GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. PD8-05-PD8-05
    Abstract: Background: Pyrotinib (an irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting EGFR, HER2, and HER4) plus capecitabine previously demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) over placebo plus capecitabine for HER2-positive local relapsed or metastatic breast cancer after prior trastuzumab and taxanes in the interim analysis of the PHENIX trial (NCT02973737; Jiang Z et al. Oral presentation at ASCO 2019, Abstract 1001). It is shown that patients also benefit from subsequent pyrotinib monotherapy after progressed on capecitabine alone. Here we present an updated OS from a follow-up period with a median of 42.1 months. Methods: This PHENIX trial enrolled patients with HER2-positive local relapsed or metastatic breast cancer who had received prior trastuzumab and taxanes and up to two prior lines of chemotherapy for relapsed or metastatic disease. Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive pyrotinib (400 mg orally once daily) in combination with capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 for 21-day cycles; P+C group) or placebo plus capecitabine followed by pyrotinib monotherapy upon disease progression (C-P group). Randomization was stratified by the presence of visceral disease (yes vs. no) and the hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER]- and/or progesterone receptor [PR] -positive vs. ER- and PR-negative). The primary endpoint was the independent review committee-assessed PFS. The data cutoff for the updated OS analysis was January 15, 2021. Results: A total of 279 eligible patients were randomized, with 185 to P+C group and 94 to C-P group. As of data cutoff, the median duration of follow-up was 41.7 months (95% CI 40.2-42.4) in P+C group and 43.1 months (95% CI 38.8-44.5) in C-P group. 71 out of 94 patients who progressed on placebo plus capecitabine received pyrotinib monotherapy as the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy according to protocol. Excluding the protocol prespecified pyrotinib monotherapy, 129 (69.7%) patients in the P+C group and 74 (78.7%) patients in the C-P group received anti-cancer therapy after discontinuing study treatment, and 107 (57.8%) patients and 61 (64.9%) patients received post-discontinuation anti-HER2 drugs, respectively. 98 (53.0%) of the 185 patients in P+C group and 59 (62.8%) of the 94 patients in C-P group died by the time of data cutoff. Kaplan-Meier estimated median OS was 34.9 months (95% CI 28.4-42.1) in P+C group and 23.6 months (95% CI 19.3-34.4) in C-P group (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.54-1.02; p=0.068). The 2-year OS rate was 65.2% (95% CI 57.6%-71.8%) versus 48.9% (95% CI 38.1%-58.7%), respectively. Subgroup analyses of OS were generally consistent with the overall result (Table 1). Conclusion: The updated OS analysis highlighted the long-term efficacy of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in pretreated HER2-positive local relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in OS between pyrotinib plus capecitabine group and capecitabine group followed by subsequent pyrotinib monotherapy upon disease progression. Table 1.Subgroup analysis of OS.Pyrotinib plus capecitabine (n=185)Placebo plus capecitabine (n=94)HR (95% CI) *Brain metastasesPresentEvents14/21 (66.7)8/10 (80.0)Median OS22.9 (19.7-35.0)17.3 (1.6-34.4)0.77 (0.32-1.84)AbsentEvents84/164 (51.2)51/84 (60.7)Median OS36.7 (30.7-43.0)23.6 (21.5-40.4)0.72 (0.51-1.02)Previous chemotherapyNoneEvents29/60 (48.3)12/22 (54.5)Median OS37.5 (34.2-NA)32.6 (18.9-NA)0.75 (0.38-1.47)1 lineEvents34/70 (48.6)27/47 (57.4)Median OS35.6 (25.9-NA)31.6 (18.0-NA)0.73 (0.44-1.21)2 linesEvents30/44 (68.2)13/18 (72.2)Median OS21.1 (13.6-33.4)15.9 (5.4-44.0)0.77 (0.40-1.49)Data are n/N (%) or median (95% CI). NA, not available. *HRs are from unstratified analyses. Citation Format: Zefei Jiang, Min Yan, Li Bian, Tao Wang, Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Quchang Ouyang, Jifeng Feng, Yongmei Yin, Tao Sun, Zhongsheng Tong, Xiaojia Wang, Herui Yao, Shuping Jiang, Xiaoyu Zhu, Jianjun Zou. Overall survival (OS) results from the phase III PHENIX trial of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer treated with pyrotinib plus capecitabine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-05.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 103 ( 2018-11), p. 147-154
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468190-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82061-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Forensic Science International, Elsevier BV, Vol. 343 ( 2023-02), p. 111566-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0379-0738
