GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

You have 0 saved results.
Mark results and click the "Add To Watchlist" link in order to add them to this list.

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 19, No. 5 ( 2018-05), p. 421-432
    Abstract: Pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality metrics have been reported in few children less than 8 years. Our objective was to characterize chest compression fraction, rate, depth, and compliance with 2015 American Heart Association guidelines across multiple pediatric hospitals. Design: Retrospective observational study of data from a multicenter resuscitation quality collaborative from October 2015 to April 2017. Setting: Twelve pediatric hospitals across United States, Canada, and Europe. Patients: In-hospital cardiac arrest patients (age 〈 18 yr) with quantitative cardiopulmonary resuscitation data recordings. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: There were 112 events yielding 2,046 evaluable 60-second epochs of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (196,669 chest compression). Event cardiopulmonary resuscitation metric summaries (median [interquartile range]) by age: less than 1 year (38/112): chest compression fraction 0.88 (0.61–0.98), chest compression rate 119/min (110–129), and chest compression depth 2.3 cm (1.9–3.0 cm); for 1 to less than 8 years (42/112): chest compression fraction 0.94 (0.79–1.00), chest compression rate 117/min (110–124), and chest compression depth 3.8 cm (2.9–4.6 cm); for 8 to less than 18 years (32/112): chest compression fraction 0.94 (0.85–1.00), chest compression rate 117/min (110–123), chest compression depth 5.5 cm (4.0–6.5 cm). “Compliance” with guideline targets for 60-second chest compression “epochs” was predefined: chest compression fraction greater than 0.80, chest compression rate 100–120/min, and chest compression depth: greater than or equal to 3.4 cm in less than 1 year, greater than or equal to 4.4 cm in 1 to less than 8 years, and 4.5 to less than 6.6 cm in 8 to less than 18 years. Proportion of less than 1 year, 1 to less than 8 years, and 8 to less than 18 years events with greater than or equal to 60% of 60-second epochs meeting compliance (respectively): chest compression fraction was 53%, 81%, and 78%; chest compression rate was 32%, 50%, and 63%; chest compression depth was 13%, 19%, and 44%. For all events combined, total compliance (meeting all three guideline targets) was 10% (11/112). Conclusions: Across an international pediatric resuscitation collaborative, we characterized the landscape of pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest chest compression quality metrics and found that they often do not meet 2015 American Heart Association guidelines. Guideline compliance for rate and depth in children less than 18 years is poor, with the greatest difficulty in achieving chest compression depth targets in younger children.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1529-7535
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2070997-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 144, No. Suppl_2 ( 2021-11-16)
    Abstract: Introduction: Survival of adult patients with COVID-19 who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) are poor. Characteristics and outcomes for pediatric IHCA patients with COVID-19 are unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that pediatric COVID-19 patients would have worse survival outcomes when compared to non-COVID patients. Methods: A multicenter, multinational cohort of pediatric IHCA in the pediRES-Q collaborative were reviewed (March 1, 2020 - April 1, 2021). We characterized patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19 and investigated whether COVID-19 was associated with survival outcomes using multivariate logistic regression with mixed effects. Results: We identified 362 pediatric IHCAs of which 14 were COVID-19 positive. For non-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 patients respectively, median [Q1; Q3] age was 1.0 [0.3; 7.1] vs. 7.1 [1.5; 14.0] years and 42% vs. 43% were female. Immediate cause of arrest was hypotension: 8% vs. 43%, respiratory decompensation: 19% vs. 21%, and hypoxia 22% vs. 36% for non-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19 patients. For non-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 patients, total CPR duration was 10 [4; 33] min vs 19 [5; 33] min (for non-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) cases only: 35 [20; 55] min vs 34 [24; 34] min). For non-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 patients, ROSC was 79% vs. 57%, aOR: 0.48 (95% CI: 0.24-0.98), survival to hospital discharge was 45% vs. 29%, aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.25-1.57) and survival with favorable neurological outcome was 39% vs. 21%, aOR: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.16-1.65). Conclusions: In a pediatric resuscitation quality improvement collaborative, pediatric IHCA patients with COVID-19 were older when compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Median CPR duration was 〉 30 minutes for COVID-19 non-survivors, COVID-19 patients had lower chance of ROSC when compared to non-COVID-19 patients but considerably better survival outcomes than those reported for adults.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 140, No. Suppl_2 ( 2019-11-19)
