ISSN:
1432-0517
Keywords:
Key words Certification by isotope specific methods
;
Isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)
;
Neutron activation analysis (NAA)
;
Water analysis
;
Trace elements in water
;
Water pollution
;
Comparability and traceability of analytical measurements
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
Abstract The aim of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to give an objective picture of the state-of-the-practice (SoP) of chemical measurements in field laboratories by comparing them to a reference range that contains a value that is as traceable to the SI system of measurements (in this case to the Avogadro Constant, one of the best realizations of the mole so far), as can presently be achieved, but which in any case is independent of human or political decision. Thus, a large-scale field test has been made to realize (international) comparability of these measurements by providing them with an independent scientific common basis. In the third measurement round, IMEP-3, ten trace elements, B, Ca, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Pb, Rb and Zn were measured in a synthetic and in a natural water by about 155 participating laboratories using their routine methods. The (coded) results are graphically reported and compared to certified reference values, established by IRMM and NIST, using isotope specific methods (isotope dilution mass spectrometry and neutron activation analysis), wherever possible. One of these methods (IDMS) has recently been defined as a primary method of measurement by the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance (Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière: CCQM) in its founding meeting in April 1995 at BIPM, Paris. Results indicate a spread of more than ±50%, asymmetrically distributed around the reference range, although the declared accuracy was 5–10%. Self-assessment by participants of their analytical capabilities does not show a high correlation between a self-rating ("more experienced" or "less experienced") and actual performance. In the way they have been applied, all methods seem to produce results of approximately the same quality. There is little reduction in the spread of the measurements if the results obtained for one element in the natural water B are divided by the results obtained for the same element in the synthetic water A (which was unknowingly, a reference material). Index entries International measurement evaluation programme (IMEP).
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007690050038
Permalink
