GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Hochschulschrift  (8)
  • Determination  (1)
  • Digital repository  (1)
  • 1
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift ; Meerwasser ; Spurenelement ; Mikroanalyse
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 159 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 572.5
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift ; Phytoplankton ; Eisen
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 104, XXXV Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 577.7
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xiv, 184 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 572.86
    Language: English
    Note: Kumulatives Verfahren, enthält Aufsätze aus Zeitschriften
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (118 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 577.27
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift ; Atlantischer Ozean ; Aluminiumverbindungen ; Biogeochemie
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (234 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 551.46
    Language: German
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Kiel : Universitätsbibliothek Kiel
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift ; Meerwasser ; Spurenmetall
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xiii, 195 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 551.46
    Language: English
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Kiel : Universitätsbibliothek Kiel
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift
    Description / Table of Contents: Fram Strait is the major gateway for Arctic Ocean sea-ice export, and the only deep-water connection between the Arctic Ocean and high latitude North Atlantic. The region is confined by the NE Greenland Shelf to the west and Svalbard to the east; approximately half is covered by summer sea-ice. The bioessential micronutrient iron (Fe) limits primary production across much of the high latitude ocean, including parts of the sub polar North Atlantic south of Fram Strait. Whilst primary production in the Arctic Ocean is generally thought to be controlled by a combination of light and fixed nitrogen availability, the potential role of trace elements as co-limiting factors for phytoplankton growth and their role in ecosystem dynamics has scarcely been investigated. What factors control the supply of Fe to the dynamic Fram Strait region and how does this affect marine primary production? To answer these questions, in late summer 2016, we performed a detailed investigation into the macronutrient and trace element micronutrient distribution across Fram Strait as part of the GEOTRACES GN05 cruise, including full Fe speciation analysis, and conducted nutrient addition bioassay experiments to assess spatial patterns in limiting nutrients. Surface dissolved Fe (dFe), the biologically most accessible form of Fe, showed an east-to-west gradient across Fram Strait. Concentrations were elevated near the Greenlandic coast in proximity to the marine-terminating glaciers Nioghalvfjerdsbrae and Zachariæ Isstrøm, and depleted in the West Spitsbergen Current near Svalbard. Fixed nitrogen (N), the sum of nitrate, nitrite and ammonium, and dFe were deficient in seawater relative to typical phytoplankton requirements. An east to west trend in the relative deficiency of N and Fe was apparent and aligned with phytoplankton responses in bioassay experiments, which showed greatest chlorophyll-a increases in +N treatments near the Greenland continental margin, and +N+Fe near Svalbard. Collectively, our results suggest primary N limitation of phytoplankton growth in the study region, with conditions potentially approaching secondary Fe limitation in the eastern Fram Strait. The supply of Atlantic-derived subsurface N and Arctic-derived Fe therefore exerts a strong control on summertime primary production in the Fram Strait region. Analyses of Fe species immediately adjacent to the Nioghalvfjerdsbrae glacier terminus revealed a decoupling of dFe from labile particulate Fe inputs likely due to a prolonged residence time of meltwater beneath Greenland's largest floating ice-tongue. Subglacial removal in combination with limited stabilization from organic material (i.e. Fe-binding ligands) leads to restricted supply of 'new' Fe from meltwater. Water exchange between the subglacial cavity, formed by the 80 km long floating ice tongue, and the shelf, is driven by the cavity overturning circulation, and exerts a strong control on subglacial dFe discharge to the NE Greenland Shelf. Comparison of findings at Nioghalvfjerdsbrae to observations in Antarctica suggests a more universal role for cavity overturning circulation in determining the extent of lateral dFe fluxes to broad glaciated shelf regions. Future retreat of deep-grounded marine termini may result in increased export of glacial dFe to shelf environments and more direct connectivity between meltwater discharge and marine primary production. Fluxes of dissolved trace elements across Fram Strait was dominated by the southward-directed East Greenland Current and the northward-directed West Spitsbergen Current, and comprised ⁓80% of gross dFe, dMn, dCo and dZn transport across Fram Strait. Dissolved Fe, Mn, Co and Zn fluxes on the NE Greenland Shelf that includes Greenland Ice Sheet discharge were of only local importance and contributed ⁓10% to gross northbound and southbound