In:
Industrial Law Journal, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 46, No. 2 ( 2017-07-01), p. 185-207
Abstract:
The debate on how to adjust existing regulation to keep pace with the rise and spread of the non-standard workforce worldwide has mainly concentrated on individual employment law. This article means to draw attention to some collective labour regulation issues that have a significant impact on the labour protection of non-standard workers. Without subscribing to the idea that the standard employment relationship is an outmoded model of regulation, this article argues that some existing restrictions on collective rights are failing to keep pace with transformations of labour markets that occurred in recent decades and in particular with the growth in the number of non-standard workers. Consequently, these workers are legally or practically denied access to the meaningful exercise of collective rights. Some of these restrictions, such as antitrust bans on collective bargaining, regulations imposing strike ballots, limitations of secondary action and the distinction between political and economic strikes, are called into question since they disproportionately affect non-standard workers and are at odds with the recognition of collective rights, and in particular the right to strike, as human rights.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0305-9332
,
1464-3669
DOI:
10.1093/indlaw/dww034
Language:
English
Publisher:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Date:
2017
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1494337-2
SSG:
2
Permalink
