GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 27 ( 2022-09-20), p. 3162-3171
    Abstract: Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; HS-10296) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in China. This double-blind phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib compared with gefitinib as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03849768 ). METHODS Patients at 53 sites in China were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either aumolertinib (110 mg) or gefitinib (250 mg) once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. RESULTS A total of 429 patients who were naïve to treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. PFS was significantly longer with aumolertinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.60; P 〈 .0001). The median PFS with aumolertinib was 19.3 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 20.8) versus 9.9 months with gefitinib (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.6). Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups (objective response rate, 73.8% and 72.1%, respectively; disease control rate, 93.0% and 96.7%, respectively). The median duration of response was 18.1 months (95% CI, 15.2 to not applicable) with aumolertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.1) with gefitinib. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 severity (any cause) were observed in 36.4% and 35.8% of patients in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups, respectively. Rash and diarrhea (any grade) were observed in 23.4% and 16.4% of patients who received aumolertinib compared with 41.4% and 35.8% of those who received gefitinib, respectively. CONCLUSION Aumolertinib is a well-tolerated third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that could serve as a treatment option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the first-line setting.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5207-5207
    Abstract: Background: Based on the cells' antigen differentiation expression patterns, most cases of acute leukemia (AL) are classified as either myeloid or lymphoid lineage. However, there are patients with leukemic blast population that co-express both lymphoid and myeloid characteristics, known as biphenotypic acute leukemia (BAL) or mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). BAL is a rare subgroup of acute leukemia with a poor prognosis. Currently, a standard chemotherapy treatment has yet to be established. Aims: This study aims to retrospectively investigate the incidence, pathological characteristics, and clinical outcome of BAL patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China, between January, 2014 and June 2019. Methods: From January 2014 to June 2019, the medical records of newly diagnosed BAL based on the EGIL criteria, or ALAL based on the 2008/2016 WHO criteria and who were admitted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnostic workup of BAL was based on initial morphological, cytochemical, and immunophenotypic evaluation of the BM. Using the EGIL scoring system and 2008/2016 WHO criteria, treatment methods and outcome data, including induction chemotherapy, complete remission (CR), relapse, and death, were collected and reviewed. This study was an observational, retrospective, and descriptive study of the clinical aspects of BAL, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Results: Among a total of 6100 newly diagnosed patients with AL, 10 (0.16%) patients satisfied the definition of BAL based on the EGIL criteria, or MPAL based on the WHO criteria, including 7 males and 3 females. The median age of these patients at diagnosis was 19 years (range 3-67 years). One patient (Pt #1) had extramedullary invasion, including neck, mediastinum (area 8), posterior septal group, left axillary, peritoneal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Another patient (Pt #7) had extramedullary invasion with central nervous system leukemia. Immunophenotypic characteristics showed that among 10 BAL patients, 4 cases carried B/Myeloid phenotype, 4 cases carried T/Myeloid phenotype and 2 case carried T/B phenotype. For 8 patients with myeloid lineage differentiation, MPO was positive in 6 (75%), CD13 in 4 (50%), CD33 in 4 (50%), CD38 in 6 (75%), CD58 in 3 (37.5%), CD117 in 4 (50%) patients. In 5 patients with B-lymphoid lineage differentiation, CD19 was positive in 4 (80%), CD79a in 5 (100%) patients. The most frequently T-lymphoid lineage positive markers were CD7 and cCD3, which were positive in 4 of 5 (80%) patients. The stem cell markers HLA-DR and CD34 were both positive in 7 (7/10, 70%) patients, while CD117 was positive in 4 (4/10, 40%) patients. Cytogenetic analysis results showed that 7 of 10 patients had normal karyotypes (Pt#1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9,10) while the other 3 patients had clonal abnormalities. Pt#4 had 46, xx, t(9;22)(q34;q11) aberration; Pt#6 had 45, XY, -7/46, idem,+8 aberration; and Pt#7 had 45, X,-Y, del(7)q32, t(8,21) (q22;q22) aberration. Two patients (Pt# 3, 5) had RUNX1 gene mutation, one patient (Pt#4) had BCR/ABL fusion gene mutation, and one patient (Pt#9) had JAK1, JAK3, FBXW7 mutation. Six patients received