GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 11
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2010
    In:  Journal of Pragmatics Vol. 42, No. 2 ( 2010-2), p. 392-407
    In: Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 42, No. 2 ( 2010-2), p. 392-407
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0378-2166
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1480730-0
    SSG: 5,1
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 12
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2015
    In:  Critical Discourse Studies Vol. 12, No. 3 ( 2015-07-03), p. 313-329
    In: Critical Discourse Studies, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 12, No. 3 ( 2015-07-03), p. 313-329
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1740-5904 , 1740-5912
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2146507-1
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 13
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2018
    In:  Critical Discourse Studies Vol. 15, No. 3 ( 2018-05-27), p. 285-302
    In: Critical Discourse Studies, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 15, No. 3 ( 2018-05-27), p. 285-302
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1740-5904 , 1740-5912
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2146507-1
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 14
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2018
    In:  Discourse & Society Vol. 29, No. 4 ( 2018-07), p. 380-398
    In: Discourse & Society, SAGE Publications, Vol. 29, No. 4 ( 2018-07), p. 380-398
    Abstract: This article explores the discursive patterns of legitimization of anti-immigration policies adopted by the Polish right-wing government which has been ruling the country since October 2015. It argues that legitimization of anti-immigration policies is essentially threat-based and coercive, involving a specific selection of rhetorical tools deployed to characterize different immigrant groups and individual immigrants from mainly Middle East and East African territories. Construed as ‘different’, ‘alien’ and ‘unbelonging’, in a whole lot of cultural, ideological and religious terms, they are claimed to pose an emerging threat to the safety of Poland and the personal safety and well-being of Polish citizens. The article draws on discourse space models and Proximization Theory in particular, revealing how the concepts of closeness and remoteness are manipulated in the service of threat construction and the sanctioning of tough anti-immigration measures, such as the refusal to accept non-Christian refugees from war territories in Syria. It demonstrates how Poland’s government manufactures and discursively perpetuates the aura of fear by conflating the issue of refugee migration into Europe with the problem of global terrorism, and how virtual threats to Polish cultural legacy and values are conceived to justify the government’s opposition to the idea of the multiethnic and multicultural state in general.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0957-9265 , 1460-3624
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1484288-9
    SSG: 3,4
    SSG: 3,5
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 15
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2021
    In:  Discourse & Society Vol. 32, No. 3 ( 2021-05), p. 328-345
    In: Discourse & Society, SAGE Publications, Vol. 32, No. 3 ( 2021-05), p. 328-345
    Abstract: This paper describes ways in which political speakers define and legitimize future policies by construing different policy options in terms of ‘privileged’ and ‘oppositional’ futures. Privileged and oppositional futures are conceptual projections of alternative policy visions occurring in quasi-dialogic chunks of speech, revealing specific evidential, mood, and modality patterns. Privileged future involves speaker’s preferred vision and is articulated through absolute modality and evidential markers which derive from factual evidence, history, and reason. Oppositional future involves antagonistic and plainly threatening vision, expressed by probabilistic modality and interrogative mood. For psychological reasons, oppositional future is normally communicated first, allowing a swift response from the privileged future expressed in the speaker-preferred vision. The paper demonstrates that privileged and oppositional futures blur traditional distinctions between dialog and monolog and thus invite heterogeneous methods and instruments of analysis. It discusses the most productive interdisciplinary tools (critical, SFL and rhetorical tools, socio-psychological models), and their implementation in analysis of lexical manifestations of alternative futures in political discourse, such as immigration and anti-terrorist discourse.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0957-9265 , 1460-3624
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1484288-9
    SSG: 3,4
    SSG: 3,5
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 16
    In: JAMA, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 329, No. 14 ( 2023-04-11), p. 1183-
    Abstract: Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0098-7484
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2958-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018410-4
    SSG: 5,21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 17
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2010
    In:  International Review of Pragmatics Vol. 2, No. 1 ( 2010), p. 1-2
    In: International Review of Pragmatics, Brill, Vol. 2, No. 1 ( 2010), p. 1-2
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1877-3095 , 1877-3109
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2513837-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 18
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2020
    In:  International Review of Pragmatics Vol. 12, No. 2 ( 2020-08-19), p. 272-294
    In: International Review of Pragmatics, Brill, Vol. 12, No. 2 ( 2020-08-19), p. 272-294
    Abstract: The present paper explores the current nexus between Cognitive Linguistics ( CL ) and Critical Discourse Analysis ( CDA ), focusing on theories of conceptual positioning, distancing and perspective-taking in discourse space. It assesses the strengths, limitations, and prospects for further operationalization of positioning as a valid methodology in CDA , and political discourse studies in particular. In the first part, I review the cognitive models of positioning that have made the most significant contribution to CDA . Discussing Deictic Space Theory and Text World Theory, among others, I argue that these models reveal further theoretical potential which has not been exploited yet. While they offer a comprehensive and plausible account of how representations and ideologically charged worldviews are established, they fail to deliver a pragmatic explanation of how addressees are made to establish a worldview, in the service of speaker’s goals. The second part of the paper outlines Proximization Theory, a discursive model of crisis and conflict construction in political discourse. I argue that, unlike the other models, it fully captures the complex geopolitical and ideological positioning in political discourse space, providing a viable handle on the dynamics of conflict between the opposing ideologies of the space.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1877-3095 , 1877-3109
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2513837-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 19
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2020
    In:  International Review of Pragmatics Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2020-02-13), p. 165-181
    In: International Review of Pragmatics, Brill, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2020-02-13), p. 165-181
    Abstract: This short paper makes a tentative attempt to capture the most salient of persuasion strategies engaged in the construction of leadership in three different yet apparently interrelated domains of public life and public policy, political communication, management/business discourse, and academic communication. It explores the cognitive underpinnings, as well as linguistic realizations, of such concepts/phenomena/mechanisms as consistency-building, source-tagging, forced conceptualizations by metaphor, and discursive neutralization of the cheater detection module in the discourse addressee. A preliminary conclusion from the analysis of these mechanisms is that the three discourses under investigation reveal striking conceptual similarities with regard to the main strategies of credibility-building and enactment of leadership. At the same time, they reveal differences at the linguistic level, i.e. regarding the types of lexical choices applied to realize a given strategy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1877-3095 , 1877-3109
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2513837-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 20
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2023
    In:  International Review of Pragmatics Vol. 15, No. 1 ( 2023-01-19), p. 1-2
    In: International Review of Pragmatics, Brill, Vol. 15, No. 1 ( 2023-01-19), p. 1-2
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1877-3095 , 1877-3109
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2513837-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...