    Abstract: Background: Recommendations for “standardized” communication during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) events to reduce interruptions in chest compressions (CCs) are lacking. We aimed to achieve consensus on standardized communication during in-hospital CPR, evaluate feasibility and potential to decrease CC pauses, mental task load, and frustration. Methods: Modified Delphi consensus surveys of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation taskforce members to identify preferred communication for in-hospital cardiac arrest teams. Consensus was reached after-survey teleconference resolution by a team of interdisciplinary experts in communication and CPR. Feasibility was tested in 8 simulated CPR scenarios with physician team leaders randomized (1:1) to ‘standardized’ communication vs. “usual best practice”, closed loop communication. Team leaders watched a 3-min video and received a 10-min training on the assigned intervention before the CPR scenario. NASA task load index questionnaires were used to assess mental task load and frustration (0=lowest to 100=highest). Results: Modified Delphi consensus on standardized communication included: 1) preparing the team 15-30 seconds before interrupting CCs, 2) countdown for interruption synchronized with 5 CCs, 3) action words for stopping and resuming CCs, 4) action words for intubation and defibrillation. Among 8 CPR teams (4 standardized, 4 usual communication), median (Q1; Q3) CC interruption duration for rhythm check was significantly shorter, 5.3 (4.8; 6.8) vs. 9.4 (6.4; 13.0) sec for standardized vs. closed loop communication [p=0.02]. Median (Q1; Q3) scores of mental task load were 63 (33; 70) vs 85 (70; 96), [p=0.10] and frustration 10 (5; 34) vs 40 (26; 50) [p=0.11] for standardized vs. closed loop communication. Trained team leaders adhered to standardized phrases 77% of the time. Conclusion: Expert consensus for standardized communication during in-hospital CPR was achieved. Pilot simulation implementation of standardized communication demonstrated feasibility of team leader adherence, significantly decreased duration of CC interruption during rhythm checks, and a tendency to reduce team leader task load and frustration.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Pediatric Quality & Safety, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 5, No. 4 ( 2020-07-08), p. e319-
    Abstract: Clinical event debriefing functions to identify optimal and suboptimal performance to improve future performance. “Cold” debriefing (CD), or debriefing performed more than 1 day after an event, was reported to improve patient survival in a single institution. We sought to describe the frequency and content of CD across multiple pediatric centers. Methods: Mixed-methods, a retrospective review of prospectively collected in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) data, and a supplemental survey of 18 international institutions in the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality (pediRES-Q) collaborative. Data from 283 IHCA events reported between February 2016 and April 2018 were analyzed. We used a Plus/Delta framework to collect debriefing content and performed a qualitative analysis utilizing a modified Team Emergency Assessment Measurement Framework. Univariate and regression models were applied, accounting for clustering by site. Results: CD occurred in 33% (93/283) of IHCA events. Median time to debriefing was 26 days [IQR 11, 41] with a median duration of 60 minutes [20, 60] . Attendance was variable across sites (profession, number per debriefing): physicians 12 [IQR 4, 20], nurses 1 [1, 6] , respiratory therapists 0 [0, 1], and administrators 1 [0, 1] . “Plus” comments reported per event were most commonly clinical standards 47% (44/93), cooperation 29% (27/93), and communication 17% (16/93). “Delta” comments were in similar categories: clinical standards 44% (41/93), cooperation 26% (24/93), and communication 14% (13/93). Conclusions: CDs were performed after 33% of cardiac arrests in this multicenter pediatric IHCA collaborative. The majority of plus and delta comments could be categorized as clinical standards, cooperation and communication.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2472-0054
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2898348-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Pediatric Neurology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 134 ( 2022-09), p. 45-51
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0887-8994
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2014321-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Critical Care Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 41 ( 2013-12), p. A128-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0090-3493
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2034247-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2015
    In:  Critical Care Medicine Vol. 43 ( 2015-12), p. 196-
    In: Critical Care Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 43 ( 2015-12), p. 196-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0090-3493
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2034247-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 20, No. 1 ( 2019-01), p. e30-e36
