In:
STUF - Language Typology and Universals, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 72, No. 3 ( 2019-09-25), p. 421-452
Abstract:
In a numeral classifier language, a sortal classifier (C) or a mensural classifier (M) is needed when a noun is quantified by a numeral (Num). Num and C/M are adjacent cross-linguistically, either in a [Num C/M] order or [C/M Num] . Likewise, in a complex numeral with a multiplicative composition, the base may follow the multiplier as in [ n×base ], e.g., san-bai ‘three hundred’ in Mandarin. However, the base may also precede the multiplier in some languages, thus [ base×n ]. Interestingly, base and C/M seem to harmonize in word order, i.e., [ n×base ] numerals appear with a [Num C/M] alignment, and [ base×n ] numerals, with [C/M Num] . This paper follows up on the explanation of the base-C/M harmonization based on the multiplicative theory of classifiers and verifies it empirically within six language groups in the world’s foremost hotbed of classifier languages: Sinitic, Miao-Yao, Austro-Asiatic, Tai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, and Indo-Aryan. Our survey further reveals two interesting facts: base-initial ([ base×n ]) and C/M-initial ([C/M Num] ) orders exist only in Tibeto-Burman (TB) within our dataset. Moreover, the few scarce violations to the base-C/M harmonization are also all in TB and are mostly languages having maintained their original base-initial numerals but borrowed from their base-final and C/M-final neighbors. We thus offer an explanation based on Proto-TB’s base-initial numerals and language contact with neighboring base-final, C/M-final languages.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1867-8319
,
2196-7148
DOI:
10.1515/stuf-2019-0017
Language:
English
Publisher:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Publication Date:
2019
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2244789-1
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1149842-0
SSG:
7,11
Permalink