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2006235-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Human Pathology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 40, No. 9 ( 2009-9), p. 1336-1341
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0046-8177
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041481-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 29 ( 2019-10-10), p. 2610-2619
    Abstract: Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, showed promising antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in a phase I trial. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of pyrotinib versus lapatinib, both in combination with capecitabine, in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chinese patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab were assigned (1:1) to receive 400 mg pyrotinib or lapatinib 1,250 mg orally once per day for 21-day cycles in combination with capecitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 orally twice per day on days 1 to 14). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. RESULTS Between May 29, 2015, and March 15, 2016, 128 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the pyrotinib (n = 65) or lapatinib (n = 63) treatment groups. The overall response rate was 78.5% (95% CI, 68.5% to 88.5%) with pyrotinib and 57.1% (95% CI, 44.9% to 69.4%) with lapatinib (treatment difference, 21.3%; 95% CI, 4.0% to 38.7%; P = .01). The median progression-free survival was 18.1 months (95% CI, 13.9 months to not reached) with pyrotinib and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.8 months) with lapatinib (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.58; P 〈 .001). The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome in 16 of 65 patients (24.6%) in the pyrotinib group versus 13 of 63 (20.6%) in the lapatinib group; diarrhea in 10 patients (15.4%) versus three patients (4.8%), respectively; and decreased neutrophil count in six patients (9.2%) versus two patients (3.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION In women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab, pyrotinib plus capecitabine yielded statistically significant better overall response rate and progression-free survival than lapatinib plus capecitabine in this randomized phase II trial.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 1048-1048
    Abstract: 1048 Background: Trastuzumab is the most widely used anti-HER2 agent in patients (pts) with HER2-positive breast cancer, both in (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings; however, drug resistance is inevitable. This pooled study aimed to investigate the efficacy of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in pts with HER2-positive, trastuzumab-resistant relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Data were derived from three randomized controlled trials, including a phase II (NCT02422199) and the PHOEBE phase III (NCT03080805) study comparing pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs lapatinib plus capecitabine and the PHENIX phase III (NCT02973737) study comparing pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs placebo plus capecitabine. Pts with trastuzumab-resistant disease were included in the analyses, including 39 pts who had relapsed within six months after adjuvant trastuzumab and 57 pts who had progressed within three months of trastuzumab treatment for metastatic disease. The pooled tumor response data (per blinded independent central review) were reported herein. Results: In the pooled analysis of all three studies, 63 pts received pyrotinib plus capecitabine. Among them, 28 (44.4%) pts had disease progression or died. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI, 6.9 to not reached). In total, 40 pts (63.5% [95% CI, 50.4% to 75.3%]) achieved objective response, and the estimated median duration of response (DoR) was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to not reached). In the pooled analysis involving the phase II and PHOEBE phase III, 43 pts were treated with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 33 pts with lapatinib plus capecitabine. In total, 18 (41.9%) pts with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 17 (51.5%) pts with lapatinib plus capecitabine had disease progression or died. The PFS tended to be prolonged with pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs lapatinib plus capecitabine (median, 12.4 months [95% CI, 6.9 to not reached] vs 6.9 months [95% CI, 5.5 to not reached]; hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.31 to 1.24] ; p=0.0864). The objective response rate was 67.4% (95% CI, 51.5% to 80.9%) with pyrotinib plus capecitabine compared with 54.5% (95% CI, 36.4% to 71.9%) with lapatinib plus capecitabine. The estimated median DoR was 11.1 months [95% CI, 6.9 to not reached] vs not reached [95% CI, 4.2 months to not reached] , respectively. Conclusions: Pyrotinib plus capecitabine showed favorable efficacy in pts with HER2-positive, trastuzumab-resistant relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. This combination could be a treatment option for this population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 1066-1066
