Abstract: Juvenile systemic scleroderma (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1,000,000 children. Currently no medications are licensed for the treatment of jSSc. Due to its rarity, only recently have the first management and treatment guidelines been published, the jSSc SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe) recommendations, reflecting consensus opinion upon pediatric rheumatologists (1). Objectives To better understand treatment practices internationally for jSSc, both at baseline and over 24 months observation period and to compare if real world therapies are congruent with the recent SHARE recommendations. Methods The juvenile systemic sclerosis inceptions cohort (jSScC) is a multinational cohort that prospectively collects clinical data, including medications at baseline and subsequent visits. The jSScC enrollment criteria include age of onset of the first non-Raynaud symptom younger than 16 years and age younger than 18 years at cohort entrance. The frequency of medications (general category and specific medication) was calculated across the cohort at timepoint 0 (enrollment), 12 months and 24 months. Results We extracted data from the jSScC of patients who were followed for 12 or 24 months. 109 patients were followed at time point 0 (T0) and 12 months (T12), and data was available for 77 of them up at 24 months (T24). The mean age of the patients was 13.2 years at the timepoint 0. 77% were female and 75% had diffuse subtype. Disease duration at baseline visit was 3.1 years. The medications the patients were on recorded by the physician were captured at T0, T12 and T24 listed in Table 1. Table 1. MEDICATIONS Time point 0N=109 T12 monthsN=109 T24 months N=77 Any Medication 92% (100) 97% (106) 97% (75) Vascular medications  Endothelial receptor antagonist 16% (17) 24% (26) 21% (16)  PDE-5-Blocker 5% (5) 8% (9) 9% (7) Immunomodulators Corticosteroids 52% (57) 44% (48) 44% (21) All csDMARDs: 81% (88) 93% (101) 92% (71)  csDMARDs monotherapy 61% (67) 66% (72) 60% (46)  csDMARDs combination therapy 17% (18) 15% (16) 14% (11)  Methotrexate 51% (56) 50% (55) 39% (30)  Mycophenolate Mofetil 26% (28) 44% (48) 47% (36)  Hydroxychloriquine 11% (12) 15% (16) 21% (16)  Cyclophosphamide 12% (13) 2% (2) 1% (1)  Azathioprine 2% (2) 2% (2) 3% (2) All bDMARDs: 5% (5) 14% (15) 18% (14)  bDMARDs monotherapy 2%(2) 2%(2) 1% (1)  bDMARDs combined with csDMARDs 3% (3) 12% (13) 17% (13)  Tocilizumab 2% (2) 10% (11) 14% (11)  Rituximab 2% (2) 4% (4) 4% (3)  Adalimumab 1% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) Autologous Stem cell transplantation 0% (0) 1% (1) 0% (0) csDMARDs: Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs b DMARDs: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs Conclusion At baseline half of the patients were on corticosteroids. This is more frequent than typical adult SSc practice but coincides with jSSc SHARE treatment recommendations (#1). After 12 months observation in the cohort over 90% of patients received a DMARD therapy. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil were the most commonly prescribed DMARDs, which also reflects the SHARE treatment recommendations (#2, #3). At 12 months the use of glucocorticoid decreased and the use of bDMARDs increased. In general, biological DMARDs are typically considered in severe or refractory (SHARE recommendation #7), reflecting the lower percentage compared to csDMARDs. Autologous stem cell transplantation was observed in one patient at 12 months, reflecting an option in jSSc with progressive and refractory disease (SHARE recommendation #8). Endothelial receptor antagonists, such as bosentan, were used over time in approximately 20% of the patients, reflecting SHARE recommendation #6 for pulmonary hypertension and/or digital tip ulcers. This is the first evaluation looking at clinical medication practice pattern in jSSc, and its comparison to recently published consensus guidelines. References [1]Foeldvari I, Culpo R, Sperotto F et al. Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(4):1651-8. Disclosure of Interests None declared

Abstract: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1 000 000 children (1). In adult patients there are significant differences between the clinical presentation of diffuse and limited subtypes (2). We reviewed clinical differences in presentation of subtypes in patients in the juvenile systemic scleroderma inception cohort up to 2021. Objectives To study the clinical presentation of jSSc patients with diffuse (djSSc) and limited (ljSSc) subtypes. Methods We reviewed the clinical baseline characteristics of the patients, who were recruited to the juvenile scleroderma inception cohort (jSScC) (3, 4) till 1 st of December 2021. jSScC is a prospective cohort of jSSc patients, who developed the first non-Raynaud´s symptom before the age of 16 years and are under the age of 18 years at the time