GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 1810-1810
    Abstract: Introduction: BCR-ABL mutations are the major background players in manifestation of resistance to all FDA approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) including imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, Bosutinib and ponatinib 1. Detection of mutations is a vital part of European or North American clinical guidelines at the time of resistance and/or drug switching, because resistance-causing mutations appearing as a result of one drug are sensitive to other in many instances and mutational data can therefore help in prescription of better alternative TKI in case of resistance or unsatisfactory response 1,2. Although BCR-ABL sequencing protocols are reported, they either lack the experimental details or are not cost-effective to be used in third world countries 1’3. Therefore, objective of this study was to develop a cost-effective protocol for BCR-ABL mutation detection in TKI resistant CML. Material and Methods: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 10 imatinib resistant, 10 imatinib sensitive, 5 CML patients receiving nilotinib, positive for Philadelphia chromosome by conventional cytogenetics, and 10 healthy volunteers. Isolation of RNA was performed using TriZol® LS reagent and complementary DNA (cDNA) was prepared using random hexamer primers. The integrity of cDNA was checked by amplification of housekeeping gene GAPDH. A nested RT-PCR assay was optimized for ABL kinase domain amplification using standard PCR optimization techniques. PCR bands of 1306 or 1380 base pairs, corresponding to b2a2 and b3a2 BCR-ABL splice variants, were detected in 25 CML patients but no healthy controls. Consumables for CDNA and PCR were used from Fermentas (USA). PCR products were purified using Quick gel extraction kit (Invitrogen). DNA sequencing was performed using BigDye® Terminator v3.1Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Results: Compound mutations were detected in CML patient showing primary resistance to nilotinib, including a novel K245N mutation and G250W mutations (Figure 1) while 4 of nilotinib responders did not show any mutations. Similarly, mutations detected in four (4/10, 40%) imatinib resistant were (G250W), (T394A), (Y253H), (E355G, Y393H}. Of 10 imatinib sensitive patients, mutations were detected in 3, 2 in accelerated phase and 1 in blast crisis, while none in 7 c chronic phase CML (Figure 2). Discussion: We show association of BCR-ABL mutations with imatinib/nilotinib resistance and disease progression in CML patients, which is in accordance with previous studies 1’2’4,5. This also proves the usefulness and applicability of our BCR-ABL sequencing protocol for detection of clinically relevant mutations in CML patients receiving TKI treatment. A cost effective protocol it will facilitate the incorporation of mutation detection in clinical setting in low-resourced laboratories from third world countries and thus help better manage clinical interventions in drug-resistant CML 6’7. References: 1. Baccarani M, Soverini S, De Benedittis C. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:167-75. 2. Kang Y, Hodges A, Ong E, Roberts W, Piermarocchi C, Paternostro G.PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102221. 3. Branford S, Hughes T. Methods Mol Med. 2006; 125:93-106. 4. Viganò I, Di Giacomo N, Bozzani S, Antolini L, Piazza R, Gambacorti Passerini C. Am J Hematol. 2014 Jul 15. 5. Balabanov S, Braig M, Brümmendorf TH. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2014 Mar;11:89-99. 6. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H. Am J Hematol. 2014 May;89(5):547-56. 7. Kagita S, Jiwtani S, Uppalapati S, Linga VG, Gundeti S, Digumarti R. Tumour Biol. 2014 May;35(5):4443-6. Figure 1: Electropherogram showing compound mutations, including a novel BCR-ABL mutation associated with primary nilotinib resistance in CML patient Figure 1:. Electropherogram showing compound mutations, including a novel BCR-ABL mutation associated with primary nilotinib resistance in CML patient Figure 2: Response to imatinib and BCR-ABL mutation status in CML patients Figure 2:. Response to imatinib and BCR-ABL mutation status in CML patients Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 3089-3089
    Abstract: Introduction: BCR-ABL kinase domain (KD) mutations have well established role in tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistance and disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)1. In recent years, compound BCR-ABL mutations have emerged as a new threat to CML patients by causing higher degrees of resistance involving multiple TKIs, including ponatinib2. However, there are limited reports about association of compound BCR-ABL mutations with disease progression in imatinib sensitive CML patients3. Furthermore, BCR-ABL mutation detection is currently recommended only in case of drug resistance and disease progression and clinical significance of BCR-ABL mutation detection in TKI responder chronic phase CML is not well documented4. Therefore, we investigated presence of ABL-KD mutations in chronic phase (CP) and advanced phase imatinib