ALL-directed induction therapy (VDLP), whereas two patients received AML-directed induction therapy (MEA and IA regimens). Overall, 4 of 8 (50%) patients with chemotherapy achieved complete remission (CR) after initial induction therapy. In the AML-directed therapy group, 1 of 2 (50%) patients achieved CR. Meanwhile, 3 of 6 (50%) patients achieved CR after ALL-directed induction chemotherapy. Two patients received HSCT after initial CRs, one patient (Pt#7) died two months after transplantation due to the infection, and another patient (Pt#5) is still alive. With an average of 14.3 (4.0-42.0) months follow-up, the median survival time was 7 months. Conclusion: We reported 10 cases of BAL, including 4 cases of B/Myeloid phenotype, 4 cases of T/Myeloid phenotype and 2 case of T/B phenotype. 4 of 8 patients achieved CR (50%) after initial chemotherapy. Although many patients achieved CR after initial chemotherapy, but the relapse rate was very high and the CR rate after relapse was very low. Our results confirmed that BAL is a rare malignancy with a very poor prognosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 16_Supplement ( 2020-08-15), p. CT190-CT190
    Abstract: Background: Almonertinib (HS-10296) is an oral, potent, high selective third generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) for sensitizing mutations and EGFR T790M mutation. The preliminary clinical data of almonertinib reported in WCLC showed favorable efficacy and safety in target populations. Here, we presented the latest efficacy data, including the subgroup analysis of central nervous system (CNS) response. Methods: Patients aged at least 18 years with centrally confirmed EGFR T790M mutation, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on prior EGFR-TKI treatment, received almonertinib 110 mg orally once daily until disease progression. Patients with asymptomatic, stable brain metastases not requiring steroids were enrolled. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR) using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), depth of response (DepOR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Response endpoints were assessed in full analysis set (NCT02981108). Results: From May 2018 to October 2018, 244 patients entered study in 36 sites in mainland China (189 patients) and Taiwan (55 patients). Of 88 patients with CNS metastases on baseline brain scans, 23 had at least one intracranial measurable target lesion. At cutoff date (Aug 1, 2019), the median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 11.8 months. 168 of 244 patients achieved confirmed partial responses. The ORR was 68.9% (95% CI: 62.6, 74.6). The DCR was 93.4% (95% CI: 89.6, 96.2). The mPFS (48.0% maturity) and mDOR were 12.3 (95% CI: 9.6, 13.8) and 12.4 (95% CI: 11.3, NA) months, respectively. The confirmed CNS ORR and DCR were 60.9% (95% CI: 38.5, 80.3) and 91.3% (95% CI: 72.0, 98.9), respectively. The CNS mPFS (47.8% maturity) was 10.8 (95% CI: 5.5, 12.6) months. The safety profile was consistent with the previous report. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (17 [7.0%]) and pulmonary embolism (6 [2.5%] ). There was no interstitial lung disease reported. Conclusions: Almonertinib demonstrated progression-free survival benefit in EGFR T790M positive NSCLC patients who had progressed after previous EGFR-TKI treatment, especially showed clinically meaningful efficacy against CNS metastases, and the safety profile was consistent with that reported previously. A randomized, controlled, double-blinded, phase III study is ongoing comparing almonertinib with gefinitib in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients. Citation Format: Shun Lu, Qiming Wang, Guojun Zhang, Xiaorong Dong, Cheng-Ta Yang, Yong Song, Gee-Chen Chang, You Lu, Hongming Pan, Chao-Hua Chiu, Zhehai Wang, Jifeng Feng, Jianying Zhou, Xingxiang Xu, Renhua Guo, Jianhua Chen, Haihua Yang, Yuan Chen, Zhuang Yu, Her-Shyong Shiah, Chin-Chou Wang, Nong Yang, Jian Fang, Ping Wang, Kai Wang, Yanping Hu, Jianxing He, Ziping Wang, Jianhua Shi, Shaoshui Chen, Qiong Wu, Changan Sun, Chuan Li, Hongying Wei, Ying Cheng, Wu-Chou Su, Te-Chun Hsia, Jiuwei Cui, Yuping Sun, James Chih-Hsin Yang. A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study: The third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor almonertinib for pretreated EGFR T790M-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (APOLLO) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT190.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. GS1-06-GS1-06
