GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Alaskan tussock tundra  (1)
  • Arctic  (1)
  • Arctic; Arctic_SEB_CA-SCB; Arctic_SEB_CP1; Arctic_SEB_Dye-2; Arctic_SEB_EGP; Arctic_SEB_FI-Lom; Arctic_SEB_GL-NuF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaH; Arctic_SEB_KAN_B; Arctic_SEB_KAN_L; Arctic_SEB_KAN_M; Arctic_SEB_KAN_U; Arctic_SEB_KPC_L; Arctic_SEB_KPC_U; Arctic_SEB_MIT; Arctic_SEB_NASA-E; Arctic_SEB_NASA-SE; Arctic_SEB_NASA-U; Arctic_SEB_NUK_K; Arctic_SEB_NUK_L; Arctic_SEB_NUK_N; Arctic_SEB_NUK_U; Arctic_SEB_QAS_A; Arctic_SEB_QAS_L; Arctic_SEB_QAS_M; Arctic_SEB_QAS_U; Arctic_SEB_RU-Che; Arctic_SEB_RU-Cok; Arctic_SEB_RU-Sam; Arctic_SEB_RU-Tks; Arctic_SEB_RU-Vrk; Arctic_SEB_Saddle; Arctic_SEB_SCO_L; Arctic_SEB_SCO_U; Arctic_SEB_SE-St1; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Adv; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Blv; Arctic_SEB_SouthDome; Arctic_SEB_Summit; Arctic_SEB_TAS_A; Arctic_SEB_TAS_L; Arctic_SEB_TAS_U; Arctic_SEB_THU_L; Arctic_SEB_THU_U; Arctic_SEB_Tunu-N; Arctic_SEB_UPE_L; Arctic_SEB_UPE_U; Arctic_SEB_US-A03; Arctic_SEB_US-A10; Arctic_SEB_US-An1; Arctic_SEB_US-An2; Arctic_SEB_US-An3; Arctic_SEB_US-Atq; Arctic_SEB_US-Brw; Arctic_SEB_US-EML; Arctic_SEB_US-HVa; Arctic_SEB_US-ICh; Arctic_SEB_US-ICs; Arctic_SEB_US-ICt; Arctic_SEB_US-Ivo; Arctic_SEB_US-NGB; Arctic_SEB_US-Upa; Arctic_SEB_US-xHE; Arctic_SEB_US-xTL; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; Aspect; Aspect, coefficient of variation; Calculated average/mean values; Cloud cover; Cloud cover, standard deviation; Cloud top pressure; Cloud top pressure, standard deviation; Cloud top temperature; Cloud top temperature, standard deviation; Conrad's continentality index; Daily maximum; Daily mean; Data source; Date/Time of event; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; ELEVATION; Elevation, standard deviation; Event label; Field observation; glacier; graminoids; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; high latitude; Humidity, relative; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; Land cover classes; Land cover type; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; LATITUDE; Location ID; LONGITUDE; longwave radiation; Mean values; Median values; meteorological data; Number of vegetation types; observatory data; Peat bog; Permafrost, type; Permafrost extent; Permafrost ice content, description; Precipitation; Precipitation, coefficient of variation; Precipitation, daily, maximum; Precipitation, snow; Precipitation, sum; Pressure, atmospheric; p-value; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; Reference/source; sensible heat flux; Shannon Diversity Index; Shannon Diversity Index, maximum; shortwave radiation; shrub tundra; Site; Slope; Slope, coefficient of variation; Slope, mathematical; Snow, onset, day of the year; Snow cover, number of days; Snowfall, coefficient of variation; Snow-free days; Snow type; Soil water content, volumetric; Species present; Summer warmth index; surface energy balance; synthetic data; Temperature, air, annual mean; Temperature, air, coefficient of variation; Temperature, annual mean range; tundra vegetation; Type of study; Uniform resource locator/link to reference; Vapour pressure deficit; Vegetation type; wetland; Wind speed; Zone  (1)
Document type
Keywords
Publisher
Years
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites - Environmental conditions (2022)
    PANGAEA
    Details
    Publication Date: 2024-06-09
    Description: Despite the importance of surface energy budgets (SEBs) for land-climate interactions in the Arctic, uncertainties in their prediction persist. In situ observational data of SEB components - useful for research and model validation - are collected at relatively few sites across the terrestrial Arctic, and not all available datasets are readily interoperable. Furthermore, the terrestrial Arctic consists of a diversity of vegetation types, which are generally not well represented in land surface schemes of current Earth system models. This dataset describes the environmental conditions for 64 tundra and glacier sites (〉=60°N latitude) across the Arctic, for which in situ measurements of surface energy budget components were harmonized (see Oehri et al. 2022). These environmental conditions are (proxies of) potential drivers of SEB-components and could therefore be called SEB-drivers. The associated environmental conditions, include the vegetation types graminoid tundra, prostrate dwarf-shrub tundra, erect-shrub tundra, wetland complexes, barren complexes (≤ 40% horizontal plant cover), boreal peat bogs and glacier. These land surface types (apart from boreal peat bogs) correspond to the main classification units of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM, Raynolds et al. 2019). For each site, additional climatic and biophysical variables are available, including cloud cover, snow cover duration, permafrost characteristics, climatic conditions and topographic conditions.