sensitive CML to find out association of BCR-ABL mutations with progression to advanced disease phases in CML patients. . Patients and Methods: Imatinib sensitive CML patients in CP and advanced phases of the disease were included in the study.All CP patients were incomplete hematological, complete cytogenetic and major molecular responses. Due to specific study objectives, patients manifesting drug resistance during follow-up studies were excluded from the study. A total of 90 imatinib sensitive CML patients (CP=41, late CP=33, and accelerated phase=16) were finally available for analysis. All patients as well as 10 healthy controls were investigated for BCR-ABL mutations using Sanger sequencing. All response criteria were per European LeukemiaNet guidelines4. Data was analyzed using SPSS software (version 19). Results: Mean age of the patients was 33 years (Table 1). Eleven out of 33 (33.3%) patients in late-CP CML harbored 24 types of point mutations, out of which eight (72.72%) harbored compound mutated sites (Figure 1, Table 2). E355G (3.33%) was the most prevalent mutant. Five patients (45.45%), all of which had compound mutations, progressed to advanced phases of disease during follow up studies. No BCR-ABL mutation was detected in healthy subjects and in early CP CML patients. Therefore, early CP CML patients served as additional control in this study. BCR-ABL mutations were found in 3 accelerated phase patients as well. Late-CP mutations were associated with elevated platelet count (p= 0.037) and male gender (p= 0.049). The median overall survival and event free survival of CML patients (n=90) was 6.98 and 5.8 years respectively. Seven year survival was found to be 94.2%. Discussion and conclusions: Compound BCR-ABL mutations were associated with progression to advanced disease in imatinib sensitive late-CP CML patients. Although single BCR-ABL mutations have previously been found to cause CML progression5, this is first report of association of compound BCR-ABL mutations with disease progression in stable imatinib responders at late CP. Detection of new mutations can help in defining mechanism of CML progression6. Moreover, BCR-ABL mutation detection in late CP CML patients sensitive to TKI treatment can help in early assessment of risk for disease progression and/or drug resistance and subsequent clinical intervention to delay disease progression which is a major challenge of CML therapy in TKI era7. References: 1. Haznedaroglu IC. Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases 2015;7. 2. Khorashad JS, Kelley TW, Szankasi P, Mason CC, Soverini S, Adrian LT, Eide CA, Zabriskie MS, Lange T, Estrada JC. Blood 2013;121:489-98. 3. Deininger MW, Hodgson JG, Shah NP, Cortes JE, Kim DW, Nicolini FE, Talpaz M,Baccarani M, Müller MC, Li J, Parker WT, Lustgarten S, Clackson T, Haluska FG,Guilhot F, Kantarjian HM, Soverini S, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Rivera VM, Branford S. Blood. 2016 Feb 11;127(6):703-12.dddd 4. 7. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, Clark RE, Cortes JE, Guilhot F. Blood 2013;122:872-84. 5. Carella AM, Garuti A, Cirmena G, Catania G, Rocco I, Palermo C, Pica G, Pierri I, Miglino M, Ballestrero A, Gobbi M, Patrone F. Leukemia & lymphoma 2010;51:275-8. 6. Giotopoulos G, van der Weyden L, Osaki H, Rust AG, Gallipoli P, Meduri E,Horton SJ, Chan WI, Foster D, Prinjha RK, Pimanda JE, Tenen DG, Vassiliou GS,Koschmieder S, Adams DJ, Huntly BJ. J Exp Med. 2015 Sep 21;212(10):1551-69. 7. Mukherjee S, Kalaycio M. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016 Apr;11(2):86-93. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2017
    In:  American Journal of Gastroenterology Vol. 112 ( 2017-10), p. S726-S727
    In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 112 ( 2017-10), p. S726-S727
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9270
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2017
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2278-2278
    Abstract: Abstract 2278 Introduction: BCR-ABL oncogene makes leukemic cells unstable, leading to mutations in BCR-ABL itself as well as other genes1. Studies have shown that prior-to-treatment BCR-ABL mutations do exist in CD34+CD38- (primitive) CML cells2, a population with stem cell like properties responsible for disease persistence, Imatinib (IM) resistance and relapses3. There are also reports regarding association of such pre-existing BCR-ABL mutations (PEM) and Imatinib resistance4. Therefore, the objective of this study was to find BCR-ABL PEM in CD34+38- cells from newly diagnosed CML patients and their correlation with IM resistance. Methods: CD34+CD38- cells from 100 newly diagnosed, untreated, chronic-phase Ph+ CML patients were analyzed for PEM using multiplex allele specific (AS) PCR5 and sequencing AS-PCR products. All of the patients resistant to IM (400mg/day), irrespective of their PEM status, were analyzed by multiplex AS-PCR and DNA sequencing5 for post-therapeutic BCR-ABL mutations, to see if PEM persist in IM resistant patients. T-test was applied to see any significant difference with respect to IM resistance between IM resistant patients with PEM (Group1) and