GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • History  (12)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JSTOR ; 1985
    In:  The American Historical Review Vol. 90, No. 2 ( 1985-04), p. 393-
    In: The American Historical Review, JSTOR, Vol. 90, No. 2 ( 1985-04), p. 393-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-8762
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JSTOR
    Publication Date: 1985
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1493196-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 203401-3
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1979
    In:  The Journal of Hellenic Studies Vol. 99 ( 1979-11), p. 7-19
    In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 99 ( 1979-11), p. 7-19
    Abstract: Unlike much else in the Pentecontaetia, the chronology of the Samian War, its antecedents included, has apparently evoked such little critical interest that an almost casual treatment of the subject is observable in modern works. Nesselhauf, for example, annotated his brief discussion of the Samian War with a reference to Busolt and Beloch ‘for the details’. Each scholar provides a radically different chronology from the other. Indeed, the range of dates postulated by modern writers is remarkable considering the relatively small span of time, two years, in which the events appear to have unfolded. Beloch and the authors of ATL date the war between Samos and Miletus, which ultimately caused the revolt, in summer 441 B.C.; Busolt set the war in March-April 440 B.C., E. Meyer a shade earlier. Some scholars fail to specify the date (Nesselhauf, Meiggs). The beginning of the revolt itself has been placed in spring 440 B.C. by Sealey, among others; Gomme and Meiggs date it in early summer, Busolt, strangely, in early July. The direct cause of the revolt, the installation of the democracy at Samos (Thuc. i 115.3), is little discussed, much less fixed in date. The democracy was not established in a day: it therefore requires consideration in any chronological reconstruction. Finally, the end of the war has been variously set in late winter, early spring and early summer 439 B.C. Such uncertainty is surprising since our evidence is abundant and also specific enough to allow us to make reasonably firm chronological estimates. Indeed, our fortunate possession of mutually independent data—the historical tradition and the monumental evidence—provides us with the opportunity to attempt precision in a degree usually beyond our expectations. However we may separately interpret Thucydides' relative chronology or the random evidence of the stones, these data, when taken in combination, yield knowledge greater than the sum of its parts.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-4269 , 2041-4099
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1979
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067299-8
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    SSG: 6,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1989
    In:  The Journal of Hellenic Studies Vol. 109 ( 1989-11), p. 217-218
    In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 109 ( 1989-11), p. 217-218
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-4269 , 2041-4099
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1989
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067299-8
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    SSG: 6,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JSTOR ; 1972
    In:  The American Historical Review Vol. 77, No. 4 ( 1972-10), p. 1096-
    In: The American Historical Review, JSTOR, Vol. 77, No. 4 ( 1972-10), p. 1096-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-8762
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JSTOR
    Publication Date: 1972
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1493196-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 203401-3
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JSTOR ; 1967
    In:  The American Historical Review Vol. 73, No. 2 ( 1967-12), p. 425-
    In: The American Historical Review, JSTOR, Vol. 73, No. 2 ( 1967-12), p. 425-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-8762
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JSTOR
    Publication Date: 1967
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1493196-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 203401-3
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1991
    In:  The Journal of Hellenic Studies Vol. 111 ( 1991-11), p. 241-242
    In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 111 ( 1991-11), p. 241-242
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-4269 , 2041-4099
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1991
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067299-8
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    SSG: 6,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1966
    In:  The Journal of Hellenic Studies Vol. 86 ( 1966-11), p. 51-54
    In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 86 ( 1966-11), p. 51-54
