GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2008
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 45, No. 2 ( 2008-03), p. 131-141
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 45, No. 2 ( 2008-03), p. 131-141
    Abstract: Recent formal and empirical research in political science and economics strongly indicates that various forms of political and social polarization increase the risk of violent conflict within and between nation states. The articles collected for this issue explore this crucial relationship and provide answers to a variety of topics: First, contributors address how institutions and other contingent factors mediate the conflict potential in polarized societies. Second, this special issue compares the explanatory power of income polarization with traditional and new measures of inequality. Third, the contributions examine how groups form and coalitions are built in polarized societies and how this affects political decision-making. Finally, the special issue analyses the interconnections between interstate war, internationalized conflict and polarization. This introduction synthesizes the literatures that have been developed on the issue of polarization and conflict in the various social scientific disciplines. The authors particularly discuss the similarities between economic models of conflict and the so-called crisis bargaining literature which has been mainly developed within political science. The article shows the differences between `polarization' and `inequality' and introduces the various measures of diversity that have been used in the study of interstate and intrastate conflict during the past few decades.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2000
    In:  Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 44, No. 2 ( 2000-04), p. 250-276
    In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, SAGE Publications, Vol. 44, No. 2 ( 2000-04), p. 250-276
    Abstract: Federalism belongs to those institutions that usually attract more admirers than critics. This study investigates whether decentralized decision making in the asylum domain undermines the principle of equality in the handling of individual cases. The externalities that power delegation creates are examined, and a principal/agent framework is developed to show how state discretion in the implementation of a unifying federal measure arises. The model distinguishes between positive and negative discrimination in the acceptance of asylum applications. The empirical analysis of approximately 180,000 cases demonstrates that the probability of negative discrimination is partly a function of the organizational principles that characterize the asylum policies of the 26 Swiss states (cantons).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-0027 , 1552-8766
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2000
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500229-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3013-2
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 51, No. 2 ( 2014-03), p. 173-183
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 51, No. 2 ( 2014-03), p. 173-183
    Abstract: The security externalities of globalization and capitalism continue to play an influential role in peace research. Typical contributions to these interrelated areas of scientific inquiry address the hope that the external openness (commercial liberalism) and the internal freedom of an economy (capitalist peace) pacify interstate as well as intrastate relations. I claim, despite the empirical support both theses have received, that they face considerable analytical hurdles. Commercial liberalism has, on a theoretical level, not yet moved much beyond the opportunity cost arguments that enlightenment philosophers first advanced more than 200 years ago. The capitalist peace research program similarly does not offer clear micro-level mechanisms explaining why the interactions between economic agents and political decisionmakers should be more peaceful in capitalist than in state-dominated economies. Drawing on the political economy literature, I argue that economic liberalism should distinguish between level- and change-effects of both globalization and capitalism and that thinking in analogies between domestic and interstate peace has prevented the field from making analytical headway. Both literatures will only profit from the advent of ‘big data’ in the case that the field addresses the theoretical challenges upfront.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2005
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 42, No. 3 ( 2005-05), p. 361-362
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 42, No. 3 ( 2005-05), p. 361-362
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 1999
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 36, No. 4 ( 1999-07), p. 387-404
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 36, No. 4 ( 1999-07), p. 387-404
    Abstract: `Globalization' has largely superseded the term `economic interdependence' to describe the rapidly growing links between nations, economies, and societies. The effects that the internationalization of the world system has on social equality, the environment, and economic growth are, however, still largely disputed. In this article, we discuss the literature that covers another intensively debated issue and which attempts to assess the relationship between trade and interstate conflict. Although liberal economists maintain that economic interdependence exerts an unconditionally pacifying influence on interstate relations, we show that the most recent formal work expects that trade will have a negligible and, in the perspective of one important model at least, even an amplifying effect on conflict. Much empirical work, by contrast, supports the claim that the relationship between trade and conflict is direct and not mitigated by contextual factors. We review the different controversies on the link between economic interdependence and militarized disputes and outline some major challenges that have not yet been adequately dealt with in the scientific study of war and peace.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 1999