    Abstract: To describe the U.S. experience with interhospital transport of children in cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design: Self-administered electronic survey. Setting: Pediatric transport teams listed with the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Transport Medicine. Subjects: Leaders of U.S. pediatric transport teams. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty of the 88 teams surveyed (68%) responded. Nineteen teams (32%) from 13 states transport children undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation between hospitals. The most common reasons for transfer of children in cardiac arrest are higher level-of-care (70%), extracorporeal life support (60%), and advanced trauma resuscitation (35%). Eligibility is typically decided on a case-by-case basis (85%) and sometimes involves a short interhospital distance (35%), or prompt institution of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (20%). Of the 19 teams that transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 42% report no special staff safety features, 42% have guidelines or protocols, 37% train staff on resuscitation during transport, 11% brace with another provider, and 5% use mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices for patients less than 18 years. In the past 5 years, 18 teams report having done such cardiopulmonary resuscitation transports: 22% did greater than five transports, 44% did two to five transports, 6% did one transport, and the remaining 28% did not recall the number of transports. Seventy-eight percent recall having transported by ambulance, 44% by helicopter, and 22% by fixed-wing. Although patient outcomes were varied, eight teams (44%) reported survivors to ICU and/or hospital discharge. Conclusions: A minority of U.S. teams perform interhospital transport of children in cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eligibility criteria, transport logistics, and patient outcomes are heterogeneous. Importantly, there is a paucity of established safety protocols for the staff performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in transport.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1529-7535
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2070997-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2020
    In:  Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Vol. 21, No. 9 ( 2020-09), p. e592-e598
    In: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 21, No. 9 ( 2020-09), p. e592-e598
    Abstract: The American Heart Association recommends minimizing pauses of chest compressions and defines high performance resuscitation as achieving a chest compression fraction greater than 80%. We hypothesize that interruption times are excessively long, leading to an unnecessarily large impact on chest compression fraction. Design: A retrospective study using video review of a convenience sample of clinically realistic in situ simulated pulseless electrical activity cardiopulmonary arrests. Setting: Johns Hopkins Children’s Center; September 2013 to June 2017. Patients: Twenty-two simulated patients. Interventions: A framework was developed to characterize interruptions. Two new metrics were defined as follows: interruption time excess (the difference between actual and guideline-indicated allowable duration of interruption from compressions), and chest compression fraction potential (chest compression fraction with all interruption time excess excluded). Measurements and Main Results: Descriptive statistics were generated for interruption-level and event-level variables. Differences between median chest compression fraction and chest compression fraction potential were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Comparisons of interruption proportion before and after the first 5 minutes were assessed using the X 2 test statistic. Seven-hundred sixty-six interruptions occurred over 22 events. Median event duration was 463.0 seconds (interquartile range, 397.5–557.8 s), with a mean 34.8 interruptions per event. Auscultation and intubation had the longest median interruption time excess of 13.0 and 7.5 seconds, respectively. Median chest compression fraction was 76.0% (interquartile range, 67.7–80.7 s), and median chest compression fraction potential was 83.4% (interquartile range, 80.4–87.4%). Comparing median chest compression fraction to median chest compression fraction potential found an absolute percent difference of 7.6% (chest compression fraction: 76.0% vs chest compression fraction potential: 83.4%; p 〈 0.001). Conclusions: This lays the groundwork for studying inefficiency during cardiopulmonary resuscitation associated with chest compression interruptions. The framework we created allows for the determination of significant avoidable interruption time. By further elucidating the nature of interruptions, we can design and implement targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1529-7535
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2070997-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 8, No. 6 ( 2013-12), p. 418-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1559-2332
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2223429-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...