    Keywords: Arctic; Arctic_SEB_CA-SCB; Arctic_SEB_CP1; Arctic_SEB_Dye-2; Arctic_SEB_EGP; Arctic_SEB_FI-Lom; Arctic_SEB_GL-NuF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaF; Arctic_SEB_GL-ZaH; Arctic_SEB_KAN_B; Arctic_SEB_KAN_L; Arctic_SEB_KAN_M; Arctic_SEB_KAN_U; Arctic_SEB_KPC_L; Arctic_SEB_KPC_U; Arctic_SEB_MIT; Arctic_SEB_NASA-E; Arctic_SEB_NASA-SE; Arctic_SEB_NASA-U; Arctic_SEB_NUK_K; Arctic_SEB_NUK_L; Arctic_SEB_NUK_N; Arctic_SEB_NUK_U; Arctic_SEB_QAS_A; Arctic_SEB_QAS_L; Arctic_SEB_QAS_M; Arctic_SEB_QAS_U; Arctic_SEB_RU-Che; Arctic_SEB_RU-Cok; Arctic_SEB_RU-Sam; Arctic_SEB_RU-Tks; Arctic_SEB_RU-Vrk; Arctic_SEB_Saddle; Arctic_SEB_SCO_L; Arctic_SEB_SCO_U; Arctic_SEB_SE-St1; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Adv; Arctic_SEB_SJ-Blv; Arctic_SEB_SouthDome; Arctic_SEB_Summit; Arctic_SEB_TAS_A; Arctic_SEB_TAS_L; Arctic_SEB_TAS_U; Arctic_SEB_THU_L; Arctic_SEB_THU_U; Arctic_SEB_Tunu-N; Arctic_SEB_UPE_L; Arctic_SEB_UPE_U; Arctic_SEB_US-A03; Arctic_SEB_US-A10; Arctic_SEB_US-An1; Arctic_SEB_US-An2; Arctic_SEB_US-An3; Arctic_SEB_US-Atq; Arctic_SEB_US-Brw; Arctic_SEB_US-EML; Arctic_SEB_US-HVa; Arctic_SEB_US-ICh; Arctic_SEB_US-ICs; Arctic_SEB_US-ICt; Arctic_SEB_US-Ivo; Arctic_SEB_US-NGB; Arctic_SEB_US-Upa; Arctic_SEB_US-xHE; Arctic_SEB_US-xTL; ArcticTundraSEB; Arctic Tundra Surface Energy Budget; Aspect; Aspect, coefficient of variation; Calculated average/mean values; Cloud cover; Cloud cover, standard deviation; Cloud top pressure; Cloud top pressure, standard deviation; Cloud top temperature; Cloud top temperature, standard deviation; Conrad's continentality index; Daily maximum; Daily mean; Data source; Date/Time of event; dry tundra; Eddy covariance; eddy heat flux; ELEVATION; Elevation, standard deviation; Event label; Field observation; glacier; graminoids; ground heat flux and net radiation; harmonized data; high latitude; Humidity, relative; Land-Atmosphere; Land-cover; Land cover classes; Land cover type; latent and sensible heat; latent heat flux; LATITUDE; Location ID; LONGITUDE; longwave radiation; Mean values; Median values; meteorological data; Number of vegetation types; observatory data; Peat bog; Permafrost, type; Permafrost extent; Permafrost ice content, description; Precipitation; Precipitation, coefficient of variation; Precipitation, daily, maximum; Precipitation, snow; Precipitation, sum; Pressure, atmospheric; p-value; Radiation fluxes; Radiative energy budget; Reference/source; sensible heat flux; Shannon Diversity Index; Shannon Diversity Index, maximum; shortwave radiation; shrub tundra; Site; Slope; Slope, coefficient of variation; Slope, mathematical; Snow, onset, day of the year; Snow cover, number of days; Snowfall, coefficient of variation; Snow-free days; Snow type; Soil water content, volumetric; Species present; Summer warmth index; surface energy balance; synthetic data; Temperature, air, annual mean; Temperature, air, coefficient of variation; Temperature, annual mean range; tundra vegetation; Type of study; Uniform resource locator/link to reference; Vapour pressure deficit; Vegetation type; wetland; Wind speed; Zone
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 4705 data points
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    DATA PANGAEA
  • 2
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    The response of Arctic vegetation and soils following an unusually severe tundra fire (2013)
    The Royal Society
    Details
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: © The Author(s), 2013. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 368 (2013): 20120490, doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0490.