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2004
    In:  Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 48, No. 4 ( 2004-08), p. 506-524
    In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, SAGE Publications, Vol. 48, No. 4 ( 2004-08), p. 506-524
    Abstract: Mathematical procedures that promise an envy-free, equitable, and efficient solution to distributional conflicts have received widespread attention. Two fair-division mechanisms, adjusted Knaster and proportional Knaster, which are similar to the well-known adjusted-winner procedure, are compared with the less fair divide-and-choose mechanism. Results show that participants largely prefer the adjusted-Knaster procedure to the two alternatives. Adjusted Knaster, closely followed by proportional Knaster, also promises the highest average payoff. Yet the sophisticated mechanisms cease to perform better than divide-and-choose once actors receive the possibility to deviate from the mandatory bargaining protocols of fair-division procedures. The preference for adjusted and proportional Knaster is found to be a partial function of the participants’ psychological profile. The more “antisocial” a participant, the more likely this respondent is to opt for a procedure with a compensatory mechanism.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-0027 , 1552-8766
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500229-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3013-2
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JSTOR ; 2000
    In:  International Migration Review Vol. 34, No. 4 ( 2000-24), p. 1182-
    In: International Migration Review, JSTOR, Vol. 34, No. 4 ( 2000-24), p. 1182-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0197-9183
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JSTOR
    Publication Date: 2000
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3510-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052202-2
    SSG: 3,4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2008
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 45, No. 2 ( 2008-03), p. 183-203
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 45, No. 2 ( 2008-03), p. 183-203
    Abstract: One controversy in the study of civil war relates to the role that institutions play in ethnically diverse societies. `Constitutional engineers' advance various institutional arrangements, ranging from democracy in general to specific constitutional and electoral rules, as those mechanisms that help divided societies to resolve disputes peacefully. Political sociologists, by contrast, maintain that political institutions are largely an epiphenomenon. Synthesizing the two conflicting schools of thought, the authors examine how different institutions in conjunction with three forms of ethnic diversity — fractionalization, dominance and polarization — affect the risk of civil war. It is argued that groups perceive institutions as a constraint and that they consider the usage of political violence if they cannot achieve their goals peacefully. The examination of these conditional institutionalist hypotheses for the period between 1950 and 2000 shows, in accordance with recent theoretical work, that fractionalization can indeed be linked to low-intensity civil wars and that this effect is particularly strong in democracies in comparison to autocracies. Interacting the measures of diversity with different democratic institutions, the authors confirm that rules that encourage power-sharing lower the risk of war in diverse societies. The event-history models, moreover, show that the combination of fractionalization and majoritarian voting forebodes badly for the internal stability of a state. Within the set of democratic regimes studied in this article, presidential systems are the most war-prone institutional setting.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2001
    In:  Journal of Peace Research Vol. 38, No. 5 ( 2001-09), p. 650-651
    In: Journal of Peace Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 38, No. 5 ( 2001-09), p. 650-651
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3433 , 1460-3578
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1490712-4
    SSG: 3,6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2000
    In:  International Migration Review Vol. 34, No. 4 ( 2000-12), p. 1182-1216
    In: International Migration Review, SAGE Publications, Vol. 34, No. 4 ( 2000-12), p. 1182-1216
    Abstract: In the late eighties and early nineties, almost all Western European nations adopted an increasingly restrictive policy towards the growing number of asylum seekers. We develop a push-and-pull model and evaluate whether these newly created deterrence measures had a significant impact on the number of asylum applications in Switzerland. The statistical tests in the form of Box-Tiao intervention analyses shows that states are only partially able to control global migration. We particularly demonstrate that only one of the unilateral measures adopted by the Swiss government reached the main goal and led to a substantial reduction in the number of applications in 1990. Further, legal reforms did not affect the number of asylum requests of refugees fleeing from a violent conflict in the neighborhood of the host country.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0197-9183 , 1747-7379
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2000
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3510-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052202-2
    SSG: 7,36
    SSG: 3,4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...