GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Medicine  (3)
  • XA 52760  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e15040-e15040
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e15040-e15040
    Abstract: e15040 Background: NTRK fusions are actionable genomic alterations detected across tumor types. NTRK gene fusions involving either NTRK1, NTRK2 or NTRK3 (encoding the neurotrophin receptors TRKA, TRKB and TRKC, respectively) are oncogenic drivers of various adult and paediatric tumour types. Here, we update the detection of NTRK gene fusions across tumor types and further describe fusion partner characteristics among Chinese patients. Methods: Samples submitted for clinical molecular profiling were retrospectively analyzed for NTRK fusion events. Method for identifying NTRK fusions was DNA-based next-generation sequencing that tumour DNA is extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. All NTRK fusion partners were identified for intact functional domains, domain prediction, breakpoints, frame retention and co-occurring alterations. Results: A total of 64 NTRK fusion events (0.26% of 24,451) were identified. NTRK fusions are characteristic in a few rare types of cancer, such as melanoma, glioma and carcinomas of the thyroid, lung and colon, but they are also infrequently seen in some uncommon cancers, such as secretory carcinoma of the breast or salivary gland and infantile fibrosarcoma. Among the fusions, NTRK1 (0.08% of 24,430), NTRK2 (0.02% of 24,445), NTRK3 (0.15% of 24,414) were identified. Twenty-six unique fusion partners were identified, the most common in NTRK1 fusion being TPM3 (23.8%), NTRK2 fusion being AGTPBP1 (33.3%), and NTRK3 fusion being TFG (13.5%). Almost 53.8 % (14 of 26) of all fusion events are expected to include the transmembrane domain contributed by the NTRK fusion partner. The most commonly identified breakpoints occur in exon 14 and exon 17 and in exon 15 and exon 20, in NTRK1, NTRK3, respectively. Conclusions: NTRK fusion products are diverse across tumor types, but the significance of these variations is not clear. The biological and clinical implications of retaining certain domains of NTRK and of fusion partners warrants further investigation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e21046-e21046
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e21046-e21046
    Abstract: e21046 Background: To explore the prognostic value of TP53 co-mutation with EGFR or KRAS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: 314 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) admitted to the Department of Oncology of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2016 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, all with complete genetic information.According to the analysis results, EGFR and KRAS were identified as co-mutated genes.TP53 mutation was used as the experimental group and TP53 wild as the control group.Patients in TP53 mutation group were further classified and discussed according to different exon 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, other mutations and mutations could not be classified.Co-mutation group was studied according to TP53/KRAS mutation status, and according to KRASG12 mutation, Patients were divided into TP53/KRASG12C (wt/wt), TP53/KRASG12C (wt/mut), TP53/KRASG12C (mut/mut) and TP53/KRASG12C (mut/mut) for further grouping.In the study of TP53/EGFR co-mutation, TP53/EGFR mutation status was divided into groups, and subgroup analysis was conducted according to different TP53 exon mutations.SPSS 26.0 software was used to analyze the data, and P 〈 0.05 indicated statistical difference. Results: The frequency of single gene mutation in 314 patients was analyzed. The most common mutation was TP53 (64.3%), followed by EGFR (49.4%).TP53wt group compared with TP53mut group OS (34.3m vs 28.9m; HR = 1.263, 95% ci: 0.933 1.709;P = 0.131).The OS of Exon4 group was 23 months, Exon8 group was 44.5 months, and TP53wt group was 34.3 months, no statistical significance was observed (P = 0.159).In the TP53/KRAS co-mutation group, the median OS of KRAS/TP53 (mut/mut) group and KRAS/TP53 (wt/wt) group was 29.4m vs 34.3m; HR = 2.482, 95%Cl:1.378-4.471, P = 0.002).In subgroup analysis, the median OS of KRASG12Cmut/TP53mut group and KRASG12Cmut/TP53wt group were (8.9m vs 34.9m; HR = 38.268, 95%CL: 8.359-175.183, P = 0.199), (3.1m vs 34.3m; HR = 2.572, 95%Cl:1.344-4.922,P = 0.004).In the TP53/EGFR co-mutation group, the median OS of EGFRmut/TP53mut, EGFRwt/TP53mut, EGFRmut/TP53wt and EGFRwt/TP53wt were 32.9, 17.9, 42.7 and 31.2 months, respectively (P = 0.004).In subgroup analysis, the median OS of EGFRmut/ TP53Exon4-mut versus EGFRwt/TP53wt group was (25.8m vs 31.1m; HR = 2.909, 95%Cl: 1.438-5.886, P = 0.003). Conclusions: TP53 is a factor of poor prognosis in NSCLC patients, patients with TP53/KRAS co-mutation have poor survival, and kRASG12C-mut /TP53mut subgroup have worse prognosis.Patients with TP53/EGFR co-mutation had a better prognosis, and the EGFRmut/ TP53Exon4-mut subgroup had the worst prognosis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e15531-e15531
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e15531-e15531
    Abstract: e15531 Background: DNA polymerase ε (POLE) is essential for proofreading and fidelity in DNA replication and repair. Previous studies found that mutation in POLE associated with higher tumor mutational burden (TMB), which is an approved biomarker for immunotherpy in solid tumors. However, the clinicopathological and mutational analyses of POLE-mutated colorectal cancer in a large Chinese population have not yet been reported. Methods: Hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed in 4628 samples of colorectal tumors and matched normal pairs in a CAP/CLIA-approved laboratory (3DMed). NGS testing for gene mutations, TMB and MSI was implemented. Results: Of 4628 colorectal cancer patients, POLE mutations were observed in 67 patients (1.45%). A total of 11 different POLE mutations were identified, mostly associated with exonucleas domain. P286R(32,0.69%), V411L(13,0.28%), A456P(7,0.15%), S459F(3,0.06%) and S297F(3,0.06%) were the most frequently mutated sites of POLE. We also detected 1 V758L and 1 W1130R mutation outside the exonuclease domain in separate cases. Among the 4628 patients, 2157 patients were detectable for TMB by NGS panel, including 2128 POLE wild type and 29 POLE mutation patients. The TMB of patients with POLE mutations was significantly higher than that in wide type POLE tumors (mean TMB 252.3 vs 13.4 muts/Mb, P <0.0001). All the 29 POLE-mutated patients were TMB-H (≥10 muts/Mb) and 28 of them were MSS. A MSS patient with metastatic colon cancer harboring A456P POLE mutation responsed well to the immunotherpy and achieved a partial response. Conclusions: Our results realved a remarkable positive correlation between POLE mutation and TMB level in a Chinese colorectal cancer population, which suggests POLE gene will be a promising biomarker of immunotherpy for MSS colorectal tumor.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...