    Abstract: Background Entinostat is a novel, potent, once weekly, orally bioavailable, class I selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. In a previous Phase II study, the combination of entinostat with exemestane showed significant improvement of overall survival in patients with advanced hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer. To verify and further confirm the benefit of HDAC inhibitor in combination with exemestane we designed a randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety in a larger population of Chinese patients with advanced, HR positive breast cancer. Methods We carried out the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial at 35 sites in China. Eligible patients were women (aged ≥18 years) with HR positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer, whose disease had relapsed or progressed after at least one endocrine therapy (either in advanced or metastatic or adjuvant setting), and who had at least one measurable lesion, adequate organ function, ECOG performance status of 0-1, and adequate haematological and biochemical parameters. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web-response system to orally take 5 mg entinostat or placebo. Both groups received oral administration of 25 mg exemestane daily. Randomization was stratified according to previous usage of CDK4/6 (yes vs no), fulvestrant (yes vs no), chemotherapy (yes vs no), and the presence of visceral metastases (yes vs no). Patients, investigators, study site staff, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was Independent Radiographic Committee (IRC)-assessed progression free survival (PFS). Efficacy and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of any study treatment. The study has reached the required number of events for final analysis of the primary endpoint. The trial is no longer enrolling patients, but follow-up for investigation of overall survival is ongoing. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with the number of NCT03538171. Results From April 16th, 2019 to May 13th, 2020, 354 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned as 235 to the entinostat group and 119 to the placebo group. IRC-assessed median PFS was 6.32 months (95% CI 5.30-9.11) in the entinostat group and 3.72 months (95% CI 1.91-5.49) in the placebo group (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.57-0.96]; p & lt;0.001). The most common Grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the entinostat group vs placebo group were neutropenia (103 [43.8%] vs 119 [0.8%] ), thrombocytopenia (20 [8.5%] vs 1 [0.8%] ), and leucopenia (15 [6.4%] vs 0). Serious adverse events occurred in 28 out of 235 patients (11.9%) in the entinostat group and 11 out of 119 patients (9.2%) in the placebo group. Conclusions Entinostat and exemestane combination treatment significantly improved PFS compared with exemestane alone in patients with advanced, HR positive, HER2 negative breast cancer that progressed after previous endocrine therapy. Entinostat and exemestane combination was generally tolerated and can offer meaningful clinical benefit in these patients with unmet medical need. This phase III trial was sponsored by Taizhou EOC Pharma Co., Ltd. Citation Format: Binghe Xu, Qingyuan Zhang, Xichun Hu, Qing Li, Tao Sun, Wei Li, Quchang Ouyang, Jingfen Wang, Zhongsheng Tong, Min Yan, Huiping Li, Xiaohua Zeng, Changping Shan, Xian Wang, Xi Yan, Jian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Jiani Wang, Liang Zhang, Ying Lin, Jifeng Feng, Qianjun Chen, Jian Huang, Yongkui Lu, Hongsheng Li, Jinsheng Wu, Jing Cheng, Yanrong Hao, Cuizhi Geng, Min Lu, Yanping Li, Xi Chen, Lihua Song, Xueying Wu, Changlu Hu, Xinhong Wu, Xiaojia Wang, Yueyin Pan, Yuehong Cui, Guohua Yu, Sanyuan Sun. A randomized control phase III trial of entinostat, a once weekly, class I selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with exemestane in patients with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-06.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 184 ( 2023-05), p. 73-82
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468190-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82061-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: The American Journal of Human Genetics, Elsevier BV, Vol. 109, No. 8 ( 2022-08), p. 1366-1387
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9297
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1473813-2
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 5475-5475
    Abstract: Background: The efficacy and safety of rituximab(R)-based immunochemotherapy, the standard regimens for patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) which is more common in Asia than in Western countries, are well confirmed in RCT studies. However, the safety and effectiveness of R+chemo for DLBCL in real world use is not widely reported, especially population are normally excluded in RCT studies. The objective of this observational study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of R+chemo as 1st line treatment for Chinese DLBCL in routine clinical practice. Methods: This study was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study conducted in China. DLBCL pts eligible to receive R+chemo (CHOP or non-CHOP) as 1st line treatment were enrolled with no specific exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was safety. Data on safety and effectiveness were collected from medical records 120 d after the last R dose was administered. This study was registered in clincialtrials.gov (NCT01340443). Results: In total, 279 pts (162male/117femal) with a median age of 57 yrs (range 13 to 88 yrs) were included in the safety analysis set. By IPI criteria, 50.2% of pts were low risk, 25.4% low-intermediate risk, 16.5% intermediate-high risk, 7.2% high risk and 0.7% with unknown risk. The most common concomitant diseases observed are liver (44,15.8%), heart (23, 8.2%), kidney (9, 3.2%) or lung (7, 2.5%) disease. Pts received R+chemo treatment with a median cycle of 6 and a median interval of 24 d. In total, 52.7% pts had grade 3-4 AEs and 16.8% pts had SAE (Table 1). AE related death was 1.1% (n=3). 