Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Introduction: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), there is uncertainty about the extent of influence nutritional parameters have on clinical outcomes. In this study, we investigated the association between initial body mass index (BMI) and weight loss during HSCT on clinical outcomes in a well-characterised cohort of AML patients. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We analysed data of the Basel stem-cell transplantation registry (‘KMT Kohorte') including all patients with AML undergoing first allogeneic HSCT from January 2003 to January 2014. We used multivariable regression models adjusted for prognostic indicators (European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation risk score and cytogenetics). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Mortality in the 156 AML patients (46% female, mean age 46 years) over the 10 years of follow-up was 57%. Compared to patients with a baseline BMI (kg/m 〈 sup 〉 2 〈 /sup 〉 ) of 20-25, a low BMI 〈 20 was associated with higher long-term mortality (70 vs. 49%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.04-3.71, p = 0.036). A more pronounced weight loss during HSCT ( 〉 7 vs. 〈 2%) was associated with higher risk for bacterial infections (52 vs. 28%, OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.96-8.18, p = 0.059) and fungal infections (48 vs. 23%, OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.11-10.19, p = 0.032), and longer hospital stays (64 vs. 38 days, adjusted mean difference 25.6 days (15.7-35.5), p 〈 0.001). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 In patients with AML, low initial BMI and more pronounced weight loss during HSCT are strong prognostic indicators associated with lower survival and worse disease outcomes. Intervention research is needed to investigate whether nutritional therapy can reverse these associations.

Abstract: Abstract 3098 Background. Upfront treatment for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a matter of debate. The wide difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or freedom from treatment failure observed between the intensified regimen escalated (esc) BEACOPP and other standard intensity schedules - such us ABVD, ABVD hybrids and BEACOPP baseline - is in contrast with a small difference in overall survival (OS) [NEJM 2011;365 :203 and JCO 2009;27 :4548]. This fact suggests that high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) can salvage more patients treated with standard intensity schedules than escBEACOPP treated patients. Methods. In order to better understand this subject we analyzed all Swiss cases of refractory/relapsed HL that received HDT/ASCT after failure of at least 4 cycles of upfront escBEACOPP (4 to 8 cycles), given alone or combined with other regimens (cases, n=22) and compared outcomes with a control group of 33 patients transplanted after failure of upfront ABVD (N=18), ABDV-based combinations (hybrids, N=7), BEACOPP baseline (N=5) or up to 3 cycles of escBEACOPP plus radiotherapy (N=3). The high-dose schedule used before transplant was BEAM for 51/55 patients and CBV in 1 case and 3 controls. Results. Controls and cases were statistically similar in terms of timing of transplant (median year 2006 vs 2007), age at transplant (median 33 vs 28 years), sex (males 64% vs 68%), HL subtype, Ann Arbor stage, international prognostic score, ESR (38 vs 59 mm/1h) and bulky presentation (35% vs 60%), but there were significantly more B-symptoms among escBEACOPP patients (77% vs 23%, p=0.007). Furthermore, chemosensitivity (94% vs 82%), timing of relapse after upfront treatment (0–3 months: 30% vs 22%, 3–12 months: 18% vs 23% and 〉 12 months: 52% vs 55%), median number of CD34+ cells reinfused (4.11 vs 2.99 ×10*6/kg), and need for a second salvage (12% vs 27%) were not significantly different in the two groups. After a median post transplant follow up of 42.5 months, median PFS was 15.4 months for escBEACOPP, and was not reached for control cases (p=0.145). Two-years OS was 84% for controls (95% CI 65%-93%) and 72% for escBEACOPP (95% CI 45%-87%), while 5-years OS was 68% (95% CI 44%-84%) and 65% (95% CI 37%-83%) for controls and cases, respectively. Four of 33 controls (12%) and 3 of 22 (14%) upfront escBEACOPP cases received an allograft for relapsed HL after HDT/ASCT (p=NS). The incidence of severe (grade 3–4) anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, stomatitis and neutropenic fever was similar in the two groups. Regarding uncommon/unexpected toxicities of HDT/ASCT, one patient in the escBEACOPP group developed grade 4 encephalopathy, whilst in the control group we observed two cases of acute renal failure, one ARDS and one fatal stroke. One patient in the control group was diagnosed with a T-cell lymphoma after transplant (p=NS). Three t-MDS plus one t-AML were recorded among patients in the escBEACOPP group, with no cases of t-AML/t-MDS occurring among those treated with the less intensive approaches (p=0.023). Conclusion. In our series, overall survival of chemosensitive HL patients autografted after failure of either upfront escBEACOPP or standard intensity regimens is encouraging. HDT/ASCT consolidation of chemosensitive patients failing upfront escBEACOPP seems justified. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: The clinical value of chemotherapy sensitization of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with G-CSF priming has remained controversial. Cytarabine is a key constituent of remission induction chemotherapy. The effect of G-CSF priming has not been investigated in relationship with variable dose levels of cytarabine. We randomized 917 AML patients to receive G-CSF (456 patients) or no G-CSF (461 patients) at the days of chemotherapy. In the initial part of the study, 406 patients were also randomized between 2 cytarabine regimens comparing conventional-dose (199 patients) versus escalated-dose (207 patients) cytarabine in cycles 1 and 2. We found that patients after induction chemotherapy plus G-CSF had similar overall survival (43% vs 40%, P = .88), event-free survival (37% vs 31%, P = .29), and relapse rates (34% vs 36%, P = .77) at 5 years as those not receiving G-CSF. However, patients treated with the escalated-dose cytarabine regimen benefited from G-CSF priming, with improved event-free survival (P = .01) and overall survival (P = .003), compared with patients without G-CSF undergoing escalated-dose cytarabine treatment. A significant survival advantage of sensitizing AML for chemotherapy with G-CSF was not apparent in the entire study group, but it was seen in patients treated with escalated-dose cytarabine during remission induction. The HOVON-42 study is registered under The Netherlands Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl) as #NTR230.

Abstract: Background: Previous trials from the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the Nordic Lymphoma Group (NLG) showed that therapy with single-agent rituximab can produce long-term remissions in a sizeable subset of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, with overall survival not inferior to chemo-immunotherapy, providing the rationale for the development of chemotherapy-free treatment strategies. Promising results have also been reported with the combination of rituximab and lenalidomide. The SAKK 35/10 phase-2 study was developed and conducted by the SAKK in cooperation with the NLG to compare the activity of rituximab plus lenalidomide versus single-agent rituximab in the first-line FL therapy. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed untreated FL, grade 1, 2, 3a and in need of systemic therapy, were randomized either to rituximab monotherapy (R) (8 infusions of 375mg/m2 at day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and repeated at day 1 of weeks 12, 13, 14 and 15) or to rituximab (given at the same schedule) in combination with lenalidomide (RL) (lenalidomide given orally, 15 mg daily, starting 14 days before the first rituximab administration and continuously until 14 days after the last). The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR/CRu) assessed at week 23, defined according to the NCI standardized criteria (Cheson et al 1999). The study sample size was calculated to allow the detection of a 20% increase of the CR/CRu rate with RL over R, with 90% power and a type I error of 0.10. The 2 arms were compared using a one-sided Z-test with unpooled variance for proportions. Trial treatment was discontinued in patients who at week 10 did not achieve at least a minimal response, defined as reduction of more than 25% in the sum of product of tumor diameters (SPD), and rescue chemotherapy was given at the discretion of the treating physician. Results: In total, 154 patients were randomized; 77 (40 women and 37 men; median age 63yrs, range 29-85; 52% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) were allocated to arm R and 77 (42 women and 35 men; median age 61yrs, range 26-80; 48% with stage IV and 47% with poor-risk FLIPI score) to arm RL. Treatment was discontinued by 21 (28%) patients in arm R, in 16 due to lack of response at week 10 and in 1 due to toxicity, and by 19 (25%) patients in arm RL, in 3 due to lack of response at week 10 and in 13 due to toxicity. Adverse events of any grade were reported in 91% of patients in arm R and 100% in arm RL and adverse events of grade ≥3 were more common in arm RL than in arm R (51% vs 18% of patients). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5% of patients in arm R and 19% in arm RL. The primary endpoint analysis (using the response assessment from the local investigators, reviewed by the study chairs) showed a significantly higher CR/CRu rate in patients treated with RL in comparison with those receiving R. This difference was observed both in the intent-to-treat (CR/CRu rate, 36% vs. 25%, respectively; p=0.056) and the per-protocol population (CR/CRu rate, 42% vs. 28%, respectively; p=0.049). Conclusions: The addition of lenalidomide to rituximab results in a significantly better CR/CRu at the cost of an expected increased toxicity. Further follow-up is needed to ascertain whether the response improvement will translate into prolonged time to next treatment and superior progression-free and overall survival rates. TableInvestigators’ assessment of the response at week 23 in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population Rituximab (N=77) Rituximab+Lenalidomide (N=77)Response category n (%)[95% C.I.]n (%)[95% C.I.] CR/CRu19 (25) [16-36%]28 (36)[26-48%] PR28 (36) [26-48%]35 (45)[34-57%] SD6 (8) [3-16%]4 (5)[1.4-13%] PD/relapse2 (3) [0.3-9%] 3 (4)[0.8-11%]Not evaluable*22 (29) [19-40%] 7 (9)[4-18%]*Patients