GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Multivariate Analysis Vol. 153 ( 2017-01), p. 136-155
    In: Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier BV, Vol. 153 ( 2017-01), p. 136-155
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0047-259X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 121773-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1469773-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. ; 2019
    In:  World Journal of Cardiology Vol. 11, No. 2 ( 2019-2-26), p. 84-93
    In: World Journal of Cardiology, Baishideng Publishing Group Inc., Vol. 11, No. 2 ( 2019-2-26), p. 84-93
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1949-8462
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2573665-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Current Cancer Reports, Syncsci Publishing Pte., Ltd., Vol. 3, No. 1 ( 2021), p. 81-94
    Abstract: Background: The controversy surrounding prostate cancer screening, coupled with the high rates of incidence and mortality among African American men, increase the importance of African American men engaging in an informed decision-making process around prostate cancer screening. Purpose: To examine predictors of prostate cancer screening via the prostatespecific antigen (PSA) test. Secondary objectives were to examine whether African American men have been screened for prostate cancer; their confidence in making an informed choice about whether PSA testing is right for them; and whether they have talked with their provider about PSA testing and engaged in an informed decision-making process around prostate cancer screening. Methods: We conducted a study among a sample of African American men patients ages 〉 40 years. Results: A total of 65 men completed the questionnaire (response rate = 6.5%). The mean age of the men was 64.4 years. Most of the participants (90.8%) reported a regular healthcare provider and that their provider had discussed the PSA test with them (81.3%). About 84.1% of the men ever had a PSA test, but only 38.0% had one in the past year. Most of the men reported that they make the final decision about whether to have a PSA test on their own (36.5%) or after seriously considering their doctor’s opinion (28.6%). About 31.8% of the men reported that they share responsibility about whether to have a PSA test with their doctor. About half of the participants (49.2%) reported that they have made a decision about whether to have a PSA test and they are not likely to change their mind. The majority of the men (75%) perceived their risk of prostate cancer to be about the same level of risk as other men who were their age. The men’s knowledge of prostate cancer was fair to good (mean prostate cancer knowledge scale = 10.37, SD 1.87). Knowledge of prostate cancer was positively associated with receipt of a PSA test (p 〈 0.0206). Discussion: The modest overall prostate cancer knowledge among these participants, including their risk for prostate cancer, indicates a need for prostate cancer educational interventions in this patient population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2661-3166
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Syncsci Publishing Pte., Ltd.
    Publication Date: 2021
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Wiley, Vol. 51, No. 12 ( 2020-06), p. 1332-1341
    Abstract: Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist relieves irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C) symptoms, but how it improves pain in humans is unknown. Aims To investigate the effects of linaclotide and placebo on the afferent and efferent gut‐brain‐gut signalling in IBS‐C patients, in a randomised clinical trial. Methods Patients with IBS‐C (Rome III) and rectal hypersensitivity were randomised (2:1) to receive linaclotide (290 µg) or placebo for 10 weeks and undergo bi‐directional gut and brain axis assessment using anorectal electrical stimulations and transcranial/transspinal‐anorectal magnetic stimulations. Rectal sensations were examined by balloon distention. Assessments included abdominal pain, bowel symptoms and quality of life (QOL) scores. Primary outcomes were latencies of recto‐cortical and cortico‐rectal evoked potentials. Results Thirty‐nine patients participated; 26 received linaclotide and 13 received placebo. Rectal cortical evoked potentials latencies (milliseconds) were significantly prolonged with linaclotide compared to baseline (P1:Δ 19 ± 6, P   〈  0.005; N1:Δ 20 ± 7, P   〈  0.02) but not with placebo (P1:Δ 3 ± 5; N1:Δ 4.7 ± 5, P  = 0.3) or between groups. The efferent cortico‐anorectal and spino‐anorectal latencies were unchanged. The maximum tolerable rectal volume (cc) increased significantly with linaclotide compared to baseline ( P   〈  0.001) and placebo (Δ 29 ± 10 vs 4 ± 20, ( P   〈  0.03). Abdominal pain decreased ( P   〈  0.001) with linaclotide but not between groups. Complete spontaneous bowel movement frequency increased ( P   〈  0.001), and IBS‐QOL scores improved ( P  = 0.01) with linaclotide compared to baseline and placebo. There was no difference in overall responders between linaclotide and placebo (54% vs 23%, P  = 0.13). Conclusions Linaclotide prolongs afferent gut‐brain signalling from baseline but both afferent and efferent signalling were unaffected compared to placebo. Linaclotide significantly improves rectal hypersensitivity, IBS‐C symptoms and QOL compared to placebo. These mechanisms may explain the effects of linaclotide on pain relief in IBS‐C patients. ClinicalTrials.Gov: Registered at Clinical trials.gov no NCT02078323.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0269-2813 , 1365-2036
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003094-0
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference Vol. 143, No. 5 ( 2013-05), p. 929-943
    In: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Elsevier BV, Vol. 143, No. 5 ( 2013-05), p. 929-943
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0378-3758
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468074-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 753153-9
    SSG: 17,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2021
    In:  Computational Statistics & Data Analysis Vol. 163 ( 2021-11), p. 107284-
    In: Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier BV, Vol. 163 ( 2021-11), p. 107284-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0167-9473