of inclusion. Results 210 patients with jSSc were included in the cohort, 71% (n=162) had diffuse subtype. The median age at onset of Raynaud phenomenon was 10.4 years (7.3 – 12.9) and the median age at the first non-Raynaud symptom was 10.9 years (7.4 – 13.2). Median disease duration was 2.5 years (1 – 4.4) at the time of inclusion. The female/male ratio was significantly lower in the djSSc subtype (3.7:1 versus 5:1, p 〈 0.001). Antibody profile was quite similar, with the exception of a significantly higher number of anticentromere positive patients in the ljSSc (12% versus 2%, p=0.013). Decreased FVC 〈 80% was found in approximately 30% and decreased DLCO 〈 80% was found in around 40% in both subtypes. Pulmonary hypertension assessed by ultrasound was identified in 5% in both groups. Patients with diffuse subtype had significantly higher modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (16 versus 4.5, p 〈 0.001), sclerodactyly (84% versus 60%, p 〈 0.001), history of digital ulceration (62% versus 31%, p 〈 0.001), decreased Body Mass Index (BMI) 〈 -2 z score (20% versus 4%, p=0.003) and decreased joint range of motion (64% versus 46%, p=0.019). Patients with ljSSc had significantly higher rate of cardiac involvement (13% versus 2%, p=0.001). Regarding patient related outcomes djSSc patients had more severe disease, looking at patient reported global disease activity (VAS 0 – 100) (40 versus 25, p=0.039), patient reported global disease damage (VAS 0 – 100) (40 versus 25, p=0.021) and patient reported assessment of ulceration activity (10 versus 0, p=0.044). Regarding physician related outcomes the physician reported global disease activity (VAS 0 – 100) (32 versus 20, p 〈 0.001) and physician reported global disease damage (VAS 0 – 100) (30 versus 15, p=0.014) was significantly higher in djSSc. Conclusion In this jSSc cohort, the largest in the world, djSSc patients have a significantly more severe disease than ljSSc patients. Interestingly, we found no differences regarding interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension. References [1]Beukelman T, Xie F, Foeldvari I. Assessing the prevalence of juvenile systemic sclerosis in childhood using administrative claims data from the United States. Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders. 2018;3(2):189-90. [2]Dougherty DH, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Salazar G, Assassi S, Baron M, et al. The Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort: baseline clinical features and comparison with other large scleroderma cohorts. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(9):1623-31. [3]Foeldvari I, Klotsche J, Kasapcopur O, Adrovic A, Terreri MT, Sakamoto AP, et al. Differences sustained between diffuse and limited forms of juvenile systemic sclerosis in expanded international cohort. www.juvenile-scleroderma.com . Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021. [4]Foeldvari I, Klotsche J, Torok KS, Kasapcopur O, Adrovic A, Stanevica V, et al. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FIRST 80 PATIENTS AT TIMEPOINT OF FIRST ASSESSMENT INCLUDED IN THE JUVENILE SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS INCEPTION COHORT. WWW.JUVENILESCLERODERMA.COM . Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders. 2018;4(1-13). Disclosure of Interests None declared

Abstract: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of around 3 in 1, 000,000 children. It is known that in pediatric jSSc cohorts, there are a significant number of patients with overlap features, such as arthritis and myositis. However, the disease burden between those with and without overlap features in jSSc has not been defined. Objectives: Compare the clinical phenotype between children with and without overlap features in the juvenile systemic scleroderma inception cohort (jSScC). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using baseline visit data. Demographic, organ system evaluation, autoantibody profile, treatment, and patient and physician reported outcome variables were extracted from jSScC. Comparison between patients with and without overlap features was performed using chi-square test and Mann Whitney U-test. Results: At the time of data extraction, 175 jSSc patients were enrolled in the cohort, 81% were Caucasian and 81% female. Mean disease duration was 3.1 year (±2.7). Mean age at Raynaud´s onset was 10 years (±3.8) and mean age of first non-Raynaud´s was 10.2 years (±3.8). Overlap features occurred 17% (n=30) of the cohort, 12.5% in the diffuse cutaneous (dc) jSSc and in 30% in the limited cutaneous (lc) jSSc. Significant differences in clinical characteristics were found between those patients with compared to without overlap characteristics. Patients with overlap features presented more frequently with Gottron papules (p=0.007), swollen joints (p=0.019), muscle weakness (p=0.003), and lung involvement documented by decreased DLCO 〈 80% (p=0.06) and/or abnormal high resolution computed tomography (p=0.049). Anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies were also more common in this group (p=0.001). Significantly more patients without overlap features had Raynaud´s (p=0.006). Physician Global Assessment of disease activity was significantly higher in patients with overlap features (41 vs 34; p=0.041). (Table 1.) Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of jSSc patients with and without overlap features. Whole Cohort N=175 Patients without overlap N=145 Patients with overlap N=30 P value Female to Male Ratio 4.3:1 (142/33) 4:1 (116/29) 6.5:1 (26/4) 0.395 Cutaneous subtype Diffuse subtype (N) 73% (128) 112 16 Limited subtype (N) 27% (47) 33 17 Mean disease duration (years) 3.1 (± 2.7) 3.2 (± 2.8) 3.1 (± 2.2) 0.291 Mean age of onset of Raynaud´s (years) 10.0 (± 3.8) 17 non-Raynaud 10.0 (± 3.8) 10 non-Raynaud 10.0 (± 3.7) 7 non-Raynaud 0.931 Mean age of onset of non-Raynaud´s (years) 10.2 (± 3.8) 10.2 (± 3.9) 9.8 (± 3.7) Disease modifying drugs (N) 88% (154) 89% (129) 83% (25) 0.388 Raynaud´s phenomenon 90% (158) 93% (135) 77% (23) 0.006 Anti-PMScl 18% (12/68) 9% (5/53) 47% (7/15) 0.001 Gottron Papules (N) 27% (46/171) 23% (33/144) 48% (13/27) 0.007 DLCO 〈 80% (N) 44% (39/88) 39% (28/71) 65% (11/17) 0.06 Abnormal findings in HRCT (N) 44% (59/133) 40% (43/107) 62% (16/26) 0.049 Proportion of patients with swollen joints 18% (32) 14% (21) 37% (11) 0.019 Muscle Weakness (N) 21% (31/149) 16% (20/123) 42% (11/26) 0.003 Physician global disease activity (0-100) min -max 35 (0-90) n=141 34 (0-90) n=114 41 (0-80) n=27 0.041 Conclusion: Results from this large international cohort of jSSc patients demonstrate significant differences between patients with and without overlap features. Patients with overlap have significantly more interstitial lung disease and more physician rated disease activity and should not be considered to have more “mild disease”. Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung” Disclosure of Interests: None declared

Abstract: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1 000 000 children (1). The Juvenile Systemic Scleroderma Inception cohort (jSScC) is the largest cohort of jSSc patients in the world. The jSScC collects longitudinal data prospectively in jSSc, allowing the evaluation of the development of organ involvement and patients and physician reported outcomes in jSSc over time. Objectives To review the changes in the clinical characteristics and patient and physician reported outcomes over 12 months observation period from the time of inclusion into the cohort. Methods The jSScC cohort enrolls jSSc patients who developed the first non-Raynaud´s symptom before the age of 16 years and are under the age of 18 years at the time of inclusion (2, 3). We reviewed jSScC patient clinical data and patient and physician reported outcomes, who had 12 months follow up from the time of inclusion until 1 st of December 2021. Results We could extract data of 113 patients. The female/male ratio was 3.5:1. Median age of onset of Raynaud´s was 10.1 years and the median age of onset of non-Raynaud´s was 10.8 years. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at time of inclusion in the cohort (T0) and 93% after 12 months (T12). Median disease duration was 2.5 years at T0. Antibody profile stayed unchanged. Only 3 clinical parameters changed and improved significantly, the median modified Rodnan skin score improved from 13 to 8 (p=0.002), the number of patients with swollen joints decreased from 17% to 8% (p=0.043) and number of patients with joints with pain on motion decreased from 20% to 12% (p=0.048). All other organ involvement did not show any statistically significant change from T0 to T12. All collected patient reported outcomes improved significantly from T0 to T12: the patient reported disease activity (VAS 0 – 100) from 40 to 20 (p=0.011), the patient reported disease damage (VAS 0 – 100) from 40 to 20 (p=0.001), patient reported ulceration activity (VAS 0 – 100) from 10 to 0 (p=0.02) and the CHAQ score from 0.3 to 0.1 (p=0.002). Two of the three physician reported outcomes improved significantly, the physician global disease activity (VAS 0 – 100) from 30 to 20 (p=0.011) and physician reported global disease damage (VAS 0 – 100) from 30 to 25 (p=0.028). Conclusion Skin and musculoskeletal clinical features improved over 12 months, with almost all patients on DMARDs, supporting likely response of these features to therapy. It was promising that internal organ involvement, like cardiac and lung, although potentially stable, did not significantly worsen or increase. The most striking observation in the positive direction is improvement across several patient and physician reported outcome measures over the 12 month time period in this large international cohort. References [1]Beukelman T, Xie F, Foeldvari I. Assessing the prevalence of juvenile systemic sclerosis in childhood using administrative claims data from the United States. Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders. 2018;3(2):189-90. [2]Foeldvari I, Klotsche J, Kasapcopur O, Adrovic A, Terreri MT, Sakamoto AP, et al. Differences sustained between diffuse and limited forms of juvenile systemic sclerosis in expanded international cohort. www.juvenile-scleroderma.com . Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021. [3]Foeldvari I, Klotsche J, Torok KS, Kasapcopur O, Adrovic A, Stanevica V, et al. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FIRST 80 PATIENTS AT TIMEPOINT OF FIRST ASSESSMENT INCLUDED IN THE JUVENILE SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS INCEPTION COHORT. WWW.JUVENILESCLERODERMA.COM . Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders. 2018;4(1-13). Disclosure of Interests None declared

Abstract: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is a rare disease with a prevalence of around 3 in 1,000,000 children. To better capture the clinical manifestations of jSSc the juvenile systemic sclerosis inception cohort (jSScC) has been prospectively enrolling patients with predetermined clinical variables over the past 12 years. One of the goals is to study the demographic, clinical features, and physician and patient reported outcome differences between those with juvenile limited cutaneous (lc) compared to diffuse cutaneous (dc) disease subtypes, to determine if characteristics are similar or different between dc and lc jSSc. Objectives: Evaluation of the baseline clinical characteristics of jSSc patients in the jSScC. Compare clinical phenotype between diffuse (dcjSSc) and limited cutaneous (lcjSSc) subtypes. Methods: Demographic, physical examination, organ system evaluation, autoantibody profile, treatment, and patient and physician reported outcome variables were evaluated from the jSSc Inception cohort and summary statistics applied using chi-square test and Mann Whitney U-test comparing lcjSSc and dcjSSc subtypes. Results: At the time of data extraction, 175 jSSc patients were enrolled in the cohort, 81% were Caucasian and 81% female. Diffuse cutaneous jSSc subtype predominated (73%). Mean disease duration was 3.1 year (±2.7). Mean age at Raynaud´s was 10 years (+3.8) and mean age of first non-Raynaud´s was 10.2 years (±3.8). Significant differences were found between dcjSSc versus lcjSSc, regarding several clinical characteristics. Patients with diffuse cutaneous subtype had significantly higher modified Rodnan skin score (p=0.001), presence of sclerodactyly (p=0.02), presence of Gottron’s papules (p=0.003), presence of telangiectasia (p=0.001), history of digital tip ulceration (p=0.01), and frequency of elevated CK value (p=0.04). Cardiac involvement was significantly higher in limited cutaneous jSSc subtype (p=0.02). Diffuse cutaneous jSSc patients had significantly worse scores for Physician Global Assessment of disease activity (38 vs 25; p=0.002) and disease damage (34 vs 19; p=0.008). Table 1. Comparison of demographic data and significant differences between dcjSSc and lcjSSc at time of inclusion Whole Cohort N=175 Diffuse Subtype N=128 Limited Subtype N=47 P value Female to Male Ratio 4.3:1 (142/33) 4.1:1 (103/25) 4.8:1 (39/8) 0.829 Cutaneous subtype Diffuse subtype 73% (128) 128 0 Limited subtype 27% (47) 0 47 Mean Disease duration (years) 3.1 (± 2.7) 3.3 (± 2.9) 2.6 (± 2.2) 0.135 Mean age of onset of Raynaud´s (years) 10.0 (± 3.8) 17 non-Raynaud 9.8 (± 3.6) 10 non-Raynaud 10.6 (± 4.3) 7 non-Raynaud 0.219 Mean age of onset of non-Raynaud´s (years) 10.2 (± 3.9) 10.0 (± 3.7) 10.9 (± 4.3) 0.173 Disease modifying drugs 88% (154) 89% (114) 85% (40) 0.446 Cutaneous Mean modified Rodnan skin score 14.3 (0-51) 17.4 (0-51) 6.1 (0-24) 0.001 Gottron Papules 27% (46/171) 33% (41/124) 11% (5) 0.003 Sclerodactyly 78% (126/162) 82% (98/119) 65% (28/43) 0.020 Laboratory values Elevated CK 25% (30/122) 30% (26/88) 12% (4/34) 0.041 Vascular Telangiectasia 36% (56/154) 44% (49/111) 16% (7/43) 0.001 History of ulceration 53% (91/173) 61% (77/127) 30% (14/46) 0.001 Cardiac Cardiac Involvement 6% (10) 2% (3) 15% (7) 0.002 Patient Related Outcomes Physician global disease activity (0-100) min -max 35 (0-90) n=141 38 (0-90) n=108 25(0-80) n=33 0.002 Physician global disease damage (0-100) min -max 31 (0-85) n=140 34 (0-85) n=108 19 (0-60) n=32 0.008 Conclusion: Results from this large international cohort of jSSc patients demonstrate significant differences between dcjSSc and lcjSSc patients. According to the general organ involvement and physician global scores, the dcjSSc patients had significantly more severe disease. These observations strengthen our previous findings of the unique organ pattern of pediatric patients. Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung” Disclosure of Interests: None declared.

