GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 11
    In: Bone Marrow Transplantation, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 59, No. 8 ( 2024-08), p. 1181-1183
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0268-3369 , 1476-5365
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 632854-4
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004030-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 12
    In: British Journal of Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 126, No. 5 ( 2022-03-23), p. 718-725
    Abstract: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), including carfilzomib, potentiate the activity of selinexor, a novel, first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, in preclinical models of multiple myeloma (MM). Methods The safety, efficacy, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor (80 or 100 mg) + carfilzomib (56 or 70 mg/m 2 ) + dexamethasone (40 mg) (XKd) once weekly (QW) was evaluated in patients with relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) not refractory to carfilzomib. Results Thirty-two patients, median prior therapies 4 (range, 1–8), were enrolled. MM was triple-class refractory in 38% of patients and 53% of patients had high-risk cytogenetics del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or gain 1q. Common treatment-related adverse events (all/Grade 3) were thrombocytopenia 72%/47% (G3 and G4), nausea 72%/6%, anaemia 53%/19% and fatigue 53%/9%, all expected and manageable with supportive care and dose modifications. MTD and RP2D were identified as selinexor 80 mg, carfilzomib 56 mg/m 2 , and dexamethasone 40 mg, all QW. The overall response rate was 78% including 14 (44%) ≥ very good partial responses. Median progression-free survival was 15 months. Conclusions Weekly XKd is highly effective and well-tolerated. These data support further investigation of XKd in patients with MM.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-0920 , 1532-1827
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002452-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80075-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 13
    In: Amyloid, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 26, No. sup1 ( 2019-03-29), p. 115-116
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1350-6129 , 1744-2818
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2141924-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1205246-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 14
    In: HemaSphere, Wiley, Vol. 3, No. S1 ( 2019-06), p. 740-
    Abstract: Selinexor is a first‐in‐class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates Exportin 1 (XPO1). Selinexor in combination with dexamethasone (dex) has demonstrated a 26.2% overall response rate (ORR) in patients (pts) with triple‐class refractory myeloma (defined as refractory to an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), proteasome inhibitor (PI), and CD‐38 monoclonal antibody [mAb]) including deep responses with very good partial response (VGPR) and 2 pts in a stringent complete response (sCR) (minimal residual disease negative). Daratumumab (Dara), an anti‐CD38 mAb, is approved for the treatment of heavily pretreated MM is limited by short progression‐free survival (PFS) and an ORR of ∼21% in quad‐refractory MM. Aims: The objectives of the study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of SDd in pts with PI/IMiD refractory MM. Methods: This is amulticenter, open‐label, phase 1/2b study with a dose escalation and expansion phase.Pts were eligible if they had received ≥3 prior lines of anti‐myeloma therapy, including a PI and an IMiD or whose MM is refractory to a PI and IMiD. In the expansion phase, pts’ prior dara therapy was exclusionary. Selinexor was dose‐escalated in 2 concurrent cohorts: once‐weekly (QW, at 100 mg) or twice‐weekly (BIW, at 60 mg). Dara was administered at 16 mg/kg IV (recommended schedule) and dex at 40 mg QW or 20 mg BIW. In the expansion phase, pts were to receive the RP2D. Results: As of February 20 th 2019, 30 pts (16 male/14 female) have been enrolled. Three pts have been enrolled into the 60 mg BIW and 27 pts in the 100 mg QW cohorts. The median age was 69 years and the median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 2 – 10). Common treatment‐related adverse events (all grades, Grades 3/4) included: thrombocytopenia (66%, 48%), nausea (66%, 3%), fatigue (55%, 14%), anemia (52%, 31%), leukopenia (48%, 31%), and neutropenia (48%, 24%). Two dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in the 60 mg BIW cohort: Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 2 fatigue requiring dose reduction in selinexor to 100 mg QW. In the 100 mg QW escalation cohort (n = 6), no DLTs occured.Based on tolerability and efficacy, the RP2D of SDd is selinexor 100 mg, dara 16 mg/kg, and dex 40 mg, administered QW. A total of 28 pts were evaluable for response.In dara naïve pts (n = 26), the ORR was 77% (9 VGPR, 8 partial response, 3 unconfirmed partial response). In the 2 pts with dara refractory MM, there was one progressive disease and one stable disease. Summary/Conclusion: Selinexor 100 mg QW can be combined safely with dara (per approved dosing) and dex to produce a deep and durable response warranting further investigation in pts with relapsed refractory MM. The ORR was 77% in pts who had not received prior dara or selinexor. Enrollment in the expansion arm is expected to be completed in March 2019 and full study results will be presented.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2572-9241 , 2572-9241