67.0% pts had any grade hematologic toxicity and the most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were leukocytopenia (29.7%), erythrocytopenia (3.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Infection (46.2%), gastrointestinal toxicity (45.2%), and liver toxicity (12.5%) were common non-hematologic toxicities. The AEs of special population (with common concomitant and very young/older DLBCL) are listed in Table 2. For HBV management, the incidence of HBV reactivation in HBsAg+, HBsAg-/HBcAb+, HBsAg-/HBcAb-, and undefined pts was 12.5% (3/24), 4.3% (3/69), 0.7% (1/149), and 2.7% (1/37), respectively, no death due to HBV reactivation 120 d after the last R dose was administered. The detail outcomes of HBV reactivation management in this study was reported in EHA 2014. For ITT population (n=258), the overall response rate was 93.7%. Rates of complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu) and partial response (PR) were 55.0%, 18.2% and 20.9%, respectively. Summary and Conclusions: During this observation study, the incidence of adverse events of R+chemo as 1st line for DLBCL in real world were tolerable and consistent to previous reports. The AEs in special DLBCL sup-population (very younger, older or with common concomitant disease) are well tolerated too. R+chemo treatment brought more than 90% response rate in these Chinese pts might due to the pts with relative low IPI score. More education on standard management of HBV is needed. Accordingly, this real world study further validates the safety and effectiveness of using R+chemo to treat pts with DLBCL. Table 1: The Hamatologist and common non-hematologist AEs ¡¡ Any grade, n (%) Grade 3/4, n (%) SAE, n (%) Death, n (%) Any toxicity 267 (95.7) 147 (52.7) 47 (16.8) 3 (1.1) Hematological toxicity 187 (67.0) 104 (37.3) 6 (2.2) 0 (0.0) Bone Marrow Failure 23 (12.3) 14 (7.5) 2 (1.1) 0 (0.0) Leukocytopenia 167 (59.9) 83 (29.7) 4 (1.4) 0 (0.0) Erythrocytopenia 62 (22.2) 11 (3.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Thrombocytopenia 24 (8.6) 16 (5.7) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) Common Non-hematological toxicity Infection 129 (46.2) 48 (17.2) 34 (12.2) 2 (0.7) Gastrointestinal toxicity 126 (45.2) 7 (2.5) 2 (0.7) 0 (0.0) Liver toxicity(SMQ) 663(22.6) 10 (3.6) 2 () 0 (0.07) Cardiac toxicity(SMQ) 29 (10.4) 4 (1.4) 3 (1.1) 1 (0.4) Kidney toxicity 9 (3.2) 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Table 2: The AEs of special population (with common concomitant and very young/older DLBCL) ¡¡ Total common concomitant disease ¡¡ Age ¡¡ Cardiac History Liver History ¡¡ 〈 =18 or 〉 =80 19-79 ¡¡ (N=279) (N=23) (N=44) ¡¡ (N=10) (N=269) ¡¡ No.% No.% No.% ¡¡ No.% No.% AE 267 (95.7) 22 (95.7) 42 (95.5) ¡¡ 10 (100) 257 (95.5) SAE 47 (16.8) 7 (30.4) 11 (25.0) ¡¡ 3 (30.0) 44 (16.4) AESI 46 (16.5) 6 (26.1) 9 (20.5) ¡¡ 2 (20.0) 44 (16.4) ADR 226 (81.0) 21 (91.3) 36 (81.8) ¡¡ 10 (100) 216 (80.3) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 1001-1001
    Abstract: 1001 Background: Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed promising anti-tumour activity and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in phase 1/2 trials. Methods: This double-blinded, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial was conducted in Chinese patients with HER2+ MBC previously treated with taxanes and trastuzumab. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 400 mg pyrotinib or placebo orally once daily for 21-day cycles in combination with capecitabine (1000 mg/m 2 orally twice daily on days 1–14). The primary endpoint (IRC-assessed progression free survival [PFS]) was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Patients whose disease progressed on placebo plus capecitabine received subsequent single agent pyrotinib. Results: Between July, 2016 and November, 2017, 279 patients were randomised to pyrotinib plus capecitabine (n = 185) or placebo plus capecitabine (n = 94) arms. The median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.66, 16.53) in the pyrotinib plus capecitabine arm and 4.1 months (95% CI 2.79, 4.17) in the placebo plus capecitabine arm. seventy-one patients in placebo plus capecitabine arm received subsequent pyrotinib, showing single-agent response rate of 38.0% (95%CI 26.7%, 49.3%) and median PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI 4.07, 6.90). The most frequent (≥5%) treatment-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events were diarrhoea (30.8% vs 12.8% ) and hand-foot syndrome (15.7% vs 5.3%). Conclusions: In women with HER2+ MBC previously treated with taxanes and trastuzumab, pyrotinib plus capecitabine yield statistically significant better PFS. Pyrotinib monotherapy showed anti-tumour activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02973737. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Society for Microbiology, Vol. 64, No. 6 ( 2020-05-21)
