GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Sociology  (2)
Material
Publisher
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • Sociology  (2)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2020
    In:  Environment and Behavior Vol. 52, No. 1 ( 2020-01), p. 60-81
    In: Environment and Behavior, SAGE Publications, Vol. 52, No. 1 ( 2020-01), p. 60-81
    Abstract: Research has found that many people view climate change as a psychologically distant, future threat, which leads them to be less motivated to engage in pro-environmental behavior. Engaging in episodic future thinking (EFT; projecting the self into the future to pre-experience future events) may facilitate the perception of future events as psychologically close, thereby increasing the perceived risk associated with those events. Therefore, engagement in EFT regarding climate change–related risks should induce higher risk perceptions and lead to acting pro-environmentally. In two experiments, we demonstrated that engaging in EFT to pre-experience climate change–related risk events was associated with a higher level of risk perception and a greater tendency toward pro-environmental behavior, including energy-saving use of air-conditioning (Experiment 1), willingness to participate in beach cleaning (Experiment 2), and choice of a meal with lower environmental impact (Experiment 2). The current research provides experimental evidence for an innovative approach to improving public engagement with climate change.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0013-9165 , 1552-390X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500133-7
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 280662-9
    SSG: 5,2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 1990
    In:  The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Vol. 507, No. 1 ( 1990-01), p. 91-102
    In: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, SAGE Publications, Vol. 507, No. 1 ( 1990-01), p. 91-102
    Abstract: Political reforms in the socialist countries cannot be understood with the traditional demand-side theories. The property-rights structure is a crucial element in deciding the level of social demand for democracy. But the institutionalization of political pluralism can only be explained by elite strategic thinking. Typically, Leninist elites do not opt for political reforms if they can successfully restructure the economic systems without making political changes. There are two primary reasons for the regime to take steps toward political pluralism: one is to stifle the conservative opponents in the regime who are against economic reform; the other is to strike a social contract with the society to make economic reform acceptable to the population. When the elites are forced to tinker with political reforms, the single-party multicandidate model usually precedes the multiparty solution. Democratization, however, may fail to bring about economic recovery and is vulnerable to the elite's change of mind and the pressure from more orthodox Leninist regimes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-7162 , 1552-3349
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 1990
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2274940-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 757146-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2097792-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 328-1
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 3,4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...