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 1066-1066
    Abstract: 1066 Background: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy delivered positive outcomes in early-phase trials in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, t he highest objective response rate (ORR) is 18.5%. IMPassion130 trial has demonstrated that only PD-L1 + TNBC had overall survival benefit from anti-PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy. Preclinical studies found that antiangiogenic therapy could sensitize anti-PD-1 treatment via inducing PD-L1 expression and increasing CTLs infiltration in tumor microenvironment. Thus, we designed a phase II, open-label trial (NCT03394287) of SHR-1210 (anti-PD-1 antibody) in combination with apatinib (VEGFR2 inhibitor) in patients with advanced TNBC. Methods: 20-58 advanced TNBC patients whose systemic therapy lines in the metastatic setting was less than 3, will be randomly (1:1) enrolled from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital to receive either SHR-1210 200mg Q2W plus apatinib 250mg, continuous dosing (d1-d14), or SHR-1210 200mg Q2W plus apatinib 250mg, intermittent dosing (d1-d7), until progression or unacceptable toxicities. Primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary end points included PFS, DCR, TTR, DoR, CBR, one year-OS and toxicity. Results: Until Jan 30, 2019, 34 patients were enrolled, 10 in the intermittent dosing arm, and 24 in the continuous dosing arm. 26 (76.5%) patients had prior systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. At the cutoff date (Jan 30, 2019), 28 patients were evaluable for ORR as per RECIST. The ORR was 47.4% (9 of 19) in the continuous dosing cohort, and no confirmed objective response was found in the intermittent dosing arm. The DCR was 68.4% in the continuous dosing arm, whereas it was 44.4% in the other arm. The median PFS was 2 months in the intermittent dosing cohort, while it was not reached in the continuous dosing cohort. The most common adverse events (AEs) was fatigue (65.0%), hand-foot syndrome (63.3%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase (73.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Another 5 patients will be enrolled into the continuous dosing arm because of its favorable response. Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 combined with apatinib demonstrates favorable clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT03394287.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e13022-e13022
    Abstract: e13022 Background: Anti-HER2 agents combined with chemotherapy is the treatment strategy for treatment-naive HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. This pooled study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of pyrotinib plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Data were derived from three randomized controlled trials. In the phase 2 (NCT02422199) and the PHOEBE phase 3 (NCT03080805) studies, patients were randomized to receive pyrotinib plus capecitabine or lapatinib plus capecitabine. In the PHENIX phase 3 (NCT02973737) study, patients were randomly assigned and given pyrotinib plus capecitabine or placebo plus capecitabine. Patients who had received neither anti-HER2 agents nor chemotherapy for the relapsed or metastatic disease were included in the analyses, and the pooled tumor response data (per blinded independent central review) were reported herein. Results: In the pooled analysis of all three studies, 145 patients received pyrotinib plus capecitabine. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 months to not reached). The objective response rate (ORR) reached 72.4% (95% CI, 64.4% to 79.5%). In the pooled analysis involving the phase 2 and PHOEBE phase 3, 84 patients were treated with pyrotinib plus capecitabine and 62 patients with lapatinib plus capecitabine. The PFS was significantly prolonged with pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs lapatinib plus capecitabine (median, 12.4 months [95% CI, 11.1 months to not reached] vs 8.2 months [95% CI, 5.5 to 9.7 months] ; hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.66]; p = 0.0001). The ORR was 71.4% (95% CI, 60.5% to 80.8%) with pyrotinib plus capecitabine compared with 58.1% (95% CI, 44.8% to 70.5%) with lapatinib plus capecitabine. Conclusions: The pooled analysis demonstrated pyrotinib plus capecitabine was efficacious as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer, offering a potent treatment option for these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 1001-1001