without PEM (Group2). Results & Discussion: Thirty two out of 100 patients showed at least one PEM (Table 1, Figure 1). During a follow-up of 12–18 months, all patients with PEM manifested IM resistance (32/32,100%). On the other hand, 24/68 patients without PEM manifested IM resistance (35.3%). This shows a significant difference between two groups of patients with respect to IM resistance (100% vs. 35.3%, p= 〈 0.01). On mutational analysis of IM resistant patients, those with PEM persisted with same mutations present before treatment (32/32=100%) while only 21/24 patients manifesting acquired IM resistance (87.5%) harbored BCR-ABL mutations (Table 1). In IM resistant patients, we detected mutations F311V, M351T, Y253F and T315I. All IM resistant patients except with T315I and Y253F showed completed hematological and cytogenetic responses to Imatinib dose escalation (600-800mg/day) or Nilotinib. Our results are in accordance with previous reports3-5. On the basis of this study, it is concluded that BCR-ABL PEM are present in primitive, innately resistant CD34+38- stem cells from a considerable number of CML patients before start of the therapy. This cell population proliferates under selective pressure of the drug to become major cell population, leading to resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors like Imatinib and Nilotinib. Therefore, we recommend testing of BCR-ABL mutations in CML stem cell population before start of TKI treatment using sensitive, validated techniques like ASO-PCR and DHPLC, and utilization of this mutation data in clinical management, hence in patient-tailored treatment. References: Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 31_suppl ( 2017-11-01), p. 44-44
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 31_suppl ( 2017-11-01), p. 44-44
    Abstract: 44 Background: Recent research shows tele-health and remote access technology enhances patient-provider communication. Among oncology patients, studies demonstrate that electronic access promotes improved treatment adherence and symptom management and provides better continuity of care and patient satisfaction. In a previous audit, we found only 26% of our oncology patients had activated our EHR (EPIC) online patient portal. MyChart facilitates communication by allowing patients to see results and email providers through a secure network. We undertook this study to discover patient opinions about MyChart and barriers to wider adoption. Methods: A short, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of patients in waiting areas or the infusion center of the outpatient oncology clinic. Results: 76/108 patients knew of MyChart; 32 did not. 54/76 (71.1%) of patients who knew of MyChart had used it. 81.5% of 54 users were very or somewhat satisfied with it. Users rated features of MyChart on a 5 point scale: certain their confidentiality is protected 4.7,ability to track tests 4.4,receiving faster answers 3.0,and ease of contacting providers 2.8. 21 non-users gave several reasons for not using MyChart: preference to speak with a live person 38.1%, discomfort with the internet 23.8%, not having internet 19.0%, concern about personal information on the internet 14.3%, and too complicated 9.5%. Among 32patients not previously aware of MyChart, 43.7% said they would definitely or probably start using it.56.3% thought MyChart would make it easier to contact providers and 53.1%cited convenience over telephone.However, 28.1%,preferred speaking to a live person; 12.5% were uncomfortable with the internet, and 9.4% expressed concern with their information on the internet. Conclusions: In this sample, 50% of respondents used MyChart. Patients using MyChart were generally satisfied, specifically with confidentiality and ability to monitor their care. Barriers to increased use included a desire to speak directly to providers and lack of internet skill or access. While those using MyChart were confident that it was secure and confidential, those not using expressed concern about this issue.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 5167-5167
    Abstract: Introduction: BCR-ABL kinase mutations are the most common reason of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients1. Hence, determination of BCR-ABL mutation status at the time of resistance, disease progression and subsequent drug switching is an integral component of North American and European clinical guidelines 1,2. Compound BCR-ABL mutations have been emerged as one of the major issues in TKI-based therapy of CML, which cause new patterns of drug resistance, including resistance to ponatinib 3. This study wascarried out to find out association of BCR-ABL mutations with treatment outcome in CML patients. Materials & Methods: 150 CML patients were investigated for BCR-ABL mutations using direct sequencing as previously reported 4. SPSS version 19 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA.) was employed for statistical analysis. Results: 78 (52%) patients were males and 72 (48%) females, with median age 34 years (range: 9-62) (Table 1). Ninety (60%) were IM sensitive and 60 (40%) IM resistant. 