    Abstract: Among the manifest improbabilities in the tale of Aristeides' message to Themistocles on the night before Salamis, most notable, certainly, is that the information Aristeides imparted supplied indeed a lack but effected no response until its duplication by the crew of a Tenian trireme. The rejection with which the episode has been met is thoroughly deserved. But a problem, that of motive, remains, and other questions arise. For unlike the setting of the story, which has some claim to dramatic, though not to historical, validity, the supposititious message cannot, as it neither illustrates character nor exaggerates truth, simply be explained as a fanciful and harmless accretion to the Aristeides legend. How, then, came the story to be told? One possibility is worth considering. As it is likely prima facie that Herodotus derived his account of Aristeides at Psyttaleia (viii 95) from the same source that brought him to Salamis with his message, the message may have been intended to smooth his way to Psyttaleia. The story of his deed on that island, therefore, deserves attention. The account arouses suspicion. Its context, the epilogue to the battle , where Herodotus metes out blame and praise, is not reassuring. Whatever information was related to Herodotus about the exploit, it was not embedded, apparently, in the sequence of events of which the battle of Salamis consisted. He seems to have only the vaguest notion of the relation of the exploit to the battle as a whole— viii 95; and lightly does he accord to Aristeides, apparently a private person, the leadership of the landing party.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-4269 , 2041-4099
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1966
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067299-8
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    SSG: 6,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1971
    In:  The Journal of Hellenic Studies Vol. 91 ( 1971-11), p. 25-34
    In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 91 ( 1971-11), p. 25-34
    Abstract: In this paper I contest the usually accepted terminus for the date of the publication of Herodotus' Histories , namely, just prior to the production of the Acharnians in February 425. I argue instead that Herodotus survived the Archidamian War—basically a return, this, to the position taken until the middle of the last century, especially in Germany, before the work of Schoell, Kirchoff and then Meyer and Jacoby. Further, I suggest that he published at a date close to 414 B.C. or, at least, that his Histories reached the Athenian public at around that time. Since even the orthodox date for his publication (426 or so) figures in the constructions of modern scholars merely as a literary curiosity devoid of significance—such are the preconceptions dominating our notion of Herodotus' ‘era’—a reconsideration of this question needs no apology if it serves the purpose of directing attention to a matter vitally affecting our interpretation of this author. First, a general observation. In seeking for external evidence to establish the date of the publication of Herodotus' Histories , we need to distinguish between possible and certain echoes of Herodotus in the works of others. The question must constantly be asked whether any allusion we have isolated presupposes and requires the knowledge of Herodotus' work on the part of the contemporary audience. For otherwise we could be misled by a coincidence or we could reach a false conclusion because some point of specific knowledge eludes us. Of the latter the famous parallel in the Antigone of Sophocles (909 ff. with Herodotus iii 119) provides a notable example. If Herodotus had been just a little more strict with himself in avoiding allusions to his own time, who would not suppose that his work had been published prior to 441? What we require, therefore, is material which is calculated to evoke Herodotus himself—the special characteristics of the man and his Histories —so as to leave in no doubt a general familiarity with his work on the part of others.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-4269 , 2041-4099
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1971
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067299-8
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    SSG: 6,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    JSTOR ; 1975
    In:  The American Historical Review Vol. 80, No. 3 ( 1975-06), p. 618-
    In: The American Historical Review, JSTOR, Vol. 80, No. 3 ( 1975-06), p. 618-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-8762
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: JSTOR
    Publication Date: 1975
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1493196-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 203401-3
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 1991
    In:  The Journal of Hellenic Studies Vol. 111 ( 1991-11), p. 1-15
    In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 111 ( 1991-11), p. 1-15
    Abstract: The nature of the bond connecting the work of Ammianus Marcellinus with the now fragmentary history of Eunapius of Sardis or with Zosimus' Νέα Ἱστορία is an old and intriguing problem rather more notable for the multiplicity than for the finality of its hypothetical solutions. The question arises out of the perception that Ammianus and Zosimus provide coincidental material in their accounts of Julian's Persian expedition. Eunapius figures in the equation because, as we generally assume, it was he whom Zosimus followed. Since all scholars but Dillemann are satisfied that these correspondences indubitably require some hypothesis of literary affiliation, all of the formal possibilities have one by one been tried. Sudhaus, whose investigation of the similarities proved influential, denied that Ammianus could have been used either by Zosimus or by his source (Eunapius); he affirmed instead that Ammianus and Eunapius must have been linked by their own use of a common source, namely, Oribasius, the physician of Julian and his companion on the Persian expedition.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-4269 , 2041-4099
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 1991
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067299-8
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    SSG: 6,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...