with no assessment at week 23, including patients not achieving at least a minimal response at week 10. Disclosures Kimby: Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide, not approved for follicular lymphoma. Mey:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferreri:Celgene: Research Funding. Bargetzi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krasniqi:Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zucca:Roche, Mundivarma, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract: Abstract 2803 Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 6% of all B-cell lymphomas and remains incurable for most patients. Those who relapse after first line therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have a dismal prognosis with short response duration after salvage therapy. On a molecular level, MCL is characterised by the translocation t[11;14] leading to Cyclin D1 overexpression. Cyclin D1 is downstream of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase and can be effectively blocked by mTOR inhibitors such as temsirolimus. We set out to define the single agent activity of the orally available mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) in a prospective, multi-centre trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL (NCT00516412). The study was performed in collaboration with the EU-MCL network. Methods: Eligible patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed relapsed (not more than 3 prior lines of systemic treatment) or refractory MCL received everolimus 10 mg orally daily on day 1 – 28 of each cycle (4 weeks) for 6 cycles or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the best objective response with adverse reactions, time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure, response duration and molecular response as secondary endpoints. A response rate of ≤ 10% was considered uninteresting and, conversely, promising if ≥ 30%. The required sample size was 35 pts using the Simon's optimal two-stage design with 90% power and 5% significance. Results: A total of 36 patients with 35 evaluable patients from 19 centers were enrolled between August 2007 and January 2010. The median age was 69.4 years (range 40.1 to 84.9 years), with 22 males and 13 females. Thirty patients presented with relapsed and 5 with refractory MCL with a median of two prior therapies. Treatment was generally well tolerated with anemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (11%), neutropenia (8%), diarrhea (3%) and fatigue (3%) being the most frequent complications of CTC grade III or higher. Eighteen patients received 6 or more cycles of everolimus treatment. The objective response rate was 20% (95% CI: 8–37%) with 2 CR, 5 PR, 17 SD, and 11 PD. At a median follow-up of 6 months, TTP was 5.45 months (95% CI: 2.8–8.2 months) for the entire population and 10.6 months for the 18 patients receiving 6 or more cycles of treatment. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that single agent everolimus 10 mg once daily orally is well tolerated. The null hypothesis of inactivity could be rejected indicating a moderate anti-lymphoma activity in relapsed/refractory MCL. Further studies of either everolimus in combination with chemotherapy or as single agent for maintenance treatment are warranted in MCL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: everolimus for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.

Abstract: Background High quality response [very good partial remission (VGPR), complete remission (CR)] is associated with improved long-term outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) therapy. Lenalidomide (Len)/ dexamethasone (Dex) (Rd) is considered a standard 2nd-line regimen. However, after 1st-line MM therapy containing a “novel agent” like thalidomide, only a relatively small fraction (21.3%) of patients (pts) achieved VGPR or better when RD was used in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)1. Bendamustine (Ben) is an alkylating agent with superior activity compared to melphalan/prednisone. The combination of Ben, Len and Dex (BRd) in pts with advanced RRMM resulted in dose-limiting hematotoxicity, which restricted its efficacy in extensively pretreated pts2. However, recent phase I experience demonstrated the feasibility of BRd as 2nd- and 3rd-line myeloma therapy3. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the BRd-regimen as 2nd line therapy for RRMM. Patients and methods This multicenter Phase II study was designed to enroll 50 pts with RRMM undergoing 2nd-line MM therapy [including also pts with prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)]. Pts had to have measurable disease, ECOG performance status 0-2, adequate hematological values and a creatinine clearance 〉 50 ml/min. Study treatment consisted of Ben 75 mg/m2 i.v. day (d) 1 & 2 and Len 25 mg p.o. d 1-21 for a total of six 28-day induction cycles. Dex (40 and 20 mg p.o. for pts 〈 = or 〉 75 years of age, respectively) was given on d 1, 8, 15, and 22. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg s.c. was administered on d 3 in case of severe neutropenia, treatment delay due to neutropenia or febrile neutropenia according to predefined application rules. Induction treatment was followed by 12 cycles (28 d) of maintenance therapy with Rd at the same dose. The primary study endpoint was the CR/VGPR rate after induction therapy, based on standard IMWG criteria. A Simon's two stage design was used to differentiate between 20% (considered uninteresting) vs 40 % (considered promising, power of 80%, p=5%) of high quality responses. At least 13 pts with VGPR or better after induction therapy were required to meet the statistical threshold predefined for promising activity of the BRd regimen in this study. Results 50 pts were enrolled between 04/2012 and 07/2014 (median age 68 years [46-84y], 73% men). 49% pts had ISS stage II/III, 42.5% had undergone prior SCTs, and 13% had known high risk cytogenetic aberrations. 91% of pts had received novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib) during 1st-line therapy. At the time of abstract submission, data from 38 pts having completed induction treatment were available. Final analysis of the primary study endpoint including all patients will be updated and presented at the meeting. Of the currently 38 evaluable pts, 20 (52.6%, Table 1) achieved a CR/VGPR after a median of 3.3 induction cycles. Only 1 patient experienced disease progression (PD) during induction phase. 77% of pts received pegfilgrastim. Dose reduction during induction therapy was required in 7.7% of pts. 42.5% received 〈 6 scheduled induction cycles (50% due to toxicities, 50% for other reasons). 49% had treatment-related SAEs. Grade 3/ 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 51%/25.5% and 23.4%/8.5% of pts, respectively. Only 1 patient developed CTC grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were infections (14%), rash (9.5%), and diarrhea (9.5%). Anaphylactic reaction grade 4 related to Ben and pulmonary embolism grade 3 occurred in 1 patient each. A cerebral insult grade 4 occurred in a patient non-compliant with the anti-thrombotic prophylaxis required per protocol. One death due to respiratory failure (considered to be unlikely related to study treatment) was reported for an 83 year old male. Conclusion BRd is a safe and efficacious regimen for 2nd line treatment of RRMM patients whose 1st-line therapy included thalidomide or bortezomib. High quality responses ( 〉 = VGPR) can be achieved in a considerable proportion (52.6%) of these pts. Our study suggests that the fraction of patients achieving VGPR or better after BRd treatment may be substantially higher than attainable with Rd alone. References 1 Wang et al. Blood, 2008, 112: 4445-51 2 Lentzsch et al. Blood, 2012, 119: 4608-13 3 Poenisch et al., Br J Haematol, 2013, 162, 202–9 Table 1 Best response after induction CR VGPR PR MR SD total (n=38) 3 17 15 1 2 prior ASCT (n=16) 2 6 7 1 0 no prior ASCT (n=22) 1 11 8 0 2 Disclosures Mey: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of Bendamustine in relapsed/refractory Multiple Myekoma. To investigate the efficacy and safety of Bendamustine in combination with the standard backbone of Lenalidomide/ Dexamethasone in patients with replaced/refractory MM.. Bargetzi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Taverna:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schmid:Celgene: Honoraria. Knauf:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. von Moos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hiendlmeyer:Celgene: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Hitz:Celgene: Research Funding. Driessen:Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Standard conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are often not tolerated by elderly patients, on one hand. Single high‐dose melphalan, on the other hand, has been shown to be safe and active as a pretransplant preparative regimen in elderly patients. Y 90 ‐Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Y 90 ‐IT) is well tolerated and feasible in the transplantation setting. We therefore investigated the combination of high‐dose melphalan and Y 90 ‐IT as a conditioning regimen for patients ≥65 years of age. Patients with relapsed or resistant CD20‐positive lymphoma in remission after salvage chemotherapy could be enrolled. High‐dose therapy consisted of standard dose Y 90 ‐IT (0.4‐mCi/kg body weight) followed by melphalan at escalating doses (100, 140, 170 and 200 mg/m 2 ) and ASCT. The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose; secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate 100 days after transplantation and toxicity. Twenty patients (median age 72 years) were included. No DLT occurred at any dose level. Thirteen patients completed the treatment, 11 were evaluable for response. Seven patients did not complete treatment because of mobilization failure (n = 3), progressive disease (n = 2), worsening of cardiac function (n = 1), and grade 3 dyspnea (n = 1). Seven patients achieved a CR/complete remission/unconfirmed (CRu) and 2 had stable disease. Five out of 7 responding patients were still alive more than 3 years after transplantation. The 2 patients with SD had a long‐term survival of 3 and 5 years, respectively. Nonhematological grade 3 or higher treatment related adverse events (AEs) were infection (n = 6), including 2 cases of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea (n = 3), mucositis, anorexia, viral hepatitis, hypokalemia, dehydration, and multiorgan failure (n = 1 for each). The combination of Y 90 ‐IT and high‐dose melphalan is feasible before ASCT for elderly patients, with promising activity and manageable toxicity.