transport. The advection of Central Arctic Ocean waters including the trace element-rich Transpolar Drift, feeding into the East Greenland Current, plays a fundamental role in dFe, dMn and dCo supply to surface Fram Strait. Comparison of fluxes to estimates from the Barents Sea Opening and Davis Strait stresses the importance of Fram Strait as the main gateway for Arctic-Atlantic dFe, dMn, dCo and dZn exchange, a consequence of intermediate and deep water transport between Svalbard and Greenland. Fluxes of all three gateways combined suggests the Arctic is exporting 2.7 ± 2.4 Gg dFe per year to the North Atlantic Ocean. Arctic export of dMn (2.8 ± 4.7 Gg per year) and dCo (0.3 ± 0.3 Gg per year) appears more balanced and within uncertainty. For dZn, Arctic-Atlantic exchange was balanced with an insignificant net northbound flux of 3.0 ± 7.3 Gg per year. More observational data, particularly from non summer months, is needed to project changes in seasonal and interannual Arctic-Atlantic micronutrient exchange and potential effects on ecosystem services sensitive to (micro)nutrient stoichiometry.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 155 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 551.462
    Language: English
    Note: Kumulatives Verfahren, enthält 3 Aufsätze aus Zeitschriften
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Kiel : Universitätsbibliothek Kiel
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    Pages: 1 Online-Ressource (XVI, 148 Seiten) , Illustrationen
    DDC: 551.46
    Language: English
    Note: Kumulatives Verfahren, enthält 3 Artikel aus Zeitschriften
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: Author Posting. © The Authors, 2005. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier B. V. for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Marine Chemistry 98 (2006): 81-99, doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2005.07.002.
    Description: The first large-scale international intercomparison of analytical methods for the determination of dissolved iron in seawater was carried out between October 2000 and December 2002. The exercise was conducted as a rigorously “blind” comparison of 7 analytical techniques by 24 international laboratories. The comparison was based on a large volume (700 L), filtered surface seawater sample collected from the South Atlantic Ocean (the “IRONAGES” sample), which was acidified, mixed and bottled at sea. Two 1 L sample bottles were sent to each participant. Integrity and blindness were achieved by having the experiment designed and carried out by a small team, and overseen by an independent data manager. Storage, homogeneity and time-series stability experiments conducted over 2.5 years showed that interbottle variability of the IRONAGES sample was good (〈7%), although there was a decrease in iron concentration in the bottles over time (from 0.8-0.5 nM) before a stable value was observed. This raises questions over the suitability of sample acidification and storage. For the complete dataset of 45 results (after excluding 3 outliers not passing the screening criteria), the mean concentration of dissolved iron in the IRONAGES sample was 0.59±0.21 nM, representing a coefficient of variation (%CV) for analytical comparability (“community precision”) of 36% (1s), a significant improvement over earlier exercises. Within-run precision (5-10%), inter-run precision (15%) and inter-bottle homogeneity (〈7%) were much better than overall analytical comparability, implying the presence of: (1) random variability (inherent to all intercomparison exercises); (2) errors in quantification of the analytical blank; and (3) systematic inter-method variability, perhaps related to secondary sample treatment (e.g. measurement of different physicochemical fractions of iron present in seawater) in the community dataset. By grouping all results for the same method, analyses performed using flow injection – luminol chemiluminescence (with FeII detection after sample reduction) [Bowie et al., 1998. Anal. Chim. Acta 361, 189] and flow injection – catalytic 3 spectrophotometry (using the reagent DPD) [Measures et al., 1995. Mar. Chem. 50, 3] gave significantly (P=0.05) higher dissolved iron concentrations than analyses performed using isotope dilution ICPMS [Wu and Boyle, 1998. Anal. Chim. Acta 367, 183]. There was, however, evidence of scatter within each method group (CV up to 59%), implying that better uniformity in procedures may be required. This paper does not identify individual data and should not be viewed as an evaluation of single laboratories. Rather it summarises the status of dissolved iron analysis in seawater by the international community at the start of the 21st century, and can be used to inform future exercises including the SAFE iron intercomparison study in the North Pacific in October 2004.
    Description: SCOR and NSF (Grant No. OCE-0003700 to SCOR) kindly provided financial support for three workshops in Amsterdam (1998), San Antonio (2000) and San Francisco (2002). The European Union provided support for the fieldwork under the IRONAGES project (EVK2-1999-00031). Laboratory studies were funded by the Australian Research Council (X00106765 and DP0342826), ACROSS and the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme through the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre (ACE CRC). Final preparation of this manuscript was assisted by funding from NERC grant NER/A/S/2003/00489.
