GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 2023-01-04)
    Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies are increasingly reporting relative VE (rVE) comparing a primary series plus booster doses with a primary series only. Interpretation of rVE differs from traditional studies measuring absolute VE (aVE) of a vaccine regimen against an unvaccinated referent group. We estimated aVE and rVE against COVID-19 hospitalization in primary-series plus first-booster recipients of COVID-19 vaccines. Methods Booster-eligible immunocompetent adults hospitalized at 21 medical centers in the United States during December 25, 2021–April 4, 2022 were included. In a test-negative design, logistic regression with case status as the outcome and completion of primary vaccine series or primary series plus 1 booster dose as the predictors, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to estimate aVE and rVE. Results A total of 2060 patients were analyzed, including 1104 COVID-19 cases and 956 controls. Relative VE against COVID-19 hospitalization in boosted mRNA vaccine recipients versus primary series only was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%–74%); aVE was 81% (95% CI, 75%–86%) for boosted versus 46% (95% CI, 30%–58%) for primary. For boosted Janssen vaccine recipients versus primary series, rVE was 49% (95% CI, −9% to 76%); aV E was 62% (95% CI, 33%–79%) for boosted versus 36% (95% CI, −4% to 60%) for primary. Conclusions Vaccine booster doses increased protection against COVID-19 hospitalization compared with a primary series. Comparing rVE measures across studies can lead to flawed interpretations of the added value of a new vaccination regimen, whereas difference in aVE, when available, may be a more useful metric.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 8, No. Supplement_1 ( 2021-12-04), p. S281-S281
    Abstract: Immunocompromised (IC) patients (pts) can have prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity, even after resolution of COVID-19 symptoms. This study aimed to determine if viable virus could be detected in samples collected & gt; 21 days after an initial positive (pos) SARS-CoV-2 PCR in IC pts. Methods We obtained 20 remnant SARS-CoV-2 PCR pos nasopharyngeal swabs from IC pts (bone marrow or solid organ transplant, high dose steroids, immunosuppressive medications) with a pos repeat PCR within the previous 30 days. The repeat specimens were cultured on Vero-hACE2-TMPRSS2 cells and incubated for 96 hours to assess viral viability. Viable RNA and infectious virus in the cultured cells were measured by qPCR and infectious plaque assays. RNA sequencing was performed on a HiSeq platform (Illumina). Samples also underwent SARS-CoV-2 antigen (Ag) testing (BD Veritor). Clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record by chart review. Results Pt characteristics are in Table 1. Viral cultures from the repeat specimen were negative (neg) for 18 pts and pos for 2 (Table 2). Pt 1 is a 60M treated with obinatuzumab 19 days prior to his first pos PCR test, with repeat specimen collected 21 days later (cycle threshold (Ct) not available). Pt 1 had a low viral titer (27 PFU/mL) & a D614G mutation on sequencing. Pt 2 is a 75M treated with rituximab 10 days prior to his first pos PCR test, with repeat specimen collected 23 days later (Ct 27.56/27.74). Pt 2 had a high viral titer (2e6 PFU/mL) and D614G, S98F, and S813I mutations. Demographics of Study Population (N=20) Characteristics of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture Conclusion 90% of specimens collected & gt; 21 days after an initial pos SARS-CoV-2 PCR did not have viable virus detected on their repeat specimen. The 2 pts with pos viral cultures had active hematologic malignancies treated with an anti-CD20 mAb at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. One pt had a high concentration of active, viable virus. No known variants of concern were noted in this cohort, collected in Q2 2020, though prolonged replication is a risk for variant development. Further data are needed about risk factors for persistent viable viral shedding & methods to prevent transmission of viable virus from IC hosts. Disclosures Victoria J. Fraser, MD, CDC Epicenters (Grant/Research Support)Cigna/Express Scripts (Other Financial or Material Support, Spouse is Chief Clinical Officer)Doris Duke Fund to Retain Clinical Scientists (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)NIH (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support) Victoria J. Fraser, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support; Cigna/Express Scripts (Individual(s) Involved: Spouse/Partner): Employee; Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support; National Institutes of Health (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support; The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support Michael S. Diamond, MD, PhD, Carnival Corporation (Consultant)Emergent BioSolutions (Grant/Research Support)Fortress Biotech (Consultant)Immunome (Advisor or Review Panel member)Inbios (Consultant)Moderna (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Vir Biotechnology (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Carey-Ann Burnham, PhD, BioFire (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support)bioMerieux (Grant/Research Support)Cepheid (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Luminex (Grant/Research Support)Roche (Other Financial or Material Support) Carey-Ann Burnham, PhD, BioFire (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; bioMerieux (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speakers’ bureau; Cepheid (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Luminex (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator Hilary Babcock, MD, MPH, FIDSA, FSHEA, Nothing to disclose