    Description: Fire causes dramatic short-term changes in vegetation and ecosystem function, and may promote rapid vegetation change by creating recruitment opportunities. Climate warming likely will increase the frequency of wildfire in the Arctic, where it is not common now. In 2007, the unusually severe Anaktuvuk River fire burned 1039 km2 of tundra on Alaska's North Slope. Four years later, we harvested plant biomass and soils across a gradient of burn severity, to assess recovery. In burned areas, above-ground net primary productivity of vascular plants equalled that in unburned areas, though total live biomass was less. Graminoid biomass had recovered to unburned levels, but shrubs had not. Virtually all vascular plant biomass had resprouted from surviving underground parts; no non-native species were seen. However, bryophytes were mostly disturbance-adapted species, and non-vascular biomass had recovered less than vascular plant biomass. Soil nitrogen availability did not differ between burned and unburned sites. Graminoids showed allocation changes consistent with nitrogen stress. These patterns are similar to those seen following other, smaller tundra fires. Soil nitrogen limitation and the persistence of resprouters will likely lead to recovery of mixed shrub–sedge tussock tundra, unless permafrost thaws, as climate warms, more extensively than has yet occurred.
    Description: This work was supported by NSF (no. OPP-0632264) and NSF (no. OPP-1107892) to M. S. Bret-Harte, NSF (no. OPP-0856853) to G. R. Shaver and NSF (no. OPP-6737545) to M. C. Mack.
    Keywords: Alaskan tussock tundra ; Fire ; Vegetation recovery ; Permafrost ; Climate change ; Soil N availability
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    PAPER (OA)
  • 3
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Long-term experimental warming and nutrient additions increase productivity in tall deciduous shrub tundra (2014)
    Ecological Society of America
    Details
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2014. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Ecosphere 5 (2014): art72, doi:10.1890/ES13-00281.1.
    Description: Warming Arctic temperatures can drive changes in vegetation structure and function directly by stimulating plant growth or indirectly by stimulating microbial decomposition of organic matter and releasing more nutrients for plant uptake and growth. The arctic biome is currently increasing in deciduous shrub cover and this increase is expected to continue with climate warming. However, little is known how current deciduous shrub communities will respond to future climate induced warming and nutrient increase. We examined the plant and ecosystem response to a long-term (18 years) nutrient addition and warming experiment in an Alaskan arctic tall deciduous shrub tundra ecosystem to understand controls over plant productivity and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) storage in shrub tundra ecosystems. In addition, we used a meta-analysis approach to compare the treatment effect size for aboveground biomass among seven long-term studies conducted across multiple plant community types within the Arctic. We found that biomass, productivity, and aboveground N pools increased with nutrient additions and warming, while species diversity decreased. Both nutrient additions and warming caused the dominant functional group, deciduous shrubs, to increase biomass and proportional C and N allocation to aboveground stems but decreased allocation to belowground stems. For all response variables except soil C and N pools, effects of nutrients plus warming were largest. Soil C and N pools were highly variable and we could not detect any response to the treatments. The biomass response to warming and fertilization in tall deciduous shrub tundra was greater than moist acidic and moist non-acidic tundra and more similar to the biomass response of wet sedge tundra. Our data suggest that in a warmer and more nutrient-rich Arctic, tall deciduous shrub tundra will have greater total deciduous shrub biomass and a higher proportion of woody tissue that has a longer residence time, with a lower proportion of C and N allocated to belowground stems.
    Description: This research was supported by NSF grants DEB-0516041, DEB-0516509 and the Arctic LTER (DEB-0423385).
    Keywords: Arctic ; Carbon pools ; Climate change ; Deciduous shrubs ; Manipulated warming ; Meta-analysis ; Nitrogen pools ; Nutrient additions ; Tundra
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    PAPER (OA)
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...