    Keywords: Iron ; Seawater ; Determination ; Intercomparison ; IRONAGES ; Large volume sample
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Preprint
    Format: 53444 bytes
    Format: 266863 bytes
    Format: application/pdf
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Publication Date: 2022-10-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Pearlman, J., Bushnell, M., Coppola, L., Karstensen, J., Buttigieg, P. L., Pearlman, F., Simpsons, P., Barbier, M., Muller-Karger, F. E., Munoz-Mas, C., Pissierssens, P., Chandler, C., Hermes, J., Heslop, E., Jenkyns, R., Achterberg, E. P., Bensi, M., Bittig, H. C., Blandin, J., Bosch, J., Bourles, B., Bozzano, R., Buck, J. J. H., Burger, E. F., Cano, D., Cardin, V., Llorens, M. C., Cianca, A., Chen, H., Cusack, C., Delory, E., Garello, R., Giovanetti, G., Harscoat, V., Hartman, S., Heitsenrether, R., Jirka, S., Lara-Lopez, A., Lanteri, N., Leadbetter, A., Manzella, G., Maso, J., McCurdy, A., Moussat, E., Ntoumas, M., Pensieri, S., Petihakis, G., Pinardi, N., Pouliquen, S., Przeslawski, R., Roden, N. P., Silke, J., Tamburri, M. N., Tang, H., Tanhua, T., Telszewski, M., Testor, P., Thomas, J., Waldmann, C., & Whoriskey, F. Evolving and sustaining ocean best practices and standards for the next decade. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, (2019):277, doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00277.
    Description: The oceans play a key role in global issues such as climate change, food security, and human health. Given their vast dimensions and internal complexity, efficient monitoring and predicting of the planet’s ocean must be a collaborative effort of both regional and global scale. A first and foremost requirement for such collaborative ocean observing is the need to follow well-defined and reproducible methods across activities: from strategies for structuring observing systems, sensor deployment and usage, and the generation of data and information products, to ethical and governance aspects when executing ocean observing. To meet the urgent, planet-wide challenges we face, methods across all aspects of ocean observing should be broadly adopted by the ocean community and, where appropriate, should evolve into “Ocean Best Practices.” While many groups have created best practices, they are scattered across the Web or buried in local repositories and many have yet to be digitized. To reduce this fragmentation, we introduce a new open access, permanent, digital repository of best practices documentation (oceanbestpractices.org) that is part of the Ocean Best Practices System (OBPS). The new OBPS provides an opportunity space for the centralized and coordinated improvement of ocean observing methods. The OBPS repository employs user-friendly software to significantly improve discovery and access to methods. The software includes advanced semantic technologies for search capabilities to enhance repository operations. In addition to the repository, the OBPS also includes a peer reviewed journal research topic, a forum for community discussion and a training activity for use of best practices. Together, these components serve to realize a core objective of the OBPS, which is to enable the ocean community to create superior methods for every activity in ocean observing from research to operations to applications that are agreed upon and broadly adopted across communities. Using selected ocean observing examples, we show how the OBPS supports this objective. This paper lays out a future vision of ocean best practices and how OBPS will contribute to improving ocean observing in the decade to come.
    Description: The Ocean Best Practices project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under grant agreement no: 633211 (AtlantOS), no. 730960 (SeaDataCloud) and no: 654310 (ODIP). Funding was also received from the NSF OceanObs Research Coordination Network under NSF grant 1143683. The Best Practices Handbook for fixed observatories has been funded by the FixO3 project financed by the European Commission through the Seventh Framework Programme for Research, grant agreement no. 312463. The Harmful Algal Blooms Forecast Report was funded by the Interreg Atlantic Area Operational Programme Project PRIMROSE (Grant Agreement No. EAPA_182/2016), and the AtlantOS project (see above). PB acknowledges funding from the Helmholtz Programme Frontiers in Arctic Marine Monitoring (FRAM) conducted by the Alfred-Wegener-Institut. JM acknowledges fundng from the WeObserve project under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant agreement no. 776740). MTe acknowledges support from the US National Science Foundation grant OCE-1840868 to the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR, US) FM-K acknowledges support by NSF Grant 1728913 ‘OceanObS Research Coordination Network’. Funding was also provided by NASA grant NNX14AP62A ‘National Marine Sanctuaries as Sentinel Sites for a Demonstration Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON)’ funded under the National Ocean Partnership Program (NOPP RFP NOAA-NOS-IOOS-2014-2003803 in partnership between NOAA, BOEM, and NASA), and the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Program Office.
    Keywords: Best practices ; Sustainability ; Interoperability ; Digital repository ; Peer review ; Ocean observing ; Ontologies ; Methodologies
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...