive function groups. Conclusion: The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased between 1982 and 2000, in all levels of cognitive impairment except moderate cognitive impairment. This might possibly be explained by the depressive symptoms having different etiologies in different stages of a dementia disorder, which in turn might not be equally susceptible to antidepressant treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1041-6102 , 1741-203X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2147136-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2018
    In:  ESC Heart Failure Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 2018-04), p. 337-343
    In: ESC Heart Failure, Wiley, Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 2018-04), p. 337-343
    Abstract: This study aims to investigate the eligibility of the Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) with ACE inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM‐HF) study to a real‐world heart failure population. Methods and results Medical records of all heart failure patients living within the catchment area of Umeå University Hospital were reviewed. This district consists of around 150 000 people. Out of 2029 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, 1924 (95%) had at least one echocardiography performed, and 401 patients had an ejection fraction of ≤35% at their latest examination. The major PARADIGM‐HF criteria were applied, and 95 patients fulfilled all enrolment criteria and thus were eligible for sacubitril–valsartan. This corresponds to 5% of the overall heart failure population and 24% of the population with ejection fraction ≤ 35%. The eligible patients were significantly older (73.2 ± 10.3 vs. 63.8 ± 11.5 years), had higher blood pressure (128 ± 17 vs. 122 ± 15 mmHg), had higher heart rate (77 ± 17 vs. 72 ± 12 b.p.m.), and had more atrial fibrillation (51.6% vs. 36.2%) than did the PARADIGM‐HF population. Conclusions Only 24% of our real‐world heart failure and reduced ejection fraction population was eligible for sacubitril–valsartan, and the real‐world heart failure and reduced ejection fraction patients were significantly older than the PARADIGM‐HF population. The lack of data on a majority of the patients that we see in clinical practice is a real problem, and we are limited to extrapolation of results on a slightly different population. This is difficult to address, but perhaps registry‐based randomized clinical trials will help to solve this issue.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2055-5822 , 2055-5822
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2814355-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: ESC Heart Failure, Wiley, Vol. 7, No. 3 ( 2020-06), p. 1150-1160
    Abstract: Glomerular filtration rate is an important factor in management of heart failure (HF). Our objective was to validate eight creatinine‐based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in an HF population against measured glomerular filtration rate. Methods and results One hundred forty‐six HF patients (mean age 68 ± 13 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 45% ± 15) within a single‐centre hospital that underwent 51 Cr‐EDTA clearance between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. eGFR was estimated by means of Cockcroft–Gault ideal and actual weight, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD), simplified MDRD with isotope dilution mass spectroscopy traceable calibration, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, revised Lund–Malmö, full age spectrum, and the Berlin Initiative Study 1. Mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 42 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ) had the highest precision for MDRD ( r  = 0.9), followed by revised Lund–Malmö ( r  = 0.88). All equations except MDRD (mean difference −4.8%) resulted in an overestimation of the renal function. The accuracy was below 75% for all equations except MDRD. Conclusions None of the exclusively creatinine‐based methods was accurate in predicting eGFR in HF patients. Our findings suggest that more accurate methods are needed for determining eGFR in patients with HF.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2055-5822 , 2055-5822
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2814355-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2018
    In:  Cardiovascular Therapeutics Vol. 36, No. 5 ( 2018-10)
    In: Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Wiley, Vol. 36, No. 5 ( 2018-10)
    Abstract: Previous studies and national assessments indicate an undertreatment of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists ( MRA ) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ( HF r EF ). This study aimed to investigate why MRA is not used to full extent. Methods A complete community‐based heart failure population was studied. Several variables were collected, and medical records were scrutinized to identify reasons for not prescribing MRA . Results Of 2029 patients, 812 had EF ≤40%. Five hundred and fifty‐three patients (68%) tried MRA at some point but 184 of these (33%) discontinued therapy. There were 259 patients that never tried MRA with 177 with a listed explanation or contraindication. Eighty‐two patients, 10% of the total HF r EF population, had no clear contraindications. They were older and had less HF hospitalizations compared to patients on MRA ( P   〈  0.05) and 32% did not have any follow‐up at the cardiology clinic. Contraindications to MRA were renal dysfunction (93 patients), hypotension (28 patients), and hyperkalemia (25 patients). Only six patients had hyperkalemia without renal dysfunction. Of the patients with renal dysfunction, 66 (72%) had eGFR 〉 30 mL/min. Conclusions The reasons why MRA are underutilized were mainly because of contraindications. However, the data suggest that physicians are overly cautious about moderately reduced kidney function. There seems to be a 10%‐18% avoidable undertreatment with MRA , especially for elderly patients that are admitted to the hospital for other reasons than heart failure. This suggests that patients with heart failure would benefit from routine follow‐up at a cardiology clinic.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1755-5914 , 1755-5922
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2417088-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Public Library of Science (PLoS) ; 2021
    In:  PLOS ONE Vol. 16, No. 10 ( 2021-10-28), p. e0258949-
    In: PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 16, No. 10 ( 2021-10-28), p. e0258949-
    Abstract: Impaired renal function is a major contributor to the low proportion of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our aims were to investigate the impact of MRA treatment on all-cause mortality and worsening renal function (WRF) in patients with HFrEF and moderately impaired renal function. Methods Retrospective data between 2010–2018 on HFrEF patients from a single-centre hospital with estimated glomerular renal function (eGFR) 〈 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 were analysed. WRF was defined as a decline of by eGFR ≥ 20%. Results 416 patients were included, 131 patients on MRA and 285 without MRA, mean age was 77 years (SD ± 9) and 82 years (SD ± 9), respectively. Median follow-up was 2 years. 128 patients (32%) experienced WRF, 25% in the MRA group and 30% in patients without MRA (p = 0.293). In multivariable analysis, hospitalization for heart failure and systolic blood pressure were associated with WRF (p = 0.015 and p = 〈 0.001), but not use of MRA (p = 0.421). MRA treatment had no impact on the risk of adjusted all-cause mortality (HR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66–1.32 p = 0.685). WRF was associated with increased adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07–1.89 p = 0.014). Use of MRA did not increase the adjusted overall risk of mortality even when experiencing WRF (HR 1.15; 95% CI, 0.81–1.63 p = 0.422). Conclusion In this cohort of elderly HFrEF patients with moderately impaired renal function, MRA did not increase risk for WRF or all-cause mortality.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1932-6203
    Language: English
    Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2267670-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...