Abstract: Juvenile systemic scleroderma (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 per 1 000 000 children. There are limited data regarding the clinical presentation of jSSc. The Juvenile Systemic Scleroderma Inception Cohort (JSSIC) is the largest multinational registry that prospectively collects information about jSSc patients. Objectives: Evaluation of the jSSc patients at the time of inclusion in the JSSIC. Methods: Patients were included in the JSSIC if they fulfilled the adult ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic scleroderma, if they presented the first non-Raynaud symptom before 16 years of age and if they were younger than 18 years of age at time of inclusion. Patients’ characteristics at time of inclusion were evaluated. Results: Until 15 th of December 2019 hundred fifty patients were included, 83% of them being Caucasian and 80% female. The majority had the diffuse subtype (72%) and 17% of all jSSc had overlap features. The mean age of first presentation of Raynaud´s phenomenon was 9.8 years in the diffuse subtype (djSSc) and 10.7 years in the limited subtype (ljSSc) (p=.197). The mean age at first non-Raynaud’s symptoms was 10.0 years in the djSSc and 11.2 years in the ljSSc (p=0.247). Mean disease duration at time of inclusion was 3.4 years in the djSSc and 2.4 years in the ljSSc group. Significant differences were found between the groups regarding mean modified Rodnan skin score, 18.2 in the djSSc vs 6.2 in the ljSSc (p=0.02); presence of Gottron´s papulae (djSSc 30% vs ljSSc 13%, p=0.43);presence of teleangiectasia (djSSc 42% vs 18% ljSS, p=0.01); history of ulceration (djSSc 42% vs 18% ljSSc,p=0.008); 6 Minute walk test below the 10 th percentile (djSSc 85% vs ljSSc 54%, p=0.044), total pulmonary involvement (djSSc 49% vs ljSSc 31%, p=0.045), cardiac involvement (ljSSc 17% vs djSSc 3%, p=0.002). djSSc patients had significantly worse scores for Physician Global Assessment of disease activity compared to ljSSc patients (VAS 0-100) (40 vs 15) (p=0.001) and for Physician Global Assessment of disease damage (VAS 0-100) (36 vs 17) (p=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the other presentations. Pulmonary hypertension occurred in approximately 6% in both groups. No systemic hypertension or renal crisis was reported. ANA positivity was 90% in both groups. Anti-Scl70 was positive in 35% in djSSc and 36% in the ljSSc group. Anticentromere positivity occurred in 3% in the djSSc and 7% in the ljSSc group. Conclusion: In this unique large cohort of jSSc patients there were significant differences between djSSc and ljSSc patients at time of inclusion into the cohort regarding skin, vascular, pulmonary and cardiac involvement. According to the physician global scores the djSSc patients had a significantly more severe disease. Interestingly the antibody profile was similar in both scleroderma phenotypes. Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung” Disclosure of Interests: : Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Jens Klotsche: None declared, Ozgur Kasapcopur: None declared, Amra Adrovic: None declared, Kathryn Torok: None declared, Maria T. Terreri: None declared, Ana Paula Sakamoto: None declared, Valda Stanevicha: None declared, Flávio R. Sztajnbok: None declared, Jordi Anton Grant/research support from: grants from Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Brian Feldman Consultant of: DSMB for Pfizer, OPTUM and AB2-Bio, Ekaterina Alexeeva Grant/research support from: Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Novartis, Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer., Maria Katsikas: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, edoardo marrani: None declared, Mikhail Kostik: None declared, Natalia Vasquez-Canizares: None declared, Simone Appenzeller: None declared, Mahesh Janarthanan: None declared, Monika Moll: None declared, Dana Nemcova: None declared, Anjali Patwardhan: None declared, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Novartis and Pfizer, Sujata Sawhney: None declared, Dieneke Schonenberg: None declared, Cristina Battagliotti: None declared, Lillemor Berntson Consultant of: paid by Abbvie as a consultant, Speakers bureau: paid by Abbvie for giving speaches about JIA, Blanca Bica: None declared, Juergen Brunner Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Patricia Costa Reis: None declared, Despina Eleftheriou: None declared, Liora Harel: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Daniela Kaiser: None declared, Dragana Lazarevic: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Susan Nielsen: None declared, Farzana Nuruzzaman: None declared, Yosef Uziel: None declared, Nicola Helmus: None declared