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 8, No. Supplement_1 ( 2021-12-04), p. S2-S3
    Abstract: MDROs frequently contaminate hospital environments. We performed a multicenter cluster-randomized, crossover trial of two methods for intensive monitoring of terminal cleaning effectiveness at reducing infection and colonization with MDROs within ICUs. Methods Six medical and surgical ICUs at three medical centers received both intensive monitoring interventions sequentially, in a randomized order. The intervention included surveying a minimum of 10 surfaces each in 5 rooms weekly, after terminal cleaning, with adenosine triphosphate (ATP) monitoring or an ultraviolet fluorescent marker (UV/F). Results were delivered to environmental services (EVS) staff in real-time, with failing surfaces recleaned. The primary study outcome was the monthly rate of infection or colonization with MDROs, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridioides difficile, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB), assessed during a 12-month baseline comparison period and sequential 6-month intervention periods, separated by a 2-month washout. Outcomes during each intervention period were compared to the combined baseline period plus the alternative intervention period using mixed-effects Poisson regression, with study hospital as a random effect. Results The primary outcome rate varied by hospital and ICU (Figure 1). The ATP method was associated with a relative reduction in the incidence rate of infection or colonization with MDROs (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.887, 95% confidence-interval (CI) 0.811–0.969, P=0.008) (Table 1), infection with MDROs (IRR 0.924, 95% CI 0.855–0.998, P=0.04), and infection or colonization limited to multidrug-resistant MDR-GNB (IRR 0.856, 95% CI 0.825–0.887, P & lt; 0.001). The UV/F intervention was not associated with a statistically significant impact on these outcomes. Room turn-around time was increased by a median of one minute with the ATP intervention and 4.5 minutes with the UV/F intervention compared to baseline. Conclusion Intensive monitoring of ICU terminal room cleaning with an ATP modality is associated with a relative reduction of infection and colonization with MDROs with a negligible impact on TAT. Disclosures Hilary Babcock, MD, MPH, FIDSA, FSHEA (nothing to disclose), David K. Warren, MD, MPH, Homburg & Partner (consultant), Ebbing Lautenbach, MD, MPH, MSCE (nothing to disclose), Jennifer Han, MD, MSCE, GlaxoSmithKline (employee, shareholder).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2009
    In:  Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Vol. 30, No. 6 ( 2009-06), p. 609-610
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 30, No. 6 ( 2009-06), p. 609-610
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 41, No. 11 ( 2020-11), p. 1321-1322
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 41, No. 12 ( 2020-12), p. 1455-1457
    Abstract: We performed a mixed-methods study to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) uptake and to assess variability of program implementation in Missouri hospitals. Despite increasing uptake of ASPs in Missouri, there is wide variability in both the scope and sophistication of these programs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 43, No. 2 ( 2022-02), p. 147-155
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2020
    In:  Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Vol. 41, No. S1 ( 2020-10), p. s431-s432
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 41, No. S1 ( 2020-10), p. s431-s432
    Abstract: Background: Immunization resistance is fueling a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States, where several large measles outbreaks and 1,282 measles cases were reported in 2019. Concern about these measles outbreaks prompted a large healthcare organization to develop a preparedness plan to limit healthcare-associated transmission. Verification of employee rubeola immunity and immunization when necessary was prioritized because of transmission risk to nonimmune employees and role of the healthcare personnel in responding to measles cases. Methods: The organization employs ∼31,000 people in diverse settings. A multidisciplinary team was formed by infection prevention, infectious diseases, occupational health, and nursing departments to develop the preparedness plan. Immunity was monitored