In:
The Astrophysical Journal, American Astronomical Society, Vol. 878, No. 1 ( 2019-06-10), p. 10-
Abstract:
We investigate the interplay between magnetic ( B ) field, gravity, and turbulence in the fragmentation process of cores within the filamentary infrared dark cloud G34.43+00.24. We observe the magnetic field morphology across G34.43, traced with thermal dust polarization at 350 μ m with an angular resolution of 10″ (0.18 pc), and compare with the kinematics obtained from N 2 H + across the filament. We derive local velocity gradients from N 2 H + , tracing motion in the plane of sky, and compare with the observed local B field orientations in the plane of sky. The B field orientations are found to be perpendicular to the long axis of the filament toward the MM1 and MM2 ridge, suggesting that the B field can guide material toward the filament. Toward MM3, the B field orientations appear more parallel to the filament and aligned with the elongated core of MM3, indicating a different role of the B field. In addition to a large-scale east–west velocity gradient, we find a close alignment between local B field orientations and local velocity gradients toward the MM1/MM2 ridge. This local correlation in alignment suggests that gas motions are influenced by the B field morphology or vice versa. Additionally, this alignment seems to become even closer with increasing integrated emission in N 2 H + , possibly indicating that a growing gravitational pull alignes the B field and gas motion more and more. We analyze and quantify B field, gravity, turbulence, and their relative importance toward the MM1, MM2, and MM3 regions with various techniques over two scales, a larger clump area at 2 pc scale and the smaller core area at 0.6 pc scale. While gravitational energy, B field, and turbulent pressure all grow systematically from large to small scale, the ratios among the three constituents clearly develop differently over scale. We propose that this varying relative importance between B field, gravity, and turbulence over scale drives and explains the different fragmentation types seen at subparsec scale (no fragmentation in MM1; aligned fragmentation in MM2; clustered fragmentation in MM3). We discuss uncertainties, subtleties, and the robustness of our conclusion, and we stress that a multiscale joint analysis is required to understand the dynamics in these systems.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0004-637X
,
1538-4357
DOI:
10.3847/1538-4357/ab1484
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
American Astronomical Society
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2207648-7
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1473835-1
SSG:
16,12
Permalink