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2922183-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 15
    In: HemaSphere, Wiley, Vol. 3, No. S1 ( 2019-06), p. 245-
    Abstract: The nuclear export protein Exportin 1 (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM) and associated with poor prognosis. Selinexor is a first‐in‐class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that selectively binds and inactivates XPO1, therefore forces the nuclear retention and re‐activation of cell cycle regulators such as p53, FOXO, IkB, and Rb. Pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 31% and progression‐free survival (PFS) rate of 〈 4 months in patients (pts) refractory to prior bortezomib and lenalidomide ( Richardson et al, Blood 2014 ). Methods to increase response rate and depth are needed. Selinexor in combination with dexamethasone (dex) has demonstrated a 26.2% ORR in pts with triple‐class refractory myeloma including deep responses with very good partial response (VGPR) and 2 pts in a stringent complete response/minimal residual disease negative. It is hypothesized that the combination of SPd may improve the ORR, depth of response, and PFS. Aims: The primary objectives of the study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of SPd in pts with RRMM. Methods: STOMP is amulticenter, open‐label, phase 1/2b, dose escalation study with an expansion phase.Eligiblity included pts with RRMM who received ≥2 prior therapies including lenalidomide (len) and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). Oral (PO) selinexor was evaluated in 2 different dosing schedules of once‐weekly (QW, 60 or 80 mg) or twice‐weekly (BIW, 60 or 80 mg), with escalating doses of pomalidomide (pom)2, 3, or 4 mg PO on Days 1–21, and low dose dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg BIW or 40 mg QW. In the expansion phase, all pts were pom naïve. Results: As of February 20 th 2019, 43 pts (22 male/21 female) have been enrolled. The median age is 61 years and pts received a median of 4 (range, 2 – 9) prior treatment regimens. Thirty‐nine pts were immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD) refractory (26 refractory to len, 13 pts refractory to pom and len). The phase 1 dose escalation is ongoing. Enrollment is ongoing in 2 difference schedules: selinexor 80 mg/pom 2 mg and selinexor 60 mg/pom 4 mg in combination with dex. Six dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed (see Table 1). Common hematologic SPd treatment‐related adverse events (TRAE) included (all grades, Grades 3/4): neutropenia (54%, 49%), thrombocytopenia (51%, 30%), anemia (47%, 30%). Common non‐hematologic TRAE were predominantly Grade 1/2 and include nausea (51%, 0%), fatigue (47%, 9%), anorexia (42%, 0%). Thirty‐seven pts were evaluable for response. Among pts who were pom naïve (n = 27), the ORR was 52% (5 VGPR, 9 partial response [PR]) and the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 12.2 months. Among pts refractory to len/pom (n = 10) the ORR was 30% (2 PR, 1 unconfirmed PR) and the median PFS was 5.5 months. Summary/Conclusion: Once weekly selinexor can be safely combined with pom/dex. The all oral SPd combination is durable and active with a 52% ORR in pom‐naïve pts with heavily pretreated MM compared to previously published data of 31% ORR for pom/dex. The median PFS on SPd of 12.2 months in pom naïve pts is significantly longer than that observed with pom/dex ( 〈 4 months). No unexpected adverse events were noted. Cytopenias were expected and known with IMiD use. Non‐hematologic side effects were limited to Grade 1/2 events. The RP2D will be presented at the meeting and supports future phase 2/3 studies in RRMM. image
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2572-9241 , 2572-9241
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2922183-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 16
    In: Blood Cancer Journal, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 7, No. 8 ( 2017-08-25), p. e599-e599
    Abstract: For decades, conventional skeletal survey (CSS) has been the standard imaging technique for multiple myeloma (MM). However, recently whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) has been implemented into the diagnostic criteria of MM. This analysis compares sensitivity and prognostic significance of WBCT and CSS in patients with smoldering MM (SMM) and MM. Fifty-four of 212 patients (25.5%) had a negative CSS and a positive WBCT for osteolytic lesions ( P 〈 0.0001). Of 66 patients with SMM based on CSS, 12 (22.2%) had osteolytic lesions on WBCT. In comparison, WBCT failed to detect some bone destructions in the appendicular skeleton possibly due to limitations of the field of view. Presence of lytic bone lesions in WBCT was of borderline prognostic significance ( P =0.051) for SMM patients, with a median time to progression of 38 versus 82 months for those without bone destructions. In conclusion, WBCT identifies significantly more sites of bone destruction than CSS. More than 20% of patients with SMM according to CSS have in fact active MM detectable with WBCT. On the basis of this and other studies, WBCT (either computed tomography (CT) alone or as part of a positron emission tomography-CT protocol) should be considered the current standard for the detection of osteolytic lesions in MM.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2044-5385