    Abstract: Polymyxins are increasingly used as the critical last-resort therapeutic options for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Unfortunately, polymyxin resistance has increased gradually over the past few years. Although studies on polymyxin mechanisms are expanding, systemwide analyses of the underlying mechanism for polymyxin resistance and stress response are still lacking. To understand how Klebsiella pneumoniae adapts to colistin (polymyxin E) pressure, we carried out proteomic analysis of a K. pneumoniae strain cultured with different concentrations of colistin. Our results showed that the proteomic responses to colistin treatment in K. pneumoniae involve several pathways, including (i) gluconeogenesis and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, (ii) arginine biosynthesis, (iii) porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, and (iv) enterobactin biosynthesis. Interestingly, decreased abundances of class A β-lactamases, including TEM, SHV-11, and SHV-4, were observed in cells treated with colistin. Moreover, we present comprehensive proteome atlases of paired polymyxin-susceptible and -resistant K. pneumoniae strains. The polymyxin-resistant strain Ci, a mutant of K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA 2146, showed a missense mutation in crrB . This crrB mutant, which displayed lipid A modification with 4-amino-4-deoxy- l -arabinose ( l -Ara4N) and palmitoylation, showed striking increases in the expression of CrrAB, PmrAB, PhoPQ, ArnBCADT, and PagP. We hypothesize that crrB mutations induce elevated expression of the arnBCADTEF operon and pagP via PmrAB and PhoPQ. Moreover, the multidrug efflux pump KexD, which was induced by crrB mutation, also contributed to colistin resistance. Overall, our results demonstrated proteomic responses to colistin treatment and the mechanism of CrrB-mediated colistin resistance, which may offer valuable information on the management of polymyxin resistance.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0066-4804 , 1098-6596
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society for Microbiology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1496156-8
    SSG: 12
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 9055-9055
    Abstract: 9055 Background: Despite the development of targeted therapies for advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations ( EGFR+), acquired resistance remains inevitable. Immune checkpoint inhibitor as monotherapy has limited efficacy. Blockade of the TGF-β pathway which plays a key role in immune suppression may enhance the tumor response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Here, we assessed SHR-1701, a novel bifunctional fusion protein composed of a mAb against PD-L1 fused with the extracellular domain of TGF-β receptor II, in advanced NSCLC pts including one separate EGFR+ cohort. Methods: This phase 1 study includes a 3+3 dose-escalation and dose-expansion period of pretreated advanced NSCLC and multiple clinical expansion cohorts of different tumor types, genetic aberrations, or prior therapies. During the dose-escalation and dose-expansion period, pathologically confirmed pts received SHR-1701 at 3, 10, or 20 mg/kg Q3W or 20 mg/kg Q2W by intravenous infusion. The primary objectives were to determine the safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of SHR-1701. In the EGFR+ NSCLC clinical expansion cohort, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced pts after at least 1L standard EGFR TKI received SHR-1701 at RP2D, and the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Treatment beyond progression was allowed. Results: During the dose-escalation and dose-expansion period, 30 pts were recruited: all stage IV; 83.3% had ≥2 metastasis sites; 76.7% had received ≥2L prior systemic therapy. One dose-limiting toxicity (immune-mediated pneumonitis) in the 20 mg/kg Q2W group was observed, and the MTD was not reached. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure‐response analysis of SHR-1701 based on this study and another phase 1 study for advanced solid tumors (NCT03710265) demonstrated 30 mg/kg Q3W as the RP2D. In the EGFR+ NSCLC cohort, 27 pts were enrolled: all stage IV; 77.8% had ≥2 metastasis sites; 70.4% had received ≥2L prior systemic therapy; 29.6% had 19-Del, 14.8% 19-Del and T790M, 7.4% 20-ins, 29.6% L858R, 18.5% L858R and T790M. With a median SHR-1701 exposure of 8.7 weeks (range, 3.0-24.0), 4 of the 24 pts who had at least one post-baseline radiographic assessment achieved objective responses, including 3 ongoing confirmed and 1 unconfirmed partial response. ORR was 16.7% (95% CI, 4.7%-37.4%), and disease control rate was 50.0% (95% CI, 29.1%-70.9%). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 2 (7.4%) pts, including anemia, hypokalemia, and asthenia (1 [3.7%] for each). There were no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs. No pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. Conclusions: SHR-1701 monotherapy shows a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in advanced EGFR+ NSCLC pts after failure of at least 1L standard EGFR TKI. Further investigation of SHR-1701 combination therapy for EGFR+ NSCLC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03774979.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...