GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Journal of Endocrinology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 167, No. 3 ( 2012-09), p. 453-
    Abstract: The journal and the authors apologise for errors in Table 2 of this article that was published in the August issue (vol 167 , pp 287–294 ). The n values were incorrectly published. The correct values are presented below and the table is published in full below. Table 2 Observed mean changes from baseline HbA1c, FPG and body weight. Data are observed as mean ( s.d .) for all randomised subjects (full analysis set). n Baselinea Week 16b Change from baseline HbA1c (%)  IDegAsp 61 8.5 (1.2) 6.7 (1.0) −1.8 (1.1)c  AF 59 8.5 (0.9) 6.6 (0.6) −1.9 (1.1)c  BIAsp 30 62 8.6 (1.0) 6.7 (0.7) −1.8 (0.9)c FPG (mmol/l)  IDegAsp 61 11.5 (2.6) 6.4 (2.2) −5.1 (2.9)  AF 59 11.8 (2.9) 6.5 (1.9) −5.3 (3.0)  BIAsp 30 62 11.7 (3.1) 7.5 (2.1) −4.3 (3.0) Body Weight (kg)  IDegAsp 61 87.5 (16.3) 88.6 (16.9) 1.1 (2.8)  AF 59 84.9 (14.3) 85.6 (14.9) 0.7 (2.5)  BIAsp 30 62 91.8 (13.5) 93.2 (13.1) 1.4 (3.2) a Values at randomisation. b Last observation carried forward. c % points.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0804-4643 , 1479-683X
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1485160-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Journal of Endocrinology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 167, No. 2 ( 2012-08), p. 287-294
    Abstract: Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble co-formulation of insulin degludec (70%) and insulin aspart (IAsp: 30%). Here, we compare the efficacy and safety of IDegAsp, an alternative IDegAsp formulation (AF: containing 45% IAsp), and biphasic IAsp 30 (BIAsp 30). Design Sixteen-week, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial. Methods Insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes (18–75 years) and a HbA1c of 7–11% were randomised to twice-daily IDegAsp ( n =61), AF ( n =59) or BIAsp 30 ( n =62), all in combination with metformin. Insulin was administered pre-breakfast and dinner (main evening meal) and titrated to pre-breakfast and pre-dinner plasma glucose (PG) targets of 4.0–6.0 mmol/l. Results Mean HbA1c after 16 weeks was comparable for IDegAsp, AF and BIAsp 30 (6.7, 6.6 and 6.7% respectively). With IDegAsp, 67% of subjects achieved HbA1c 〈 7.0% without confirmed hypoglycaemia in the last 4 weeks of treatment compared with 53% (AF) and 40% (BIAsp 30). Mean fasting PG was significantly lower for IDegAsp vs BIAsp 30 (treatment difference (TD): −0.99 mmol/l (95% confidence interval: −1.68; 0.29)) and AF vs BIAsp 30 (TD: −0.88 mmol/l (−1.58; −0.18)). A significant, 58% lower rate of confirmed hypoglycaemia was found for IDegAsp vs BIAsp 30 (rate ratio (RR): 0.42 (0.23; 0.75)); rates were similar for AF vs BIAsp 30 (RR: 0.92 (0.54; 1.57)). IDegAsp and AF had numerically lower rates of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia vs BIAsp 30 (RR: 0.33 (0.09; 1.14) and 0.66 (0.22; 1.93) respectively). Conclusions IDegAsp provided comparable overall glycaemic control to BIAsp 30 with a significantly lower rate of hypoglycaemia.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0804-4643 , 1479-683X
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1485160-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cardiovascular Research, Oxford University Press (OUP), ( 2024-05-16)
    Abstract: Data describing the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of inclisiran are limited. This was explored in ORION-8, an open-label extension study of preceding Phase 2 and Phase 3 placebo-controlled and open-label extension trials. Methods Adults with ASCVD, ASCVD risk equivalent, or HeFH received open-label inclisiran every 180 days (after completion of the parent trial) until Day 990, followed by an end-of-study (EOS) visit at Day 1080 or ≥90 days after last dose. Study endpoints included proportion of patients achieving pre-specified LDL-C goals (ASCVD: & lt;1.8 mmol/L [ & lt;70 mg/dL]; ASCVD risk equivalent: & lt;2.6 mmol/L [ & lt;100 mg/dL]), percentage and absolute changes in LDL-C at EOS, and safety of inclisiran. Results Of 3274 patients included in the analysis, 2446 (74.7%) were followed until EOS. Mean age was 64.9±9.9 years, 82.7% (n=2709) had ASCVD, and mean baseline LDL-C was 2.9±1.2 mmol/L. Mean cumulative exposure to inclisiran (including parent trials) was 3.7 years; maximum exposure was 6.8 years. With inclisiran, 78.4% (95% CI: 76.8, 80.0) of patients achieved pre-specified LDL-C goals and mean percentage LDL-C reduction was −49.4% (95% CI: −50.4, −48.3). No attenuation of LDL-C lowering over time was observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site (all mild or moderate) occurred in 5.9% of inclisiran-treated patients. Inclisiran-associated anti-drug antibodies were infrequent (5.5%) and had no impact on the efficacy or safety of inclisiran. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions In the largest and longest follow-up to date, inclisiran demonstrated sustained and substantial LDL-C lowering with a favourable long-term safety and tolerability profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03814187
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-6363 , 1755-3245
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1499917-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cardiovascular Research, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 117, No. 1 ( 2021-01-01), p. 284-291
    Abstract: Small-interfering RNA (siRNA)-based targeting of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) represents a novel therapeutic approach that may provide a convenient, infrequent, and safe dosing schedule to robustly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Given the long duration of action, however, establishing safety in particular with respect to immunogenicity is of paramount importance. In earlier clinical studies of other RNA-targeted treatment approaches (antisense oligonucleotide therapy) immunological and haematological adverse effects, in particular thrombocytopenia and pro-inflammatory effects, have been reported. Here, we present the pre-specified safety analysis from ORION-1 evaluating platelets, immune cells, immunological markers, antidrug antibodies, and clinical immunogenicity adverse events (AEs) under PCSK9 siRNA treatment with inclisiran. Methods and results  The pre-specified safety analysis from ORION-1 was performed in six different inclisiran dosing regimens in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease with elevated LDL-C levels. Patients received either a single dose (SD: 200 mg, n = 60; 300 mg, n = 62 or 500 mg, n = 66) or double-dose starting regimen (DD: 100 mg, n = 62; 200 mg, n = 63; or 300 mg, n = 61 on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran or placebo (SD: n = 65; DD: n = 62). The effects of inclisiran on haematological parameters including platelet counts, lymphocytes, and monocytes as well as on the immune markers interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were examined after 180 days. Immunogenicity was further evaluated by analysis of anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs) towards inclisiran in 6068 study samples and by careful analysis of immunogenicity AEs as part of the pharmacovigilance strategy. At day 180, no significant alterations of platelet counts were observed in any of the dosing groups (change from baseline, SD: 200 mg: 0.8%; 300 mg: −0.5%; 500 mg: −1.8%; DD: 100 mg: 1.3%; 200 mg: −0.5%; 300 mg: 1.0%; no significant difference for any group as compared with placebo). No significant effects on other immune cells, including leucocytes, monocytes, or neutrophils were detected. Notably, no significant increase of inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6 or TNF-α) with either the SD or DD regimen became evident. There was no evidence for immunogenicity based on ADA level analysis and careful review of clinical immunogenicity AEs in none of the treatment regimens. Conclusion  In this pre-specified safety analysis of ORION-1 for the siRNA therapeutic inclisiran, no adverse effects on measures of inflammation or immune activation nor adverse effects on platelets or clinical immunogenicity AEs were observed over at least 6-month treatment. These safety findings in the largest analysis of an RNAi study in humans to date provide strong reassurance about the safety of inclisiran and the potential of cardiovascular RNA-targeted therapies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-6363 , 1755-3245
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1499917-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...