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2600560-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 17
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 643-643
    Abstract: Background: Mortality in patients with AL Amyloidosis remains high due to progressive organ damage from amyloid deposition. Current therapies eliminate the plasma cell clone that produces amyloidogenic light chains. However, there are no approved therapies that directly target amyloid deposits, a major culprit of progressive multi-organ dysfunction. To address this, a murine (Mu) amyloid fibril-reactive monoclonal antibody (mAb) 11-1F4 was developed that binds to a conformational epitope present on human light-chain amyloid fibrils and initiates cell-mediated phagocytosis. In vivo testing of the Mu mAb and later its chimeric (Ch) form in mice with induced human AL amyloidomas resulted in rapid amyloidolysis without any evidence of toxicity [Hrncic 2000; Solomon 2003]. Subsequent evaluation of an I-124 labeled Mu mAb confirmed that it specifically bound to amyloid-laden organs as evidenced by PET/CT imaging [Wall 2010] . Because of these favorable results, GMP-grade amyloid fibril-reactive Ch IgG1 mAb 11-1F4 was produced by NCI's Biological Resource Branch for a phase 1a/b trial. An analysis of Phase 1a was presented at the American Society of Hematology's 2015 annual meeting. Here we report data from the phase 1a/b trial. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory AL Amyloidosis were enrolled in this open-label, dose-escalation phase 1a/b study of Ch IgG1 mAb 11-1F4 (NCT02245867). The primary objective was to determine safety and tolerability of the antibody when given as a single intravenous infusion (phase 1a) or as a series of weekly infusions for 4 weeks (phase 1b). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and efficacy as evidenced by organ response. For both phase 1a and 1b, a dose-escalation "up and down" design was used where sequential doses of 0.5, 5, 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500 mg/m2 were administered to successive patients. Assessment of organ response was based on the International Society of Amyloidosis' revised consensus criteria [Pallidini 2012] and the clinically validated renal staging and response criteria [Pallidini 2014] . Results: As of July 15th, 2016, 8 (2 κ and 6 λ) patients completed phase 1a and 11 (4 κ and 7 λ) patients commenced treatment in phase 1b. Median age was 67 years (range: 34 - 77) and median number of organs involved was 2 (range: 1 - 4) with heart and kidney being the most common. All patients received prior anti-plasma cell systemic treatment and achieved at least partial hematologic response. All patients tolerated the given dose of mAb 11-1F4. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 500mg/m2 for phase 1a and 1b. There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events (AEs) related to the drug. In phase 1a, one patient at dose level 4 developed a grade 2 rash 4 days after infusion. Skin biopsy revealed a so far undiagnosed cutaneous amyloidosis and immunohistochemical staining showed the mAb surrounding amyloid fibrils with an accompanying neutrophilic infiltrate. The same patient and another patient developed a similar rash during treatment in phase 1b suggesting mAb 11-1F4 binding. Although the primary objective of the trial was to evaluate safety, 63% of patients (5 of 8) with measurable disease burden demonstrated organ response after one infusion of mAb 11-1F4 in phase 1a. In phase 1b, 83% of patients (5 of 6 who completed follow up) showed organ response. At the time of presentation, we will report a complete analysis of the phase 1a and 1b clinical trial. Conclusions: Treatment with mAb 11-1F4 is well tolerated and safe without grade 4 or 5 AEs or dose limiting toxicity up to an MTD of 500mg/m2. Clinical efficacy data shows early and sustained organ response when the mAb is administered as a single infusion or as a weekly infusion for 4 weeks. Based on these very encouraging results, a phase 2 SWOG trial for patients with newly diagnosed AL Amyloidosis will be launched. Overall, we posit that amyloid fibril-specific 11-1F4 mAb represents a novel and promising adjunct to the treatment of AL Amyloidosis by safely promoting amyloid resolution and subsequent improvement in organ function. This may result in improved outcomes for patients with this devastating disease. Disclosures Wall: Prothena Inc: Patents & Royalties. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 18
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease Vol. 17, No. 3 ( 2016-03), p. 142-145
    In: Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 17, No. 3 ( 2016-03), p. 142-145
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-0443
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1454947-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 19
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 22, No. 7 ( 2022-07), p. e526-e531
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540992-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 20
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 15 ( 2015-09), p. e151-e152
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540992-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...