Abstract: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence in around 3 in a million children. Pulmonary involvement in jSSc occurs in approximately 40 % in the inception cohort. Traditionally in jSSc, pulmonary function testing (PFT) with FVC and DLCO are used for screening and computed tomography (HRCT) was more reserved for those with abnormal PFTs. More recently, it has become apparent that PFTs might not be sensitive enough for detecting ILD in children. Objectives: Utilizing a prospective international juvenile systemic scleroderma cohort (JSScC) [2], to determine if pulmonary screening with FVC and DLCO is sufficient enough to assess the presence of interstitial lung disease in comparison to CT evaluation. Methods: The international juvenile systemic scleroderma cohort database was queried for available patients with recorded PFT parameters and HRCT performed to determine sensitivity of PFTs detecting disease process. Results: Of 129 patients in the jSScC, 67 patients had both CT imaging and an FVC reading from PFTs for direct comparison. DLCO readings were also captured but not in as many patients with tandem HRCT (n =55 DCLO and HRCT scan). Therefore, initial analyses focused on the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the FVC value from the PFTs to capture the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease as determined by HRCT. Overall, 49% of the patients had ILD determined by HRCT, with 60% of patients having normal FVC ( 〉 80%) with positive HRCT findings, and 24% of patients having normal DLCO ( 〉 80%) with positive HRCT findings. Fourteen percent (n = 3/21) of patients with both FVC and DLCO values within the normal range had a positive HRCT finding. Conclusion: The sensitivity of the FVC in the JSScC cohort in detecting ILD was only 39%. Relying on PFTs alone for screening for ILD in juvenile systemic sclerosis would have missed the detection of ILD in almost 2/3 of the sample cohort, supporting the use of HRCT for detection of ILD in children with SSc. In addition, the cut off utilized, of less than 80% of predicted FVC or DLCO could be too low for pediatric patients to exclude beginning ILD. This pilot data needs confirmation in a larger patient population. Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung” Disclosure of Interests: Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Bernd Hinrichs: None declared, Kathryn Torok: None declared, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Novartis and Pfizer, Ozgur Kasapcopur: None declared, Amra Adrovic: None declared, Valda Stanevicha: None declared, Flávio R. Sztajnbok: None declared, Maria T. Terreri: None declared, Ana Paula Sakamoto: None declared, Ekaterina Alexeeva Grant/research support from: Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Novartis, Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer., Jordi Anton Grant/research support from: grants from Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Maria Katsikas: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Rolando Cimaz: None declared, Mikhail Kostik: None declared, Simone Appenzeller: None declared, Mahesh Janarthanan: None declared, Monika Moll: None declared, Dana Nemcova: None declared, Dieneke Schonenberg: None declared, Cristina Battagliotti: None declared, Lillemor Berntson Consultant of: paid by Abbvie as a consultant, Speakers bureau: paid by Abbvie for giving speaches about JIA, Blanca Bica: None declared, Juergen Brunner Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Patricia Costa Reis: None declared, Despina Eleftheriou: None declared, Liora Harel: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Dragana Lazarevic: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Susan Nielsen: None declared, Farzana Nuruzzaman: None declared, Anjali Patwardhan: None declared, Yosef Uziel: None declared, Nicola Helmus: None declared