using a centralized database. Employees without evidence of immunity were asked to provide proof of vaccination, defined by the CDC as 2 appropriately timed doses of rubeola-containing vaccine, or laboratory confirmation of immunity. Employees were given 30 days to provide documentation or to obtain a titer at the organization’s expense. Staff with negative titers were given 2 weeks to coordinate with the occupational heath department for vaccination. Requests for medical or religious accommodations were evaluated by occupational heath staff, the occupational heath medical director, and the human resources department. All employees were included, though patient-interfacing employees in departments considered higher risk were prioritized. These areas were the emergency, dermatology, infectious diseases, labor and delivery, obstetrics, and pediatrics departments. Results: At the onset of the initiative in June 2019, 4,009 employees lacked evidence of immunity. As of November 2019, evidence of immunity had been obtained for 3,709 employees (92.5%): serological evidence of immunity was obtained for 2,856 (71.2%), vaccine was administered to 584 (14.6%), and evidence of previous vaccination was provided by 269 (6.7%). Evidence of immunity has not been documented for 300 (7.5%). The organization administered 3,626 serological tests and provided 997 vaccines, costing ∼$132,000. Disposition by serological testing is summarized in Table 1. Conclusions: A measles preparedness strategy should include proactive assessment of employees’ immune status. It is possible to expediently assess a large number of employees using a multidisciplinary team with access to a centralized database. Consideration may be given to prioritization of high-risk departments and patient-interfacing roles to manage workload. Funding: None Disclosures: None
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2010
    In:  Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2010-03), p. 233-240
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 31, No. 3 ( 2010-03), p. 233-240
    Abstract: To describe the results of different measures implemented to improve adherence to the healthcare worker (HCW) influenza immunization program at BJC HealthCare during the period from 1997 through 2007. Design. Descriptive retrospective study. Setting. BJC HealthCare, a 13-hospital nonprofit healthcare organization in the Midwest. Methods. We reviewed and analyzed HCW influenza vaccination data from all BJC HealthCare Occupational Health Services and hospitals during the period from 1997 through 2007. Occupational health staff, infection prevention personnel, and key influenza vaccination campaign leaders were also interviewed regarding implementation measures during the study years. Results. At the end of 2007, BJC HealthCare had approximately 26,000 employees. With the use of multiple progressive interventions, influenza vaccination rates among BJC employees increased from 45% in 1997 to 72% in 2007 ( P 〈 .001). The influenza vaccination rate in 2007 was significantly higher than in 2006: 72%, compared with 54% ( P 〈 .001). Five hospitals had influenza vaccination rates that exceeded the target goal of 80% in 2007. The most successful interventions were adding influenza vaccination rates to the quality scorecard incentive program and the use of declination statements, both of which were implemented in 2007. The most important barriers to success identified by interview respondents were HCWs' misconceptions about influenza vaccination and a perceived lack of leadership support. Conclusions. Influenza vaccination rates among HCWs significantly improved with multiple interventions over the years. However, the BJC HealthCare influenza vaccination target of 80% was not attained at all hospitals with these measures. More aggressive interventions, such as implementing mandatory influenza vaccination policies, are needed to achieve higher vaccination rates.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2010
    In:  Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Vol. 31, No. 10 ( 2010-10), p. 987-995
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 31, No. 10 ( 2010-10), p. 987-995
    Abstract: Executive Summary This document serves as an update and companion piece to the 2005 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Position Paper entitled “Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers and Vaccine Allocation for Healthcare Workers During Vaccine Shortages.” In large part, the discussion about the rationale for influenza vaccination of healthcare personnel (HCP), the strategies designed to improve influenza vaccination rates in this population, and the recommendations made in the 2005 paper still stand. This position paper notes new evidence released since publication of the 2005 paper and strengthens SHEA's position on the importance of influenza vaccination of HCP. This document does not discuss vaccine allocation during times of vaccine shortage, because the 2005 SHEA Position Paper still serves as the Society's official statement on that issue.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...