    Abstract: 1001 Background: Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed promising anti-tumour activity and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in phase 1/2 trials. Methods: This double-blinded, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial was conducted in Chinese patients with HER2+ MBC previously treated with taxanes and trastuzumab. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 400 mg pyrotinib or placebo orally once daily for 21-day cycles in combination with capecitabine (1000 mg/m 2 orally twice daily on days 1–14). The primary endpoint (IRC-assessed progression free survival [PFS]) was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Patients whose disease progressed on placebo plus capecitabine received subsequent single agent pyrotinib. Results: Between July, 2016 and November, 2017, 279 patients were randomised to pyrotinib plus capecitabine (n = 185) or placebo plus capecitabine (n = 94) arms. The median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.66, 16.53) in the pyrotinib plus capecitabine arm and 4.1 months (95% CI 2.79, 4.17) in the placebo plus capecitabine arm. seventy-one patients in placebo plus capecitabine arm received subsequent pyrotinib, showing single-agent response rate of 38.0% (95%CI 26.7%, 49.3%) and median PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI 4.07, 6.90). The most frequent (≥5%) treatment-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events were diarrhoea (30.8% vs 12.8% ) and hand-foot syndrome (15.7% vs 5.3%). Conclusions: In women with HER2+ MBC previously treated with taxanes and trastuzumab, pyrotinib plus capecitabine yield statistically significant better PFS. Pyrotinib monotherapy showed anti-tumour activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02973737. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 17_suppl ( 2023-06-10), p. LBA1013-LBA1013
    Abstract: LBA1013 Background: Checkpoint blockade combined with taxanes based chemotherapy had generated mixed results as first line treatment for metastatic TNBC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided significant clinical efficacy with a favorable safety profile in various solid tumors. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of toripalimab versus placebo, in combination with nab-P for metastatic or recurrent TNBC (NCT04085276). Methods: Patients with initially diagnosed metastatic or recurrent inoperable TNBC were randomized 2:1 to receive toripalimab (240mg, D1, q3w) or placebo along with nab-P on days1, 8 in 3-week cycles. Stratifications included PD-L1 expression, paclitaxel therapy history and line of prior therapy at enrollment. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1, first in the PD-L1-positive population and then in the ITT population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 531 patients were randomized to toripalimab (n = 353) or placebo (n = 178); 200 and 100 patients, respectively had PD-L1 positive TNBC. At interim analysis, with the median follow-up of 14 months, a statistically significant improvement in PFS by BICR was demonstrated for the toripalimab arm in the PD-L1 positive subgroup (mPFS 8.4 vs 5.6 months; HR = 0.653, 95% CI 0.470-0.906, P = 0.0102). The PFS in the ITT population showed a similar trend (mPFS 8.4 vs 6.9 months, HR = 0.773, 95%CI 0.602-0.994). Descriptive analysis of OS showed a trend towards improved OS in the PD-L1 positive (mOS 32.8 vs 19.5 months; HR = 0.615, 95%CI 0.414-0.914) and the ITT population (mOS 33.1 vs 23.5 months; HR = 0.691, 95% CI 0.513-0.932). No new safety signals were identified. Grade≥3 adverse events (AEs) (56.4% vs 54.3%) and fatal AEs (0.6% vs 3.4%) were similar between arms, while AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (8.5% vs. 3.4%) and immune-related (irAEs) (40.8% vs. 24.0%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to nab-P provided a significant improvement in PFS for PD-L1 positive metastatic or recurrent TNBC patients receiving first-line treatment with an acceptable safety profile. Patients will be followed for the final PFS and OS analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT04085276 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...