72 mutations were detected in 28 (46.7%) patients, with 71.4% patients having compound (2-5) mutations. 14 mutations were detected in 7 IM sensitive patients in late chronic or advanced phases. E355G was the most common mutation (Fig 1). P-loop mutations were found only in IM resistant patients at advanced phases (Fig 2). Elevated TLC, advanced phases and suboptimal responses were associated with IM resistance and mutations. Higher complete hematological and complete cytogenetic responses were seen in patients without mutations (Fig 3). 7-year OS and EFS were 80.4% and 55.6%, respectively (Figs 4-5). Higher survivals were associated with IM sensitivity, low or intermediate Sokal risk, chronic phase, complete hematologic response and complete cytogenetic response. Discussion: Our results show association of BCR-ABL mutations with IM resistance, disease progression and late chronic phase 1,4. Therefore, we recommend BCR-ABL mutation detection for late chronic phase CML patients as well. High frequency of compound mutations in IM resistant patients poses a threat to CML patients by complicated drug resistant patterns, including resistance to 3rd generation TKIs 3,6,7. Therefore, we recommend regular monitoring of CML patients for BCR-ABL mutations and associated drug response in all patients at risk of BCR-ABL mutations and drug resistance. References: 1- Hochhaus A, Ernst T, Eigendorff E, La Rosée P. Causes of resistance and treatment choices of second- and third-line treatment in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients. Ann Hematol. 2015 Apr;94 Suppl 2:S133-40. 2- Baccarani M, Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Rosti G. A review of the European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of CML. Ann Hematol. 2015 Apr;94 Suppl 2:S141-7. 3- Zabriskie MS, Eide CA, Tantravahi SK, Vellore NA, Estrada J, Nicolini FE,et al. BCR-ABL1 compound mutations combining key kinase domain positions confer clinical resistance to ponatinib in Ph chromosome-positive leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2014 Sep 8;26(3):428-42. 4- Iqbal Z, Akhtar A, Akram AM, Khalid M, Shah IH, Aleem A, et al. Detection of Compound BCR-ABL Mutations in TKI Resistant CML Patients Including a Novel K245N Mutation Associated with Primary Nilotinib Resistance By Employing a Newly Developed Cost Effective BCR-ABL Sequencing Protocol. Blood Dec 2014; 124(21):1810. 5- Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Breccia M, Stagno F, Iurlo A, Albano F, et al. Long-term outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated frontline with imatinib. Leukemia. 2015 Jun 19. doi:10.1038/leu.2015.152. [Epub ahead of print]6- BCR-ABL1 compound mutations drive ponatinib resistance. Cancer Discov. 2014 Nov;4(11):OF13. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2014-186. 7- Gibbons DL, Pricl S, Posocco P, Laurini E, Fermeglia M, Sun H, Talpaz M,Donato N, Quintás-Cardama A. Molecular dynamics reveal BCR-ABL1 polymutants as a unique mechanism of resistance to PAN-BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibitor therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3550-5. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e15716-e15716
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e15716-e15716
    Abstract: e15716 Abstract Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Although the vast majority of cases are sporadic, up to 10% of cases are related to a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, the most common of which is germline BRCA mutation. Although BRCA2 mutation has been well described in the literature, data on BRCA1 mutation-associated PAC is limited. This work aims at reviewing the literature on BRCA1 mutation-associated PAC and discussing the relevant findings. Methods: We have searched the Pubmed database for articles using the search terms “pancreatic”, “BRCA”, BRCA1”, “adenocarcinoma” or any combination of these keywords. Data about epidemiology, staging, prior history of other tumors, and management were collected. Systematic data extraction and assessments of quality were carried out by two reviewers, and good agreement was found. Results: A total of 13 studies were selected for review and included a total of 149 patients. The prevalence rate of PAC among patients with germline BRCA1 mutations ranged between 0.002% and 0.03%. Moreover, the prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in patients with BRCA-related PAC was found to be between 27% and 30%. Of note, PAC was diagnosed as the first tumor in 74% of patients with BRCA1-related PAC. The most common stage at diagnosis was stage 4 (56%) followed by stage 2 (22%). Conclusions: Germline BRCA1 mutation-associated PAC is an under-recognized entity when compared to BRCA2 mutations. Given the incredibly poor prognosis and the growing interest in targeted therapies, physicians need to be familiar with BRCA1 mutations as a possible etiology of PAC. A significant number of patients with BRCA1 mutation-associated PAC were diagnosed with PAC as the first tumor. Therefore, upper gastrointestinal screening should be considered in patients with germline BRCA1 mutations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...