In:
International Journal of Sports Medicine, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 44, No. 08 ( 2023-07), p. 545-557
Abstract:
The purpose was to determine the effect low-intensity training with blood flow
restriction (LI-BFR) versus high-intensity aerobic training (HIT) on acute physiological and perceptual responses. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and
Allied Health Literature, National Library of Medicine, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases and the reference list of eligible studies were
consulted to identify randomized experimental studies, published until July 4, 2022, that analyzed physiological or perceptual responses between LI-BFR versus
HIT in healthy young individuals. Mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as effect estimates and random effects models were
applied in all analyses. Twelve studies were included in this review. During exercise sessions, HIT promoted higher values of heart rate (MD=28.9
bpm; p 〈 0.00001; I 2
=79%), oxygen consumption (SMD=4.01; p 〈 0.00001;
I 2 =83%), ventilation
(MD=48.03 l/min; p=0.0001; I 2
=97%), effort (SMD=1.54; p=0.003; I 2
=90%) and blood lactate (MD=3.85 mmol/L; p=0.002;
I 2 =97%). Perception of
pain/discomfort was lower in HIT (SMD=−1.71; p=0.04; I 2
=77.5%). In conclusion, LI-BFR promotes less pronounced physiological responses than HIT but
with greater perception of pain.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0172-4622
,
1439-3964
Language:
English
Publisher:
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2041541-2
SSG:
31
Permalink