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1478763-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Gastroenterology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 156, No. 6 ( 2019-05), p. S-354-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0016-5085
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Briefings in Bioinformatics Vol. 23, No. 1 ( 2022-01-17)
    In: Briefings in Bioinformatics, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 23, No. 1 ( 2022-01-17)
    Abstract: m6A methylation is a highly prevalent post-transcriptional modification in eukaryotes. MeRIP-seq or m6A-seq, which comprises immunoprecipitation of methylation fragments , is the most common method for measuring methylation signals. Existing computational tools for analyzing MeRIP-seq data sets and identifying differentially methylated genes/regions are not most optimal. They either ignore the sparsity or dependence structure of the methylation signals within a gene/region. Modeling the methylation signals using univariate distributions could also lead to high type I error rates and low sensitivity. In this paper, we propose using mean vector testing (MVT) procedures for testing differential methylation of RNA at the gene level. MVTs use a distribution-free test statistic with proven ability to control type I error even for extremely small sample sizes. We performed a comprehensive simulation study comparing the MVTs to existing MeRIP-seq data analysis tools. Comparative analysis of existing MeRIP-seq data sets is presented to illustrate the advantage of using MVTs. Results Mean vector testing procedures are observed to control type I error rate and achieve high power for detecting differential RNA methylation using m6A-seq data. Results from two data sets indicate that the genes detected identified as having different m6A methylation patterns have high functional relevance to the study conditions. Availability The dimer software package for differential RNA methylation analysis is freely available at https://github.com/ouyang-lab/DIMER. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Briefings in Bioinformatics online.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1467-5463 , 1477-4054
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036055-1
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 8, No. Supplement_1 ( 2021-12-04), p. S297-S298
    Abstract: More than half of all hospitals in the U.S. are rural hospitals. Frequently understaffed and resource limited, community hospitals serve a population that tends to be older and have less access to care with increased poverty and medical co-morbidities. There is a lack of data surrounding the impact of COVID-19 among rural minority communities. This study seeks to determine rural and urban disparities among hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. Methods This is a descriptive, retrospective analysis of the first 155 adult patients admitted to a tertiary hospital with a positive COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR test. Augusta University Medical Center serves the surrounding rural and urban counties of the Central Savannah River Area. Rural and urban categories were determined using patient address and county census data. Demographics, comorbidities, admission data and 30-day outcomes were evaluated. Results Of the patients studied, 62 (40%) were from a rural county and 93 (60%) were from an urban county. No difference was found when comparing the number of comorbidities of rural vs urban individuals; however, African Americans had significantly more comorbidities compared to other races (p-value 0.02). In a three-way comparison, race was not found to be significantly different among admission levels of care. Rural patients were more likely to require an escalation in the level of care within 24 hours of admission (p-value 0.02). Of the patients that were discharged or expired at day 30, there were no differences in total hospital length of stay or ICU length of stay between the rural and urban populations. Baseline Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Day 30 Outcomes and Characteristics Level of Care at Time of Admission Conclusion This study suggests that patients in rural communities may be more critically ill or are at a higher risk of early decompensation at time of hospitalization compared to patients from urban communities. Nevertheless, both populations had similar lengths of stay and outcomes. Considering this data is from an academic medical center with a large referral area and standardized inpatient COVID-19 management, these findings may prompt further investigations into other disparate outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. 3 ( 2022-03-01)
    Abstract: There is a lack of data surrounding the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among rural and urban communities. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in epidemiologic characteristics and clinical outcomes among individuals with COVID-19 among these communities. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 155 patients admitted to a single-center tertiary academic hospital located in Augusta, Georgia, with a large proportion of hospitalized patients transferred from or residing in rural and urban counties. Hospitalized adult patients were included in the study if they were admitted to AUMC between March 13, 2020, and June 25, 2020, and had a positive polymerase chain reaction test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 regardless of the presence or absence of symptomatology. Demographics, admission data, and 30-day outcomes were examined overall and by geographical variation. Results Urban patients were more likely to be admitted to the general medical floor (P = .01), while rural patients were more likely to require an escalation in the level of care within 24 hours of admission (P = .02). In contrast, of the patients who were discharged or expired at day 30, there were no statistically significant differences in either total hospital length of stay or intensive care unit length of stay between the populations. Conclusions There may be many social determinants of health that limit a rural patient’s ability to seek prompt medical care and contribute to decompensation within the first 24 hours of admission. This study provides insight into the differences in clinical course among patients admitted from different community settings and when accounting for comorbid conditions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...